Michael Jackson and ‘THEY’ are poles apart
One of our readers has asked me to post her views on Michael Jackson’s detractors and a very specific kind of people who were playing a major role in Michael’s harassment. These people are pedophiles but I will call them ‘they’ in order not to put Michael’s pure name beside this despicable class.
Since I had a couple of things to add to the original text it turned it into a sort of a dialog between the two of us. The reader didn’t provide her full name and will go under the abbreviation “MOA”:
MOA: The Veritas project says, “Before the summer of 1993, Michael Jackson was sitting on top of the world of entertainment much like a king sits upon his throne”.
In fact, Michael Jackson’s march to the top began in the 1980s. After several years of glory with his brothers in the J5 era, Jackson decided to work alone. As we know, his solo carrier was even more glorious and it brought him not only fame but also a huge amount of money. Again, we remember how he bought the ATV catalog and became the owner of Kings like Elvis and the Beatles. Neverland was born and Michael was more and more involved with philanthropic and civil rights works.
It began as a fairy tale but turned into the ugliest nightmare the mankind had ever seen. Why? For a very simple reason: a Black icon with so much wealth, power, popularity and true humanitarian goals was a danger to some people. While observing him in the 80s, it was not difficult for these people to foresee that Jackson would reach many of his goals.
Actually, several of Michael Jackson’s opinions and plans were not well-received; his messages of peace, brotherhood, his concern for the planet and the environment but most of all his fight for children and youth were too scary.
He compared children to the face of God. He described them as innocent little puppies that look at us so deeply.
In Oxford, UK, he asked all parents to be more involved with their children’s life, not to let them down, to guide and help them because children are our future. Without them we are doomed and will extinguish:
- “Friends, let me paint a picture for you. Here is a typical day in America – six youths under the age of 20 will commit suicide, 12 children under the age of 20 will die from firearms – remember this is a DAY, not a year – 399 kids will be arrested for drug abuse, 1,352 babies will be born to teen mothers. This is happening in one of the richest, most developed countries in the history of the world.
- Yes, in my country there is an epidemic of violence that parallels no other industrialized nation. These are the ways young people in America express their hurt and their anger. But don’t think that there is not the same pain and anguish among their counterparts in the United Kingdom. Studies in this country show that every single hour, three teenagers in the UK inflict harm upon themselves, often by cutting or burning their bodies or taking an overdose. This is how they have chosen to cope with the pain of neglect and emotional agony.
- In Britain, as many as 20% of families will only sit down and have dinner together once a year. Once a year! And what about the time-honoured tradition of reading your kid a bedtime story? Research from the 1980s showed that children who are read to, had far greater literacy and significantly outperformed their peers at school. And yet, less than 33% of British children ages two to eight have a regular bedtime story read to them. You may not think much of that until you take into account that 75% of their parents DID have that bedtime story when they were that age.”
VMJ: I would even say that from his very young age Michael Jackson was rather ‘old-fashioned’ in his views on children and family life. All he wanted was to promote traditional family values – which, frankly, is something totally unexpected of a pop idol and a young man who started getting to know life in night clubs with their striptease, drinking audience and lustful eyes.
If you read Michael’s speeches you will be amazed to learn that he was aiming at nothing less than a global entertainment revolution based on family-oriented values, love, brotherhood of people and great appreciation for children as a treasure parents are blessed with.
There were several projects he was about to launch all of which were family-theme ones – a unique family theme park in Poland, educational programs, animation and feature films – and all of these under the umbrella of global family entertainment.
He called his dreams a global multimedia explosion, but despite its revolutionary name it was actually a return to an innocent way of life, reestablishing links between different generations and promoting simple, pure and eternal values of family life:
- “My earliest inspiration to be actively involved in all dimensions of the global multimedia explosion was derived from decades of concert tours throughout the world. During these travels, I heard the heartbeats of millions of fans who shared their hopes, their loves and their fears, and, most importantly, their desire for a better life. It was during this time that I began to appreciate that global family entertainment could bring peace, brotherhood and love to the world.
- Until recently, my hectic schedule and outstanding professional commitments left me little time to develop a specific strategy for a fully integrated entertainment company. All that began to change about eighteen months ago [middle of 1994], when I first met my friend and partner in the Kingdom Entertainment, HRH Prince Al-Walleed. In short order, it was clear we share the same goals and values, traditional family values. Through Kingdom Entertainment, the Prince and myself will combine human and financial resources to be successful in all phases of the global entertainment revolution.
