Skip to content

It is our COMMON DUTY to protect Michael Jackson’s children from further harassment

July 25, 2011

“The bullying/hate towards Paris Jackson is on a larger scale” – Gigi

Gigi, I want to thank you and David for alerting us to the situation with haters abusing Paris Jackson on Twitter. They do it in the same way they did it to her father, only this time it is even worse because they are doing it to a child and an orphaned one at that.

Those who allow themselves to behave like that to children are their worst offenders – and it makes me doubt very much their “high morals” which is actually their only pretext for this atrocious behavior. They accuse Michael of horrendous things but then turn his children’s lives into a nightmare by shattering their good memory of a beloved father and try to break the children’s spirit when they are still in their vulnerable teens.

Michael’s haters are extremely disappointed that Michael raised his kids in an absolutely normal way (the media did indeed turn the good word into something hateful!) and therefore want to break them now, after his death – delivering them blow after blow and dreaming their dearest dream of seeing them broken, defeated and ending up like Amy Winehouse (God forbid it!).

Their goal is to turn good, balanced, sweet-natured and innocent kids into nervous wrecks who will start doubting the best they ever had in life – their father – and if Michael’s haters ever reach their goal, then they will condescendingly say to the whole world, “See what these children turned out really like? And what else could you expect of his offspring?”

There is one more direction for their activities though. Since Paris is very vocal in defending her father, they want to tear her and her brothers away from Michael Jackson by proving to them that he wasn’t their father biologically – which makes us suspect that we can expect a torrent of new lies in this connection and more candidates put up by haters for the role of their “father”.

Ironically, the haters’ claim that Michael’s children might not be biologically his,  automatically proves that he could be trusted with any children (even not his own) and was therefore no child molester – but logic, sanity and reason have never been the strongest points of Michael’s haters so they shamelessly pursue both ideas at once, which is a true “doublethink” in Orwell’s meaning of the word:

  • “Doublethink is the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them”.  George Orwell, “1984”, Part II, Chapter IX).

Whatever game the genetics played on Michael’s children this is not the point.  Even in the unlikely case Michael is their foster parent, his ability to raise children in such a marvelous way still makes him a great father. A real parent is not the one who gives birth to a child but the one who feeds him, reads fairy tales to him, stays sleepless nights by his bedside when the child is ill, gets up at his first cry to change his diapers and is constantly on his guard as to his well-being – all of which Michael WAS according to his wife Debbie who was totally awestruck by his parental skills.

So in the unlikely case of Michael not being their biological father this fact alone should inspire even more respect for the man – as adopting children and taking upon oneself the burden of their raising is held in all cultures of the world in the greatest respect.  And it is only these beasts who are trying to turn this noble deed into its very opposite…

Imagine the neighbors of a family with an adopted child constantly ridiculing a child for being adopted and with much glee at that? Wouldn’t it be considered an abominable and despicable behavior by all those around them? So why does everyone allow people behave like that in this case?

There is no word of excuse for those who are bullying, harassing and ridiculing Michael’s children.  If these people are still doubtful (in their total insanity) of Michael’s innocence it would still be a complete taboo to take revenge on the little ones for the hatred they feel for their father. A rare barbarian will allow himself a thing like that – but some of those highly “moral” people do it on a routine basis and surprisingly, are still of a very high opinion of themselves and are considered decent and respectable members of the society (and not the murderous apes they truly are).

It is high time the general public knew what insults and harassment these people allow themselves towards Michael Jackson’s children and I hope very much indeed that the normal parental instinct of each of us will make us stand up for Michael’s children and protect them as if they were our own.

I am also hopeful that in this process more people will realize that if Michael’s haters are capable to do so much harm to innocent children there is no dirt they will hesitate to throw at Michael Jackson himself and no lie they will not stoop to and pick up to muddy him whenever they hear his name.

Please allow me to quote Gigi’s letter and her comment in this blog where she says what Michael’s haters are doing to Paris via Twitter and of the way Gigi and her friends are dealing with it:

  • Paris got harassed by a nasty hater today, on Father’s Day of all days. She retweeted the messages she got and it was really bad. This person went all out evil, ie called her a wh*re, questioned paternity, called her dad a junkie, called her klien, accusing her of killing her dad, that blanket was illegal not her brother, called her lester’s kid, said that her dad didn’t want her that’s way he killed himself, called her dad a ped-le –  it was just really, really bad. I knew if they ever opened a twitter account and it was really them, it would only be a matter of time before I saw tweets to her like this.
  • The people I follow on twitter reported that person, who came at her twice for abuse and harassment. With all the reporting the person finally deleted their account again themselves. Whenever a hater pops up we’re all quick to block and file a abuse/harassment claim to twitter. It’s the least we can do on the social network side of things. Also, one of the reasons why I feel she may not know all that her dad went through, is cause she follows Enmeim (sp ?) on twitter. A couple weeks ago a friend told me that someone tweeted her that video that disrespects her dad. I can’t remember the name of the video, but MJ told Geraldo he would hate it if his kids saw it.
  • The bullying/hate towards her is on a larger scale, cause of the large scale bullying/hate that her dad had to live through…

Since not all of us are good at twittering in the internet (I also left several comments but for some reason they never appeared there), here is my appeal to the general public – please act and act swiftly by answering the bullies or blocking them in order to protect Michael’s children whenever and wherever you see someone harassing them.

And it isn’t only because they are Michael Jackson’s children. It is a common goal of all sane human beings on this planet to shield children (anyone’s children) from those who may be a threat to their physical, moral or psychological health. The massacre of defenseless youngsters in Norway has shown once again how vulnerable the young ones are and how fragile a human life is. No idea on earth can justify a murder of a child or breaking his spirit which is often equivalent to killing him as it ruins the very little good he has yet seen in his short life.

I hope that seeing for themselves the abominable things done to Paris Jackson and other Michael’s children all reasonable people will understand that it is our common parental duty to stand by their side and protect them from any further harassment.

I repeat – it is the DUTY of every normal human being, independent of his or her opinion of  Michael Jackson, to protect his children from the treatment he himself was subjected to and from erasing these children’s good memories of their father BECAUSE THIS IS ALL THEY HAVE OF HIM NOW.

Let us bring some sanity back into this world and take action whenever we see this atrocity taking place.

As to the ideas these beasts are expressing and words they are saying – here is a short glimpse into the rotten and sick world they are living in:

http://cdn.mediatakeout.com/49950/michael_jacksons_daughter_paris_has_her_facebook_page_hacked___and_all_her_personal_pictures_are_leaked_pics_inside.html

  •  senorasuarez This dumb bitch is not Michael Jackson’s daughter. She is a spoiled brat who obviously thinks she is cute. Why did Jackson not have his own children, we will never know. Self hating freak bleached his skin white and bought himself some white children. Very sick.
  • Bunni2Gay Thank goodness she and her brothers are free from that pervert ass MJ..
  • Senorasuarez Blanket is not his kid either. Da self hating freak didn’t want any black children. Paris wants to be an actress, well, she is pretending to be a black child and not doing a good job of it. I think she should look into other career options. But she won’t need it anyway since this little Jewish girl whose real father is Arnold Klein will be profiting heavily from a black man’s money.
  •  Makaveli-The-Don- MTO need to change the headline cause that’s not Micheal Jackson Biological  Daughter
  •  Senorasuarez  They need to change it to Arnold Klein’s daughter has her facebook page hacked.
  •  IdoMYthing  Yo…this is a serious question….WHO THE [EXPLETIVE] CARES ABOUT THESE BORING ASS CORNEY ASS [EXPLETIVE] KIDS OF HIS…….??
  • Senorasuarez  Black kids were not good enough for him to leave his money to. He wanted to outdo everyone and have white children. What a sick sorry ass excuse for a black icon. The boy looks just like his father Arnie.
  •  ilan2endi  Ummm.. she looks just like Michael’s dermatologist and Debbie Rowe. those 2 are that man’s kids and blanket is Mike’s & a taliban broad’s.

Very sick, as one of these characters said? Yes, very sick indeed.

Imagine that they are talking of your children and that your children are left alone and have to deal with these grown-up monsters all around them. And there are so many of them and their pressure is so big that no grandmother or sibling is capable of shielding the children from so much hatred.

There is only one power in the world which can ensure their necessary protection and it is the public at large. Only the general public in all its multitude will be able to stand up to every single instance of this harassment and at every point in time when it takes place.

In short it is a job too big for one or two persons around these children – however it is not too big for ALL OF US TAKEN TOGETHER.  

So let us do the job without thinking twice.

194 Comments leave one →
  1. nannorris permalink
    October 23, 2015 12:39 pm

    Arnold Klien has died ,probably due to his complications from MS, just so everyone knows.
    He was supposedly writing a tell all book, going to name names etc.
    I dont follow him , much but this is his blog in case anyone is interested in reading it before it may disappear.
    https://awkleinmd.wordpress.com/

    Like

  2. sanemjfan permalink
    August 28, 2012 6:35 am

    here is an article that will help humanize MJ to non-fans. Christina Applegate (who starred in the sitcom “Married With Children”) recently blasted the paparazzi for constantly photographing her children, and she said that now she understands why MJ made his kids wear masks when they were with him! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/24/christina-applegate-slams-paparazzi-taking-photos-kids-sick_n_1827850.html

    Like

  3. July 23, 2012 1:37 pm

    David, thank you for the videos. The way it looks to me Katherine Jackson could indeed suffer a mini-stroke and possibly even as a result of the rift in the family over the will, the Estate executors and the suit against AEG.

    And now, instead of siding with their mother the Jacksons chose to attack the Estate, challenge the will and possibly even call back the lawsuit against AEG thus going against their mother’s wishes?

    Human nature does not stop baffling me. Unless the Jacksons have stone-concrete proof that what they are doing now has solid reasons for it, their behavior seems inexcusable.

    Like

  4. sanemjfan permalink
    July 21, 2012 12:28 am

    Here is the media’s coveragof the Jackson family’s feud with the Estate!

    Like

  5. Rodrigo permalink
    June 8, 2012 8:07 am

    I’m sure she’d sharp change her mind if she knew what dear old Mr. Simmons said about her dad, just to get his crummy little interview the publicity it needed for people to pick it up.

    Like

  6. June 8, 2012 8:00 am

    OH MY GOODNESS. Guys, Paris’ Twitter is @parisjackson right?

    This is what she tweeted on May 29th: “for those asking my favorite punk/rock artists/bands are ACDC, P!nk, Guns n Roses, Kiss, Mötley Crüe, Pixies, Gorillaz, & Marilyn Manson (:”

    KISS?

    Like

  7. June 7, 2012 12:42 pm

    I’m wondering if Oprah will ask about the allegations. I wonder how much of it the kids know about?

    Like

  8. June 7, 2012 6:41 am

    Reblogged this on Fan Blog for MJ and commented:
    As a precaution for the reactions and possible aftermath of the Paris Jackson interview, this post from VindicateMJ will serve as a good reminder about what we could expect from the those who are hellbent on attempting to tarnish Michael’s legacy and making Michael’s children suffer. As a community dedicated to protecting Michael’s legacy, and ultimately his children, it is crucially important that we do everything we can to see that his children are protected from the same treatment that he received during his life. There is bound to be more sick, heinous people who will creep from the depths where they fester their hate for innocent human beings. With that in mind, this article should remind us to be on our guard as to what we might deal with after the interview airs.

    Like

  9. sanemjfan permalink
    June 7, 2012 1:24 am

    Here’s a longer preview of Oprah & Paris: why is Oprah STILL asking about the freaking masks?! And why was THIS question previewed?! Oprah asked about it in the FIRST interview with her in 2010! Good grief! She’s still trying to portray MJ as being “weird” and “bizarre”!

    Well, well, well, it looks like the media is finally catching on to Oprah’s M.O.! The answer to the question that is asked in the heading of this article is HELL YEAH!!!!!!

    http://crushable.com/entertainment/paris-jackson-oprah-exploitation-401/

    Like

  10. June 5, 2012 7:53 am

    I wasn’t saying Michael’s kids weren’t his kids. What I was saying was you’re not going to win a hater over with showing them pictures of other people’s babies because it’s “hard to believe” that three kids could look “white” when they have a black father (in their eyes). I admit, I DO have doubts (which is why I brought up the thing with sterility and lupus, but not because that’s conclusive proof of anything, but because I thought it should be considered because I’ve never heard anyone ever bring that up; and also Prince’s blond hair as a child bugged me, but then I read your explanation), but why would Michael claim something that could so easily be refuted? That’s why I DO believe they are his. It’s like my heart tells me one thing, but my mind another, but it’s not anything I dwell on (like I did on my doubts about his innocence, which, thanks to this site, are all gone).

    As hard as it may be to believe, iIt’s not even an issue to me whether or not they are his, because even the people who have slandered Michael (Dimond, Brown) have said he was a great father. No one can dispute that, and that’s all that matters to me. The paternity of his kids has no bearing on his abilities as a father or who he is as a person, which is why I am surprised at how people try so hard to prove it one way or the other. I wasn’t trying to debate anyone and say they weren’t his so I’m sorry if it came off sounding like that. The last thing that I am is an MJ hater.

    Like

  11. kaarin22 permalink
    June 5, 2012 1:11 am

    Oprah has to stick her nose into the Jackson family and especially Michaael´s children. Shame on her.Her whole career is built on this.-Now it is often a gift and also often a burden to be the offspring of a famous parent.Many a child of someone extreemely gifted has suffered from not being able to meet the high expectations.I hope the best for the 3 of them.Remember that Michael´s wish for them was to have a normal, a good childhood.
    I agree there is a risk for Paris starting a career so young.

    Like

  12. June 5, 2012 12:15 am

    It’s hard to believe that Michael Jackson was this amazing talent, plus he had vitiligo which only 2% of the population has, plus he had lupus, plus he had different surgeries for skin grafts and cosmetic reasons to explain away his “ever changing” appearance, PLUS he had THREE kids with a rare phenotype. It’s just too good to be true.

    The chances of someone developing vitiligo are 1-2%, the chances of someone in Michael’s family also having vitiligo is 40-50% because there’s a genetic family incidence rate of vitiligo, Michael has his great aunt who suffered from the disease, Jermaine said he had a small patch of vitiligo on his thigh and now Prince Jackson suffers from it.

    Vitiligo is an autoimmune disease, the chances of him having are another are great, which is why he also suffered from the autoimmune disease lupus.

    I don’t know why you need to list anything else, none of them has any bearing on his own children and what they’d look like. “Too good to be true” makes it seem like there’s a finite amount of things in Michael’s life that he was honest about and we can’t expect all of them to be true because it’d reflect too well on him. I feel like Michael is the only person who has to have a finite amount of truth in his life and the rest we have to make up for him.

    Michael’s children don’t look “white” – Paris gets mistaken for latino (for a long time people didn’t recognize her and she used to be asked if she was latino by people), as does Blanket. Blanket looks just like MJ. Michael’s cousins Levon, Elijah, Anthony, and nephews Jermajesty and Jeremy all had straight/wavy hair even though none of them had a “white” mother.

    but we should still entertain that possibility.

    It’s something you should entertain because clearly it is a problem for you. It isn’t a problem for Prince, Paris, Blanket who all say they’re Michael’s biological children, that they’re mixed raced and to quote Paris, “I’m black and I’m proud of it.”

    Like

  13. lynande51 permalink
    June 4, 2012 10:52 pm

    There are a few typos that I can no longer correct. Read over them please.

    Like

  14. lynande51 permalink
    June 4, 2012 10:36 pm

    And here is the link to the San Diego Fertility Center.
    http://www.sdfertility.com/aboutsurrogates.htm

    Like

  15. lynande51 permalink
    June 4, 2012 10:29 pm

    Here is another exception to the hearsay rule. This would be considered an excited utterance.

    Like

  16. lynande51 permalink
    June 4, 2012 10:26 pm

    There are no genetic codes in determining what race a person will be because there is no DNA that determines race. It determines that a person is human and the other characteristics are strictly to that individual. That is why it is used as a positive identification method. The only way to determine if Michael’s children are biologically his would be a DNA test. Now this has been something that the tabloids have pursued for many years. Part of it I’m sure is an attempt to have Blanket’s mother come forward for one thing. This comes from a general lack of knowledge in the public about invitro fertilization or artificial insemination procedures for another. Hilary’s assertion that they are a rare phenotype is just more proof that they are his children because there is photographic evidence that Prince might have Vitiligo.
    It started as far back as before Prince was born in the tabloids and they still have not stopped. Because to them Michael was one of two things, he was either gay or a child molester because that is what THEY said he was. Michael and Debbie went public in the beginning and they have denied all of the rumors of invitro fertilization/artificial insemination since that time. Debbie was bound by a confidentiality agreement in the divorce that she would not talk about their sex life to the media. She has been bound by that agreement ever since.
    What is it that makes you think the kids aren’t his? Paris’s pigmentation is deepening as she ages. A Black baby will not even get their pigment for the first two to three weeks of their lives in most cases. Prince went from black straight hair to blonde wavy hair as he got older and back again to a darker wavy hair. It had to do with genetics; Michael did not have his baby’s hair lightened. I can give proof with baby pictures of my father and several nieces if you would like to see that other people have experienced the same phenomenon. Blanket’s hair is quite tightly curled in the nape. He is still only ten years old so he does not have his adult hair yet. Hair is not fully mature until a person is around 12 or the beginning of puberty. Paris always has had wavy/curly hair since her birth. She has been using a flat iron and highlighting it since just after her father’s death. So all of that just proves that they are three separate people with individual characteristics and any kind of rare phenotype that you mention is dependent on the interaction of the genotype with the environment.
    I have two Masters Degrees in Nursing. One of them is in Psychiatric Nursing. One of my Masters theses was a study done on genetics in schizophrenia. Meaning is it a genetic disease or is it caused by environmental differences and what those environmental differences would be that would cause the physical changes in the brain that develop into schizophrenia. So I do know what a phenotype is but would like to know what rare phenotype you are referring to when you talk about the Jackson kids. No one seems to look at Debbie Rowe and ask what genetic traits come from her family and how dominant they may be in any given offspring. The kids did have two parents no matter what anyone else believes. They have to there is just no way around that part. Someone who started talking about phenotypes was just having fun with you.
    But let’s talk a little bit about invitro feritzation and artificial insemination so you can have all of your bases covered when you think about this. Debbie said that she miscarried her first pregnancy with Michael in March of 1996. That information was in both JRT’s book and Debbie was released from a confidentiality agreement to talk about it in “Take Two: The Footage You Were Never Meant To See”. She then got pregnant again with Prince sometime in late May or early June if he was born at a full 40 weeks and did not go over that gestation. That would never have been able to occur in an invitro or artificial insemination procedure because the uterus would require a “rest” period and the hormonal treatments would have to start all over again.
    In order for the female body to accept invitro or artificial insemination the woman must go through a series of hormone treatments to prepare her uterus for the implantation and assure acceptance of the embryo or the seminal fluid. They do this to insure the process produces a viable fetus. Back in 1995 -1996 this was still not a perfect science and often if embryos were implanted the doctor would implant multiple embryos again to insure a healthy viable fetus. It was usually five at a time with the thinking that at least 2-3 embryos would be lost. I don’t know how old you are but if you know anyone that has been born through that process back then there is usually a multiple birth. All invitro or artificial insemination pregnancies are considered high risk do to the hormonal treatments prior to the implantation/ insemination procedure. Debbie was not on high risk pregnancy precautions prior to her children’s births. If she had been she never could have flown to Australia to get married.
    Now again back to the artificial insemination treatment: That also involved using hormones to hyperstimulate ovulation and egg cell production resulting in multiple births. So the odds back in 1996 or 1995 of having multiples, at least twins, was much greater than it is now just because of the science involved then compared to now. Here is a link to a site that gives excellent information about the process from a surrogacy standpoint. You can read through that if you like. This service is based in San Diego California. That is where Blanket was born. The court system in San Diego County has special procedures that involve celebrity surrogates to provide anonymity for the mother.
    Then let’s look at the origin of the story’s that created the doubt about the Jackson kid’s parentage. Like I said it started back before Prince was born when a British Tabloid reported that Michael had asked for an amniocentesis to determine that the baby was his. That is what started it. That went on over the years for awhile. Then came the trial and certain “journalists” heard something in court that because they don’t understand legal terms did not know what they were listening too. Of course Diane Dimond was the leader of that pack.
    At the end of the defense presentation the defense team wanted to introduce the Hamid Moslehi outtake video. The Prosecution called it hearsay “fawning self serving hearsay” to be exact. In order to introduce any part of that “hearsay” evidence they had to get it introduced fewer than one of the exceptions to the hearsay rule. There are three exceptions to the hearsay rule and they had to use one of them.
    Theory of the Hearsay Rule
    The theory of the rule excluding hearsay is that assertions made by human beings are often unreliable; such statements are often insincere, subject to flaws in memory and perception, or infected with errors in narration at the time they are given. Furthermore, someone testifying in court regarding another’s out-of-court statement may have misheard or misremembered that statement, in addition to possibly having misinterpreted the speaker’s sincerity, etc. The law therefore finds it necessary to subject this form of evidence to “scrutiny or analysis calculated to discover and expose in detail its possible weaknesses, and thus to enable the tribunal (judge or jury) to estimate it at no more than its actual value”. [3]
    Three tests are calculated to expose possible weaknesses in a statement:
    1. Assertions must be taken under oath
    2. Assertions must be made in front of the tribunal (judge or jury)
    3. Assertions must be subject to cross-examination.
    Assertions not subject to these three tests are (with some exceptions) prohibited insofar as they are offered testimonially (for the truth of what they assert).
    Now Michael was not going to testify so in order to introduce the 2 hour and 10 minutes of outtakes they had to introduce them with an exception to the hearsay rule. That exception was that they were showing this tape to the jury “not for the truth of the matter asserted” but for another reason. That reason was to show the jury what other statements Michael made to Bashir regarding some of the things asserted by the prosecution like “sleeping with boys”. Michael never said that. He said he slept with many children and gave a much more lengthy explanation that what Bashir showed on his program.
    There were other assertions that the prosecution was making that they used to argue against the playing of the Bashir tape. One of those was that they were going to prove that Michael was not a good parent. Yeah I know what does that have to do with anything. But in the outtakes Michael is seen and heard discussing how much he loves his children and Bashir is heard saying that he is so good with his children it almost makes him weep. You don’t see that in the original Bashir hitpiece. So in order to get the entire thing introduced as an exception to the hearsay rule Bob Sanger said that he wanted that part introduced not for the truth of the matter asserted that they were his children but that he loved them.
    The press took that and ran with it as meaning the kids were not his. Now you know the origins of that misconception and that it is Diane Dimond’s reporting for Court TV without a working knowledge of legal terms and litigation that started that whole thing.
    As for the person that was Tweeting Paris the autopsy photo of her father they Tweeted that photo to her 122 times until I Tweeted them and said that for their sake I hoped they were not someone over the age of 21 that was so obviously harassing a child of 13. Within seconds the entire account was deleted.You are right about that person being more than a little sick to do something like that.

