Why they harassed Michael Jackson but welcome Thomas O’Carroll. IS IT THE ANSWER?
I’ve always wondered why the UK press was so relentless in its harassment of Michael Jackson though accusations against him were never corroborated by any evidence and he was fully acquitted of all possible and impossible charges.
The answer to it may be totally unexpected.
While browsing for Thomas O’Carroll (aka Carl Tom), a self-confessed pedophile who suddenly became the talk of the internet as the author of an awfully slanderous book about Michael Jackson, I came across a wealth of information suggesting that at exactly the same time when Michael was being trashed by British tabloids the media was covering up for real pedophiles in Britain.
These people were not only involved in their pedophile activities but were also spreading their ideas all over the British society and were doing it right through Thomas O’Carroll.
It seems that the media trashed an innocent guy like Michael Jackson to divert public attention from a big number of pedophiles who permeated the British establishment up to its government offices and at the same time break barriers and prepare ground for their triumphant emergence on the publicly accepted level – which is actually the cause Thomas O’Carroll has been championing for years.
This guy was one of the founders of the ‘accept-pedophiles’ movement and was indeed miraculously given numerous chances for propagating his ideas on a really wide scale. To name only a few of them:
- In 1981 he successfully published his ‘academic’ study on pedophilia called “Paedophilia: Radical Case” where he advocated the idea of adult-child sexual relations being normal (the book is still being sold by Amazon.com).
- In 2000 he was invited to the annual meeting in Paris of the International Academy of Sex Research by sexologist Richard Green who included O’Carroll’s book as recommended reading for his criminology students at Cambridge University.
Incidentally the same sexologist is now recommending the general public to read this pedophile’s latest book (this time about MJ), see here please: https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2010/05/17/carl-toms-book/.
- In 2003 Thomas O’Carroll was a panelist in the TV discussion program After Dark, chaired by Baroness Helena Kennedy QC where he championed the rights of pedophiles with so much ardor that the fellow participant Esther Rantzen proposed that O’Carroll should be committed to a mental hospital. The Guardian described the show: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2003/mar/04/digitaltv.broadcasting.
- Up till now O’Carroll has been openly writing newsletters about pedophilia on their official site which gives free access to anyone willing to get familiar with their cause: http://www.ipce.info/newsletters/e_27/mj_1.htm.
- And today he is emerging with his most LETHAL WEAPON – a book of lies about Michael Jackson, an innocent victim of their manipulation whose incredible popularity (or rather notoriety which was most probably the result of their concerted effort) is needed by them for using him as a ‘poster boy’ for furthering their cause. What an intricate and devilish plan it is – first turn an innocent man into a ‘child molester’ and then use his popularity to propagate their ideas among the public!
If Michael Jackson were alive he would die of horror that they are throwing his innocent name into support and legalization of child abuse as a ‘norm’ of human behavior – which was something totally unthinkable for a pure guy like him.
I myself am no advocate of conspiracy theories. It is just that I’ve come across some facts that truly surprised me and also explain a couple of strange things going on now. One of those strange things is that a pedophile like Thomas O’Carroll is given a free hand in popularizing his ideas, is openly supported by acamedic scientists and is allowed to go stronger than ever before – while at the very same time an innocent guy like Jackson is still being trashed on every corner.
It is strange because it should be one way or the other, and it can’t be both and at once too.
The documents I’ve found will probably help to explain this mystery. These are top serious and well-documented materials on the so-called “Loch Ness Monster” – the Scottish paedophile nexus, as well as other cases of child abuse in Britain covered by this site: http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=27562&sid=ae8a0c45486ccf81fa975868da3ff38c&start=0
If this information is true (and I see no reason to doubt it as their links refer us to credible newspapers) it will become clear why various anti-pedophilia groups have been fighting a losing battle against Thomas O’Carroll and his academic supporters whose books are so widely published in Britain and now sold by the UK Amazon.com.