- As an example, we intend to be active in theme parks, hotels, animation, feature films, interactive educational entertainment, and, of course, character licensing and merchandising. And, we are really looking forward to this incredible venture.” [“Kingdom Entertainment” Speech – 1996]
MOA: He used to be the voice of the poor, the hungry, the sick and the abandoned children and youth who live in every corner of this world; “the voice of the voiceless” as he said it himself.
On June 23, 1992, at a press conference in London, MJ made an announcement regarding the establishment of the “Heal The World Foundation” (“HTWF”) and its mission:
- “Our children are the most beautiful, most sweet, most treasured of our creations. And yet, every minute at least 28 children die. Today our children are at risk of being killed by diseases and by the violence of war, guns, abuse and neglect.
- Children have few rights and no one to speak for them. They have no voice in our world. God and nature has blessed me with a voice. Now I want to use it to help children speak for themselves. I have founded the “Heal The World Foundation” to be the voice of the voiceless: the children.
- Please join with me and the children to help heal the world together. Parents, communities, governments, all people of the world, we must put our children first. Finally and most importantly, I want to tell the children of the world, you are all our children, each one of you is my child and I love you all. Thank you very much.”
But not everyone was happy to hear these speeches. As we know, for some individuals children are just cheap labor force who work 10-12 hours a day for a miserable salary; some of them are sex slaves or child soldiers.
To bring Michael Jackson down, three different groups had to work together: the Los Angeles DA who was obsessed with him, the media and organized pedophilia. In fact, the latter group could have acted as the mastermind behind the other two and created and produced the most horrendous scenarios that were played by the so called “accusers”.
At least three persons were the links between these three groups: Victor Gutierrez, Diane Dimond and Martin Bashir. We know about Gutierrez and his collaboration with Dimond; and through her with the DA (also read this and this posts please).
In fact, organized pedophilia saw in Michael Jackson their fierce enemy as they probably guessed that their views on children and childhood were complete opposite to Michael Jackson’s. They would not stand if, from the top of the world, the singer shouted words like these:
She wrote that she is tired of stepdaddy using her
Saying that he’ll buy her things, while sexually abusing her
Just think that she’s all alone somewhere out on the street
How will this girl survive?
She ain’t got nothing to eat!
Now she’s on the move, she’s off to Hollywood
She says she wanna be a star, she heard the money’s good
She gets off from the train station, the man is waiting there
“I’ll show you where the money is, girl just let down your hair”
He’s taking her on the streets, of Sunset Boulevard
She’s selling her body hard, girl that will take you far
The police come ’round the corner, somebody there they told
He’s arresting this little girl, that’s only twelve years old!!
(From Do You Know Where Your Children Are? Jackson wrote the lyrics sometime before 1991)
Furthermore, Jackson was among those celebrities who were helping child protection organizations. In 1988, Sara O’Meara Sigholtz and Yvonne Fedderson who had launched Childhelp organization, established the Michael Jackson International Institute For Research on Child Abuse. Jackson was one of their ambassadors and supporters:
“Jackson donated tickets to shows in is 1989 Bad Tour to underprivileged children. The proceeds from one of his shows in Los Angeles were donated to Childhelp USA, the biggest charity-organization against child abuse. Childhelp of Southern California then established the “Michael Jackson International Institute for Research On Child Abuse”.
VMJ: The establishment of the Michael Jackson Institute for Research on Child Abuse is a total surprise to all of us. Due to the never-ending smear media campaign the general public has become so used to the distorted image of Michael Jackson that the news of him supporting the anti-child-abuse effort must be a bucket of cold water spilled on the heads of his worst detractors…
However if we come to think of it why are we so surprised? It is well-known that Jackson was indeed extremely concerned about the scope of violence and sexual abuse of children, and was among those who drew attention to the problem and called for immediate action against it:
- “We are behaving like people without compassion and love for the most vulnerable section of society. The children of the universe are without a spokesperson, they are voiceless…We are all touched by the atrocities committed against children:sexual, physical abuse, child slave labor, educational neglect. We feel ashamed. Angry. Appalled. But there is no action…. No action”. [Sun City, South Africa, July, 1996]
One might say that Jackson was praying to children’s innocence and was probably the only person in the world who called for a very rare right children should have. Driven by his own miserable childhood experience he called for adults to give their children the right to a childhood and enjoy its wonders without being forced into the grown-up world earlier than they should.