    Like

  17. lynande51 permalink
    June 4, 2012 7:52 pm

    The right (slide L) and left (slide M) testes show active
    spermatogenesis with the usual number of Leydig cells. There is no significant fibrosis or inflammation. The epididymides are unremarkable.

    @ Hilary
    That is a direct quote from the offical Autopsy Report of Michael Jackson. He was actively producing sperm. Because I am no longer a wrtier on this blog I cannot add the Autopsy report or I would add it with a link so you could refer to it directly.
    Michael did not have SLE or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. He had Discoid Lupus which causes skin rashes. If he had SLE it would have been evident in one or more of his internal organs at death. It was not. The offical autopsy would have had to list those finding to Lupus if they were found and Michael’s complete medical records woul dhave been released to the Coroner for examination for reference.
    So he was actively producing sperm.

    Like

  18. Truth Prevail permalink
    June 4, 2012 7:18 pm

    @SaneMJFan

    Wow i just found out about that interview and i actually feel sick about it Oprah she has no shame.

    Now with that said does Paris know all about Oprah turning her back on her father because i really don’t know if i would be seen with the person who publicly played a role in turning my father into CM unless she is not aware.

    Like

  19. June 4, 2012 6:28 pm

    @sanejfan

    With all due respect, and I do respect you and this site IMMENSELY, but I think trying to prove these kids are Michael’s using pictures of other biracial couples doesn’t actually prove anything. Michael has THREE kids. It is highly improbable that ALL three kids ended up looking white. Like you said, if Michael’s kids weren’t his, then that proves the haters that call him a you-know-what wrong. He could take care of a kid that wasn’t related to him, including a prepubescent boy, without hurting them.

    I only know basic genetics, but if Michael had one kid that looked white, I’d think, “Okay, this is just very rare.” But for ALL THREE of his kids to exhibit NO SIGN of being of African American descent when they have an African American father with two African American parents is just too good to be true. I read somewhere that lupus can cause infertility, so maybe Michael wasn’t physically able to be a father, and that would explain why the kids aren’t his (if that was true). Not that the paternity of his kids is even any of our business, but we should still entertain that possibility.

    http://voices.yahoo.com/lupus-autoimmune-disease-cause-infertility-639453.html

    Now I’m not trying to say that I know for a fact the kids aren’t Michael’s. I’m saying that using pictures of other biracial babies doesn’t really prove anything. It’s hard to believe that Michael Jackson was this amazing talent, plus he had vitiligo which only 2% of the population has, plus he had lupus, plus he had different surgeries for skin grafts and cosmetic reasons to explain away his “ever changing” appearance, PLUS he had THREE kids with a rare phenotype. It’s just too good to be true.

    Speaking of Michael’s kids being bullied, I was listening to a podcast on Positively Michael with Tom Mesereau and it turns out that some complete IDIOT Tweeted Paris a picture of Michael’s dead body. Mr. Mesereau said someone like that belongs in a mental hospital.

    Jermaine also did an interview with Charles Thomson and he said the whole family is against the kids using social media, and that they all know about these haters tweeting Paris these disgusting comments about Michael.

    Like

  20. sanemjfan permalink
    June 4, 2012 8:23 am

    Here is a preview of Paris Jackson’s interview with Oprah, which will air on Sunday, June 10th @ 8pm CST.

    http://www.oprah.com/own-oprahs-next-chapter/Preview-Oprahs-Next-Chapter-with-Paris-Jackson-and-50-Cent-Video

    Like

  21. mjjyo permalink
    May 9, 2012 3:04 pm

    vindicatemj – L.O.V.E., thanks for Your opinion and i’ll be with You.
    We, us Michael’s fan, are United for prince paris and blanket JACKSON to protect from these crooks.
    Yoshimi

    Like

  22. mjjyo permalink
    May 9, 2012 2:41 pm

    I write for the treasures of Michael JACKSON, Prince Paris and Blanket

    Michael, You are The Trseure of The Entire Planet
    Michael,
    Your Eyes
    Your Smile
    Your Pure innocent heart
    Your Generous human nature
    Your Compassion to The life
    Your Courage of A MAN
    Your Sublime L.O.V.E.
    You are Great Wisdom.
    Michael JACKSON,
    The Meaning of Your name is “HUMANEMOTION”
    All of You is cherished..,
    We love You, miss You…

    Yoshimi

    Like

  23. sanemjfan permalink
    February 1, 2012 12:16 am

    Here is a behind the scenes footage of Paris’ photo shoot for her new movie:

    Be sure to read my previous comment with Ivy’s review of the storyline of this movie from Amazon!

    Like

  24. sanemjfan permalink
    January 9, 2012 8:22 pm

    Here’s a photo of actor Taye Diggs, who is black, with his new biracial child, who he conceived with his white wife. http://celebritybabies.people.com/2010/03/23/taye-diggs-on-his-sons-numerous-nicknames/

    As you can see, the baby doesn’t look “biracial”, but WHITE!!! I wonder how many times he’s gonna be told that the child isn’t his because he doesn’t “look” like him!

    Like

  25. sanemjfan permalink
    January 2, 2012 12:33 am

    Here is a review of Lunden’s Bridge by Ivy, one of the admins of an MJ forum:http://www.amazon.com/review/R3U196QCSF5EHM/ref=cm_cr_rdpvoterdr#R3U196QCSF5EHM.2115.Helpful.Reviews

    The biggest misconception about Lundon’s Bridge book is the claim that it’s about pollution and therefore is close to Michael Jackson’s heart. Well don’t get fooled fellow MJ Fans because pollution is only the side story and not the main plot of the book. Actually if you read the author’s 2009 interview you’ll see that the book is about “child kidnapping” and “bringing back belief in the family unit” but as they want to pull the heart strings of MJ fans suddenly the book is portrayed like it’s about pollution.

    What is the plot of the book? A mutant monster created by sea pollution allegedly kills the King of the Sea and the good Queen turns evil and seeks revenge from the humans starting with Lundon’s family with the use of half human – half insect army. Pollution is just a brief mention in the book to explain why the Queen of Sea’s anger is aimed towards humans, the rest is about how evil Queen plans to destroy the humans and how a few humans and sea creatures try to stop the Queen.

    Like mentioned in the previous reviews the book suffers terribly from editing and grammar problems, however I guess it’s not surprising given the fact that the “author” is a small time actor.

    The books storyline contents are seemed to be highly “influenced” by every other children’s classic. For example

    – Animals can talk (well it’s almost like a requirement in children’s literature although not really creative)
    – Lundon’s family is literally the equivalent of Dr. Doolittle ( a scientist father than can speak and helps animals, a daughter that is aware of this and an unsuspecting wife)
    – An Evil Queen with an army (Sea Queen with her half human / half bug-insect soldiers) that doesn’t succeed in her plans
    – A dangerous land that you shouldn’t go into (Decayed Sea)
    – A magical land ( A special swamp)
    – A special tree with powers and a gatekeeper
    – A mother nature / Fairy Godmother (Madam Lifee)
    – Ability to make wishes and a fairy / magician (Paco)
    – A variation of a protector / Prince Charming (Waxer)
    – A royal servant turning to a betrayer

    In short Lundon’s Bridge reads like the author has lifted an element from each of the children’s classics, mixed them all together and came up with this book. So don’t expect a unique storyline or this book/movie to be the next Harry Potter.

    Furthermore in some instances the main character Lundon is highly naïve. Lundon, who happens to be 13, sees five bounded and gagged children in the back of a van and yet walks towards it because she doesn’t comprehend kidnapping. Really, a 13 year old? Although her ability to “believe” is shown as strength in the book, it’s also an apparent weakness because Lundon seems to believe – well to everything!!. Even when the evil Queen tells Lundon her mother didn’t want her anymore, she believes it. It’s not really a special power, if you believe to everything you are told with no questions asked.

    Personally I don’t see this book and movie having an appeal to general public. It’s such a Z-list book that’s only perhaps interesting for elementary school kids. Also this all seems like taking advantage of the name and popularity of Paris and Michael Jackson. To give you an idea: this was supposed to be video that would be shown at elementary school cafeterias, now it’s promoted as a “major motion picture”. Simply they depend on the name of “Paris Jackson” and “Michael Jackson” to attract big time investors to the movie. It’s such a shame.

    I’m glad that she was able to look at it objectively, and see the big picture! Here is someone’s Twitlonger to Ivy about her review: http://www.twitlonger.com/show/f31itg

    I also want to thank you, Ivy, for your honest review. This is very important to know. Paris is clearly being used for her name. This is not a surprise but it is very disheartening…:-(

    Of course it’s known that Paris very much wants to be an actress and she will learn from this project such things as the real time mechanics of movie making. In that regard it can be a good learning experience for her personally/professionally. My biggest fear is that her expectations may have been set too high by those behind the scenes for this first time project, especially as its being called a major motion picture release with a recent high profile interview on Ellen Degeneres. I hope someone behind the scenes is not only providing encouragement but is also gently helping to put this project in the proper perspective for her and preparing her for any unpleasant reviews that may occur in the future.

    That said, Paris is clearly very excited about this project and I wish her the very best with it. I’m confident that she will do her best to rise to the challenge. Lots of love and good wishes for Paris in that regard!

    Again, thank you Ivy, for this valuable, clear eyed view of this sadly exploitive project. Although always supportive of Paris, the fan community will not be fooled by those behind the scenes who don’t have her best interests at heart.

    Like

  26. sanemjfan permalink
    December 17, 2011 9:12 am

    Here is HLN’s analysis of Paris’ interview and the auctioning of MJ’s furniture:

    Like

  27. December 17, 2011 1:09 am

    “Just when you thought the media wouldn’t stoop any lower than to twist Paris’ quote about the masks and veils being “stupid” in order to make MJ look like an unfit parent, they have now sunk to an all-time low! In each of these articles, the media is spinning her quotes about crying in the spot while doing acting improve with MJ and her brothers by saying that this “confirms” that her tears at MJ’s memorial were fake! HOW DISGUSTING! … Welcome to showbiz, Paris!”

    David, thank you for the full video of Paris’s interview – frankly, I enjoyed it though Paris probably said too much by mentioning her “faking tears a lot of times” and using the word “stupid” with regard to those masks.

    I mean too much only for the anti-Michael hostile environment – for normal or neutral public it would have been perfectly okay, as the reaction of the people in the studio showed it.

    But as we see now, it is not WHO SAYS WHAT which matters – and it is WHO INTERPRETS HOW which does.

    Nothing depends on whether it is Michael’s best friend or beloved daughter who is speaking about him – everything depends on who is listening to these people, and since those who are listening are monsters, so what they hear is monstrous too.

    Is Paris to blame for what she said? Absolutely not.

    She simply came from a different world inhabited by normal healthy people and therefore expected everyone to react to her words in a normal and healthy way.

    But the media and the public following its stories are sick, crazy and rotten.

    They understand things the only way they are capable of understanding them. And when people are all rotten inside the only way they can see things with their rotten eyes is sick distortion of the reality.

    You know, I am even glad that she said those things. Paris is above suspicion when it comes to her love for her father, so what we actually see here is a very clean experiment on what these monsters do to people who never meant any harm to Michael by their words.

    I hope it will open some people’s eyes on what the media did to Michael and his words, and the way they invariably turned his very best intentions into their usual dirt. Their usual dirt, not his.

    It will also help to show that now they are doing the same to all those in Michael’s surrounding who have the audacity to say something good about him. And how easily they are turning the truth into lies by blowing one single word out of all proportion.

    Like

  28. December 17, 2011 12:15 am

    “The fact that paris said her father taught her how to act on cue somehow proves that her emotions are not geniune on loosing the father she loves”

    Okunuga, recalling your previous comments I suspect that you probably omitted “not” somewhere inside the sentence. Such mistakes often occur in my posts and to my horror I notice them only much later after the thing is posted.

    However if you are serious in what you (or someone writing as you) are saying, then following your logic all actors and actresses who ever displayed their emotions in real life should be considered liars. This as you understand would be so far-fetched that it does not even need any disproof or discussion.

    By the way Paris will probably make a good actress one day but at the moment she is only learning how to.

    So with due respect for her talent she would not have been able to make so splendid a performance that all the millions people watching had their hearts broken within one single moment upon hearing her words.

    Like

  29. Okunuga permalink
    December 16, 2011 11:55 pm

    Maybe i did not express myself better,what i was referring to is the comment david made on dec 15th about the media spinning her quote about crying on the spot while doing acting improv with her dad and brothers somehow implying that her tears at mj’s memorial were fake as if she should not show any emotions at all for loossing her father.sorry for the misunderstanding.

    Like

  30. lynande51 permalink
    December 16, 2011 8:15 pm

    Okunuga has a confirmed proxy IP address. We have to remember that unfortunately in an email earlier this year someone got all of our personal email information. It was just a matter of time before the started using names from that list and past names of visitors and commentors on our blog.

    Like

  31. sanemjfan permalink
    December 16, 2011 6:09 pm

    @Okunuga

    The fact that paris said her father taught her how to act on cue somehow proves that her emotions are not geniune on loosing the father she loves just goes to show how stupid and vindictive some people are.

    What are you saying? Do you really think that Paris’ tears at MJ’s memorial were fake and staged? Just because she knows how to cry on the spot while acting doesn’t meant that her real tears aren’t authentic! Anyone who has doubts about how Paris felt about losing her dad should pay attention to what Katherine told Oprah last year:

    OPRAH WINFREY (HOST): When you got to the hospital, who told you?

    KATHERINE JACKSON: They made the doctor tell me. We stayed there a long time before he
    came in to tell us. Really, I guess, he didn’t want to either, but the doctor had to tell us. Dr.
    Murray.

    OPRAH WINFREY (HOST): Dr. Murray told you.

    KATHERINE JACKSON: Mm-hmm. And he came out, and he was talking. It took him so long,
    and I say, “Well, what happened?” He kept saying–and I said, “Well, how is he? How is he? Did
    he make it? Or how is he?” And he said, “No. He’s gone.” That’s all I remember.

    OPRAH WINFREY (HOST): Mm-hmm.

    KATHERINE JACKSON: I’m sorry.

    OPRAH WINFREY (HOST): No, I’m sorry. I’m sorry. I’m sorry.

    KATHERINE JACKSON: It’s all right.

    OPRAH WINFREY (HOST): Who was with you at the time?

    KATHERINE JACKSON: My nephew.

    OPRAH WINFREY (HOST): Your nephew.

    KATHERINE JACKSON: That’s who was with me. The children were there, his children, but
    they were in another room. I didn’t know they were there. And they brought the children in, and
    that was the worst.

    OPRAH WINFREY (HOST): His children.

    KATHERINE JACKSON: His children.

    OPRAH WINFREY (HOST): Prince and Paris.

    KATHERINE JACKSON: Prince, Paris, and the baby, and they were crying. And Paris was–I
    didn’t think–I thought she was going to pass out. She was just saying, “Daddy, I can’t make it
    without you. I want to be with you. I want to go with you.” And, you know, I felt so bad for
    them.

    I think it is cold, cruel, and callous that anyone would doubt Paris’ tears and emotions!

    Like

  32. Okunuga permalink
    December 16, 2011 9:52 am

    The fact that paris said her father taught her how to act on cue somehow proves that her emotions are not geniune on loosing the father she loves just goes to show how stupid and vindictive some people are.

    Like

  33. sanemjfan permalink
    December 16, 2011 3:49 am

    Here is Paris’ interview with Ellen!

    Like

  34. sanemjfan permalink
    December 16, 2011 12:20 am

    Here is Janet’s interview with ABC! This is an excerpt where she discusses Paris’ future in Hollywood: http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/janet-jackson-paris-joining-family-business-life-long/story?id=15162008#.TupOF7yF9CD

    In her first interview since Michael Jackson’s physician, Dr. Conrad Murray, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s 2009 death, Janet Jackson talked about her feelings on Michael’s daughter, 13-year-old Paris Jackson, signing on to do her first movie.

    “I’m happy for her,” Jackson said with a knowing sigh. “I told her, I said, ‘you should really take your time to enjoy your youth to the upmost, to the fullest, and enjoy that.’ She wants to really give it a go. I mean, you lose so much of your childhood in this industry.

    Being a child star is something Aunt Janet is all too familiar with. While her decades-long music and acting career has brought her international fame, Jackson said the experience left her emotionally scarred for life. Even with abs of steel, Jackson said she has felt insecure about her body for years. Her newly released paperback, “True You: A Journey to Finding and Loving Yourself,” shares her lifelong battle for self-acceptance.

    Like

  35. December 15, 2011 11:40 pm

    “It’s obvious MJ has no biological children. I dont understand why MJ lied about it to begin with.”

    RedSpoon, it is NOT obvious that Michael had no biological children. The obvious fact is that Prince ALSO has vitiligo and since this disease is relatively rare, the chances of him “accidentally” having it are close to a nil. So I don’t understand why you are making so blatant a statement about Michael’s “lies”. Facts please.

    “If he was a foster parent he should have just said so because it’s no big deal. Eventually people are going to know the truth so why lie to begin with.”

    Michael had no need to lie about being a foster parent, because he wasn’t. However if he had been I would not argue with that either, but demand that everyone who comes up with this idea should immediately admit that Michael COULD be trusted with children of both sexes and of all ages, and the public hate he had to endure for so many years was totally unsubstantiated.

    Like

  36. December 15, 2011 10:07 pm

    “they want to disrupt and destroy the blog that is the biggest threat to them. I know it is hard but just ignore them and talk around them”

    Yes, Lynette and David, they want to disrupt and destroy the blog, and the surest way to do it is divide us. The usual tactics is being used – the blog is presented as having “good” and “bad” guys. Usually the bad guy is me, but since I was absent Lynette was unfortunately nominated for the role and attacked in a most vicious manner for something she never said.

    Then David as usual came in as a peacemaker (which he really is) and here we are with the final statement from the commentator saying to him: “I apologise for putting you into that group from your post, because now I see that you’re not like that and honestly, you just want the truth to get out there.”

    What truth? That Michael was heterosexual which David said he was?
    And David is not like whom? Like Lynette who was always steadfast in defending the right of gay people to be gay and argued with me over that?
    And what group of us was David originally put into and is not part of now?

    See my point about the desire to divide us?

    @youngearlgrey, I was the one who wrote the series of posts about the so-called “porn” and though I do not remember saying anything about gay people there all questions should be addressed to me, please.

    Like

  37. lynande51 permalink
    December 15, 2011 8:49 pm

    The real trick here is to ignore these statements of opinion that people like Redspoon make here on the blog. It is a very old and and overused tactic used by the same group of haters. The last 2 days have shown us that they are neither original or clever. They post a comment on an old post. They distract and redirect the discussion by making a statement that says that they are a fan. Then somewhere in there comes the dig. No surprises there but the truth is they don’t want to talk bad about Michael per say they want to disrupt and destroy the blog that is the biggest threat to them. I know it is hard but just ignore them and talk around them.Act like they aren’t there.
    What upset them recently? Well for one they want to distract the readers from David’s piece on vitiligo. It was well researched and proved that it was not the mysterious disease that only Michael had, others have had it too and had to do the same thing he did to look presentable to the public. What they don’t like is that someone pointed out that there was no choice for Michael because these entertainers had to go through the same thing and make the same decsion that Michael did.
    The thing that I find most disturbing is that these are adults that find time to make comments that they somehow have deemed are appropriate when talking about other peoples children. Now what is wrong with people like Redspoon and the others here in the last couple of days? It seems to me that it would be them that don’t care about children. There is no story there. The children were Michael’s children biologically. How do I know that? He said so.

    Like

  38. Julie permalink
    December 15, 2011 7:24 pm

    Redspoon – Obviously you are saying that Michael was not the biological father of these children. How on earth if that were even true, does that make him a “foster parent to them?” Was he not there at their births and all the way through with them until he died? According to your comment, If that’s the case then any parent who as adopted a child or any man who marries a woman who is pregnant by someone else does not have the right to be called that child’s father. Does that make that man or any parent of adopted children not the father? I will never understand the mentality of people with this opinion that feel the need to comment as if Michael had no right to raise these children and call them his own. Unbelievable!

    Like

  39. sanemjfan permalink
    December 15, 2011 6:02 pm

    Raven Woods just posted a fabulous article that debunks the media myth that Prince, Paris, and Blanket wore masks 24/7!

    http://www.allforloveblog.com/?p=5483

    Like

  40. rockforeveron permalink
    December 15, 2011 5:37 pm

    @Redspoon

    Paris has said she is biracial and that Prince has vitiligo. Are his children now also liars? Michael never fostered or adopted anyone.