These people are probably too powerful for them to cope with.
* * *
This is only a small part of the materials provided by the Rigorous Intuition website mentioned above:
“The ‘Magic circle’ in Scotland is a description that some Scottish citizens assert applies to a collective ring of purported establishment individuals who have engaged in sexual deviations, homosexual practices and paedophilia.
Twinned with this assertion, there is an overall contention by these same Scottish citizens that there was/is a conspiracy by these purported establishment figures that in order to foster and further their depraved ends they pervert the course of justice.
In Scotland the level of accusations rose to a fever pitch in the late eighties early nineties. Thus Lord Nimmo Smith was commissioned as a joint author of the Report on an Inquiry into an Allegation of a Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice in Scotland (1993).
As a taster consider the following :Child porn arrests ‘too slow’
Sunday Herald, Jan 19, 2003OPERATION Ore, the police inquiry which plans to arrest a further 7000 men across the UK, in addition to Who guitarist Pete Townshend, for buying child pornography online is set to end in disaster with many suspects walking free.Detective Chief Inspector Bob McLachlan, former head of Scotland Yard’s paedophile unit, told the Sunday Herald that the lack of urgency in making arrests will lead to suspects destroying evidence of downloading child pornography before they are arrested.
NOTE: Please consider the dates of the events described.
The first time the accusations reached a high fever in the UK was in 1993 when a certain (parliamentary?) report was made on “the Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice in Scotland” in connection with sex abuse crimes against children.
The second piece of information refers us to January 2003 when as many as 7000 people across the UK were to be arrested in connection with buying child pornography.
These dates may not ring the bell to the general public but to every Michael Jackson’s supporter they are quite meaningful as both times coincided with huge media campaigns against Michael Jackson on similar allegations. The second date is especially interesting as Martin Bashir’s film full of innuendoes against Michael was shown at the very beginning of February 2003 and was actually made by a British journalist.
Back to the Rigorous Intuition site:
Let us begin in the 1970’s – a time of radical social ferment – where there emerged in Scotland an organisation called PIE.
This stood for the Paedophile Information Exchange
It was officially extant from 1974-82/84 ( dates vary ) , emerging as a special interest group within The Scottish Minorities Group (SMG) – a gay rights organisation founded in Glasgow in 1969. Leading figures included Tom O’Carrol, Michael Hanson , Ian Campbell Dunn, Keith Hose, Warren Middleton, Steven Adrian Smith & David Joy.
Its activities could be summarised as internal networking within the paedo “community”, publishing magazines with sociological & psychological justifications for their behaviour , international contact with people such as leading Dutch politician & “boy loving” advocate Edward Brongersma & propaganda / campaigning efforts directed towards interest-groups likely to be sympathetic & / or useful to the cause of child molestation.
In 1975 PIE attended a conference organized by MIND, the national mental health organization, where it submitted a 17-page document to the Home Office Criminal Law Revision Committee on the age of consent in which it proposed that there should be no age of consent, and that the criminal law should concern itself only with sexual activities to which consent is not given, or which continue after prohibition by a civil court.
As a little lad I recall the media storm that blew up when this organisation began to come to national attention. The story I specifically remember concerned an article written by or about O’Carroll & PIE’s ideas in a magazine for social-workers.
The general public were not, it is fair to say, receptive to the message. But its early efforts were by no means in vain however:
In 1975 it was invited to affiliate to the civil-rights advocacy NGO the National Council for Civil Liberties – a status it continued to hold whilst 3 future New Labour politicians of the most senior level held top leadership positions in the NCCL.
NOTE: The National Council for Civil Liberties is one of the eminent institutions to which Thomas O’Carroll is sending his gratitude in his ‘Paedophilia: Radical Case’ book.
Another group, Paedophile Action for Liberation, a Gay Liberation Front offshoot, had also been affiliated to NCCL until it was absorbed by PIE. PIE, which campaigned for adults to have sex legally with children, only broke off its relationship with NCCL when it went undercover in 1982.