Stripping children of their childhood takes a heavy toll on the society in terms of hardening the little ones and exposing them to early crime and corruption, as well as ridding the world of innocent, creative and playful features inherent to children only:
- “…My childhood was completely taken away from me. There was no Christmas, there were no birthdays, it was not a normal childhood, nor the normal pleasures of childhood – those were exchanged for hard work, struggle, and pain, and eventually material and professional success. But as an awful price, I cannot re-create that part of my life.
- …when you grow up as I did, in front of one hundred million people since the age of five, you’re automatically different.
- However, today, when I create my music, I feel like an instrument of nature. I wonder what delight nature must feel when we open our hearts and express our God-given talents. The sound [..] of approval rolls across the universe, and the whole world abounds in magic. Wonder fills our hearts, for what we have glimpsed, for an instant, the playfulness of life.
- And that’s why I love children and learn so much from being around them. I realize that many of our world’s problems today – from the inner city crime, to large scale wars and terrorism, and our overcrowded prisons – are a result of the fact that children have had their childhood stolen from them. The magic, the wonder, the mystery, and the innocence of a child’s heart, are the seeds of creativity that will heal the world. I really believe that…. Today, I would like to thank all the children of the world, including the sick and deprived. I am so sensitive to your pain”.”
[“Grammy Awards” Acceptance Speech – February 24, 1993]
MOA: This is where the antagonism between Michael Jackson and the so-called ‘boy-lovers’ really comes in. A NAMBLA member’s point of view on children and childhood is indeed totally antagonistic to Michael ideas. (Unfortunately you will find some quotes from organized pedophilia in this article. We do not wish to promote their ideas and therefore refuse to give direct links to their sources. Those who wish to see the original can find them themselves).
The paragraph below was first written in 1983 but repeated a decade later as a sort of the NAMBLA program:
“My first statement is that I want to dispel the image that a child is an ”innocent little puppy dog”. Children have plenty of knowledge about life, the universe and everything. But adults tend not to listen to their children. This ”innocent puppy” syndrome represses the child’s social, sexual, political, economical, and emotional desires. Children are not taken seriously and are expected to conform to a society in which they can’t question its validity. This has got to stop! A child is a sexual being. Therefore, children should have the right to explore any aspect of sexuality they desire to engage in. Why do parents, politicians, and police (the 3 p’s) feed guilt into children that are sexually active?
[‘The Unicorn (first column)’ by a 11-year-old faggot; Boys speak out on man/boy love; NAMBLA; fourth edition; July 1996; published before in NAMBLA Bulletin vol. 4 no. 10; December 1983]
VMJ: If someone is wondering why we know for sure that Michael Jackson had nothing to do with these people (in addition to all the innumerable facts of his complete innocence we’ve found here) the above statement from NAMBLA is the answer. It is a vivid demonstration how dramatically different and poles apart these people and MJ are.
On the surface the above text may seem to be similar to what Jackson was talking about – “give the voiceless a voice” and a right “to be heard and listened to” – but it is on the surface only. Oh my God, they have probably quoted Michael’s words in their proclamations!
But a closer looks shows that the motive of these people is totally opposite to that of Jackson’s – they declare that children are sexual beings and have the right to “explore” their sexuality, engage in sex and prematurely lose their childhood this way – while such an idea was not only alien to Michael Jackson but was totally abhorrent to him.
From the way he spoke about children it seems that it was easier for him to slit his wrists than mention the word “sexuality” in connection with a child. He could never utter the word “molestation” either and was known to paste with paper bits some too revealing pieces in pictures hanging on the walls of a friend’s house so that his children didn’t see them…
In short he cherished the child’s innocence and drew from that crystal-clean source inspiration for his music – same as he did from the wonders of mother nature. It was children’s innocence which literally helped him survive in the stifling world of greed, betrayal and dishonesty which showed itself at its worst when it came into contact with a rich but pure and trusting man like him.
Michael prayed to children’s innocence as if to God and he indeed said so in his taped conversations with Rabbi Shmuley which laid the basis for his new book about Jackson “Honoring the child spirit”, 2011 where Michael said:
“Children are the quintessence of God”
What a marvelous way of saying it – children are the quintessence of God! If Michael felt that way, how can anyone dare say that his love of children may be even remotely close to NAMBLA’s views who claim that even a small child is a sexual being who should be given the right to explore sex?!