    Like

  41. Suzy permalink
    December 15, 2011 3:09 pm

    @ RedSpoon

    Michael Jackson didn’t owe the public to tell them every detail of his private life. I can’t understand why people have this sense of entitlement to know every detail of his privacy. It disgusts me.

    Like

  42. RedSpoon permalink
    December 15, 2011 12:58 pm

    It’s obvious MJ has no biological children. I dont understand why MJ lied about it to begin with. If he was a foster parent he should have just so because it’s no big deal. Eventually people are going to know the truth so why lie to begin with.

    Like

  43. lynande51 permalink
    December 15, 2011 6:52 am

    Yes she is really getting a taste of it now. I feel for her because how many people are going to pick up on that and use it from now through eternity.

    Like

  44. sanemjfan permalink
    December 15, 2011 5:58 am

    Just when you thought the media wouldn’t stoop any lower than to twist Paris’ quote about the masks and veils being “stupid” in order to make MJ look like an unfit parent, they have now sunk to an all-time low!

    In each of these articles, the media is spinning her quotes about crying in the spot while doing acting improv with MJ and her brothers by saying that this “confirms” that her tears at MJ’s memorial were fake! HOW DISGUSTING!

    Geraldo talked about the sleazy journalists who openly speculated that Paris’ tears were rehearsed during their coverage of the memorial while on the Bill O’Reilly show, beginning at 0:50:

    Here are the two articles:

    http://sandrarose.com/2011/12/jackos-daughter-paris-jackson-says-wearing-masks-was-stupid/
    During the interview, Paris all but confirmed our suspicions that she was fake crying during her father’s emotional star-studded funeral in 2009.
    As it turns out, Paris has been practicing crying on cue since she was a toddler.

    Paris told Ellen that she caught the acting bug after watching Jackson act in the Disney full length music video Moonwalker as a kid. “We did improvs together, and I would cry on the spot,” she said. “You could cry on the spot? That’s impressive!” remarked Ellen, who added “Then he didn’t know if you were really crying or if you were acting.” To which Paris replied: “Apparently I was faking it a lot of times.

    http://networkedblogs.com/ry926
    Michael Jackson’s daughter, Paris Jackson, 13, was a guest on ‘Ellen‘ where she promoted her first acting role and the book that the movie is based on. Paris was a substitute for troubled actress Lindsay Lohan who blew off her scheduled appearance on Ellen today.

    During the interview, Paris all but confirmed that she was fake crying during her father’s emotional star-studded funeral in 2009.

    As it turns out, Paris has been practicing crying on cue since she was a toddler.

    Paris told Ellen that she caught the acting bug after watching Jackson act in the Disney full length music video Moonwalker as a kid. “We did improvs together, and I would cry on the spot,” she said. “You could cry on the spot? That’s impressive!” remarked Ellen, who added “Then he didn’t know if you were really crying or if you were acting.” To which Paris replied: “Apparently I was faking it a lot of times.“

    Welcome to showbiz, Paris!

    Like

  45. sanemjfan permalink
    December 14, 2011 8:25 pm

    Hey guys, I could see this coming from a mile away! The tabloid media has ALREADY starting distorting Paris’ interview with Ellen to trash MJ and make him look like an unfit parent!

    In her interview with Ellen, Paris said that she originally thought that having to wear masks was “stupid”, but as she got older she realized it was for her protection. But look at how the Daily Mail tried to spin it with the misleading headline ‘The masks were stupid,’ admits Paris as she discusses father Michael Jackson’s attempts to protect his children on Ellen!

    I guess this is only a sneak preview of what we can expect the media to do to her in the future, now that she’s officially a public figure!

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2074026/Paris-admits-father-Michael-Jacksons-attempts-hide-childrens-faces-masks-stupid.html

    Like

  46. sanemjfan permalink
    December 14, 2011 8:49 am

    Here is a preview of Paris Jackson on the Ellen show! The interview airs on Thursday!

    Like

  47. Teva permalink
    December 14, 2011 4:07 am

    @SaneMjFan

    I just read a tweet and followed link where Janet Jackson talks about preferring Paris to finish high school and stay out of the entertainment business until she is eighteen. I think her aunt has some experience in this area, and knows what she is talking about.

    http://rnbphilly.com/audio/tjoyner/kevin-frazier-talks-to-janet-jackson-about-personal-life-audio/

    Like

  48. sanemjfan permalink
    December 14, 2011 12:54 am

    Guys, Paris will be on the Ellen show tomorrow!

    http://www.legendarymichaeljackson.nl/?p=7076

    http://ellen.warnerbros.com/promos/

    I’ll be sure to post the video and transcript as soon as it’s available!

    Like

  49. Heather Plonski permalink
    December 13, 2011 11:47 pm

    Good afternoon! Now that I discovered this website, I am reading your other blogs. I was compelled to read the above article. However, I felt it important to pause in order to direct you and others to Youtube. The first video that you may find interesting is “Michael Jackson’s Biological Children”. This video (and others) show comparisons between his children and Michael. One shows comparisons between Prince, Paris and Debbie Rowe. Another shows comparisons between each child and Michael, as well as other Jackson family members, i.e.
    While it is very true that it honestly does not matter whether they are biologically Michael’s children or not, it is imperative that we know the truth, as you well know. This is why fans such as yourself intelligently present the facts based on actual evidence. While I realize that this is not empirical or scientific evidence, it laid to rest my own doubts.
    I suspect that neither of us is a Geneticist. But some of the comments on these videos from fans with biracial children convinced me further. Perhaps research with commentary from a Geneticist would further substantiate these findings. Once again I must reiterate my gratitude for your well researched, comprehensive and informative articles.

    Like

  50. Teva permalink
    December 13, 2011 5:20 am

    I have no idea the validity of this article, but it says some family members are upset over Paris’ association with the new film, and concerns with her being exploited.

    http://www.suntimes.com/9383345-417/michael-jacksons-siblings-want-daughters-name-off-iffy-film-project.html

    I hope this is not the case. The kid’s first acting experience should be pleasantly memorable.

    Like

  51. sanemjfan permalink
    December 11, 2011 9:26 pm

    Here is a new post from Roger Friedman about Paris Jackson’s new movie. Unlike most fans, he’s actually asking the tough questions that need to be asked, and he raises some valid points that were overlooked by overzealous fans who are too “excited” about the possibility of Paris becoming an actress. He makes the case that Paris is being exploited as a “fundraising tool” to get gullible MJ fans to donate to this movie project.
    http://www.showbiz411.com/2011/12/10/michael-jacksons-daughter-paris-already-being-exploited-by-hollywood

    Paris Jackson–if she wanted to be in the movies, you’d think her grandmother would take her to Steven Spielberg or someone reputable or high class in Hollywood. Instead, Paris, who’s 13, is now being exploited for a movie that has no funding, a producer with no production credits, and a cast that includes such sterling movie actors as Larry King, his wife Shawn, and Joey Fatone of NSync. The website for “Lundon’s Bridge” has already been set up with Paris’s picture prominently featured.

    And there’s a FUNDRAISING button on the website–the guy, Stephen Sobisky, doesn’t actually have the money to make his three part fantasy adventure. He’s using Paris as bait. And Katherine Jackson, the ill equipped grandma, has no clue. But let’s get this straight. Sobisky is a visual effects supervisor for B movies. He has not produced or directed one major motion picture. As we’ve learned from the recent “Gotti” mess, the rest of this is hogwash.

    Where are the Jackson kids’ lawyer? Where is a guardian? Sobisky will now fish around the world using Paris Jackson to try and raise money. And the little girl probably thinks this is going to happen, and be a big deal. Oy vey.
    And please! “Fifty percent will be donated to schools”–really, what schools? What are they talking about? Fifty percent of what? It’s a shonda, as you say in Yiddish.

    PS The book this is all based on, “Lundon’s Bridge.” is such a classic it’s self published by a journeyman Hollywood bit player named Dennis Christen. It’s currently ranked around number 86,000 on amazon.com with three reviews.

    Janet Jackson, call your agents!

    Like

  52. December 11, 2011 4:18 am

    “Glad you were also able to detail why you believe they are MJ’s biological children. It does get so frustrating when fans don’t believe it – mostly due to ignorance about African Americans – and think they are doing a service by saying it doesn’t matter because he was a great father.”

    Tracy, I think you shouldn’t regard it as people doing a service to someone by saying it. They are not doing a service – they are using the words of Michael’s detractors for vindicating Michael!

    I for one take every opportunity to show how biased, illogical, unreasonable these people are. On the one hand they make snide remarks that the children are “definitely not his”, though admit that he was a great father, and five minutes later they start singing the old tune about him being “this and that” (I don’t even want to repeat what).

    Each time they say it I want to exclaim, “No, my dear ones, you cannot get away with both of it!”

    If these children were not his, it means that Michael could be trusted with any children – his or not his, boys and girls, small, big or whatever. He raised three children from infants and raised them perfectly into absolutely healthy, balanced and beautiful kids for whom he was the best of fathers in the world.

    So if now you are saying they were not his, you should immediately admit you were wrong in all your hate for him before!

    And though I understand that the words of those who don’t believe Michael’s parentage hurt the feelings of many Michael’s supporters, I nevertheless strongly recommend them not to involve themselves in tiresome discussions over this issue – but take this opportunity to immediately thrust in the faces of Michael’s detractors that they themselves are proving that he was not what they suspected him of.

    Use it for vindicating Michael instead of fighting them over it.

    And in the end tell them that it is none of their business to get into other people’s private life. And that it is totally immoral to take away from three orphaned children the only beloved father they had.

    Immoral, criminal and abusive.

    Like

  53. Tracy permalink
    December 8, 2011 4:50 am

    Vindicatmj – no hard feelings. It’s hard to reply directly on here and I think that was my first post. Glad you were also able to detail why you believe they are MJ’s biological children.

    It does get so frustrating when fans don’t believe it – mostly due to ignorance about African Americans – and think they are doing a service by saying it doesn’t matter because he was a great father. It does matter however because the man said he was their biological father, Debbie has said so, numerous family members and now Paris herself. There is no scientific reason those cannot be MJ’s biological children, so there is something deeper at work in people who persist in denying it. Even in the case of Paris’ eye color, the scientific requirements are met – she must get the gene from both parents. Her eyes are the exact same color as Joe’s and her mom also carries the gene, so there is nothing really remarkable or unscientific about it. The boys both have dark brown eyes and in fact despite all the crazy rumors, MJ never had even one blonde-haired, blue-eyed kid, let alone 3.

    As an African American myself, I am aware that we are a mixed race people – black, white and Native American. The same kind of mixtures that were revealed in studying Joe and Katherine’s ancestors would be revealed in studying most any random African American – especially those from the South like the Jacksons. People often bring up President Obama as an example of what a mixed race person should look like. His farther was 100% African and his mother was European American with most likely some black and Native American blood on her side because that is consistent with the history of our country. So in fact, despite being the product of a black and white parent, Obama’s mixture is probably consistent with many an AA that would be considered just plain black. In fact Obama’s teen pics are phenotypically consistent with MJ’s teen pics. Nick Cannon is phenotypically consistent with teen MJ and his kids with Mariah Carey look white. And to clarify MJ was never as dark as people want to make out – milk chocolate. He was never anywhere near the complexion of say Chris Rock or Akon. A lot of the so called “dark” childhood pics are due to lighting – which also explains why people were so shocked to realize Joe had those blue/green eyes all this time – because the exposure of the pics was too dark to show them.

    Like

  54. Teva permalink
    December 7, 2011 3:01 am

    I still think Michael would not have approved of her starting in Hollywood at so tender an age, but her situation is not the same as his. Paris had 11 good years of obscurity, and she seems to love the attention and limelight (nothing wrong with that). Paris unlike Michael goes to school, she has friends outside of her siblings, she is not physically abused by a parent to perform, her career is not interfering with her education (like falling asleep in class), she plays football, she went after this – it was not forced on her. With Hollywood two things could happen -she’ll either end up like Beyonce, or Lindsay Lohan.

    Like

  55. December 6, 2011 5:36 pm

    “oh and for the record i love Katherine Jackson. i dont agree with every thing shes done or every decision shes made ( i feel the same to just about everyone i know and love- we are all only human after all!) but over all i admire her and i think her hearts in the right place – just thought id add that in case my previous comment was misjudged”

    Rachel, I hope your comment will not be misguided by anyone here. I feel exactly the same way you do.

    Like

  56. December 6, 2011 4:55 pm

    ** oh and for the record i love Katherine Jackson. i dont agree with every thing shes done or every decision shes made ( i feel the same to just about everyone i know and love- we are all only human after all!) but over all i admire her and i think her hearts in the right place 🙂 – just thought id add that in case my previous comment was misjudged 🙂 x x

    Like

  57. December 6, 2011 4:49 pm

    guys could we please set our opinions about Katherine Jackson aside for one moment?! whether or not Katherine is doing the right thing in allowing the kids to start on the showbiz game is irrelevent here because it is BEYOND OUR CONTROL.the bottom line is MICHAEL WANTED THE KIDS TO GO TO KATHERINE, he knew Katherine all his 50 years so im sure he woulda known she’d be more relaxed about letting them appear in public and go into showbiz. he left them with her so regardless of whatever the outcome is, thats the way it is and theres NOTHING we can do about it,and whinging about her is as pointless and counter productive as trying to tell Paris not to embark on any further public appearences. (you REALLY think she gona listen to some complete stranger on twitter over her own granny?!) the only thing we can do is leave these kids alone if we see them on the street etc and defend them if we ever see them being abused online.
    lots of love to all of you.
    great blog-thanks for posting 🙂 xxx

    Like

  58. December 6, 2011 4:03 pm

    MUZIKfactory2, what do you suggest?

    Like

  59. jm51 permalink
    December 6, 2011 7:12 am

    @musikfactory2 – I don’t think you realize the damage you are doing with your hate.

    Like

  60. December 6, 2011 6:59 am

    @lynande51 I am NOT blocked by Paris.

    Like

  61. December 6, 2011 6:53 am

    @Jm52 I genuinely appreciate your point of view—though I respectfully disagree. I also believe in power of prayer but in conjunction with action. With all due respect, you are not Michael Jackson and your children aren’t Michael’s children. Raising every teen is difficult but Michael’s children require extra diligence. Michael was subjected to scrutiny his whole life. It is foolish to expose minors who just lost their only parent to wild, age-inappropriate stories about their father.

    – “I also know that, according to Katherine, Paris asked her where they were going to go after their father died. Can you imagine that?” You said it yourself “according to Katherine”. We don’t know that it is actually what Paris said. But let’s assume that this is true. So what? For me, the wellbeing of the children comes before what the children may or may not want to do. Michael didn’t trust people so the children weren’t surrounded by Family and friends. As a Family, only Kate saw the children, noone else from the Family. So it is normal if Paris stated that she wanted to go with her grandma.

    – “Who was Michael closest to that would take that job on?” NOONE. Just his children. Anyone who claims otherwise don’t know the real story or trying to rewrite his story.

    – I can honestly say that Diana Ross would make a better guardian than Katherine.

    – Michael loving his mother has NOTHING to do with Katherine’s qualifications as a mother or as a guardian. Michael himself said that he needed mother figures in his life because “we have to take care of Kate, who is there to take care of us?” Michael’s love for his mother shouldn’t be confused with Katherine being a fit guardian. What is paramount is that the children are raised in accordance with Michael’s wishes.

    – “Should they be stuck away somewhere in a convent raised by nuns?” No. I would like them to be raised in accordance with MJ’s wishes. Even with the masks, they weren’t living sheltered lives. Michael took them to museums, plays, movies, theme parks etc. It is a wild leap from “they shouldn’t be stuck in a convent raised by nuns” to “they should be on twitter at 3ams” It doesn’t have to be either extreme case. There should be a balance. And when they feel good and ready to step into limelight, it should be THEIR decision. Their so-called guardian has been sweetening business deals whilst binding the children into business contracts. We are not merely talking about the privacy of the children, we are talking blatant CHILD EXPLOITATION!

    – Yeah Conrad Murray ended Michael’s life but make no mistake, other factors including betrayals by his so-called Family members killed MJ’s spirit way before June 25, 2009. As I mentioned before, Katherine saw how Michael was dying in front of her. She did nothing. Leonard Rowe—Family Friend—wrote a book with a chapter about People that could have saved Michael but didn’t bother to. Do you know who is Number 1? KATHERINE. If she acted like a fit mom, Michael’s children would have their fathers alive. She was negligent when her own children were growing up, she was negligent when her son was slowly dying, she is negligent now.

    – The picture you mention with MJ kids without a mask. The children WERE masked that day. After leaving the recording studio, they didn’t realize there was a paparazzi taking pictures. As soon as Michael noticed the paparazzi, the children put on the masks. I don’t have any problem with the unveiling of masks. I have a problem with the lack of discipline, guidance and child exploitation.

    – I am not someone who cares who says what people say about me on twitter or their relationship to the “family”. I know my intentions, I know how strongly I feel about it. Nothing else matters but Michael wishes being honored vis-à-vis his children and the wellbeing of his children.

    – “I guess what’s going to be real hard is if Katherine passes away while those children are still under age. Who will step in then?” Hopefully someone who can undo the damage she already caused.

    “we have to take care of Kate, who is there to take care of us?” ~MJ

    Like

  62. lynande51 permalink
    December 6, 2011 6:33 am

    @Musikfactory2 I saw the tweets that you sent Paris before she blocked you. I saw you call her a spoiled brat bascially to her face and on here as well. If I were her parent or guardian I would have said it was you that were not acting in the best interest of the children.It is you that is angry and hurtful toward that child. It is one thing for a 13 year old girl to behave like other 13 year old girls do,it is something quite differnt for an adult to harrass a child. Would Michael have approved of your harrassing behavior toward his daughter?
    Michael did not leave you the guardian of his children. If he had ever wanted anyone else, perhaps yourself, as you seem to know so much better than him or his Mother, how to raise his children, he would have named you as guardian of his children.
    You have several things wrong in your statement. One is that Katherine still lives at Havenhurst where her other Granchildren and their Mother live. She and the MJ3 as you like to call them rather than their proper names, live in a house in Calabasas close to the school that they go to. So why don’t you know that because you seem to have made it your business to know everything about the situation?
    Next Paris and Prince are friends with Will Smith’s children Jaden and Willow. Both of his children are actors as well. Could it be that friendship is what inspired a young girl that wanted to act to take a step into the waters. It is a little film about the environment what will work for you. If you listen to Michael in at least 2 interviews Michael is asked “what if your children want to get into the business”? His reply is that he would tell them the pros and cons of the life but if that is what they want then “go! do it! be better than me”. That is not someone that was adverse to the possibility of his children going into show business. He encouraged Prince in his desires to produce movies just as he would have encouraged his daughter if she wanted to act. She said that they used to do improv together what do you think that was if not encouragement.

    Like

  63. jm51 permalink
    December 6, 2011 5:33 am

    @musikfactory – let me just begin by saying that emotion cannot be conveyed properly via email or blogging, etc., so please understand my intention in responding to you is not to create anything hostile; however, your words do frighten me because to me they are going beyond trying to set the record straight to the world about Michael Jackson as a man, which I feel like is the purpose of this site.
    First of all, yes I am a Christian so prayer is extremely important to me, secondly I am a mother of 4 grown children so I know what a parent faces in this day and age trying to raise children around all of this technology and other things that didn’t exist when we were growing up. I absolutely believe in God and in prayer, but if you don’t – I can respect that as your choice.
    I also am a mother who lost an adult child about a year before Michael Jackson died that sadly left behind a 6 year old son. I would have taken my grandchild in a heartbeat, but he has a father that loves him. So I can also feel extreme empathy for Katherine Jackson at having lost her child and I also know that, according to Katherine, Paris asked her where they were going to go after their father died. Can you imagine that? Can you imagine losing the only person in your life that raised you? Who was the adult that would have been a constant in Michael’s life that the kids would want to live with? Who was Michael closest to that would take that job on? Katherine being their grandmother wanted to do that because she loved them and she loved Michael. Who do you honestly think would be better for them? He named Diana Ross as a backup. She’s in her late 60’s and from what I understand had no prior relationship with his children at all so would that have been better for the kids had she stepped up and challenged Katherine when they didn’t even know her? He was a one man show in that regard, but he dearly loved his mother from everything that I have ever heard or read about him from people that did know him. You seem to be extremely driven and passionate about your feelings and I am right there with you when it comes to people making fun of him or calling him names, etc. It angers me to even hear the snide jokes about him. But I do have to ask you, what do you see as being a better outcome for those children? Should they be stuck away somewhere in a convent raised by nuns? Because of Conrad Murray, those children lost the only parent they had ever known. When I saw that little one at the memorial clutching his Michael Jackson doll with the tear streaming down his face – it broke my heart.
    Ok, so Katherine allowed them to take off the veils and Katherine has allowed them to be in school and do things that other teenagers are doing. There are pictures of Michael with the children the last year of his life without veils on. He also said in his 2005 interview with Geraldo that he was going to let them go on stage with him and present them to the world because they were bugging him to let them go on stage with him. Yes, he protected them because my gosh, look at how mean spirited people are when they comment about them on every single site and now to them personally on twitter. People telling them they aren’t really his kids or the sick and twisted individual who was sending them the autopsy photos. I seriously cannot believe how low people can sink.
    You say you don’t know how to dialogue properly with her – well how could you? She does not know you personally so to her, you are just another person attacking her on twitter trying to tell her what her dad (whom she knows you also didn’t know personally) would want her to do. You feel that you can somehow get her to see your reasoning by talking to her and sadly you can’t. None of us can. We are just people who loved her dad from a distance who want all the lies and misconceptions to stop. All it is going to accomplish is alienating her.
    The only reason I saw your tweet to her was because I follow someone who knew Michael and the Jacksons that retweeted a comment made about you as a result of your tweets with Paris by another person. That individual was comparing you to Conrad Murray because of how you were talking to Paris, which shocked me first of all and secondly it totally unjustified. I most certainly would never in a million years put your actions anywhere on the same planet as Conrad Murray’s, but that is how your actions were perceived by this other person and I can only guess the person I follow must feel the same way to retweet it. I think we have to be very careful in what battles we pick on Michael’s behalf and not pick ones with his children or his family. I know that in these past 2 years I have done so much research and read so many things about Michael that I never even knew and sadly it took his death for me to find it out. As such, it does give me a false sense that I knew him when in reality I didn’t and probably never would have met him in my lifetime if he were still living.
    I think we have to accept the fact that their reality is what it is now. Paris wants to act, Prince wants to direct or do things in film and they are being allowed to explore those desires.
    Once again, this reply is truly not meant to invoke any hostility – I’m just trying to dialogue with you as you were with Paris. I guess what’s going to be real hard is if Katherine passes away while those children are still under age. Who will step in then?