NCCL people were earlier involved in keeping the name of an NCCL council-member, Jonathan Walters, out of the People newspaper when it ran an exposé of Paedophile Action for Liberation, of which he was secretary, in 1975. The People still ran the story, but Walters was not named.
Even more extraordinary is the fact that a current Cabinet Minister was running the National Council of Civil Liberties at the time all this was going on. The Rt Hon Patricia Hewitt MP, Secretary of State for Health, became General Secretary of NCCL in 1974.
The very next year, 1975, NCCL invited the Paedophile Information Exchange and Paedophile Action for Liberation to affiliate.
In the year after, 1976, the now-notorious paedophile Tom O’Carroll was invited to address the NCCL conference, which promptly voted to ‘deplore’ the use of chemical castration treatments for paedophiles.
Also in 1975, Patricia Hewitt joined the Campaign for Homosexual Equality, as a ‘straight’, in the same year that Keith Hose of the Paedophile Information Exchange addressed its second annual conference. Hose moved a motion of censure on the conference organising committee for ‘relegating paedophilia to ancillary status in conference.’ The motion was seconded by Trevor Locke, who just happened to be a member of the Executive Council of the NCCL. ‘An awareness and acceptance of the sexuality of children is an essential part of the liberation of the young homosexual,’ the motion went on. It was duly passed.
Before she became an MP [currently holding the position of Deputy Leader of the Labour Party], Harriet Harman was the legal officer in the late 1970s for the National Council for Civil Liberties.
Jack Dromey, whom Harman married in 1982, and who is now Treasurer of the Labour Party, was also involved with the NCCL. He served on its Executive Committee from 1970 to 1979, so he was there when the decision to invite the two paedophile groups to affiliate was made.
NCCL also set up a gay rights sub-committee at the same time, members of which included prominent paedophiles Peter Bremner (alias Roger Nash), Michael Burbidge, Keith Hose and Tom O’Carroll.”
Let’s move swiftly on to a middle-ranking mediocrity by the name of Margaret Hodge who was Labour leader of Islington Council in London before being “talent” spotted into Blair’s government.
A couple of interesting facts about Hodge … We learn from The Independent & the Wiki entry that: “Her husband, Henry Hodge, was a solicitor who gave Cherie Blair her first brief as a barrister & was also a Chairman of the National Council for Civil Liberties”
How wonderfully cosy – oh & that’d be the same National Council for Civil Liberties that invited “PIE “ to affiliate with it. And also:
The Islington child abuse scandal has dogged her since 1992 when the London Evening Standard exposed how, for two decades, children in the borough’s care homes were molested, driven into prostitution and raped by people in positions of trust. Mrs Hodge initially derided the reports as “gutter journalism” but, within two years, accepted that there had been abuse and blamed her initial response on “misleading information” from officials.
Demetrious Panton, 35, Douglas Fitch, 28, and Yvonne Williams, 40….were subjected to abuse at the hands of different paedophiles in Islington children’s homes, have horrific stories of the suffering they endured in the 1970s and 1980s.
Mr Panton, who had been placed in care at the age of 10, was one of the many victims of Bernie Bain, a notorious paedophile who was head of one of the borough’s care homes. He complained about Bain on three occasions, in 1979, 1985 and 1992, but no action was taken by the council. Bain, whose predilection was for boys aged seven or eight, was never brought to trial in Britain.
Mr Fitch and his brother, Michael, were harassed by Roy Caterer, a sports instructor at a boarding school used by Islington. Caterer was sent to prison for seven and a half years for abusing seven boys and two girls.
Mr Fitch claims that Mrs Hodge should have listened to senior social workers who raised suspicions about paedophiles and has approached lawyers to sue her. He said: “I hold Hodge responsible for what happened to me and I will not rest until I get justice.”
Ms Williams was sexually abused every day from the age of 10 for six years by Jeffrey Wildjones, the superintendent of her Islington- controlled home”.