The only thing Michael’s deification of children helps us realize is the reason why he found it so difficult to discipline children and why it was almost impossible for him to refuse their every single request including staying beside him day and night.
MOA: The members of organized pedophilia admit that they started following Jackson as early as at the beginning of the 1980s. The sickness of their minds prompted them to adjust everything they observed about Jackson to their own means and goals:
“Those of us in tune with such things had out first suspicions early on, from the time he[ Michael Jackson] would show up at star-studded galas with the young Gary Coleman at his side.
Then there was that famous Pepsi commercial in which a very handsome 12-year-old blond boy enters Michael’s dressing room and begins putting on distinctive pieces of his wardrobe, imagining himself as Michael onstage. A moment later Michael arrives at the door, leans against it, and says suggestively (to me, at least), “Looking for me?” Others may not have seen the same thing in it, but for me it was merely icing on the cake”.
[Barry Casper, IPCE newsletter, published in 2009 after Jackson’s death]
In 1987, Anton Glanzelius, the actor of the film My life as a dog, met Michael Jackson in Neverland for one day. NAMBLA posted the newspapers reports about it in their bulletin as a “proof” that they were right about Jackson being one of them:
While Anton Glanzelius was in Los Angeles, an admirer who had seen the movie twice tracked him down and invited him to his home at 11 on a Friday night. ”Michael Jackson’s house was so big and beautiful,” Anton says, still stunned that the singer extended the invitation. ”And he was very friendly. I liked him very much, but he was very shy.”
[”Dog” Star Shines Brightly on U.S. Tour, by Rene Sanchez; Nambla Bulletin, vol. 8 n. 8; October 1987.]
VMJ: If boy lovers had to use as ‘proof’ their own sexual fantasies wrongly attributed to Jackson, it means that they were really desperate for real facts that could have proved their crazy point of view.
If they are so keen on the issue of “Michael loving boys” I suggest they use the example of Michael taking into his arms – in the literal meaning of the word – a six-year old boy Dave Rothenberg with whom Michael sustained a life-long friendship until his dying day. This unfortunate six-year old child was doused with kerosene by his father, set on fire and was burned to 90 per cent of his body.
Despite numerous operations his mutilated body presents a painful sight even now, but if you look at the way Michael embraced this little cripple you’ll be awe-struck by his genuine tenderness and a smile of sincere happiness on his face which simply cannot be affected.
This is what real love is – love displayed by Michael at a relatively young age when most teenagers think of parties only, love which was difficult to expect from a celebrity of Michael’s scale and which wasn’t meant for a moment and for publicity only – no, it is real love which lasted for full 30 years…
Dave recalled Michael as a father figure for himself and a man who replaced the father he had never had:
- “He heard about me and contacted me. He wanted to meet me. I was about 7 years old at the time (Michael was about 16 then). He befriended me. He took me into his life. He opened up his arms to me and accepted me as a very good friend of his. And throughout the years he never let me go. Michael was like a father to me”.
- “I turned around and there was Michael. At that moment we embraced and that embrace never ended throughout our whole entire friendship.”
- “He was a great person. He never hurt a soul and I’m happy to have been his friend all these years. Michael offered a lot of emotional support for me. Michael was there for me whenever I needed to talk to him. He opened up Neverland to me as a means to get away. Metaphorically he was always like a father that I never had”.
Another boy Michael Jackson embraced as if he were his son was Ryan White – a boy ill with hemophilia who contracted AIDS during a blood transfusion in 1984. Michael befriended him and publicly embraced him though the general fear of the unknown disease was so great that people flattened themselves on the wall when Ryan was passing by. The boy was so heavily ostracized and persecuted by his schoolmates, their parents and residents of their town that the family had to move to another location.
Mind you that Michael didn’t have to do it – it wasn’t a publicity stunt or anything of the kind (he never mentioned it to anyone), and it was done solely for the benefit of one fatally ill boy and at a certain risk for his health as no one could guarantee at the time that such a thing was safe…
Dr. Klein’s was incredulous at the amount of care Michael displayed towards other people when he spoke to Larry King on July 11, 2009 (http://www.cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0907/11/lkl.01.html):
KING: “You wanted to tell me something about Michael and Ryan White, the young boy dying of AIDS.
KLEIN: That’s very important, yes. Michael wanted to bring Ryan White to Neverland. And his plastic surgeon, a brilliant surgeon, said you can’t bring him in the Jacuzzi because you may catch AIDS.