    Like

  64. Carm permalink
    December 6, 2011 5:33 am

    jm51–I agree with you completely. It really isn’t any of our business how Michael’s children are raised and it’s beyond our control. What will be will be, let’s avoid being judgmental.
    When fans are critical of Michael’s own mother they have gone too far. When Katherine lost her son her world caved in. As a mother and a guardian she is allowed to be less than perfect and to make mistakes. What you regard as exploitation may not be seen that way by her. Let’s direct our attacks towards those who truly deserve it such as Dimond, Murray, Bshir, etc.
    MUSIKfactory2, you say you saw a documentary where Katherine criticizes his parenting skills. I remember seeing an interview she affectionately made a light-hearted comment about how he let the kids get away with stuff. Is that it?

    Like

  65. December 6, 2011 2:03 am

    @Jm51 You shouldn’t start your comment with a disclaimer “I am sorry but”. Don’t be sorry in stating how you feel. I never am. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to address couple of clichés:

    1- “We are not the parents” You are right. We are not. They have NO parent. Father is dead, mom stated herself that she doesn’t want the children to call her mom bc she bore them “as a gift.” The guardian is 84 year old. It difficult to raise a teen in a household with 2 young parents. Imagine an 84 year old “raising” not just 3 teens but Randy & Jermaine’s children also. Due to various reasons (generation gap between Kate and MJ3, her old age, difficulty raising teens, proclivity to exploit MJ3 as the family’s NEW cashcow etc) sadly and frankly, Katherine’s guardianship doesn’t honor MJ’s spoken wishes for his children.

    2- “He left those children in his mother’s care”. If you aren’t sure about “what he would truly do if he were still on this earth” then how do you know that he left his children to his mother? Katherine herself initially contested the veracity of the Will until the executers bought her off. But, for argument’s sake, let’s assume that Michael did leave his children to Katherine. When Michael was alive, is this how Katherine acted? Do you think Michael imagined in his wildest dreams that his own mother would exploit his children? I don’t care if God himself appointed Katherine as the guardian. I will speak up as along as she parades those in children in front of media like show ponies and does same mistakes with MJ3 as she did with her own children. I do not want those children go thru what MJ went thru.

    3- “how can she or the other two be protected from the very many jerks there are in this world?” SIMPLE. Privacy. Guidance. Counseling. Love. Attention. Support.

    4- “pray for those children that all will be ok for them “ Simply praying doesn’t accomplish anything. Not just in this matter but any matter in life. The only way to resolve issues is by having the difficult dialogs. & I highly doubt that those who propose to solve such complex issues are really on their knees praying day and night! I don’t have children. I do NOT know how to delicately talk to Paris and tell her just the right words. I really WISH I do. All I know is for 3 years now, we keep turning a blind eye. It is not just one time, two times, three times. Incidents that dishonor Michael’s wishes for his children are too many to count. Don’t preach me about the way I handled it. I tried my best. I said I love you. I said I support you. Sure I said she is acting like a spoiled brat. It is what it is. A constructive conversation doesn’t mean I tell her what she wants to hear. If u know a more efficient way to talk to Paris then YOU do it. You didn’t even try having such difficult conversation with Paris and here you are critiquing MY method. If u think, that was an easy conversation for me, think again.

    5- I have criticized Karen Faye for not doing enough when Michael melted in front of her. Katherine was very much aware of her son’s declining health. Instead of extending him a lifeline, she badgered him into doing a Family show that he had said he didn’t wanna do. They said nothing and they did nothing and look what that got us into. I’d rather advocate that Michael’s wishes are honored in raising his children than avoiding a difficult dialog. HIS, not his mother’s. Katherine criticized Michael’s parenting skills in a documentary. I take offense to that–as if she was an exemplary mother.

    6- “I think Michael knew well what his children would be facing as they got older” I doubt that he imagined that he would die when his children are so young. I doubt that he saw it coming that it wouldn’t be the media or the public that would violate his children’s problems but his own mom and Family. Those masks weren’t a fashion statement. If I was in Michael’s circumstance and my own mom raised my minor children with complete disregard to my wishes, I would want someone—anyone—to stand up and do all they can to protect the privacy and wellbeing of my children. If you don’t feel the same way as I do, OK, YOU pray, YOU tie your arms and watch but I will not.

    It’s not about being politically correct.
    It’s about caring enough to take a stand when others won’t.

    It’s not about people pleasing.
    It’s about saying what needs to be said even if it creates friction.

    Like

  66. December 5, 2011 8:18 pm

    “Vitiligo. Like father, like son?”

    Of course, Maria. Prince also has vitiligo which is another proof that he is Michael’s son: http://michaeljacksongallery.com/what-do-you-think-about-michael-and-prince-jackson-having-vitiligo.html

    However I find it totally disgusting that we have to prove anything in this respect. The public and media should stop stick their nose into things which are none of their business.

    Like

  67. Maria permalink
    December 5, 2011 6:35 pm

    vindicatemj
    4. vitiligo
    Like father, like son?.

    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Wellness/michael-jacksons-son-suffer-loss-pigment/story?id=11064783

    Like

  68. December 5, 2011 3:17 pm

    “Actually fans like you who also don’t believe he is the biological father are what gives ammunition to this foolishness.”

    I’ve just found that this Tracy’s comment was to a different post and was most probably addressed not to me.
    I jumped to a conclusion and could have been mistaken (Tracy, sorry!).

    Okay, but this at least enabled me to state my views on Michael’s parentage and all the insanity around it circulating in the press.

    I AM SURE THAT MICHAEL’S CHILDREN ARE HIS and do not doubt it for a second. Reasons for that:

    firstly, during these 2 and a half years of constant checking and rechecking various facts about Michael I have learned to trust him without any reservation. If he says so, then this is what the whole truth is. Yes, I have reached a stage when I believe him more than I believe myself.

    secondly, Michael was deceived so many times and on so continuous a basis that he most probably checked up the DNA of his children to make sure that his wife did not swindle him like numerous other people did. No offence meant to Debbie Rowe, but this was the reality Michael was living in.

    thirdly, even in case someone thinks that Michael’s children were not his and want to hurt Michael this way, their idea is totally ridiculous. All it can do is hurt the children but cannot tarnish Michael’s image in any way. If he was a foster parent than it is a double, triple, etc. proof that he could be trusted with ANY child and was NOT a child mol–ter.

    So whenever someone mocks at Michael over his parentage rights, this person automatically proves by his own words that all the allegations against Michael were slander.

    And finally, all this talk about Michael’s parentage is simply NONE OF OUR BUSINESS. He had the right to have his own children or to adopt them. When the media or public spill all this venom at Michael in connection with Klein or whoever, all they show is how insane, slimy and dirty they are.

    And surprise-surprise, the story about Klein has very little to do with it. It was intentionally exaggerated beyond any limit.

    Klein himself said that all this talk was sheer insanity. He doesn’t KNOW and he says it himself that he doesn’t know. All he knows is that there was a point in time when he gave his sperm to a sperm bank. This is all he said. However even after that all media is writing about it as if it were fact.

    When asked directly by all those dirty journalists Klein says that as far as he knows he is not a father. When you give sperm to a bank anyone may turn out to be your child, and if he hopes that his sperm was used we cannot help it. Many men cherish a hope that they have children on a side when they become older and understand that they have no one to leave and feel they lived their lives in vain.

    If I ever have a chance to talk to Klein I will say that he should look elsewhere for his children as MJ could have used a more attractive donor than AK if he had wanted to – at least someone who looked more like MJ. No offence meant to Arnold Klein.

    And if you want to know WHO was actively spreading all those lies about Michael looking for a “father” for his children – here is an article from Paris Match which shows that it was Klein’s friend HOEFFLIN who put his hand to it. He named himself an official spokesman for the Jackson family.

    Translated from French by Google but still understandable:

    PEOPLE-MATCH | MERCREDI 29 JUILLET 2009

    Steven Hoefflin, plastic surgeon: “A clique of doctors surrounding Michael, real jackals.” He knows what he’s saying …
    Olivier O’Mahony – Paris Match

    …”Michael was surrounded by a clique of doctors who behave like jackals with him,” accuses Steven Hoefflin, who knows what he is speaking of.

    “I redesigned him and it was very successful. Unfortunately, he did not listen when I told him not recommended touch-up,” defends the plastic surgeon. One of his former associates accused him of practicing fifty operations on the singer. “It’s wrong. I had Michael as a patient between 1978 and 2002, when I told him that I could not do anything for him and recommended him to seek treatment in a detoxification center.

    “He was totally dependent on drugs that some of my colleagues ordered him.” Today, Hoefflin has become the unofficial spokesman of Katherine, the mother of Michael. He says he is determined to fight the doctors who “killed” Michael.

    THE CONCERN DR. KLEIN

    One of his pet peeves is Dr. Arnold Klein, a dermatologist who was Michael, and his intimate friend, and even invited him to the New Year Eve 2008. In Los Angeles, “Botox King” as it is called, is a big fish. The “King of Collagen”, his other nickname, drives a Rolls with driver, wearing a huge Rolex vintage wrist and Roman numerals in white gold, lives in a house of thirty rooms in an upscale, has paintings by masters (including Roy Lichtenstein and David Hockney) and a splendid villa in Laguna Beach …

    As student, he was fired from his University of Pennsylvania for illegally prescribed drugs to his friends, but, in the City of Angels, everyone has forgotten: Dr. Klein has one of the most beautiful address books of the city’s customers include a nice bunch of international stars, from Cher to Liz Taylor once said that he had saved his life …

    Michael and he met in 1983 in his clinic in Beverly Hills. “He came to see me on the advice of a friend to treat an acne problem,” Klein told Larry King on CNN. As I am an observer, I told him immediately diagnosed a skin disease, lupus, and since we became friends. ”

    Gradually, Klein entered the private life of the star. At the point that it would be the biological father of two of his children, Prince Michael and Paris, who call it “Uncle Arnie” when he comes to see them at home.

    A relative says it all started in 1995, during a dinner for his 50 birthday. “There were a dozen guests including Debbie Rowe, his nurse. I do not know how it came, but one of the guests, Kate Jackson, a former actress of “Charlie’s Angels,” told Debbie and Arnold: “You should have a child together!”

    FEATURES RESEMBLING

    The joke made everyone laugh, starting with Arnold, openly gay. Michael was also present that evening. He was looking for a father to the children he had not. For him, Arnie was the ideal candidate. Michael was fascinated by his intelligence, and it was a must for the kids he dreamed of having.

    “Since then, Prince Michael and Paris have grown and developed traits of resemblance to the doctor. “Especially the ears and facial expressions,” says Ian Halperin, author of an unauthorized biography of Michael Jackson.

    The last time that Arnold Klein saw Michael was four days before his death. “He came to see me because of his nose which he hated. He wanted to redraw again to make it perfect. I found him in an excellent mood: he danced in my office.“

    Under fire from critics, concedes the dermatologist had prescribed him one time of Demerol, another powerful painkiller, but says he always put guard against side effects.

    The Jackson family, who hates him, accused him of having played a key role in addiction to drugs of any kind that the star has developed over the years.

    “It was he who signed the orders,” says an investigator. Using pseudonyms: Omar Arnold, Joseph Scruz, Bill Bray. In the crosshairs of the LAPD officers, Dr. Klein may have to pay for the operation “clean hands” being in Hollywood.

    http://www.parismatch.com/People-Match/Musique/Actu/Michael-Jackson-et-les-chacals-116425/

    Like

  69. December 5, 2011 10:41 am

    “Actually fans like you who also don’t believe he is the biological father are what gives ammunition to this foolishness.”

    Tracy, what particular fan are you talking about? If you do not specify I will regard it as a lie intended against me personally.

    Like

  70. Tracy permalink
    December 5, 2011 10:06 am

    Actually fans like you who also don’t believe he is the biological father are what gives ammunition to this foolishness. If a child knows who their bio parents are and some unknown fool tells them some nonsense, they just laugh it off and move on. Basically just as Paris did. They don’t suffer the deep hurt and lasting trauma that you are so afraid of in your article. Consider this. MJ was telling the TRUTH. Paris is his biological daughter and she is well aware of this, therefore she is not going to start believing that internet haters know her father better than she did.

    Those kids are mixed and Americans raised by a black father. They are well versed in Black American History. They are well aware just how jacked up the world can be. Much moreso than some of the well meaning fans who apparently never noticed it before now.

    Like

  71. jm51 permalink
    December 5, 2011 7:43 am

    I’m sorry, but I just have to say this to Musikfactory — while we may be fans of Michael Jackson’s — we are not the parents and/or guardians of his children. There is not one single one of us that has one idea what he would truly do if he were still on this earth and as such, we shouldn’t pretend that we do. He left those children in his mother’s care and he loved his mother. This idea that anyone needs to twitter Paris and tell her what her father would think about what she is doing is absurd seriously. I think it’s ok to care and it’s ok to want things to be ok for them, but when a line gets crossed when it shouldn’t — then it’s not ok. I personally hate the fact that people are able to send her tweets and say horrific things about her father, but sadly how can she or the other two be protected from the very many jerks there are in this world? But when you get on twitter and call her a brat and try to parent her over the computer — that’s no better. Short of you filing for custody and raising her yourself — there is nothing that you can do except to pray for those children that all will be ok for them and pray for Katherine to make good choices for them and teach them how to make good choices. I think Michael knew well what his children would be facing as they got older and we will never know if he spoke to them about it and explained things or not. Paris does seem to do a very good job taking up for herself and for her father, but she is also a young teenager and is going to go about things the way her friends do.

    Like

  72. sanemjfan permalink
    December 5, 2011 1:28 am

    @ Teva
    I don’t know all of the details about the movie at this point, but I’ll record Ellen on Thursday and update everyone with what Paris says about the project. I’ll say this, though: whether or not this is going to theaters, or straight to DVD, the movie studios will certainly begin besiege Paris with offers for various roles, because they are desperately looking for the next “Hannah Montana”, and Miley Cyrus has long since grown out of that role (and she’s not shy in reminding us about that!). If Paris is allowed to start doing movies here and there, then we’ll definitely be seeing a lot more of her in the press, promoting her projects!

    Like

  73. December 5, 2011 1:05 am

    “Amongst all of Michael’s children, Paris changed a lot. She is acting like an entitled spoiled brat. I do not believe she is being given the much needed support, attention and parenting.”

    This is why Murray’s crime is so horrible and so unforgivable. Michael’s absence for two years is already taking its toll on the children.

    Like

  74. December 5, 2011 12:23 am

    We cannot say it is “our common duty” to protect Paris on twitter without addressing WHY she is on twitter–her guardian deemed it proper for her to be on twitter, knowing full and well that Paris may be subjected to negativity due to her father. Kate’s guardianship requires that she knows this. It is Kate who uses the children as marketing tools. It is Kate who gave the final say about Paris stepping into limelight at such an early age although she knows full and well the price her own children paid. Michael not only tried to give his children the childhood that he never but also advocated that children should be children. I don’t think people are doing service talking out of both side of their mouth. Either we stand up and bravely state that Michael’s wishes aren’t being honored or if are to trust Katherine in her abilities as a guardian then it is noone’s “common duty” to do anything. Straight talk! Paris uses her twitter account to chat. She should consider protecting her account or limit chatting with her friends on skype. I think Paris should look at the twitter accounts of accomplished teens -such as Selena Gomez- and carefully tweet. There is no mystery to her life. Public knows right down to what she eats. You can not voluntarily make your private life public then whine that people don’t know you. Amongst all of Michael’s children, Paris changed a lot. She is acting like an entitled spoiled brat. I do not believe she is being given the much needed support, attention and parenting. It is not Jackson way to talk emotions. Considering the track record of Jackson ladies around the age of 16, Paris’s approaching years concerns me deeply. Someone has got to speak up before it is too late.

    Like

  75. Teva permalink
    December 4, 2011 6:29 pm

    @David

    Is this a major motion picture, or a straight to DVD? If it is a major motion picture then is Ellen the first of many press promotions Paris will make to promote the movie?

    I agree with you David it is not the place of Michael’s fans to be trying to raise his children from the internet, even though well intentioned. Some child stars have stayed on the staight and narrow like Brooke Sheilds, who was famous from a baby, and others have gone off the deep end.

    From my two years of reading about MJ I don’t think he would have let her get into Hollywood so young at the age of 13, but he is not here.

    What I can say is, Paris is a tough girl. She was tough from birth, to toddler, to teenager. She has a smart mouth and doesn’t suffer fools, which is good for Hollywood, but she also needs a steady hand. I hope her movie is successful, and she builds a career outside of her father’s name and be seen as an indivual and not just Michael Jackson’s daughter.

    Like

  76. sanemjfan permalink
    December 3, 2011 9:53 pm

    Paris Jackson will be on the Ellen Degeneres show on Thursday, December 8th!

    http://ellen.warnerbros.com/2011/12/paris_jackson_-_thursday_december_8_2011.php#.TtpZ3283BNA.facebook

    I don’t want to seem like I’m passing judgement on Katherine, because Paris isn’t my daughter and it’s none of my business how she is raised. We as fans can sit back and say “MJ wouldn’t like this, MJ wouldn’t do this or that”, but ultimately it’s Katherine’s decision to let her act at such an early age, and we as a fan community should just wish her the best of luck if this is what she chooses to do. It’s not our place to judge, as Katherine isn’t accountable to fans for what she allows MJ’s kids to do. That’s how I choose to look at it.

    Here is info on the movie that she is starring in, called “Lunden’s Bridge and the Three Keys”: http://www.abc4.com/content/about_4/gtu/featured_on/story/Lundons-Bridge-and-the-Three-Keys/DFHXKcgNzE6AY8kQXrUIpA.cspx

    Like

  77. October 22, 2011 2:55 am

    Here is footage of Paris at a Chris Brown concert last night. Glad to see she’s enjoying herself!

    http://omg.yahoo.com/blogs/now/paris-jackson-rocks-chris-brown-concert-172307604.html

    Here is a photo album of her at the concert, including a backstage photo with Brown:

    https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.2435366770909.2135003.1453894332&type=1

    Like

  78. Teva permalink
    October 1, 2011 4:06 am

    Prince Jackson tweeted
    “Idk If Kai will c this but everyone plz try and get her to c it we love u Kai and miss u” 29 September 2011

    I believe he is talking about chef Kai Chase who took the witness stand on that day.

    Like

  79. September 25, 2011 10:21 pm

    ’ll say this again I think the children should have 2 twitter accounts: locked and open. The locked account they can communicate with their friends and family anything they want, and be like “normal” children, but their open account where they want to talk to people from the public should be strictly monitored by a third party for all incoming and outgoing tweets. Children of celebrities are not run-of-the-mill kids. Any future children I may have would not have bodyguards, TMZ reading their tweets, or a global forum about their maternity & paternity. Their situation is different, and it should be treated accordingly.”

    Can anyone who is contact with the Jackson family explain to them about these locked and open twitter accounts, please???

    Like

  80. Teva permalink
    September 25, 2011 4:35 pm

    Prince looks so grown up, and comfortable in front of the camera. He spoke very well, I would have been nervous.

    Like

  81. September 25, 2011 9:43 am

    Prince at the Bambi awards:

    Host: Please welcome Prince Michael Jackson! (…) Great to have you here! Good to see you have arrived here safely. Have you had the chance to get a first impression oft he city yet?

    Prince: I flew over Berlin and I wish I could stay longer here to see the sights.
    I remember visiting Berlin/Germany in 2002 with my dad. I love Berlin. Germany is a great country. But unfortunately I won’t have a enough time to do some sightseeing.

    Host: Maybe next time. You have been to Germany before with your dad. Do you remember any of that?

    Prince: I remember that when he got the award he brought it in and I always wanted to play with it because it was such a shiny little deer. But he didn’t allow me to because it was a very important award for him and he valued it a lot as it was a recognition of his charity work.

    Host: You father had an immensly big heart and was known for his great charity work.

    Prince: It just takes one voice to change the world. My dad raised his voice through his music, through songs like „Change the world” or „Heal the world”. Songs that made people care for our planet.

    Host: That’s right. We are so honored that you are here tonight and support our charity. And you brought something with you , something very special.

    Prince: I brought this book which was written by my Grandma, who also signed it. And I will also sign it now. And we brought the handwritten lyrics of my dad’s songs „Bad”, „Smooth Criminal” and „Billie Jean”.

    Host: Wow! That’s incredible! These are the original , handwritten lyrics by Michael Jackson fort he songs „Bad”, „Smooth Criminal” and „Billie Jean”! I think that in the very moment when the idea fort he song came into his mind he put it down, right there, on the paper. That’s really incredible! Thank you!

    Prince: It’s a pleasure!

