Carl Toms’ book – a NEW STAGE OF HATRED towards Michael Jackson!
Okay guys, so after 15 years of bullying Michael Jackson and trashing his name in every possible way the devious onslaught against him has now entered a new stage – that of gentle lies masquerading as the truth and soothing reassurances to the public of the author’s ‘unbiased attitude’ and ‘best intentions’.
What am I talking about?
I am talking about the 624-page book by Carl Toms (which turns out to be a pen name of a convicted pedophile Thomas O’Carroll) which is being advertised as an all-inclusive research into Michael’s ‘real’ relationship with boys.
This new ‘scientific’ approach may turn out to be very effective for Michael’s haters and their audience.
The general public is really sick and tired of all those blatant lies about Jackson and thinks that some justice should be done to the man at last – so it is time to change one’s style and feed the same old negativity into people’s minds in a new, soft and ‘unbiased’ way, so that they never notice that they are swallowing the same old LIE.
How do they do that?
Nothing can be easier – just look at the editorial review of Amazon.com announcing the book to be released on June 7, 2010 (evidently to mark the 1st anniversary of Michael Jackson’s death this way). See how well in advance the preparation work starts and how gracefully the same old lies are being worded now.
Below is the text of the review, where each sentence is heavily loaded with lies, innuendos and fake science. For your convenience all these maneuvers are translated into plain language in the brackets:
“Not just another book about ‘Wacko Jacko’” (now we pretend to show respect for Michael Jackson)
“This vivid and insightful commentary is a joy to read” (isn’t it enjoyable to slander the deceased man in a witty and hilarious way? This way you will swallow our lies much easier)
“A must-read for those who believe he truly loved children but are not so sure about his innocence…” (even if you believed he was innocent, see what happens to your beliefs after you read it…)
“Michael Jackson spent the wedding night of his second marriage not with his bride but with his best man an eight-year-old boy”. (big lies are always the best as they are meant to fully deprive you of your thinking abilities)
In fact the wedding took place on November 15, 1996 just several hours before Michael’s departure for his tour in Australia. He left the US after the plain civil wedding ceremony at a presidential suite of the Sheraton hotel. Debbie Rowe was 6 months pregnant at the time. Just compare this news with “the wedding night with a boy” and you might see a little difference between the two ways of presenting facts.
“His first marriage ended in divorce after he had been on holiday with two young boys without his wife.” (Tom O”Carroll suggests that the first marriage ended as soon as Lisa-Maria Presley learned of a ‘relationship with boys’).
In reality the events were as follows:
- December 6, 1995: Michael collapsed while rehearsing the concert and was rushed to the Beth Israel Medical Center . He was found suffering from gastro-enteritis, dehydration and electrolyte imbalances.
- JRandy Toraborelli said about it: As soon as he was checked into the hospital, Michael’s press people telephoned Lisa in Los Angeles and, with frantic explanations, begged her to fly to her husband’s side. “Hell, no” was her response. “Screw him. I’m not going. Why should I?”
- December 10, 1995: Lisa Marie finally visited him and asked for a divorce. Officially the divorce was filed on January 18, 1996.
- Here is Lisa-Maria’s own version of the story: “He was in the hospital, and I couldn’t figure out what was wrong with him. I started asking questions, and it was always a different story. He said I was “causing trouble” and “stirring up problems.” He told me, “you’re making my heart rate go up,” and asked me to go home, and I said, “Good. I want out.”
So it wasn’t due to ‘boys’ – it was just an outbreak of emotions on LMP’s part and, as she would admit later, her suspicions that Michael was taking drugs. As regards the ‘boys’ issue Lisa-Maria told PLAYBOY in June 2003 that she had never seen any inappropriate behavior on Michael’s part:
– “Did you and he ever have children join you in your bed?
– Never. Never, never, never, never. I never saw him sleep in bed with a child, ever.
– Did you ever see him with photos of nude children?
– Never. Never.
– Do you have any reason to think he’s a child molester?
– If I’d had any reason to suspect that, I would have had nothing to do with the guy. I’ve never seen him behave inappropriately. He was great with my kids. He does have a connection with kids, babies. He’s a kid, and other kids sense that in him”.