KING: You’re kidding?
KLEIN: No, he said that. Honestly, honest to God. So Michael called me, and I had given Michael $1 million for AIDS, and check, and he said, “Will I catch AIDS if I go in the Jacuzzi with Ryan White?” I said, no way. And he was very good friends with Ryan White until he died. And that’s what people don’t know.
KING: Did he go in the Jacuzzi with him?
KLEIN: Absolutely, because, you know what? He really cared. I want to tell you, this is a person who really cared about other people. He’s unlike anyone I ever met.”
Michael’s open friendship with Ryan White was one of the factors that helped to change public perception of the disease:
This bold step by Michael must have given Ryan a serious confidence boost when he needed it most, since an open display of fearlessness by a high profile person was essential in helping the public overcome the stigma of AIDS. Michael risked his own health by taking to a Jacuzzi with Ryan at a time of great uncertainty about the disease and high public anxiety.
His actions went a long way towards changing collective attitudes of people towards the disease. Michael’s powerful show of solidarity with Ryan White and his family, his graciousness and compassion was a generous gift that brought Ryan some much deserved happiness in the face of great sorrow. It helped change the public’s perception and understanding of AIDS and brought about greater acceptance of those suffering with it”
I wonder if those guys from NAMBLA are capable of anything like that?
Victor Gutierrez who had somehow managed to attend a top secret NAMBLA conference (?) and heard its members praise Michael as a hope for the promotion of their “values” and their possible future public acceptance, upon attending the conference ‘suddenly’ started making rounds of Michael’s numerous child friends – in order to collect (or rather spread) pedophilic lies about the man.
Isn’t it surprising that Michael’s life-long friendship with Dave Rothenberg and Ryan White never interested Victor Gutierrez? Instead he focused on Michael and Jordan Chandler’s friendship and turned it into a “love story” described in the style and terms typical of a NAMBLA member only.
He alleged that his book of lies was based on Jordan’s diary while Jordan’s own uncle said that Jordan never kept any – so what else could be the source of Victor Gutierrez’s inspiration than his own personal experience?
“Author Victor Gutierrez, a journalist who said he’s been investigating Jackson’s attraction to boys for years, refused to name his source …The book claims to portray Jackson’s sex life, painting him not as a heartless predator but as a highly manipulative lover who seduced the boy into consensual sex. Its credibility, however, is unclear. (The Advocate 26 November 1996.)
Why did organized pedophilia regard Michael Jackson as their enemy? Why did they consistently spread false rumors and allegations about the man? Why did they want to ‘get’ him so badly?
Firstly, their primary goal was most probably to ruin Michael, break his spirit and make him more compliant with whatever they prepared for the man. They knew that by spreading rumors some money and fame-hungry people would buy their fabrications and would come forth. And they were right – Dimond, Feldman, Bashir, the Chandlers and Arvizos did come on board and helped them in this job.
Second, they wanted to recruit new members and expand their activities in hope of legalizing their views and achieving their goals using the fame and attraction of Michael Jackson. A notorious pedophile, Tom O’Carroll who served a sentence in prison for possessing child pornography the quantity of which exceeded 15 thousand copies (of really abused children!) admitted that his key attitude to Michael was that of expectation that he would help them in their “cause”:
I speak of “Michael”, not of “Jackson”, which itself says something about my feelings. I am old enough to have thrilled to Michael’s pre-teen Jackson Five numbers when they were first released. But I lost track as he grew up. …Then, when the scandal of his close friendships with boys broke upon the world in 1993, I started paying attention again, as so many did.
I have most assuredly become an avid and largely sympathetic Jackson watcher, even when his behavior has cried out for criticism or even outright condemnation. …When I started my own long journey into “Jacksonology” back in 1993, I had one key thought in mind: Michael’s fame would mean that his deeds, real and alleged, would inevitably play a major part in the public understanding of paedophilia for a generation or more.