    Host: Dear ladies and gentleman, you can aution these and various other items on our website. (…) Now we have something very special. A small surprise. (…) In remembrance of your father we will welcome 30 young and probably very nervous kids from the Berlin children’s choir (…) who will perfom „We Are The World”!

    Like

  82. Teva permalink
    September 25, 2011 12:27 am

    I’ll say this again I think the children should have 2 twitter accounts: locked and open. The locked account they can communicate with their friends and family anything they want, and be like “normal” children, but their open account where they want to talk to people from the public should be strictly monitored by a third party for all incoming and outgoing tweets. Children of celebrities are not run-of-the-mill kids. Any future children I may have would not have bodyguards, TMZ reading their tweets, or a global forum about their maternity & paternity. Their situation is different, and it should be treated accordingly.

    About the twitpics from Prince. I have never interacted with MJ, but I don’t think it would be a stretch for me to say he would not have patted his son on the back. I personally believe he would have had a stern, yet gentle chat with him.

    Like

  83. September 25, 2011 12:03 am

    I put a link from an article of a german tabloid about Prince Michael´s visit in Berlin. To my astonishment Dieter Wiesner is lurking around that child, you can see him in two of the pictures ! This is very concerning in my opinion, what do you think ? http://www.promiflash.de/erste-bilder-prince-michael-jackson-jr-in-berlin-11092421.html

    Appleh, I find it very disconcerting! Besides the fact that Dieter sued Michael, we know that Wiesner is in close association with Daphne Barak which is reason enough to consider him a no friend to Michael. It was from this man that she received some tapes of telephone calls which she claimed were made by MJ (where he asked for money and supposedly had slurred speech). It was very much unlike Daphne Barak that she made an exception for Dieter Wisner and didn’t d disclose who her source for the tapes was – this time she was not “exposing” anyone but was shielding her associate. A German fan wrote about this man:

    “the German manager of MJ Deiter Wiezner, who happened to be a mafia himself, published these tapes …he told the fans that he loves MJ but MJ fans in Gemany are smart enough to boycott this leech”.

    No, Diesner is no friend to Michael Jackson and his children – no matter what he says – and they should know it! See this post for more details about Daphne Barak (and a bit about Wiesner): https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2011/07/07/daphne-baraks-career-portfolio-will-there-be-any-questions-now/

    Like

  84. Suzy permalink
    September 24, 2011 11:53 pm

    @ appleh

    Not just Dieter Wiesner but also Howard Mann. Can you believe it? Prince is alone with these vultures in a foreign country. Mike is rolling in his grave!

    Like

  85. September 24, 2011 11:12 pm

    “I was thinking along the lines of maybe have them take a break from it until after the trial & things simmer down. If the defense is using twitter to screen jurors (i don’t know if that’s true, but I saw that put out there today on twitter) that clown defense could be stalking their pages just like the media during the trial.”

    Gigi, I fully agree. If you are following Paris on Twitter do you think you can explain to her the need for a break?

    “The kind of values that MJ was raised with and what was part of his character is what butted heads with the world. When it comes to what I would say are Christian values the world will hate you know matter what. My Pastor has a phrase when talking about raising children. “We don’t want to isolate our children, but insulate them.” So, I think MJ provided that insulation for them for the short time he had with them. Its the beginning of their teen years so its unfortunate that their dad is not hear to finish guiding them. I’m pretty sure that with the foundation MJ laid, they will still retain some (hopefully most) of those values their dad taught them and it will carry on into adulthood. I personally just keep them & the family in prayer its one of the things I can do from afar”.

    Generally with that kind of a foundation it would be enough, but these children are going through too much pressure. You are right, all we can do is keeping them in prayer…

    Like

  86. appleh permalink
    September 24, 2011 11:09 pm

    I put a link from an article of a german tabloid about Prince Michael´s visit in Berlin. To my astonishment Dieter Wiesner is lurking around that child, you can see him in two of the pictures ! This is very concerning in my opinion, what do you think ?

    http://www.promiflash.de/erste-bilder-prince-michael-jackson-jr-in-berlin-11092421.html

    Like

  87. September 24, 2011 10:29 pm

    “If you force them off twitter you are resented for forcing them off not being able to communicate with friends etc. Or you let them have more freedom which can result in cyber bullying and the rest of it. There is no perfect answer.”

    Chris, for the period of the trial there is an answer – it is simply IMPOSSIBLE to have Michael’s children go on tweeting. Even if they are not asked questions about their father and what they think of the trial the media will make the most of the little they have. If they choose to be nasty they will say – “Look, his children don’t give a damn for what is taking place at the trial and continue tweeting with their friends as if nothing were happening. They simply do not care”. I repeat that it will happen only if the media chooses to be nasty – but from what we know about the media I see no reason to believe that it won’t.

    In addition to that at least Prince seems to be on the witness list (right?), so should he expose himself to the public who will try in many subtle ways to get information from him? It is for his own good to stay away from Twitter for a time being – because whether he talks about his father or whether he doesn’t talk about him, the media will find a way to twist the situation.

    Can you imagine a tabloid screaming something like “Jacko’s kids watching a blockbuster on the most dramatic day of the trial”? (sorry for the name).

    I very well can.

    Like

  88. September 24, 2011 8:58 am

    One of the family members that I really see tweet their concerns to Prince & Paris is their cousing Anthony Jackson.

    This is the reply he just gave to a retweet that Paris did from another account.

    The retweet: SCHOOL = Sucks Children’s Happiness Out Of Life.

    Anthony’s reply: Thats why your dad had a completely different plan for you. Love&missU

    The school acronym came from account called funnytweets. Now, it could have been interpreted differently between funnytweets, Paris, & Anthony. But is clear from the tweets that Anthony sends two his cousins that he loves them very much and will do everything he can to protect them. Anthony can relate a little to what his cousins are going through cause his dad passed away when he was 7. Here’s a little bio on Anthony from the MJTP newsletter:

    Actor, Singer, Songwriter, and Michael’s cousin and Godson, Anthony Jackson will be honored with a Dot in Michael’s heart. We are honored to have his support.

    Michael and Anthony grew very close after his father Tony’s passing. Anthony went on numerous adventures with Michael throughout his life. Anthony was also fortunate to be part of Michael’s creative process, including touring and recording sessions.

    “I’m honored to be a part of The Michael Jackson Tribute Portrait, because bringing people together in a creative endeavor is what Michael was all about.”
    http://www.michaeljacksontributeportrait.com/article.php?article_id=333

    Like

  89. September 23, 2011 11:24 pm

    Maybe its just me I don’t know, but I highly doubt some of the things Prince & Paris say, watch, listen to, read, retweet now would have washed with their dad. I don’t know if its cause of the exposure to who they met in school, online, or whatever. From a far its like they’ve been picking up on bad habits. Maybe some habits from their family as well.

    Gigi, I am also worried. Michael wouldn’t have approved of much of it. The way he raised the children it seems that he was a very strict father, only he showed it in a loving manner – but otherwise he never allowed them to pick any bad habits.
    He raised them as very balanced children and now they have to face the sea of emotions which can turn even a grown-up into a hysterical wreck. The emotions range from boundless admiration to boundless hatred and insults (like Michael “lying” to them about being their father). Even excessive admiration for anything they do may not be too beneficial, not to mention the wave of hatred they have to rebuff on an almost daily basis. Having to go between these two extremes can really do extreme harm.

    Maybe, its just a combination of things which are affecting them and in turn they’re trying to express what they’re feeling. The main one of course the murder of their dad (some might not think murder, but that’s what I believe it is), then they are now seeing the gravity of the evil that was thrown towards their dad, receiving hateful things towards themselves and their family (who they love of course cause that’s the only family the got and known), constantly contending with the day to day hate via the internet.

    The chances that it was a murder are very high. It is a tragedy by and of itself that someone took his life and it’s a double tragedy that it happened when his children were still so young and were entering the age when they needed him most. Of all periods of their life it is now that they need his guidance most.

    Yeah Prince & Paris will/can defend themselves, especially Paris (who can clown a person with class in a heartbeat lol). However, at the end of the day the amount of & kind of stuff they have to deal with will start if it hasn’t already, get to them.

    I am afraid you are right. This cannot go unnoticed . Compare it with the frustration we, grown-up people, feel when dirty D. goes unchallenged on TV with her lies and you can imagine what Michael’s children must be going through when they hear her dirty talk and everyone nodding in reply. Compare it with our own more or less happy-go-lucky ways when we were only starting two years ago thinking that everyone will join us as they learn the truth – and how we feel now, two years later (in the face of so much hatred and injustice I for one have almost stopped smiling).

    By they way if Dimond doesn’t understand what huge responsibility she is taking upon herself by dirtying Michael in the eyes of his children, it is time someone reminded her of a thing like karma. I am even afraid to think what retribution can befall on her own descendants because of her past and present crimes against the truth.

    If she has anything human left in her she should at least think of the enormous harm her lies are doing to Michael’s children. And this woman knows that she is lying as all those “love letters” and “video tapes” were her own invention. Some people have stopped looking up to the Heavens and should be reminded that they will be held responsible for what they do…

    Taj said that he is monitoring them or at least someone in the family is.

    I hope he is wise and strong enough to cope with them.

    Btw, a lot of people including myself feel these kids should not be on twitter during the trial. The media follows all the Jacksons or anyone that knew MJ on twitter. So its obvious the media are following Prince & Paris’ accounts. These media parasites are bold enough, I wouldn’t put it pass them to ask these kids all kinds of questions about the trial. I wouldn’t put it pass some fans either cause some can be just as bad. The parasites are good at twisting a persons tweets for a headline/story.

    If anyone has contacts with the Jackson family PLEASE TELL THEM TO STOP THE CHILDREN’S ACTIVITY ON TWITTER DURING THE TRIAL! It is absolutely not acceptable from any point of view. These things are simply not done and if no one in the family is able to convince the children of it I think the police should explain. After all they are supposed to be witnesses in the case! And I am not even talking about the way everything they can possibly write on Twitter during the trial will be twisted in the media and what provocations the children will be subjected to.

    SOMEONE WHO KNOWS THE JACKSONS, PLEASE CONTACT THEM AND ASK THEM TO STOP ANY TWEETING BY PARIS AND PRINCE!

    IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES IT IS AN ABSOLUTE MUST!

    Like

  90. September 23, 2011 8:53 am

    @Chris

    I agree that there is no simple answer, sometimes never is. Its clear since they’re in school now with other kids. Its natural for them to what to do what other kids may do like having a twitter, facebook, or whatever. Overall, the situation is just on a different scale. Local and national media don’t follow other folks kids to get a headline.

    I was thinking specifically during the trial itself it may not be a good idea for them to be tweeting. Yeah so, I wasn’t thinking “force them off twitter” hey if the family is fine with them being on twitter, there’s nothing I can do about it just like everything else. I was thinking along the lines of maybe have them take a break from it until after the trial & things simmer down. If the defense is using twitter to screen jurors (i don’t know if that’s true, but I saw that put out there today on twitter) that clown defense could be stalking their pages just like the media during the trial.

    I follow Paris’ acct mainly so I can be on the look for whenever some psycho nut pops up so I can report them to twitter. She well usually retweet out when she gets crazy tweets. Prince only started tweeting again recently since March. So whenever they feel the time has come for them to step away when it gets too much, they’ll do that. In meantime, all we can do from a far is help them out on the social network side of things the best we can just like if it was anyone else that was catching heat.

    The kind of values that MJ was raised with and what was part of his character is what butted heads with the world. When it comes to what I would say are Christian values the world will hate you know matter what. My Pastor has a phrase when talking about raising children. “We don’t want to isolate our children, but insulate them.” So, I think MJ provided that insulation for them for the short time he had with them. Its the beginning of their teen years so its unfortunate that their dad is not hear to finish guiding them. I’m pretty sure that with the foundation MJ laid, they will still retain some (hopefully most) of those values their dad taught them and it will carry on into adulthood. I personally just keep them & the family in prayer its one of the things I can do from afar.

    Like

  91. Chris permalink
    September 23, 2011 5:40 am

    @ Gigi

    It doesn’t matter if your MJ’s kids or ordinary kids. U can protect em and raise em as well as u can (although many parents dont) but when they get exposed to the reality of the world there is no turning back.

    Every kid is on twitter or facebook just like 10 years ago when i was there age every1 had a mobile out and prob if u go back further it was something else. It’s the “In thing” what the “cool kids do” if u don’t do these things your outcasted. Unfortunatly ppl do a lot of things 2 be popular that are not necessarily good.

    I heard Katherine in a inteview say she believes she raised her children to innocent to the outside world, which may explain her different approach.
    Now before ppl see this as hating on Katherine It isn’t. How many people have u seen call Michael naive? I’m not talking about haters fans on this site and many others have said it.
    So u can’t have it both ways.

    You either shut them out of society and don’t let them lose there innocence which will no doubt end the same way Michael’s life did getting taken advantage of left right and centre as we all know as long as they have his assets the sharks will be swimming close by. Although they may have a better chance of being better ppl.

    OR

    Throw them in young (although 13 is about average age this happens) and have to take some hate some cruelty which could quite easily turn them into something they aren’t or simply bitter and cold nothing like Michael would be or want. Or maybe they will be strong enough to pull through and raise above it..

    Personally I would do the top 1 and do everything in my power to protect them.
    But, I’m not Katherine Jackson.
    I didn’t have to watch my son getting destroyed effectively by his faith in innocence and people who he was raised to believe had nothing but good intentions. Which is incredibly sad and heartbreaking. It was hard enough for us to see let alone her.

    Can you imagine watching your son being treated that way when you teach them the right values just to be taken advantage of because other people don’t have decent principles. Michael wouldn’t be Michael if he had been raised the 2nd way but cos he was raised the 1st way that’s why some believe he got into the bad situations that he did and he should of known better. He would only know better if he was raised the 2nd way.

    Like I say it isn’t that simple bring it back 2 twitter. If you force them off twitter you are resented for forcing them off not being able to communicate with friends etc. Or you let them have more freedom which can result in cyber bullying and the rest of it.

    There is no perfect answer.

    Like

  92. September 23, 2011 4:09 am

    Hopefully, the kids are still going through counseling. So they can talk about the feelings their going through.

    Maybe its just me I don’t know, but I highly doubt some of the things Prince & Paris say, watch, listen to, read, retweet now would have washed with their dad. I don’t know if its cause of the exposure to who they met in school, online, or whatever. From a far its like they’ve been picking up on bad habits. Maybe some habits from their family as well.

    Maybe, its just a combination of things which are affecting them and in turn they’re trying to express what they’re feeling. The main one of course the murder of their dad (some might not think murder, but that’s what I believe it is), then they are now seeing the gravity of the evil that was thrown towards their dad, receiving hateful things towards themselves and their family (who they love of course cause that’s the only family the got and known), constantly contending with the day to day hate via the internet.

    Yeah Prince & Paris will/can defend themselves, especially Paris (who can clown a person with class in a heartbeat lol). However, at the end of the day the amount of & kind of stuff they have to deal with will start if it hasn’t already, get to them.

    Personally, I’m not to keen of the fact that fans keeping ask these kids to post pictures of themselves doing this that and the other plus asking “is this your real facebook?”, “asking twitter to verify them on twitter”. The little bite of anonymity they had is now totally gone cause the family/friends all confirmed that its them online. Since that speculation is gone, at least Taj said that he is monitoring them or at least someone in the family is.

    Btw, a lot of people including myself feel these kids should not be on twitter during the trial. The media follows all the Jacksons or anyone that knew MJ on twitter. So its obvious the media are following Prince & Paris’ accounts. These media parasites are bold enough, I wouldn’t put it pass them to ask these kids all kinds of questions about the trial. I wouldn’t put it pass some fans either cause some can be just as bad. The parasites are good at twisting a persons tweets for a headline/story.

    Like

  93. September 22, 2011 3:47 pm

    “The name of the image is Jailnig[ger], again I am adding the square brackets. I would have thought the lad knew better, something is not right.” http://memegenerator.net/instance/7777428

    I looked up the picture. To me it is the embodiment of anger against all the injustice his father is going through which Prince sees, feels and faces every day.

    Unfortunately it looks like the blood of his black ancestors is boiling in his veins now. I say unfortunately because rage is not the best of advisers. Prince is now in his dangerous teens and should have had his father by his side to help cope with all the hatred the boy sees towards him as the person he loved most.

    Michael shielded his children from the hatred of the world and they never knew how bad it could be. They never even suspected that someone could not love their father. Now they see what it is and it is really too much for their young minds and souls.

    His blood is boiling and he uses images to show it. Even that “Friday” thing shows that one day “Friday” – with all its promises to relax and finally enjoy life – will come for his race too.

    Like

  94. ares permalink
    September 22, 2011 3:09 pm

    Yes, i understand and i also can understand why some people may be offended by the pictures. But i thought that your observation was a bit harsh. – I would have thought the lad knew better, something is not right.-

    I mean Prince is still a kid and kids do stupid and immature things and especially when they adress to their friends .And we should not forget that Prince is growing up in an African American family and quite possibly he is a part African American. So, him posting those picture is not about degrading or insulting a race but him making fun of his own race. A stupid picture, yes, insulting,again yes, but i don’t think that Prince intention was bad or sinister. This is how i see it but i completelly understand why you might have feel offended.

    I think that someone should contact with him and explain to him why he shouldn’t post this kind of pictures again and why their content is offending to people

    Like

  95. Teva permalink
    September 22, 2011 2:39 pm

    @Ares
    ” So why Prince should be groaned for it?” – Ares

    I commented here because it is Prince Jackson, and this entry is about him and his siblings. I agree with you “why should Prince be groaned for it?” I can honestly say if it were Miley Cirus, Willow Smith, Jaden Smith, Dakota Fanning etc and I was a reader of their blogs and saw the same pics my feeling will still be the same.

    Like

  96. Teva permalink
    September 22, 2011 2:31 pm

    @Suzy

    I remember Michael Vick, and I thought what he did to those animals was barbaric and inhumane. Granted he paid his dues. However, my point was not who the pic was of, but its essence- Jailnig[ger]s? Really?

    Like

  97. ares permalink
    September 22, 2011 2:27 pm

    Suzy, no that is not Michael Vick. But anyway, Prince is a what 14- 15 years old? Kids on this age say and do lots of stupid things, even worse that Prince posting two pictures on his twitter page. Hell, i’m a lot much older than Prince and still do things that are not so wise. So why Prince should be groaned for it? I say, if you have problem with the pictures,send him a message and kindly ask him to remove them explaining him in the meanwhile why should he do so.

    Like

  98. Teva permalink
    September 22, 2011 2:18 pm

    @Ares

    He is 14.

    Like

  99. Suzy permalink
    September 22, 2011 2:11 pm

    @ Teva

    That picture is Michael Vick, an NFL (American football) player who was jailed because he organized illegal dog fights. I think the sentence “he took my chicken – I took his life” is a reference to that.

    Like

  100. ares permalink
    September 22, 2011 1:10 pm

    Teva, do you know how old Prince is?

    Like

  101. Teva permalink
    September 22, 2011 6:53 am

    This is a picture Prince Jackson posted linking from a tweet. For those of you who cannot view it, or in the event it is removed, it shows ancing African babies in a rural setting with the caption: ITS FRIDAY NIG[GAS]!!!. Trust me I added the square brackets. As appalling as it is, more egregious are the idiots who responded that it was funny and cute.

    However, I must say his current avatar of the alien playing pool is a much much much greater improvement over the last one which was a black inmate with the caption: He took my chicken – I took his life. I had no idea what it meant so I googled it. I wish I hadn’t. I comes from this website http://memegenerator.net/instance/7777428 . The name of the image is Jailnig[ger], again I am adding the square brackets. I would have thought the lad knew better, something is not right.

    Like

  102. September 14, 2011 3:52 pm

    “if you are a REAL fan of Michaels, then you cared and loved him, wholeheartedly. You should have also known that Michael did not want the children’s identity known which is why he kept their faces covered for so long and respected his wishes”.

    Amy, I fully agree. Of course people will say that everyone knows the faces of Michael’s children anyway, but since they are growing up they change every day and if fans don’t update their pictures in a couple of years they will not be that recognizable. I think we should absolutely respect Michael’s wishes and keep the children away from the public view.

    Like

  103. Amy permalink
    September 14, 2011 6:14 am

    I have tried to protect the children on facebook following Michaels death. People were posting videos of Michaels children that were aired on television along with other photographs of them, mostly older ones. Here is my feeling on this subject…if you are a REAL fan of Michaels, then you cared adn loved him, wholeheartedly. You should have also known that Michael did not want the children’s identity known which is why he kept their faces covered for so long and repecteded his wishes. IF you are a fan and aware of all of this, why would you expose his children and put them and Michael in danger? Not only that but, at the time of Michaels death until now, they are still minors. Would you want your children exposed all over facebook, which makes it possible for anyone to see, even if protected? Facebook may have offered protection and privacay to their users, but in all reality, it is still the Internet!

    Like

  104. September 3, 2011 12:13 am

    A fan can disagree and not like something, but being hateful is not a fan of MJ. It goes against everything he stood for.”

    Oh, how very true it is! If we turn into haters it will be the worst betrayal of Michael Jackson. It will be paying lip service to him only and doing contrary to what he believed in.

    Like

  105. Carm permalink
    September 2, 2011 5:35 pm

    I feel it’s important for fans to read this twitter from Taj, Michael’s beloved nephew. It has to do with the hostile attitude some fans have towards Katherine and other family members.

    From MJStar website:
    The recent announcement of a tribute concert in the name of Michael Jackson has infuriated the majority of Michael’s fanbase. The result has seen an increase of verbal online attacks towards Michael Jackson’s family, in particular Michael’s nephew Taj.