The Labour government had the ideal job lined up for this individual when a new Government post was created for which she became its first incumbent: Minister for Children”.
* * *
Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) hasn’t gone away – it has of course migrated into cyberspace. It still exists on the web under a new name. The (ex) members of PIE still come to the attention of the authorities:
NOTE: There is indeed a website called IPCE where newsletters from Carl Tom are published under the real name of the author – Thomas O’Carroll: http://www.ipce.info/newsletters/e_27/mj_1.htm
This is actually one of the ways how we learned that Carl Tom and a convicted pedophile Thomas O’Carroll are one and the same person.
“There’s one final full-stop to the PIE story when prosecutions started happening in 1978 :
Five activists were charged with printing contact advertisements [ ] calculated to promote indecent acts between adults and children.
Others were offered lesser charges of sending indecent material through the mail if they testified against the five. These charges related to letters that the accused exchanged detailing various sexual fantasies.
It eventually became clear that one person had corresponded with most of the accused but had not been tried. After the trial, it emerged that there had been a cover-up: Mr “Henderson” had worked for MI6 and been a high commissioner in Canada”.
* * *
October 15th, 1997
PUBLIC FIGURES NAMED IN PAEDOPHILE RING
By Nick Davies, The Guardian (UK)
Policemen, social workers and prominent public figures have been accused of belonging to a paedophile ring which indulged in a relentless campaign of physical and sexual abuse in children’s homes in North Wales. The names of the alleged members of the ring have been given by witnesses in public sessions of the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal, but they have been suppressed by the tribunal’s chairman, Sir Ronald Waterhouse QC, who has threatened the media with High Court proceedings if they print them. The Guardian today publishes for the first time detailed evidence about the alleged ring, which is said to have been based in Wrexham, and to have infiltrated local children’s homes over a 20 year period.
Witnesses claim that members of the ring used their connections with police and social services to conceal their activities. All of the accused have denied the allegations.
Those named to the tribunal include:
– A man who bears the same surname as a prominent Conservative supporter. Two witnesses have told the tribunal of a rich and powerful man who belonged to the alleged ring.
– The son of an influential peer who admitted to police that he had been having sex with an under-age boy from one of the homes. Despite his admission, he was never prosecuted.
– A powerful public official who has previously been cleared of abuse. Six witnesses have given separate accounts to the tribunal of his alleged rape of young boys. Another has reported him attending parties in Wrexham which were supplied with boys from a children’s home.
-Two social workers and two police officers, one of whom was accused of abuse on four separate occasions and exonerated each time, another of whom has since been jailed in another part of the country for gross indecency with a child.
– More than a dozen other local men, including an executive with a local authority, a senior probation officer and a director of a major company.
The following comments come from the site: http://nameshamesocialworkers.blogspot.com/
PAEDOPHILE POLICE ESCAPE PROSECUTION
High Level Masons such as Chief Superintendent Gordon Angelsea and at least 12 of his colleagues were “let off the hook” for sexual abuse crimes on children (some of who are now dead) in the North Wales Paedophile Ring Cover-Up.
High Level Government Masons such as Lord McAlpine, ex aid to Margaret Thatcher, was accused by numerous children of sexual crimes in the North Wales Child Abuse Cover-Ups. He escaped public exposure by a specifically appointed Masonic Paedophile Judge”.
I have removed from this post the information which cannot be confirmed from credible sources, but what is left is serious enough for giving the matter a second thought.
If the scale of child abuse was really that big in Britain why was the British media preoccupied only with MICHAEL JACKSON who had only 2 accusers out of thousands possible (I mean all those who visited Neverland) and who could never prove any of their allegations either?
Was it because someone was using him to distract attention from something really serious going on? And was it because they wanted to turn him into their poster boy – a role to which he never agreed?
I also wonder why real convicted pedophiles like Thomas O’Carroll whose revelations are based on their experience with children are allowed to walk free and popularize their ideals among the general public?