[Tom O’Carroll, “Michael Jackson: Gone too soon”, published in IPCE newsletter in 2009 after Jackson’s death]
In fact it is customary for organized pedophilia to try and hide behind innocent individuals who were suspected and persecuted for non-existent “crimes” and by means of this dirty trick buy themselves the status of a “victim”, the right to protest and ask for legalization. Here is one of their pioneers:
“Unfortunately, victimologists have been able to tap into the hate and prejudice that is all too common in mankind, the idea that anyone who is different or belongs to a different group or has a different belief is an enemy, and must therefore be destroyed, or at the very minimum, denigrated and subjugated. This has been the fate of Gypsies, Jews, Blacks, and just about every immigrant ethnic group in its turn. This hate was long deployed against homosexuals, still surfaces in discussions of gay civil rights, and manifested itself in the brutal murder of Matthew Sheppard in Wyoming in 1998. There is very little – if any – credible evidence that a sexually expressed relationship between a boy and an older male is harmful so long as it is consensual.”
[ ‘Could they all have been wrong?’ by David L. Riegel; SafeHaven Foundation Press; Philadelphia; 2005]
And here is another one of them who has the cheek to pose himself as a victim, a member of a discriminated minority group and a civil rights activist:
I AM SITTING IN JAIL! WHY? Could it be because there is a group of people who make their living through the prosecution of cases like this? Or could it be because of public pressures caused by the people being misinformed about the facts involved in a case like this? Or could it be because of religious fanaticism wherein vociferous bigots cry out because others do not believe the same as they do? Or could it be because of the ”mob psychology” syndrome that produces witch hunts such as this one? Or could it be, because of Civil Rights issues being resolved in the courts, certain authorities have fewer and fewer people to harass and they have to find someone to vent their feelings on … they can’t harass the Communists any more … they can’t harass the Blacks any more … they can’t harass the Gays any more … where do they turn? They turn to a minority group where they feel they have a change of success. Once they get a toe-hold there, they theorize that they can start up the ladder again … the Gays … the Blacks … the Communists … ISN’T THAT A PLEASANT THOUGHT? (Written the day after conviction, July 17, 1982, in Ulster County Jail, New York)
[‘Why?’ by Karl Ahlers; Crosstalk no. 1; 1988]
When gays and lesbians groups separated themselves from pedophilia groups, these people became too isolated and tried to redefine themselves. Their author Riegel came up with a theory of “consensual sex with the minors especially boys “. Gutierrez has begun fabricating sick stories about Michael Jackson beginning with the late 80s and telling them up till now trying to adjust Jackson to Riegel’s model, and Thomas O’Carroll applauded Michael because his fame would be their “salvation”.
This list will not be complete without mentioning Hakim Bey aka Peter Lamborn Wilson, who is another opportunist pedophile hiding himself behind all kind of theories – Sufism, anarchism, etc. This man is the mastermind of the ‘movement’ and has already published several books in different languages. Unfortunately not every publisher knows the true worth of this author (for details please go to http://www.naderlibrary.com/lit.pedophiliahakimbey.htm and http://libcom.org/library/leaving-out-ugly-part-hakim-bey)
We will make an interesting discovery if we go to the first of the quoted links. It is an article written by Robert P. Helms about Bey who says that this pedophilic author is actually recommended by many American media outlets:
“Hakim Bey has been recommended in many American media outlets, including “All Things Considered” in 2003, on National Public Radio. On 28 October 2004, Europe’s ARTE television network, on the show “Tracks,” broadcast an interview with Hakim Bey to tens of millions of viewers in both French and German. When I learned of the TV interview, I contacted ARTE and the small company that made the film. Both companies carefully acknowledged their error and regret. They intended no harm, but as a result of this sort of favorable exposure, Anarchist Pedophilia becomes more popular, its star philosopher more famous”.
Doesn’t the name of Europe’s ARTE ring a bell with you? It is the same company which made Peretti’s film about Michael Jackson and broadcast it twice (and will do it again). One cannot help noticing that ARTE has a certain weakness for Bey, Gutierrez and the like…
The second of the above links mentions Bey’s book called “Temporary Autonomous Zone” (TAZ):
“Bey’s best-known book Temporary Autonomous Zone (TAZ) describes spiritual zones in which anything goes, where the oppressive rules of the outside society need not interfere with what feels good to do. I realise that many honest people have read TAZ without taking any sleazy impression from it. I hope they’ll forgive me for pointing out that paedophiles say these same things to children.”
One cannot help wonder if the German media taz.de that did an interview with Victor Gutierrez, has called itself taz in honor of Bey? It was in that interview that Gutierrez was reckless enough to mention his attendance of a NAMBLA conference under the pretext of ”reporting for his paper” – which is an incredible lie as even FBI agents have trouble infiltrating this top secret organization, not to mention a mere stranger from the outside (look here for more details on that).