    Defending Michael’s Mother and children, Taj had this to say:

    I personally had to take a break from the “social” world because everything has been so
    twisted around. You guys only hear 1/100 of the stuff that goes on around here. Now I read
    comments like crazy Katherine or Greedy Katherine. or $$$$ Katherine. It is so disappointing. My uncle thought of my Grandma as perfection. He admired her so much. And she loved him unconditionally. It just makes me so upset to know what my Grandma goes through.

    My uncle LOVED his fans and you guys gave him strength. A fan can disagree and not like something, but being hateful is not a fan of MJ. It goes against everything he stood for. I learned the concept of fans from my uncle. Sorry, you cannot call yourself a fan & attack MJ’s mother or kids. That is not a fan.

    He was more amazing as an uncle than he was as a performer, if that is even possible. I had the honor to not only be his nephew but be extremely close to him. I consider myself to be one of the luckiest people in the world.

    Like

  106. August 9, 2011 12:18 am

    Just listened to some local news here,far from the US.Here,they said, children get theit first mobile and computer at the age of 6-7 y of age, that is when I grade starts.And ,they said,that is when internet bullying starts and the huge wave of comercialism hits them.Prep. by
    parents was adviced.That made me think of Michaels children.They will
    be hit by a tsunami compared to what ordinary children have to deal with here.

    Like

  107. August 5, 2011 6:01 am

    Yeah after I saw that exchange with P and some random he/she on twitter seemed to have posted a username of some site P is on. The random person has since deleted their account. I have a feeling that its someone that knows P personally in order for her mess to be leaked like that. For one reason that he/she that posted the username had just created their account last night. They gave some weak “apologies” then they turned right around and posted the username again confirming that it was P, then said sorry again…smh

    After P’s last reply to the person, he/she deleted their acct. I tweeted to P my usual “you need to check who’s around you that maybe leaking your stuff…”

    P also talks to this other boy, I think the actually do know each other, probably someone from school. P and her friend was talking about the lil day trip she took then she mentioned the paps were there saying “strange isn’t?” then said maybe a coincidence that a certain person was with her & fam when they went. Then the boy was like that’s way he didn’t wanna go cause he knew some other boy was gonna be there and do that. Then P replied that she figured it would happen also.

    So yeah someone close to P is probably the one leaking everything and possibly tipping off the paps. Whatever social sites she’s on now or in the future. No matter what her info/id will be leaked, cause of whoever it is she knows personally is putting it out there.

    Like

  108. August 5, 2011 5:53 am

    Oh dear God when Paris ran like that she remind of her father when he went shopping he was swarmed with such crazy paparazzi,,, I’m just appalled and angry , her father is dead the King of pop Michael Jackson is dead and no longer here to take a picture of him or harass him with rude stupid comments” I’ve seen a disgusting obnoxious paps form TMZ asking Michael about kids toys or something which literally left Michael almost in tears, he was upset by this creepy guy who was babbling loudly about it”.
    If I found out the video I post it for sure.
    it is really disturbing to see Paris suffers the way her father had suffered.
    Those are just children living a life ,there is nothing wacky about them ,I hope that they don’t involve in the show business at all,seriously the media will eat them alive .

    Like

  109. Teva permalink
    August 5, 2011 3:52 am

    I wondered how Madonna manages her daughter on twitter, so I did a search for Lourdes Maria Ciccone Leon. All of the returns were fake, and here is the interesting thing they all (re)tweeted Michael’s kids. I am still to find the real Lourdes Leon.

    To the Jacksons: If you don’t know, you better ask somebody…

    Like

  110. Teva permalink
    August 5, 2011 3:35 am

    “y wud u post that? wtf. now my privacy’s out, smart one. stop. just stop.”

    Here is one of her tweets from today. Paris is a chip off the old block.

    Like

  111. August 4, 2011 8:04 pm

    Yesterday Paris twittered that she and the family went to an amusement park (she named the park, I won’t do so here) and she had fun. She is putting info out that which could lead to stalking, papz following her and worse. IMO, she should not be so transparent on her comings and goings. Thanks for alerting us and we will of course continue to do what we can; however Paris and the family obviously do not understand the downside of social media in her case. Perhaps this will subside somewhat when school resumes.

    Like

  112. Anna permalink
    August 4, 2011 2:21 am

    @juney9800

    It’s terribly frustrating that the guardians of Paris don’t see what a bad idea it is to let Paris be so accessible to the public. It’s too bad she doens’t have just a private FB or twitter account for just her friends and family.

    However, I checked out some of the accts of those cyber-stalking her and it seems they either shut down their accts or the accts were suspended. I’ve heard that after enough people mark the accts. as spam twitter shuts them down automatically. I guess most of Paris’s follower’s (many of them MJ or Jackson family fans) are very loyal and don’t take kindly to Paris being harrassed on twitter. Many reported the abusive accts. right after Paris addressed the hateful comments from them.

    I take some comfort in this, though it does worry me at the same time too. 13 is such a young age for someone to experience that kind influence without any guidance from the adults in their life. Maybe I’m wrong, maybe the adults are aware and are providing guidance, but it just doesn’t appear that way…….

    Like

  113. August 3, 2011 9:22 pm

    That is so sad. Umm ok so that 25ish – 30ish year old guy who was saying that Paris knows him was the paps right? Creepy as all get out.

    Like

  114. lynande51 permalink
    August 3, 2011 7:53 pm

    And then the papz actually put their hand up to cover the lens. How cowardly! How hypocritical!

    Like

  115. August 3, 2011 7:15 pm

    vindicatemj-last week I left the email address of the childrens’ guardian ad litem; that was after I had emailed this person myself (and can report I have had no response whatsoever)I can see from your comments that you have conferred and decided to “stand by” Paris’ account and help her. That was prior to Dave Edwards’ comment and video concerning the movie and the paps. As I have said, every Jackson sibling who has a twitter account has been informed of Paris’ twitter problems, and not one Jackson has even responded with any type of assurance that they are “aware of” the situation or “on top of” the situation, or monitoring her usage of twitter. Not one of them. They blather about their books and their appearances and their own useless twitter sessions endlessly, but do NOTHING to assure the fans that SOMEONE IN THAT FAMILY is guilding Paris through the twitter world. IMO, responsibility for guiding Paris and her brothers through the world of social media rests with the Guardian and with the Family, with as much assistance as possible from the fan base. I do agree that reporting bullying to twitter, or to the FBI might be fruitful, but can’t we just see LA Department of Social Services becoming unwelcomingly involved if the fan base becomes too vocal? For myself, I am going to continue what I have been doing, i.e., attempting to get an acknowledgement from AT LEAST one Jackson sibling that yes, they are aware of the fact that Paris is on social media and that, yes, AT LEAST one of them is monitoring her usage; no 13 year old girl should be in the social medial minefield alone, much less this particular 13 year old girl whose father was harrassed TO DEATH by the media.

    Like

  116. Anna permalink
    August 3, 2011 9:51 am

    @lcpledwards

    That is so heartbreaking! I could tell security was nervous by how close the paps were getting. Obvioulsy they’re might be people who wanted to insert themselves and help out but that’s scary too. Anyone getting to close is like that scary! Damn them paps! Pardon my language but this almost seems worse than cyberbullying!

    Like

  117. lcpledwards permalink
    August 3, 2011 7:50 am

    Oh my gosh, this is EXACTLY why Paris shouldn’t have a public twitter! Some scumbag paparazzi followed her and a friend as they were leaving a movie theater, and posted a video of it! Although she was with a bodyguard, they still harassed her by asking about her own acting classes, and if she liked the movie or not.

    Utterly ridiculous. I know they’re following her on twitter to try to track her whereabouts in order to do things like this.

    Like

  118. August 1, 2011 11:45 pm

    My two cents about Paris being on twitter is this. It doesn’t look like we’re going to be able to stop her from being on twitter. I think all we can do is stand by her and do what we can to help her out when she gets these hateful messages. I notice she RT’s the words of support after these abusive events. I’m assuming she does this to show appreciation. We can let her know we will do what we can to report these abusers on twitter who are targeting her, but I’m afraid that might be the best we can do at this point. There is so much hate directed at her father and now it seems these haters are taking it out on her as a result. At the very least we can let her know that she is not fighting this battle alone.

    Guys, for the past three days we’ve regularly attended Paris Jackson’s Twitter and had some consultations between ourselves. The very short conclusion we’ve come to is the necessity to regularly go there and stand on a kind of vigil. I’ve learned that besides reporting abusers we can even complain to the FBI for cyber abuse of a child.

    However I hope very much indeed that it will not come to that. I believe that even Michael’s haters have something human in them (they also have children) and hope that their own parental instinct will make them spare the child who is only just beginning to live and enjoy life after the tragedy she had to go through at so young an age.

    Paris and other Michael’s kids will have a very hard time again in two months when the trial starts – so it would be an elementary human duty for haters to sign a kind of a truce over these children and take a vow not to touch a single hair on their heads. Let them live a more or less normal life though it has already been saddened by the loss of their loved one and is greatly burdened now by so much attention brought on their little heads.

    This is my whole-hearted appeal to all people making up the society – no matter what your attitude towards Michael Jackson is please check yourself and others around you each time you want to say or hear a harsh word towards them or their father if there is a chance they might read it.

    It is necessary not only for these children, but for you as well in order to remain human after all.

    Like

  119. Anna permalink
    August 1, 2011 4:51 am

    My two cents about Paris being on twitter is this. It doesn’t look like we’re going to be able to stop her from being on twitter. Only the adults in her life can do that. Ofcourse they run the risk of causing her to rebel if they ban her from twitter as now she is in school and probably wants to be like other 13 year olds. I think all we can do is stand by her and do what we can to help her out when she gets these hateful messages. I notice she RT’s the words of support after these abusive events. I’m assuming she does this to show appreciation. We can let her know we will do what we can to report these abusers on twitter who are targeting her, but I’m afraid that might be the best we can do at this point. There is so much hate directed at her father and now it seems these haters are taking it out on her as a result. At the very least we can let her know that she is not fighting this battle alone.

    Like

  120. lcpledwards permalink
    July 31, 2011 3:55 am

    Here is an EXCELLENT article written by a bi-racial woman whose mother is black (from Guadeloupe) and father is white (from France). It’s called “Why asking ‘what are you’ can often be offensive”, and here is an excerpt:

    Mixed children are born with no real same combination of genes and features. I have three sisters and we all display different skin tones, body type and facial features. United Colors of Benetton could have hired us for their international billboards ads. I would have been the light skin woman with kinky hair and a muscular body and prominent behind!

    Everyone asked me the question, blacks, white, and Latinos among others, but there is a difference between white people and black people asking the question. The first group will have that surprised look as I announce the “French” part of my heritage, then a high pitch “really?” usually escapes their mouth as they start a cross examination with questions such as “not Haiti? Or a Brazilian background? Are you sure?”

    The need to discern where the black features on my face or body come from is always stronger than just accepting my answer. I guess every French person should come dress with a beret and a baguette at hand while singing “La vie en rose” and having Pepé le Pew on a leash.

    This is exactly what bothers me when the question comes from a white person. Most of the time, they look disappointed when I explain that I am a mixed child born from a black woman and a white man, as they were expecting a more exotic and interesting explanation.

    I found it more offensive for a black person to doubt my answers. I am aware that most people will ask me where I am from because of my accent, but the “What is your mix?” makes me feel like a new breed at a zoo. Curiosity can be blame on human nature regardless of their skin color, but some people can be plain rude on the topic. I used to work in a department store as a make-up artist for a black make up line and once encountered two black women who started yelling and cursing at me when I described a specific powder as “one made for us, black women.”

    They refused to believe I was black. They felt offended thinking I was trying to pass for black to reach my sale goal and that I was a Latina. I had to take my mother’s picture out of my wallet to calm them down and avoid potential trouble with my management.

    The “where are you from” question does not bother me as I know my accent will always tip people off, but personally, I would expect black people to have a better understanding of our wide cultural and ethnic spectrum.

    MJ’s kids are going to go through a lot of this as they get older! They’ll just have to learn to be patient with people, and accept the fact that there are always going to be idiots out there who will question their paternity, if not out of maliciousness, then out of ignorance and curiousity. http://www.thegrio.com/opinion/why-asking-what-are-you-is-often-offensive.php?page=2

    Like

  121. July 30, 2011 10:17 pm

    Helena & Lynette check email. Information.

    Like

  122. nan permalink
    July 30, 2011 6:04 pm

    lynande51 permalink
    July 30, 2011 5:49 am

    This is off topic but I think we need a little up lift. I have a link to a you tube video of some MJ fans following him home to Neverland after the verdict. You can see all the cars on the road and all of his neighbors have come out to the end of their driveways to welcome him home. This video pretty much says it all.Everyone in Santa Barbara County knew what Sneddon was about.

    I love that video.Shows the support MJ truly had, that the press didnt want to acknowledge….As far as Paris…i have no real answers, because I have no real authority over this child.. I am not raising her….I can parent my own child ,but i cant parent someone elses ………..you could see she wanted to defend her father on Oprah..she knows what he went through….she loves him and she misses him……..but .just the amount of garage out there can get anybody down ,so I dont think it is healthy for her to be answering these people….no point in debating with nuts..they dont care about the content ,they just love the attn…….to me the fans can try and intercept this trash but the family should nip this in the budd whether the child likes it or not…This is the stuff MJ was trying to protect them from..

    Like

  123. July 30, 2011 12:33 pm

    David, Lacienega has made a remarkable collection – I recommend everyone to go to her blog and see the superb job she did! http://lacienegasmiled.wordpress.com/2010/07/04/michael-jacksons-children-are-his/

    It is not that Michael’s paternity needs to be proved (the mere idea of having to publicly do it is absolutely disgusting) but since such a need arose it’s good that this job was done after all. With all the pictures provided it is a also a wonderful study of the wonders of genetics.

    On my part I want to add that people with a mixture of genes in their blood tend to be more gifted than those with “purer” genes. Within small nations where there is no inflow of new blood people have close genes because all of them are ultimately distant relatives – and this eventually brings about degeneration. So a cocktail of genes is very beneficial and this is what partially explains why Michael was so talented – he had African, Indian, white and Chinese blood in his veins all resulting in the fireworks he was.

    As regards his children it turns out that in 1996 the Associated Press reported that Michael performed a paternity test on Prince (see lacienega’s blog), and he probably did the same for Paris and Blanket, so this can close the subject once and for all.

    However haters do not limit themselves to questioning the children’s roots – they abuse Paris by calling her names and using all sorts of profanity towards her! Can this be helped?

    Like

  124. lcpledwards permalink
    July 30, 2011 9:11 am

    Since the main argument that haters use against Paris, Prince, and Blanket is that they “aren’t MJ’s biological kids”, I think we should all arm ourselves with the facts about interracial children. They don’t all “look” more black than white, and this post by Rockforeveron has a huge compilation of interracial celebrities, as well as numerous comparison photos of MJ and his kids.

    http://lacienegasmiled.wordpress.com/2010/07/04/michael-jacksons-children-are-his/

    The biggest surprise is that Slash from Guns N Roses is biracial! His mom is black, and his father is white! He is a PERFECT example of how a biracial child can look 100% white! And also notice how the media deliberately lightened the photos of Paris to make her look more white, too!

    Like

  125. lynande51 permalink
    July 30, 2011 5:49 am

    This is off topic but I think we need a little up lift. I have a link to a you tube video of some MJ fans following him home to Neverland after the verdict. You can see all the cars on the road and all of his neighbors have come out to the end of their driveways to welcome him home. This video pretty much says it all.Everyone in Santa Barbara County knew what Sneddon was about.

    Like

  126. July 30, 2011 2:47 am

    It is possible that Paris is ready for battle and nobody can stop her at this point.What is unknown is how ugly it can get.I doubt anybody in the family can stop her.It can get worse and too much, then I hope her therapist has the knowhow to get about it. Now, when a therapist or psychiatrist has an underage patient ,the confidentiality usually applies unless exeptions to this has been clarified from the outset.
    Then it is possible to arraigne a session where the parent(s) or guardian ad litem are present to discuss this very issue. On these blogs we can at most make her aware of the nastiest and craziest foes cand people who have built their careers on slander and betayal of Michael.

    Like

  127. July 30, 2011 12:04 am

    “I don’t get it how can they know and not do anything? Unless she is telling them that she can handle it, but no parent in their right mind would fall for that, it is not her decision to make. Not at 13 years old.”

    Guys, I don’t want to be inconsistent in what I am saying but I’ve followed some of Paris’s tweets and see that she is enjoying it so much that it will probably be impossible to forbid her going there or make her close her account. She likes talking to her followers, is happy that their number is more than 12 thousand and says that she has become a tweet-aholic. Actually I myself enjoyed it very much and was fascinated by some of her answers – you cannot help seeing who is standing behind her back and who taught her and her brothers all those beautiful things. I hope I don’t break any Twitter rules by quoting Paris (it is open to all anyway!):

    Paris Jackson
    Apologies Are Just Words, Take Action And Save This Earth.

    Paris Jackson
    if your relationship don’t last and you tried everything you could…it just wasn’t meant to be…

    Paris Jackson
    Show No Fear In The Face Of The Enemy -Prince Jackson

    Paris Jackson
    “Has life made it necessary for you to become fluent in Sarcasm?”

    Paris Jackson
    everyone can make mistakes.. just learn from ur mistakes so u wont keep making them.. no one’s perfect 🙂

    Paris Jackson
    building leggos with bloonket 😛 but my arm hurts from the vaccination the doc gave me.. is that normal 4 ur arm 2 hurt after the shot?? 😦

    Paris Jackson
    AWESOME JOB ON YOUR FINAL PRINCE!!!<3333

    Someone wrote the following to her:
    You know what bitch? Go step on a Lego. Barefoot.

    Paris Jackson
    usually when im mad, i started out sad, & an annoying person gave me a reason 2 get ticked off. so.. yeah

    Paris Jackson
    haha only the hateful ppl on twitter annoy me but not enough 4me2 really care abt the insults.. but i wasnt talking abt that

    Paris Jackson
    im done answering 2 you, im sorry but im trying 2 enjoy a movie & all these hateful comments r buggin me a lil bit, srry 😦

    * * *
    NO, I really don’t know what to do. It seems that blocking haters is the only and best way to handle it. Or them reconsidering their behavior drastically and forgetting they ever went or wanted to go to Paris Jackson’s twitter account.

    Like

  128. Teva permalink
    July 29, 2011 10:56 pm

    “All her family members have constantly been inundated with tweets whenever this arises, because this has been ongoing since she first openned her twitter. No response. She even posts photos of her and Royal together, again, the family knows full well about what goes on.” – Rockforeveron

    I don’t get it how can they know and not do anything? Unless she is telling them that she can handle it, but no parent in their right mind would fall for that, it is not her decision to make. Not at 13 years old. How can they not respond to this, but Randy can respond to being shot by Tina Turner.

    Like

  129. July 29, 2011 10:54 pm

    That was Royal, son to one of the 3T’s.

    Jaafar was the one with the stun gun.

    Like

  130. Teva permalink
    July 29, 2011 10:49 pm

    ” think it’s just like how they parent and discipline Jaafar, Lexci, and other teen Jacksons. Jaafar and others have also had abuse on their twitters. Prince used to get it too but he stopped using his…”

    You are right. Was it Jaafar in the car with Paris sining the Chris Brown song?

    Like

  131. July 29, 2011 10:35 pm

    “What’s going on with Paris is very visible and I know Joe has been told about it, Genevieve would obviously know, people tweet Jermaine about it all the time. But the only response from any of them has been Majestik, Joe’s right hand man”

    Rockforeveron, they are probably thinking that they cannot influence Paris as she has a mind of her own? I’ve suddenly thought of the Department of Children and Family Services – do they handle cases like child abuse carried out online in the Internet? Is it possible to approach them?

    But in order to do that it is probably necessary to make screen shots and produce evidence of people abusing Paris.

    Like

  132. July 29, 2011 10:34 pm

    All her family members have constantly been inundated with tweets whenever this arises, because this has been ongoing since she first openned her twitter. No response. She even posts photos of her and Royal together, again, the family knows full well about what goes on.

    They sure were vocal back over those Cascio tracks though…

    I think it’s just like how they parent and discipline Jaafar, Lexci, and other teen Jacksons. Jaafar and others have also had abuse on their twitters. Prince used to get it too but he stopped using his…

    Like

  133. Teva permalink
    July 29, 2011 10:33 pm

    Someone sent her this article.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/28/debbie-rowe-michael-is-no_n_222027.html

    I don’t understand how the family knows about this and not shut this down already! Don’t they know cyberbullying is just as harmful as physical bullying.

    Like

  134. Suzy permalink
    July 29, 2011 10:12 pm

    What about the 3T? Do they know? Are they willing to do something? They were swearing so much to protect Michael’s legacy and children.

    Like

  135. July 29, 2011 10:07 pm

    @Teva

    What’s going on with Paris is very visible and I know Joe has been told about it, Genevieve would obviously know, people tweet Jermaine about it all the time.

    But the only response from any of them has been Majestik, Joe’s right hand man

    12:24

    Like

  136. shelly permalink
    July 29, 2011 9:52 pm

    I can’t believe he or she called her a whore.

    Like

  137. July 29, 2011 9:21 pm

    “I just saw the replies to the person that calls itself MJfansRocky or something like that on her Twitter. The person does not even exist if you click on them. I think it is time for her to stop having to reply to nonsense like that. Maybe it is time for someone to contact Debbie. .. Unfortunately it started the minute she got her Twitter account and someone is keeping it up daily. She knows who she is and her and her friends reply very wisely but it is time for someone to put a stop to it and the only person that can do that is Debbie.”

    Lynette, Debbie is of course the obvious choice. If anyone has Debbie’s email or contact information please post it here.

    “What I think is amazing is this is obviously adults that are doing this to her. What kind of people are they?”