Are they so powerful that no one can stop them?
* * *
ATTACHMENT February 26, 2014
Since this post suddenly got into a hit list almost four years after it was written I reread it myself and even went to the website from which information for this post had been taken.
The new thing I found there is a link to an article dated January 29, 2003. The article is very worrisome as it is about the key figures in the then UK government possibly involved in child abuse crimes and about the way this information was fully blacked out by the UK media.
But what is also extremely worrisome about this article is its date.
It is January 29, 2003 which, as you understand, was just a few days before Martin Bashir aired his slanderous documentary about Michael first in the UK and then in the USA on February 6, 2003.
What’s interesting is that information about British politicians being investigated by police of child abuse met with a media wall of silence as the journalist puts it, while Bashir’s documentary with totally groundless innuendoes about Michael Jackson was given the utmost attention possible.
What’s also interesting is that Bashir is a British journalist and that the police investigation of the worst child abuse ring in the UK had been going on long enough for Bashir to make his film about MJ.
JANUARY 29, 2003
Are Pedophiles Running Blair’s War Machine?by MIKE JAMES
A child-sex scandal that threatened to destroy Tony Blair’s government last week has been mysteriously squashed and wiped off the front pages of British newspapers. Operation Ore, the United Kingdom’s most thorough and comprehensive police investigation of crimes against children, seems to have uncovered more than is politically acceptable at the highest reaches of the British elite.
In the 19th of January edition of The Sunday Herald, Neil Mackay sensationally reported that senior members of Tony Blair’s government were being investigated for paedophilia and the “enjoyment” of child-sex pornography:
“The Sunday Herald has also had confirmed by a very senior source in British intelligence that at least one high-profile former Labour Cabinet minister is among Operation Ore suspects. The Sunday Herald has been given the politician’s name but, for legal reasons, can not identify the person.
There are still unconfirmed rumours that another senior Labour politician is among the suspects. The intelligence officer said that a ‘rolling’ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the government if arrests occur.”
The allegations are the most serious yet levelled at an administration that prides itself on the inclusion in its ranks of a high quota of controversial and flamboyant homosexual men, and whose First Lady, Cherie Blair, has come under the spotlight for her indulgence in pagan rituals that resemble Freemasonic rites. Unconfirmed information also suggests that the term “former Labour Cabinet minister” is misleading and that the investigation has identified a surprisingly large number of alleged paedophiles at the highest level of British government, including one very senior cabinet minister
The Blair government has responded by imposing a comprehensive blackout on the story, effectively removing it from the domain of public discussion. Attempts on the part of this journalist to establish why the British media has not followed up on the revelations have met with a wall of silence. Editors and journalists of The Times, The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian, The Independent, The Sunday Times, The Observer, The Sunday Telegraph, The Daily Mail, The Daily Express, The Mirror, The Sun, the BBC, Independent Television News and even The Sunday Herald have refused to discuss the matter.
Speaking from London, freelance journalist Bob Kearley told me:
“Whether or not a D-Notice has been issued is not clear. But based on some of the feedback I’ve been getting it’s apparent that editors and media owners have voluntarily agreed not to cover the story at this time. Operation Ore is still being reported, but not in regard to government ministers, and it’s taking up very few column inches on the third or fourth page. Don’t forget that the intelligence services are involved here, and Blair is anxious to ensure that the scandal does not rock the boat at a time when the country is about to go to war.”
“You can imagine the effect this would have on the morale of troops who are about to commit in Iraq. In fact morale is reportedly quite low anyway, with service personnel throwing their vaccines into the sea en route to the battlefront and knowing how unpopular the war is with the British people. And a lot of squaddies I’ve met think there’s something weird going on between Bush and Blair. If you’re then told that the executive responsible for the conduct of the war is staffed by child-molesters … well, then Saddam suddenly looks like the sort of bloke with whom you can share a few tins [beer].”