But we have to go on:
“To kneejerk loyalists, the King of Pop’s love of children was innocent: end of story. For the more reflective among us, whether we are intrigued, baffled, appalled, empathic, or even all these things, Michael Jackson’s Dangerous Liaisons provides the definitive review of his numerous special friendships’” (By kneejerk loyalists the author means MJ fans who are ‘zombies’ not worth talking about, while he and his appreciative readers are really intelligent people. The pedophile author promises to take his readers into the depth of his own thinking and presents his views as ‘definitive’ . No need to think for yourselves, guys – just listen to what Thomas O’Carroll tells you…).
Defaming Michael Jackson’s supporters as kneejerk loyalists? Boosting the confidence and self-esteem of Michael’s haters by saying that they are the only ones who are capable of thinking? A truly divide-and-rule principle targeted at each segment of the public in a very sophisticated way!
“Armed with insights from a range of disciplines psychology, sociology, moral philosophy Carl Toms spent many years researching the megastar’s boy-love’” (Thomas O’Carroll is offering a thorough all-inclusive scientific and even moral study to his readers).
You can imagine what morals a convicted pedophile Thomas O’Carroll can teach us. Listening to him is like listening to a serial murderer lecturing us on the value of human life.
“He delves deeply into the sources of Michael’s enigmatic identity, soul and genius while keeping a sceptical eye on the assumptions and values of the King’s detractors.” (see how objective the study is – he goes as far as calling Michael a genius and is even sceptical about his detractors!)
A half-truth here and a half-lie there do not amount to the real truth. And all this game with calling Michael a genius is just a way to entrap Michael’s fans.
“Toms’ is the only book to examine thoroughly Michael’s trial on child abuse charges without losing sight of the increasingly well documented but surprisingly little known or understood facts about earlier allegations.” (he thinks he has lulled our attention well enough to allege that the 2005 trial overlooked the 1993 case).
The real truth about the matter is that the man who was Michael Jackson’s prosecutor in 2005 turned out to be his life-long and dedicated hater too. In some way it is even an advantage – under such circumstances we cannot suspect Tom Sneddon of leaving any stone unturned or any speck of dust under Michael’s shoes non-examined with a magnifying glass.
It is the character of Tom Sneddon alone which makes the above statement a complete lie – thanks to the prosecutor’s efforts ALL the evidence they scraped from earlier cases was brought into the 2005 trial and scrutinized there under a microscope. And this means that the non-guilty verdict in 2005 automatically acquits Michael Jackson of all earlier accusations as well.
“It exposes the falsity of persistent efforts to whitewash the record by inventing for Michael a phoney normal’, or plain vanilla gay’, sexuality.”
No, it is your phoney editorial review which exposes the never-ending desire of some people to smear the man who by all human laws of decency and ethics should be left alone at last.
“The author probes Michael’s intense identification with Peter Pan, the eternal boy, acknowledging the profound significance of this attachment but discarding the welter of dated Freudian psychobabble it has spawned.” (Look at this scientific approach!)
It is good they are discarding the Freudian theory which was based solely on a human’s sexual instincts – it would be complete nonsense to apply it to Michael Jackson’s beautiful inner world and deep spirituality. However since they started examining the ‘eternal boy’ phenomenon, I suggest they do it in a much wider context including similar examples from other authors and musicians who also want to stay forever young ( “Forever young” song, for example).
“Refusing to settle for the easy cliches about Michael’s lost childhood’, Toms examines groundbreaking research into intimate man-boy contacts in order to illuminate the real nature of Michael’s dangerous liaisons’ and the surprising challenge they present to our moral certainties”.
This is the essence of it all. Tom O’Carroll is doing it to challenge the society’s moral certainties. He is trying to erode them and is using Michael Jackson for the purpose. Only those who will be reading his masterpiece should not forget who they are listening to.
* * *
P.S. I am ashamed to say that after reading that several university “professors” recommended the book I made amendments to this post and expressed hope that the book might turn out to be positive towards Michael after all. Now I am told that Carl Toms is actually a pen name of a convicted pedophile Thomas O’Carroll and realize that I was totally misguided by the professors’ recommendation of the book as the one “for family reading”.
In fact the mistake of believing the author’s best intentions – against which I warned you about in this post – was the mistake I made myself when I got familiar with the opinions of these university professors whose lies I fell an easy victim to.
This post was restored to its original variant after the news of Tom O’Carroll’s true identity was made known to me.