    Monsters. Those very monsters Michael sang about so often. Alison’s comment has sent me to the “Blood on the Dance floor” album and I listened to some of its songs again. All the five new songs there are strong, powerful, amazing and absolutely relevant as if Michael was singing about today. See his “IS IT SCARY?” song:

    .. if you came to see
    The truth the purity
    It’s here inside
    A lonely heart

    Can the heart reveal the proof
    Like a mirror reveals the truth
    See the evil one is you

    Yes, the people who were lynching Michael and are going after his children now are PURE EVIL. What I know for sure is that their own hatred will one day fully consume them and bring them down into the darkest circles of inferno (they are probably living there already) – but how many more will they take down with them in the process?

    The song is so angry that you can almost feel Michael coming upon them from beyond the grave:

    “IS IT SCARY?”
    THE EVIL IS YOU:

    EVERYONE SEES HIS OWN SELF IN MICHAEL AS IF IN A MIRROR.
    A monster sees the monster he himself is.
    And only a pure heart can see the purity of his soul.

    Here are the full and correct lyrics which are explaining it all:

    There’s a ghost out in the hall
    there’s a ghoul beneath the bed
    Now it’s coming through the walls
    Now it’s climbing up the stairs

    There’s a spirit in the dark
    Hear the beating of its heart
    Can you feel it in the air
    Ghosts are hiding everywhere

    I’m gonna be
    Exactly what you wanna see
    it’s you who’s haunting me
    Because you’re wanting me
    To be the stranger in the night

    Am I amusing you
    Or just confusing you
    Am I the beast
    You visualized
    And if you wanna to see
    Eccentric oddities
    I’ll be grotesque before your eyes

    Let them all materialize

    Is that scary for you baby
    Am I scary for you oh
    Is it scary for you baby
    Is it scary for you
    You know the stranger is you
    Is it scary for you baby

    There’s a creaking in the floor
    there’s a creep behind the door
    there’s a rocking in the chair
    But nobody sitting there
    there’s a ghastly smell around
    But nobody to be found
    And a coffin nearly open
    Where a restless soul’s poking

    I’m gonna be
    Exactly what you gonna see
    So did you come to me
    To see your fantasies
    Performed before your very eyes

    A haunting ghostly treat
    The ghoulish trickery
    And spirits dancing in the night
    But if you came to see
    The truth the purity
    it’s here inside a lonely heart

    So let the performance start

    Is that scary for you baby
    Am I scary for you oh
    Am I scary for you baby
    Am I scary for you oh
    So tell me is this scary for you baby
    So tell me is that crazy for you baby
    Am I scary for you
    You know the stranger is you
    Am I scary for ya

    Masquerade the heart
    Is the heart of hurting souls
    Just not what you seek in me
    ‘Cause the heart reveals the proof
    Like a mirror reveals the truth
    See the evil one is you

    Is that scary for you baby
    Am I scary for you oh
    Am I scary for you baby
    Am I scary for you
    So tell me am I scary for you baby
    Am I scary for ya baby
    Is it scary for ya baby
    Am I scary for you
    (I don’t wanna talk about it)

    Am I scary for you baby
    Is it scary for you
    I’m tired of being abused
    You know you’re scaring me too
    I see the evil is you

    Is it scary for you, baby… oh..

    http://www.mp3lyrics.org/m/michael-jackson/is-it-scary/

    Like

  138. July 29, 2011 8:42 pm

    “Two people just a few hours ago told her she was adopted…smh.These haters in their sick twisted desire are trying to get this child to doubt, question, then be mad at her dad. She handles them with integrity, but this mess being constantly thrown up in her face will have an effect on her if not now, it can later on…smh”

    Gigi, this is making me desperate. I am afraid the situation has gone too far already. Do you think that we should probably try to convince Paris ourselves that it would be better if she shut her Twitter account or at least explain to her the rules how to open it only for friends? (I wish I knew how). She is a good and clever girl and will probably listen.

    Like

  139. July 29, 2011 8:33 pm

    “I will write to the guardian ad item, although I do not feel that will do any good, as this GAL is only involved in estate related matters, but it’s worth a shot.”

    Juney, could you give us the email address of that guardian so that we could write to her too? The situation should be brought to her attention as soon as possible. I guess that Paris has a strong character and thinks she can handle the situation – only she doesn’t know the amount of hatred she is dealing with. She thinks that the majority of people are normal and she will answer a couple of times to some freaks and that will be it. And she probably won’t listen to just anyone – the person should be an authority to her. Michael wouldn’t have allowed it, but he is not here to monitor it, alas.

    But again you cannot protect the children from some freaks constantly insulting them – if it isn’t Twitter it will be something else – shops, school, street, whatever… It is probably only now that we begin to realize the terrible need for those masks – it would have been much better if the world had not seen the kids until after they grow up. At least this way they could have had a normal and calm life.

    Like

  140. July 29, 2011 7:42 pm

    Re Paris’ twitter account, within the past couple hours, someone calling themselves @Cares6, has sent hate to her, calling her a —– and several other names, to which she has actually responded. I agree with Teva, this family needs to MONITOR her account, if she should even HAVE a twitter account! I don’t care that the family is aware she HAS IT. What in the hell are they doing to safeguard her from this hateful stuff? I know if my granddaughter had a twit account (hardly see it happening) I would be right there with her showing her the ropes. These Jacksons are too busy with self-promotion to bother about Michael’s kids. Sorry, truth hurts. I will write to the guardian ad item, although I do not feel that will do any good, as this GAL is only involved in estate related matters, but it’s worth a shot.

    Like

  141. Teva permalink
    July 29, 2011 7:38 pm

    @rockforeveron

    “They know what’s happening, they just seem to think there’s nothing they can or should do, I think Majestik speaks for the family’s position when he said he feels it’s the fans who should be doing something.”

    I hope you are wrong, and that is not the family’s position because that has got to be one of the dumbest MJ related mess I have heard. SERIOUSLY?! The fans aren’t her parents, we can’t supervise Michael’s children – that’s their job! We have our own children to supervise.

    BTW I don’t have any children just generalizing.

    Like

  142. July 29, 2011 6:13 pm

    Majestik mentioned the Paris twitter situation in a recent thing he did, it’s on youtube. They’re aware of what goes on, Toya confirmed the twitter to fans at a book signing, Jackie was joking about kids being up too late the first night they were on, Gen and others initially followed the kids before fans kept pestering them too much over them being real or not so they stopped. They know what’s happening, they just seem to think there’s nothing they can or should do, I think Majestik speaks for the family’s position when he said he feels it’s the fans who should be doing something.

    Like

  143. Teva permalink
    July 29, 2011 5:22 pm

    @lynande51

    I don’t know about Debbie Rowe, but a guardian needs to get involve, this is the very definition of CYBER-BULLYING. The fans are doing their best to report the abuse to twitter admins, but what is needed is Paris to have restricted access to social networks. Someone(s) needs to tell the GUARDIAN AD LITEM to shut this **** down. You cannot stop the haters from coming at her with the way her account is set up, you cut one down and they will return with a different name. It is the responsibility of the FAMILY AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM to do something, before it takes a toll on her mental health.

    It is clear to me that Paris loves twitter, and any restriction she would be against, but who cares she is a child and responsible adults must determine what is best for her, and clearly an open twitter account belonging to the daughter of Michael Jackson is a bad idea. I say give her a choice 2 accounts: 1 for fans (monitored) and one for friends, or none. The adults in her life have to protect her that is their job, and I believe they are CLUELESS and we should inform them.

    I could go on a rant and blame DD, and it is true she started it, but the FAMILY AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM have to end it.

    Like

  144. July 29, 2011 3:48 pm

    “I am sure Michael has told his children what they need to know, he was not stupid to let them hear it, (whatever it is) from strangers.”

    He most probably did, but this is not the point. Even if the kids know everything about their ancestry, this constant need to rebuff all the negativity from others, to defend their father from various accusations, and their exposure to words like “perv”, “ped-le”, or “bitch” are not something which an average adult is able to handle not to mention a child! It is an abnormal situation to place a child into and the abnormal pressures for anyone’s psychological balance to withstand!

    If the despicable people who harass this girl want to win a victory over a child (or other Michael’s children) I highly doubt that these people are normal at all. At very best they are suffering from a terrible inferiority complex if the only victory they can achieve in life is over someone’s orphaned children…

    Like

  145. July 29, 2011 2:35 pm

    “We have to protect his children on twitter and anywhere online. Maybe, There should be a advocacy group dedicated to reporting these horrible mean hateful people and their comments. Maybe, It could be formatted like M.J.S.A.H.R. So, That people that don’t follow his kids on twitter can also help out and report the haters”.

    Autumn, I really don’t know how to make it technically – through an advocacy group, by blocking abusers and reporting them (which is probably a very good way of dealing with the problem for a start). All I know is that we cannot leave this matter unattended and that it should become the matter of concern of a great number of ordinary people. Only the public at large will be able to cope with it, because it should be done at every level possible – in everyday conversations, in comments on public forums, in our replies to articles and TV broadcasts.

    What I mean is no matter what people think about Michael they should keep saying to each other – DO NOT TOUCH THE KIDS! The kids should be able to live a normal life, with no harassment from either the media or ordinary people, with no speculation about their origin and no doubt thrown at their father’s parentage – because they love their father, have very fond memories of him, and nothing else is left to them, so ruining all that will be highly traumatic to the children.

    Let us try and explain that those who bring a torrent of unnecessary and harmful speculation on the heads of Michael’s children will also BEAR RESPONSIBILITY for everything that can happen to them as a result of this rude interference in their lives. Yes, these people will be directly responsible for changing these children from the wonderful kids they are now into (possibly) someone different. Michael raised and left them as remarkably nice kids and if they change it will be OUR DOING!

    The children are in their teens and are entering a dangerous age and it will wholly depend on their social environment (and God) whether they will be able to withstand all this negativity surrounding them now. And people should know – those who will add to this negativity will be DIRECTLY responsible for the consequences of it.

    “I Don’t think we should be engaged in fights with haters. We should not give them the attention, they are seeking”.

    I also think that fighting haters in Paris’s Twitter account is not the right place to do it. I would prefer her to never see their comments there at all (if it is possible). However fighting haters on other forums and showing them the infernal harm they are doing to the kids is unfortunately a necessity while dedicated haters exist at all.

    “Also, I don’t think people should be saying mean things about his Mom either. I believe that should be reported as well.”

    I really don’t understand when people decide what others should or shouldn’t do, especially when it concerns Michael’s mother whom he adored. She is human too, and is an old woman who has suffered a lot – and she does make mistakes like all of us do, but it is none of our business to judge her. We can advise her, help her, show her which is a better way to take – but we cannot allow her being harassed, insulted or ridiculed. Look at her as if she were your own mother and start from that point.

    Like

  146. lynande51 permalink
    July 29, 2011 7:57 am

    I just saw the replies to the person that calls itself MJfansRocky or something like that on her Twitter. The person does not even exist if you click on them. I think it is time for her to stop having to reply to nonsense like that. Maybe it is time for someone to contact Debbie. If she doesn’t take money for the interview I think that she can by pass the clause not to do interviews. Someone needs to help her a little. Unfortunately it started the minute she got her Twitter account and someone is keeping it up daily. She knows who she is and her and her friends reply very wisely but it is time for someone to put a stop to it and the only person that can do that is Debbie. What I think is amazing is this is obviously adults that are doing this to her. what kind of people are they?

    Like

  147. July 29, 2011 7:35 am

    Two people just a few hours ago told her she was adopted…smh This child should not have to write that she is 100% Jackson. Idk maybe its a teenager thing for the reason why she responds to this stuff and engages in a convo.

    I agree with what I recall someone said here before. These haters in their sick twisted desire are trying to get this child to doubt, question, then be mad at her dad.

    She handles them with integrity, but this mess being constantly thrown up in her face will have an effect on her if not now, it can later on…smh

    Like

  148. appleh permalink
    July 28, 2011 10:04 pm

    I´m convinced to that MJ has told his children whatever they had to know. I once read that Prince Michael I knew everything about MJ´s health, so there seemed to be a very close relationship between them and the other two ! I also believe that they are his children in every way.
    Yesterday I saw a doc about Mariah Carey and she is mixed too from black and white and she looks totally white ! I also learned that due to his heritage MJ is only half black, the other half is mixed from indian, asian and white !

    Like

  149. July 28, 2011 9:18 pm

    I am sure Michael has told his children what they need to know,he was not stupid to let them hear it, (whatever it is) from strangers. Also I have read that the Afro-American gene pool has 20% white genes.That is on the average. So it is not 50/50. My intention is not to offend anybody.Then there are Indian genes .That happens when people inhabit the same territories for 100:s of years.
    Love the pic. you chose Autumn Coplean. It is of Michael and the 5yo daughter of one of his classmates(and she was a bit more, but that´s another story.) She was at least part Indian (West).

    Like

  150. shelly permalink
    July 28, 2011 8:02 pm

    @lynande,

    What do you mean by “breakdown each injection?”

    Like

  151. July 28, 2011 7:44 pm

    About Paris’ twitter account, I believe the one to which everyone is referring is legitimately hers; sadly I wish she did not use twitter. I don’t use the medium myself but recall that nasty episode over a month ago (before Paris learned to block and report) when haters sent her way territory defamatory sludge about her father. I agree with Teva’s comment that she should be able to lock it and communicate only with her true social school friends and the like. What glory is there in thousands of subscribers “following” a teenager. And who knows that some of these “followers” could be stalking on behalf of Murry and his attorneys looking for her to offhandedly tweet something. I am hoping that her activity on twitter will lessen greatly when school starts. This is not the way a teen should be spending her summer vacation. Glad to hear Prince stopped using twitter. Someone in the home with the teen needs to instruct and monitor in the use of social media and place parental restrictions where necessary.

    Like

  152. July 28, 2011 10:36 am

    Thank You for this blog, This breaks my heart. I agree, We have to protect his children on twitter and anywhere online. Maybe, There should be a advocacy group dedicated to reporting these horrible mean hateful people and their comments. Maybe, It could be formatted like M.J.S.A.H.R. So, That people that don’t follow his kids on twitter can also help out and report the haters. Also, I Don’t think we should engaged in fights with haters. We should not give them the attention, they are seeking.Also, I don’t think people should be saying mean things about his Mom either. I believe that should be reported as well.

    Like

  153. Alison permalink
    July 28, 2011 2:44 am

    Lynande,
    Those are some very good points you raise, the fertility stuff and the bashir stuff.

    anyway, I am convinced they are biologically his children, i am also sure that they know for definite what the truth is. even if they were not biologically his, they would know, he would have told them, like most parents of adopted children do. and i am sure that, knowing the gossip he will have made doubly sure they are in no doubt.

    i hate the stupidity of these so called journalists who go on and on about it, what the f… does it have to do with them? and what does it matter anyway? they think they are uncovering some big secret, but do they really think the children would not know the truth? these people are so ignorant.
    They should be doing something about the humanitarian crises in Africa with so many little ones dying needlessly , instead they waste precious time and resources gossiping about crap. its disgusting.

    Oh Yeah, the trial – they have to make sure everyone believes he deserved to die because he was “weird”. the expletives coming out of my mouth can’t be typed!

    does DD have children? perhaps we could start a rumour they may not be hers , see how she likes that!

    Like

  154. Okunuga permalink
    July 27, 2011 10:18 pm

    I’ve come to the realisation that this people(haters)cannot and will not change their views about michael but to now start abusing his daughter is a new low even for them.i am praying hard for her for god’s strenght and guidance.

    Like

  155. July 27, 2011 1:26 am

    The children need to know that unfortunately in this world, it is
    Michael´s very greatness that inspires evil people to express their envy in these sickening ways.

    Like

  156. July 27, 2011 12:38 am

    Yes, we do it for free and journalists who are paid to do it never can be bothered to fact check anything that they send out to millions of people about one person.

    The Matt Fiddes thing to me was just amazing to watch unfold because not a single journalist mentioned the court case he was involved in with the Jacksons, how Katherine had said MJ told her he didn’t even know who Matt was, how Tito said at the time that Matt had threatened him saying he’d regret not backing him up in the court case. How the court case was dismissed after Matt was caught forging documents. How Matt said his parentage of Blanket came out because of that court case, when MJ wasn’t involved in the slightest so there was no reason for DNA or anything to ever come out of it. Just ludicrous and obvious and took two seconds to google up, but not a single journalist did.

    It shouldn’t be that easy to tell such a disgusting lie about a child who’s lost a father.

    Lynande,

    Also watch his body language in the discussion of Blanket’s mother. The first story he tells, then the second story. See which is an obvious lie. Shaking your head while giving a positive statement or stating something that is supposed to be truthful is body language 101: I disagree with what I am telling you. The only part he does something consistent with other body language he’s done (Oprah, Sawyer) is when he says that they were all his own sperm, he touches himself, his heart with a hand. I wasn’t sure what story to believe to begin with, but after re watching that clip and seeing the body language it’s obvious now. Strangely enough, insiders on forums also have always said that was the case too…

    Like

  157. lynande51 permalink
    July 26, 2011 11:45 pm

    @ Rockon, Yes it is easy for someone to sell their MJ “story” to a tabloid but look at us who reseach and research and write thoughtful and factual articles about him for free. I like being on the side of doing it for free because that is what the truth usually is .

    Like

  158. July 26, 2011 11:34 pm

    Yes, it just exposes Diane Dimond’s trustworthy sources for what they are. The same as Stacy Brown/Bob Jones who said that Macaulay Culkin was the father of the children.Harvey from TMZ said neither Debbie and Mike were the parents. Maureen Orth also said Michael wasn’t the father.

    And it proves again and again how easy it is for people to lie and sell stories about MJ for money.

    Like

  159. lynande51 permalink
    July 26, 2011 11:26 pm

    The information from DD is not new; she started that crap right after his death when she was making the rounds on the morning talk shows. The one on CBS occurred on July 6th or 7th 2009, days before his public memorial. Her news of course was magnified by the idiots Klein and Lester. It is apparent and important that they are discussing the issue of custody and where the kids go so goes the money. Once that was out there of course Klein and Lester wanted their piece of the MJ pie. It was so sickening at the time and even more sickening now when you hear the things they are talking about that in fact simply weren’t true. The entire world should know by now that what was said about this so called “leaked autopsy” was a fake that was first written about in The Sun (go figure). I shouldn’t have to say more but in the mind of this idiotic woman or whoever wrote the tabloid article that she is quoting she starts spouting her vile swamp water for fact all over the world. After all everyone knows that Michael Jackson was a freak especially her she was the one that made him one.
    Within 3-4 weeks Klein was suing Michael’s family (wouldn’t that include Klein’s Children from his so called “sperm donations”) for unpaid medical bills for 179 procedures that are actually the product of overbilling by a very imaginative office manager (if you read the documents you can see where they “breakdown” each injection of a single procedure, the IM injections is actually the Restylane procedure itself). He files bankruptcy in January, and then in February of 2010 he sues again for some ugly green sport coat that he claimed was $10,000.00.
    Michael’s death should have been the time for him to put up or shut up about Michael or his kids? IF they were his that would have been the time for him to demand DNA and prove to the world that they were. Instead he doesn’t go there anymore and just rides that bandwagon a little longer with his Jason Pfeiffer lie. One that was started in August of 2009 and when the world didn’t believe it that time they did it again in 2010. Then when he finds out that he isn’t getting anywhere and people hate him for it he decides to recant a year later, a case of too little too late Klein.
    Then of course not one person out there has stopped to think about the science of fertility/infertility treatment. Debbie Rowe would have been required to be on hormone therapy for 3 months prior to any type of in vitro or artificial insemination procedure. They would have had to do it just to harvest her eggs. It is this hormone therapy that used to result in multiple births sometime up to six or seven infants. In vitro in 1995/1996 consisted of implanting a minimum of five embryos to ensure at least one viable pregnancy which is why there was a rise in the incidents of twin and triplets that were born from in vitro. These pregnancies are always considered, even today, to be high risk pregnancies which often result in prolonged bed rest for the mother which was not the case with Debbie Rowe.
    The fact that they are all single births tells me that they were conceived naturally, even Blanket. Michael first says in the Bashir trash that he did have a relationship with Blanket’s mother. He changed his mind and told him it was a surrogate right around the time that he and his business partners realized that Bashir was not on the level. About that time they were trying to get him to hold up his end of the bargain that Michael was to have final say on the project and he was running and hiding from them to avoid doing that. It has a lot to do with Bashir’s deceptiveness and timing. He decided not to confide in Bashir at that time, but of course it was too late for the worst of it. And maybe, just maybe Michael thought his love/sex life was nobody’s business. Maybe he was sick of the media/hater sick obsession with his life.
    Of course a lot of this nonsense was done in the beginning to force a woman or women to go public with a relationship with Michael. There was no concern on the part of the media that she might not want to be the next episode of the tabloid fodder soup du jour. Imagine if anyone were to come out even today how they would be slammed with “interview” requests and chased unmercifully by the tabloids. Look at the complete lack of concern for his children the paparazzi have when they chase a 13 year old girl in a car pretending to be police. What for? What did they want from her? What would have happened to her if they had caught her? That is why those kids were covered. He knew that if people didn’t know what they looked like with him they could go out with friends without him and enjoy some type of anonymity.
    Michael had a lot of friends that weren’t sycophants that he could have asked for a “donation” if he didn’t want his own biological children that would have been far prettier than Klein or Lester and black. If that were the case why not just plain adopt? He could have done like Angelina Jolie and many other celebs do and adopt from another country like he said he wanted to. Why is it that people completely lose their common sense when it comes to believing crap about MJ? Because the lie is so much fun for their type of mentality, and the tabloids and other media have built a billion dollar industry on him alone.
    The thing is DD knows she’s full of it. She just wants to have someone challenge her so she can hide behind the shield law but cause a great deal of grief in someone else’s life. In the meantime she has no qualms about coming off as a bully as long as she gets readers what difference does it make.
    @ Tatum. To quote Diane herself from her interview on the night of MJ’s arrest regarding the “love letters”: “from your lips to God’s ear”

    Like

  160. Maria permalink
    July 26, 2011 10:23 pm

    There are no words to describe the behavior of journalists. Michael was brutally treated by the media in America. Michael’s children are unusual. Michael brought them perfectly. They have a great class, manners. They are intelligent, good and very beautiful. Michael is a model for other parents. He had excellent teaching abilities. Journalists in America were surprised when they saw that Michael brought up children so well.

