He was NOT circumcised
Why would Jordan Chandler repeatedly refuse to testify in court – both in 1993 and 2005? Why would he change his whereabouts THREE times since the 2005 case began and avoid speaking at the trial at all costs?
The reason why Jordan’s evidence could not have stood ground in court was that there was one MAJOR CONTRADICTION between his words and the actual fact. This major inconsistency was found during Michael’s 25-minute strip search which proved Jordan had been wrong in his description of Michael’s genitalia.
According to Randy Taraborrelli,
- “All eyes peered at him to see if he was circumcised, as Jordy had claimed. HE WASN’T.”
The stories told in newspapers at the time make your hair stand on end at the horror and humiliation Michael had to go through. The prosecutors made Michael quit the rehabilitation course in the UK (thus almost nullifying the result of his anti-drug therapy) and summoned him back to the country. And though the media was hissing that Michael was “hiding away from justice” he proved all the sceptics wrong by returning home on December 10, 1993.
The strip search was held just before Christmas (on December 20, 1993) and was so horrifying a procedure that reading about it is quite an ordeal in itself. I wonder how he could survive it at all…
Considering that Michael was not arrested then and there after the strip search how could anyone ever believe such an outrageous lie? There has NEVER any evidence to substantiate Jordan Chandler’s claim. The fact that he was not arrested and no charges were ever brought against him even after a 13 months investigation proves that the description did NOT match. A member of the grand jury in 1994 even said to CNN:
- “NO damaging evidence was heard.”
On January 27, 1994 (two days after the settlement with the Chandlers) the result of the strip search was reported in a tiny piece of news saying that the accuser’s description given to the police was not accurate. Reuters said it was no match:
- “Photos of Michael Jackson’s genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.”
This information however went virtually unnoticed. It was mentioned by three major media outlets and that’s it. In fact everyone was so thrilled with the news of the financial settlement with the alleged ‘victim’ that no one really noticed that there was actually NOTHING TO PAY FOR.