What does Bey aka Lamborn Wilson say about Michael Jackson? According to him it is enough to look at Jackson’s dance and hear his music to understand that he is “one of them”! The same idea is used by O’Carroll in the book he has written recently (**** title of the book deleted not to advertise it). He mentions crotch-grabbing, lavishly quotes Latoya Jackson (all of them quote Latoya Jackson – obviously they have their weakness for her!) and tells us how Michael had to suppress his real personality, wear a mask and ‘hide behind homosexuality’. O’Carroll adds that all Michael’s artistry, his dance moves, his poetry, his environmental works … were the result of his suppressed personality and sexuality!
They have tried to use this trick to ruin Jackson’s work too – even the Black & White song and video which has clear a social and political message turns in their sick minds into a suspicious film featuring a young boy!
VMJ: The above is an eye-opening insight into the world of real pedophilia. What I would like to add to it is a specific feature I noticed while reading some of their materials – the fact that these people have a love-hate relationship with Michael Jackson.
On the one hand they regard him as their “hero” and poster boy who could help them break the wall of public resistance (if he was one of them and was willing to do so), but on the other hand they are utterly disappointed with “lack of cooperation” on his part and the bloody struggle he waged for the two last decades of his life against their effort to pull him into their ranks – though he could take an easier option of quietly joining them and being more or less safe there.
This love-hate relationship explains the strange metamorphosis some of these boylovers undergo – they say that they used to be “Michael’s fans” but later on converted into his detractors. This change of attitude actually took place only recently when the long-awaited (by them) ‘breakthrough’ book by Thomas O’Carroll was flatly rejected by Michael’s supporters and it became clear that Michael’s fans – same as Michael Jackson himself – couldn’t be expected to help promote their cause.
This is when their mood suddenly changed. After a temporary flirt with Michael’s fans now they have turned against them and are going out of their way to try and prove with each new post, article or book that Michael’s fans are wrong and that Michael loved children the way those guys love them. Following the steps of Diane Dimond, Tom Sneddon, the FBI and the media hordes who have already examined Michael inside out, they are once again going through tabloid archives and court documents examining every speck of dust and grasping at every straw which would give them a slight chance to throw Michael’s name into the nambla kind of people.
However, this new search is rather useless as their activist Tom O’Carroll has already gone through all tabloid sources (while on vacation in jail) and published an exhaustive 600-page detailed summary of the tabloid lies. There is not a single new fact in his book, and its only difference from earlier versions of lies is that now they are being interpreted from a ‘favorable’ point of view and turning in the direction of being “all for love”.
Fortunately Carl Toms’ (or Thomas O’Carroll’s) opus didn’t reach the desired effect with Michael’s supporters as they flatly refused to accept this novel pedophile attitude towards a completely innocent man….
MOA: At least fans should be proud of themselves; several days before Carl Toms’ book would go to the publishers, the fans protested and informed the publishers of the true identity of its author. The pedophilic circles took the matter rather nervously:
In the meantime, shortly after the book was published, frenzied discussions began on Amazon and on internet forums about MJ. The book argued that MJ’s and his liaisons had a pedophilic character, which led to online protests by his fans and even his relatives. Those fans perceive Michael as a saint or an angel; sleeping with boys, but surely without any erotic feelings. The same fans campaign against ‘pedophiles’, some blogs even forbid that word and kick people with another view from their forum.
Supposedly, the publisher will withdraw the book from publication, or will stop reprinting it. Prices rose sharply as a result of that announcement.
In the course of these discussions, bloggers, thus the public, discovered and advertised the fact that ‘Carl Toms’ actually is a pen name for Tom O’Carroll. The bloggers portrayed him as a pervert, a distorted and dangerous man who, that is clear, isn’t it, never can tell any truth.
Maybe someone will find a way to maintain the distribution of the book. The more the fans react, the more readers it will attract. The book is unique because of its unique approach.
[the IPCE newsletters, June 2010]
VMJ: So “some blogs even forbid that word and kick people with another view from their forum”? It seems to be about us! Are they following us the way they followed Michael and check every word of what we are saying?
If this is the case then please be noticed, guys, that vindicating Michael is equivalent to fighting pedophilia and supporting the right of children to have an innocent childhood free from sex, corruption and predators like you!
P.S. I am thankful to MOA for starting this conversation. Fighting the ped-lia problem is a long and enduring road to take. However as the saying goes, “a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step”.