    Like

  161. July 26, 2011 9:30 pm

    I know I shouldn’t feel this way but I want something bad to happen to Diane Dimond.

    Like

  162. July 26, 2011 9:23 pm

    Who said that the kids wouldn’t have twitter pages? They go to school and I’m sure their friends have twitter and face book pages. Not only that they live with people who are…. elderly who tend to be technology challenged.

    Like

  163. July 26, 2011 8:57 pm

    “Diane’s word has no value”

    Catherine, happy to see you here. Of course Diane’s word has no value. But now, with her new allegations about Michael not being a biological parent, all her previous talk about “molestation” issues ceases to have any value too (I mean for the general public – for us it has long been trash).

    If Michael’s children are biologically not his then it means he could have been trusted with ANY child and he would have raised each of them in a marvelous way.

    This automatically disproves all her previous stories about him being a “mol-ster”. Of course she will not accept this conclusion and will twist like a snake trying to prove both, but one thing does exclude the other, so let her decide once and for all which of the lies she prefers to adhere to.

    Like

  164. ares permalink
    July 26, 2011 4:59 pm

    What surprises me the most is that this attitude about regarding MJ’s kids is coming not only from the likes of Dimond , who we know that is a total nut, but also from the so called respectable journalists. I have told this many times but i really believe that when it comes to MJ, people, even the most sane ones, lose their common sense and their ability to think straight. I was watching the other day a video were Dimond was invited in a news program, i think, and she was talking about MJ’s kids and at some point she stated that those kids are 100% not his. And the news host listened at her without even butting an eyelid, without even questioning the things that she was saying, asking her how could she be so sure about the things she was saying etc. He just listened to her and was nodding along. And i was there watching at this disgusting thing, thinking to myself, i must be in the twilight zone. Those two people at that point were doing exactly the same thing that MJ was accused of. They were abusing his kids. I consider emotional abuse the same as the physical one. I mean, if I, who am a grown ass person, can get uncomfortable or better yet disgusted by the things that Dimond was saying in that video, then I imagine what would MJ’s kids would feel.

    On, the other hand, lets say that those kids are not biologically his. So, what? Lots of Hollywood stars have adopted kids from all over the world. Why don’t they make that a big deal? Elton John and his boyfriend adopted a baby in order to raise it. Why MJ didn’t have the right to have kids, whichever way he had them. He raised them perfectly well. Why this double standards with him? Why MJ and his kids are being treated like circus freaks or like Helena said , neutral scientific experiment, with everybody’s tolerance and consent? Well, I think we all know why.

    Like

  165. July 26, 2011 4:08 pm

    I am always fascinated by Diane D’s phrase..”sources say”. With Murdoch’s empire crumbling, we see what sources and how information was obtained. There is no reason to believe that the US was not equally infected by tabloid tactics. Diane’s word has no value. Also, for simply an adopted child, the file is not easily available and people do not screech about who anyone’s father is. It is absurd to say the least.These people know nothing.

    Like

  166. July 26, 2011 1:46 pm

    “Diane Dimond stated with 100% authority that PPB weren’t his”

    Diane Dimond did the same with the love letters she “was absolutely sure of” though even Tom Sneddon never saw them.
    She did the same with the “molestation” video which was allegedly seen by her valuable source (Victor Gutierrez) but which never existed in reality – for which she was even sued by Michael.
    And now she is coming up with another gross lie “based on her sources” – about Michael’s children this time.

    Let her go to hell with her sources. Whatever she says, whatever “proof” she has or she hasn’t – her position is monstrous as she is dealing with live human beings and not some Drosophila flies on which genetics laws were studied. It is not a neutral scientific experiment to be discussed by scientists in their labs – it is human lives she is dealing with and is manipulating to her liking!

    Like

  167. July 26, 2011 12:37 pm

    I am not so sure that Paris would have retweeted a nasty comment. She is not only intelligent, but she is someone who has lived her entire life in the spotlight, masks or not, has a far better understanding of the world in which she lives and if she found it that bad would have told her brother if sneaking or an adult if the account was real.

    The adults know about her account. Majestik commented the other day in a video about how the bullying on Paris’ account shouldn’t be tolerated, and he urged fans to defend her. But the family should be protecting her first.

    Like

  168. July 26, 2011 12:34 pm

    I think it’s funny that Diane Dimond stated with 100% authority that PPB weren’t his, so much for her valuable sources. Did those same sources also tell her about Prince having vitiligo? Both Prince, Paris and Prince’s girlfriend have all confirmed his vitiligo on various accounts too.

    The issue of their biology is important to his children. They know he’s their father, why should they have to endure having to listen to garbage from crazies trying to tell them he isn’t? It’s just done to hurt them, the same way Mike’s skin colour was an obsession for many people and they tried to use it to isolate him from black supporters.

    Like

  169. July 26, 2011 12:25 pm

    Unfortunately it is her authentic account. Prince had one too but he doesn’t use it anymore (wise kid).

    Like

  170. Suzy permalink
    July 26, 2011 12:10 pm

    I don’t really care if MJ is the biologocal father of those kids or not. I don’t know why is this even an issue for haters and fans alike. Does it matter? To me it does not. What matters is he raised them and loved them. He IS their father in every sense I find important!

    Like

  171. July 26, 2011 12:02 pm

    “I am so SICK of having to discuss and defend they’re paternity! Society needs to stop being so racist and just be happy they loved their father, and he loved them!”

    I think that the dirty talk Diane Dimond and Co. are making about Michael’s children is not racist only. I wouldn’t even call it racist – they probably focus on hereditary issues and the laws of genetics and on the face of it all of it looks “scientific”.

    BUT THIS IS NOT THE POINT.

    The point is that they can discuss whatever they like in their kitchen but not in open forums – because their so-called discussion can severely damage Michael’s children.

    The children are too young to hear this type of a conversation. The mere hint that their father may not be their father can cause severe damage to them, their character and mental balance. We all know from various examples what a blow it is for youngsters to suddenly learn that they are adopted and that the family they are living with is not actually “theirs”. In very many cases it is a cause of much drama and even tragedy in the family as it has to do with alienation, teenage rebellion (“You have no right over me, I am not yours anyway!”) and so on and so forth.

    In short, what DD is doing is a terrible violation of privacy of this family and a forceful intrusion into matters which are none of her business. She can think whatever she likes about Michael’s genetics but she has no right to make her speculations public as they are extremely damaging for the children’s well-being. I hope that Michael had all the necessary blood tests made long ago and they are not questioning the parentage within the family – but nevertheless what Diane Dimond is trying to do is unforgivable. She is trying to alienate the children from their family (the only one they have) and plant seeds of discomfort in their souls.

    And all those who repeat these speculations in their comments are doing the same.

    Monsters.

    Like

  172. July 26, 2011 11:08 am

    “I think this is why Michael covered the children faces, so they wouldn’t be picked on. Also the bodyguards did say he would go into the stores and turn the magazine covers around so they wouldn’t see the things that were being written about him. He knew this day was coming, but he did try to push it back for as long as possible.”

    Absolutely. It seems that covering the children’s faces and shielding them from the nasty things said about him was the only correct way to raise them. Michael desperately wanted a normal life for his children despite the totally abnormal world around him.

    I am sure that the goal of Diane Dimond and the like is to break Michael’s children the way they wanted to break him.

    Like

  173. July 26, 2011 10:56 am

    “There is another part to this story and it has to do with us of the Michael Jackson Community. I’ve received via email examples of some equally guttersnipe and defaming comment directed at Michael’s Mom. The kind of comments if I could put hands on the writers I’d slap them silly, give them a lesson in manners and respect either they lacked getting or have forgotten. The kind if MJ were here would not only make him weep, but madder than HELL. Comments these “FANS” would never have used if he were here.”

    Ooooh, this is a very big problem. Michael’s supporters should take every precaution not to get infected with “hatred craziness” from his enemies. It would be a complete disaster if they did. I see only one way of dealing with this problem – constantly visualizing Michael beside ourselves and looking up to him for answers to our questions. Would he want it? Would he behave in this way? What would he say in such a situation? I am sure that if we constantly looked up to him some of the problems would fall off by themselves.

    Like

  174. July 26, 2011 10:37 am

    “I hope she is proud of herself when she sees the tweets that she helped to create in her world of tabloid journalism and the mentality of people that read them. Look at those tweets Dimond and tell me what a nice loving grandmother you are. How would you like it to be your grandchild or child that has that said to them.”

    I didn’t know that it was Diane Dimond who started it. Then it is even more disgusting than I thought. She presents herself as someone respectable – at least when you look at her you might think that she is a decent person. And she even has grandchildren? And nevertheless questions publicly Michael’s parentage as if it is any of her business and right to talk about? Trying to deprive the orphaned children of their recently deceased father this way? And delivering a terrible and unexpected blow to the children? And all these Kleins, Lesters and so on immediately pop up with their own speculations to enjoy their 5 minutes of fame?

    All these people have evidently heard too much about “freedom of speech” (which is freedom to abuse in this case) but are absolutely not familiar with the concept of self-censorship (which is keeping to ethical laws even when no one is forcing you to adhere to them). Too many people have forgotten that some things are simply not done and that’s it.

    All of it has to do with ethics. Ethics is absolutely no joke – it is the only thing which distinguishes our behavior from that of animals as all the rest, including intellect, is inherent to animals as well. Ethics is solely a human feature and if it is missing, then there is a very big question whether these people have the right to be called human at all.

    Like

  175. lcpledwards permalink
    July 26, 2011 9:17 am

    Since we’re on the subject of Paris Jackson, take a look at this lady who is a former Marine officer who is trying to rejoin the military. Look at her olive skin complexion, her hair, and most importantly her EYES, and tell me she doesn’t look like an older Paris Jackson!

    I couldn’t BELIEVE IT when I saw the photo as I read the article last week. She is GORGEOUS! She’s 31 years old, and although she’s not a perfect carbon copy, the resemblance is there, and I’m sure she’s bi-racial too.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/us/17military.html?scp=1&sq=gay%20marriage%20military&st=cse

    By the way, here are 2 videos that should shut the haters up once and for all about MJ’s biracial children. In this first video, a black lady has 2 “white” babies, both of which are her biological kids!

    And this second video is full of biracial celebrities who look “more white than black”!

    I am so SICK of having to discuss and defend they’re paternity! Society needs to stop being so racist and just be happy they loved their father, and he loved them! Good grief!

    Like

  176. Suzy permalink
    July 26, 2011 8:27 am

    So the media can hack Paris Jackson’s FB and noone bats an eyelid? But when they hack the phone of a common person it’s a worldwide scandal. Like it should be a worldwide scandal, of course. I just wish they wouldn’t think what is not OK to do to common people is OK to do to celebrities and their children.

    Like

  177. lcpledwards permalink
    July 26, 2011 8:15 am

    @ Dani
    Just ignore that idiot. She’s trash, and has nothing else better in life to do except lie about MJ. Don’t waste your time with her.

    Like

  178. nan permalink
    July 26, 2011 7:28 am

    i think it is stupid the way the media went on about the veils..i was rereading the oprah stuff and she is saying they were veiled as if it was 24/7…..you dont have to be a rocket scientist to know the people most upset by it were people holding cameras..it was getting in the way of them getting the money shot………pfft….they dont see people , they see dollar signs

    ..as for the demon, oprah , bashir ..all these idiots talking trash about mj and kids……they all trash mj and yet are obsessed with him…i bet any of them would be just as thrilled as oprah was to interview his children…….. but if they cant get in the door , they sit on the street throwing rocks at them., All these people who criticized mj and his behavior toward children..
    They should look in the mirror… Bashir had no regard for gavin , when he put his face on tv in england and insinuates garbage. all the while feigning concern….would he have done that if he actually thought there was a chance gavin had been abused ,,,,,i really dont think so…,he was thinking of ratings ,not gavin….?…dimond hates mj … she claims mj3 are not his..so why hate these supposed innocent non related children??…..why does she hate them as if they were part of actual family and an extension of him?….why is it so important to these people to destroy everything and one MJ loved..is it because he achieved so much from such a young age that he makes his contemporaries all look like a bunch of under achievers…..that they pale in comparison?..i really hope this will not be the case for his children as well..

    Like

  179. Suzy permalink
    July 26, 2011 7:17 am

    @ Dani

    Please do NOT promote that blog here.

    @ Helena

    Please delete the link.

    Like

  180. lynande51 permalink
    July 26, 2011 7:10 am

    The comments in the article are from a gossip site not her Twitter. This is the site that hacked and leaked her photos. She does block comments like that, these are not directly to her, they are at her.UNfortunately someday she will see comments like that and might already have.

    Like

  181. July 26, 2011 6:13 am

    But we are assuming the Tweeter account is legitimate and if it is as someone who raised so called normal children will tell you that when there is a will there is a way for teens to do as their peers do. Tweeter is what pre-teens and teens do. I am not so sure that Paris would have retweeted a nasty comment. She is not only intelligent, but she is someone who has lived her entire life in the spotlight, masks or not, has a far better understanding of the world in which she lives and if she found it that bad would have told her brother if sneaking or an adult if the account was real.

    Like

  182. Teva permalink
    July 26, 2011 5:55 am

    “Well I hope she is proud of herself when she sees the tweets that she helped to create in her world of tabloid journalism and the mentality of people that read them. Look at those tweets Dimond and tell me what a nice loving grandmother you are. How would you like it to be your grandchild or child that has that said to them. Maybe we should look to see if they have Facebook or Twitter.” – lynande51

    You know .. DD would read those tweets, and find a way to blame Michael, she has the ability to remove blame from herself.

    I think this is why Michael covered the children faces, so they wouldn’t be picked on. Also the bodyguards did say he would go into the stores and turn the magazine covers around so they wouldn’t see the things that were being written about him. He knew this day was coming, but he did try to push it back for as long as possible.

    Michael himself had to be protected from the public. The bodyguards on their GMA interview said they would go on the internet/facebook (something like that), and make sure nothing nasty was being said before they let Michael see it because it would put him in depression.

    If Paris wants to interact with the fans etc I think she should have a separate monitored Twitter & Facebook account for that. IMO her personal twitter account should be locked where she can tweet to her friends only. She is only 13 and sometimes a grown up has to make such decisions for her. She is a celebrity kid and the media is following her, and it is only going to get worse when the trial starts.

    Like

  183. July 26, 2011 5:34 am

    The best thing which can be done is to block and report, but not retweet to others. I do not use Tweeter, but have learned a great deal about it in the past month. Retweeting allows any who are following someone to see the tweet, if they see it and send it on all who follow that person can see it as well, and on and on. Unfortunately some of us are quick to anger and react without thinking.

    Here is the beauty in all of this. The children were not so young not to remember their father. They interacted with him in a way no Fan or anyone else could have, he was their DAD not the KOP. Therefore, as much as it may hurt them to see this hatred, they know the truth and nothing a bunch of perverted, cowardly (White & Black) racists can do to change that. Sometimes I wonder if all this stirring trouble is really about Michael at all.

    There is another part to this story and it has to do with us of the Michael Jackson Community. I’ve received via email examples of some equally guttersnipe and defaming comment directed at Michael’s Mom. The kind of comments if I could put hands on the writers I’d slap them silly, give them a lesson in manners and respect either they lacked getting or have forgotten. The kind if MJ were here would not only make him weep, but madder than HELL. Comments these “FANS” would never have used if he were here.

    We have always been known to attack anyone who went after MJ, but there was respect and envy in the speaker’s words, that is rapidly changing.

    Like

  184. lynande51 permalink
    July 26, 2011 5:13 am

    One thing I saw in common in all of those tweets to her was repeating the gossip from the Tabloids. I personally hold Diane Dimond,Klein and Lester responsible for this and since they are the adult and this is a child it is their responsibility to clear it up. They were the ones that came out in public to back the insane claims of Diane DImond that she broke the story of them not being his biological children,And they claimed to be his friends. Talk about sycophants, here is a prime example.
    The funny thing is that Dimond knows that Debbie can not come out to refute any of it due to a clause in the divorce papers. Michael had her sign a confidentiality clause not to talk about their sex life or the kids parentage in an interview. His concern was of course the tabloids. She even had to get special permission from him to do the interview for the Footage you Were Never Meant to See. Otherwise I am sure she would come out and give the whole world a piece of her mind.
    As for Dimond, there is no one more evil on this planet than she is. She may have seen the report about the DNA from the 2005 trial when she bought it with Court TV’s money.However knowing what I know now she knows that no one can refute what she says. Those records are not available for public viewing Under the Freedom Of Information Act. This was the answer to me along with many legal codes cited for reference when I asked for them.Also if anyone gets someone from the Ca DOJ to leak them to them for money it is against the law and they will be prosecuted. That is what I was told so look out if someone tries.
    Dimond did the same thing with her information from the Sheriff’s record that she wasn’t supposed to see, as she did with the stolen settlement papers that she bought. She says it says one thing when no one is able to see it and then spins it in the direction that she wants people to believe. She does this to continue to make Michael her meal ticket. She is a parasite, a boil on the behind of society, and she should be held accountable. But of course she never will be.
    Well I hope she is proud of herself when she sees the tweets that she helped to create in her world of tabloid journalism and the mentality of people that read them. Look at those tweets Dimond and tell me what a nice loving grandmother you are. How would you like it to be your grandchild or child that has that said to them. Maybe we should look to see if they have Facebook or Twitter.

    Like

  185. Dani permalink
    July 26, 2011 4:19 am

    He totally denigrates the image of Michael.
    My God! I wonder why Michael has to go through all that!
    He really needs our love and compassion.
    Sorry, I don’t speak English very well, but I LOVE MICHAEL FOREVER.

    Like

  186. July 26, 2011 1:09 am

    “Hiding after an anonymus account and insulting and harrassing children is the typical behaviour of cowards, I am sure they won´t even get a single word out, when they would met the children from face to face”.

    Appleh, I am not so sure of it. These people are drunk with impunity of trashing Michael for decades. Drunk in the meaning of being carried away by their own malice and having a free hand in being vile to Michael for too long. This malice reached a point when it became good manners in the society to give “knowing” looks to each other and make jokes at the expense of Michael Jackson (even Lou Pearlman did it!) – and the one who didn’t support the conversation in the same manner turned into a sort of a “freak” himself. Now they are so overwhelmed by their habitual hatred for Michael that they cannot imagine that any other attitude is possible towards him and his children.

    There is a phrase attributed to Jesus in one of the Apocrypha where he says: “I came and found all of them drunk”. This is what happened to these people – all of them are drunk.

    To see that these haters are completely inadequate in their thoughts and deeds we could compare their behavior with that of someone who comes up to a child in the street and says that she is a b*tch and her father is not her father but a complete stranger to her. Will you think such a person normal? Certainly not. However it has become “normal” to abuse Michael and his children in this way.

    People should shake off this terrible veil off their eyes and cast a really fresh look at what they are doing.

    Like

  187. July 26, 2011 1:07 am

    “I don’t know what kind of sick, sad person would harass children on the Internet”

    Sociopaths with no life

    Like

  188. July 26, 2011 12:31 am

    I don’t think that Paris or any of her brothers has a Twitter acount!!
    I did saw that acount but I highly think is not possible.
    What is the problem of those monsters attacking a child even it is not Paris??
    What a sick world indeed.

    Like

  189. July 25, 2011 11:59 pm

    “I don’t know what kind of sick, sad person would harass children on the Internet. No matter what that person thinks about MJ.”

    I think those who have lost all sense of reality. They got used to trashing Michael so much that they automatically extend their hatred to his children. They are like robots or zombies who are not even aware of what they are doing. They were taught by the media that any insult of Michael Jackson would go unpunished and anything was acceptable when it came to harassing Michael. If you tell them now that their behavior is abnormal they will be very surprised – why isn’t it normal to harass Michael’s children if it was okay to harass him? I can even see the baffled look on their faces…

    These people should be taken by their shoulders and shaken really well until they wake up or sober up to reality.

    Like

  190. appleh permalink
    July 25, 2011 11:05 pm

    These people are really crap !!! Hiding after an anonymus account and insulting and harrassing children is the typical behaviour of cowards, I am sure they won´t even get a single word out, when they would met the children from face to face. I´m not so familiar with the internet, even when I have some expirience so I don´t know if it is possible to reveal these persons identity and go after them by law ?
    I heard from these twitter “messages” at the time of the 2nd anniversary first when someone told me about this and got really outraged about. Is this all why Paris had the audacity to speak at the memorial that her dad is the best daddy in the whole world and that she loves him so much ???

    Like

  191. Suzy permalink
    July 25, 2011 10:23 pm

    And this was made by Paris too:

    Like

  192. Suzy permalink
    July 25, 2011 10:17 pm

    I don’t know what kind of sick, sad person would harass children on the Internet. No matter what that person thinks about MJ. I sense jealousy and also racism in these tweets.

    On a positive note, this is a video Paris made. I actually like this one more than the official Hold my Hand video!

    Like

  193. TatumMarie permalink
    July 25, 2011 10:16 pm

    This is so sad.

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. Michael’s Kids: Forging Their Own Identities | AllForLoveBlog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: