Take A Stroll Down Memory Lane with the “Michael Jackson Was My Lover” Photo Album

There were several pages of photos found inside the book “Michael Jackson Was My Lover” by Victor Gutierrez that would at least verify that he was inside both Evan and June’s respective houses. Some of these photos, when you first see them and read the documents, will make you laugh. The stories that go with them are full of magic cameras that can remove makeup, theories about Vitiligo and circumcision, and question marks in the wrong places.

I have been keeping track now of all of the different descriptions out there of what they claim Michael’s genitalia looked like or what the identifying features were. I think I can safely say after today that there is no less than six. None of them are the same and the one that should be included and isn’t (if it were truly a match) is suspiciously missing from the book “All That Glitters“. The book “All That Glitters” includes a lot of information in it but only a single sentence says that Jordan’s description given to Larry Feldman on December 14^th, 1993 was a match to the photos. What is interesting is the fact that they acknowledge that this is in fact the second description that Jordan Chandler gave. The first one was on September 1^st, 1993 to ADA Lauren Weiss for law enforcement purposes. That would have been the one that was used by Detective Deborah Linden of the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department. Why would they need to give two descriptions? Well one was for Law Enforcement and the second one was for the Civil Case! That’s right in order to use that description and the ensuing photos they would have to attach it as part of Jordan’s Declaration or Statement of Facts as proof of his claim, and oddly enough when they filed his December 28^th, 1993 Declaration there was no description! The reason that Michael didn’t have to give them his photos when they had that multiple choice question in their brief before the court is because they were taken for Michael’s defense and were exculpatory!

Probably the most amusing one that I have read is the one from Ernie Rizzo, a Private Investigator from Chicago that claimed that Evan Chandler had hired him. His version was that Michael was striped like a Barber Pole. No, I’m not kidding!

HighBeam Research

Title: PRIVATES DETECTIVE SHOCK FOR JACKO; Star has striped manhood, abuse trial will be told.(News)

Date: February 19, 2005 Publication: Daily Record (Glasgow, Scotland)

Byline: By Anthony Harwood

JURORS at Michael Jackson’s trial will be told the pop megastar’s manhood looks ‘like a barber’s pole’.

Private investigator Ernie Rizzo yesterday said the star’s latest alleged victim could provide damning evidence about Jackson’s unusually marked penis.

Rizzo was hired by the family of Jordan Chandler, who accused Jackson of molestation in 1993.

He claims he saw police photos of a naked Jackson taken more than 10 years ago. And he said distinctive brown rings were visible around the star’s penis as the singer bleached his body twice a week.

Legal experts claim the distinctive ‘two tone’ markings on Jackson’s manhood could play a key role in the prosecution’s case.

Rizzo claimed: ‘It looks like a barber’s pole – that is exactly what it looks like.

‘The first kid and all the other kids who have seen his penis know there are brown circles around it.’

Rizzo dismissed claims Jackson, 46, suffered the skin-whitening disease vitiligo.

He said the singer lightened his skin chemically – and Jackson’s ex-wife Debbie Rowe got him the bleach when she worked for a dermatologist.

CAPTION(S):

ALLEGATIONS: Ernie Rizzo; ACCUSED: Michael Jackson COPYRIGHT 2009 Scottish Daily Record & SundayThis material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group.

This document provided by HighBeam Research at http://www.highbeam.com

Poor Debbie! She got blamed for everything! Like she could get medications without a prescription! Then there is the one from Christopher Andersen, the Author of “Michael Jackson: Unauthorized Biography“. He said they were looking for a Winnie the Pooh tattoo! You can also read where some people in the media got a copy of that search warrant and knew that Sneddon had an addendum added to the warrant that said that Michael had no right to refuse the photographing of his body and if he did it would be seen as a sign of consciousness of guilt and he would be arrested which is a direct violation of the Fifth Amendment right to silence and self incrimination.That is why Johnny Cochran and Howard Weitzman fought to have the photos and the warrant sealed! Still, Michael went through with the search, was not arrested because of a consciousness of guilt and was not arrested because the evidence sought through the search warrant was not found.

We can then look at Diane Dimond’s version that says he was mottled pink and brown and had a dark spot on his butt that miraculously moved forward to the underside of his penis, and no one could remember if it was light or dark now that it moved forward like that? In her book there isn’t actually a photo of the dark spot on his man parts, just a maybe that it was there because someone said it was. There are varying sources to that one too! It might be Detective Gary Speigel, Detective Russ Birchim or, if you believe her, it might even be Dr. Richard Strick. Face it guys, those spots meant nothing and Michael walked away because he wasn’t circumcised! That is the only constant in the whole thing, and here is the complete drawing included in the book MJWML.

This is funny because this is why I decided to buy the book in the first place. We “borrowed” this picture from another blog and were threatened with prosecution and a $100,000 fine or both if we did not remove it due to their copyright on it. I found that email today. So we had to use the second version that was made available on the website of Ray Chandler that was opened in 1996.

So you can see that the most revealing information was removed from their version. I don’t know about anyone else but when I see the words “My theory” for an ideal or hypothetical situation (esp. in the phrase in theory) about a description I have to ask why anyone would even have a theory if it was something they had actually seen? Wouldn’t you think they would know? Then there is the rest that is in that box that says “ass blotched shade of brown so how is MJ p. V be selective Orietta bleach” Then there is the rest of it where they say “Mike circumcised short public, Brett not circumcised, Brett pulled out head and say “look look but not all the way back or it hurts” Brett masturbates by twisting skin a different way. Body oil stink, Brown patch on ass left glut. Bleaching cream Orietta, Vaseline in Brett’s ass because bleeds when shitting, Brett eats a lot and takes big shits, Brett so cute like little, get med exam of Brett, Brett baby bottle like when sick”.

By the way the baby bottle drinking is covered in the book and it was reported to have been told by Adrian McManus in the now defunct British Tabloid News Of The World. I think the whole thing is suspicious when you consider that this was written in 1993 and that story about the baby bottles appeared in 1996. Needless to say I think we all know that this is not what was given to the police, but was in fact notes being taken by someone on how to instruct Jordan in giving his description. There you go, that is my theory and my theory is that it was Evan taking notes from Victor (like V is for Victor). There are several examples of Evans handwriting in here, especially the page from his chronology which we will look at in a minute.

Now the next group of photos: This is of some of the documents that were available in there. I think the first one we should look at is the letter from the Chandler’s and Larry Feldman firing Gloria Allred. She never has to wonder again why she was no longer on the case and couldn’t talk about it anymore. It says right in there she was being fired. That mystery has been solved for Gloria now and I am as relieved as she is, I’m sure. We also have a retainer agreement or two, one for Gloria and one for Larry,

      

just like the one on The Smoking Gun, and an inter-office memorandum where Feldman is helping Evan brainstorm his own injuries due to his son allegedly being molested. What a great dad this guy was!

There are a couple of letters from Rothman to Pellicano and Pellicano to Rothman. We also have a couple of bank statements and of course the emancipation of Jordan Chandler along with letters from his lawyers for his trust fund. Of course someone needs to point out that the retainer agreement means just what it says, and Feldman and his costs were taken from the settlement because the settlement does not specify anywhere that Michael pays more. It has that word total and in a legal document that means total. The retainer also preceded the settlement agreement so if Larry would have been paid by Michael’s insurance separately he would have been guilty of double billing. That is a legal no- no, with fines, and everything.

For those who question the insurance settlement I have one word for you: subrogation. Insurance, just like medicine, has its own set of laws and rules. Now, knowing what we know about how much the Chandlers wanted “the truth” to get out, why didn’t they just show us the parts of the documents that prove Michael gave more than what the total was? You can grab and nitpick that Settlement Agreement all you want, but unless you know about a little thing called Case management in a civil case, I don’t think those people should be taken seriously in the analysis of that Settlement agreement.

First, according to this, the two sides have to have a face to face and agree how the case will be managed, and because of the caseload in California courts all of them are automatically set up for ADR ( Alternative Dispute Resolution), that would be ALL of them. Then, depending on the face to face, it goes first to one of the 3 choices mentioned in that law and one of those choices is Judicial Arbitration.

Then again, according to the letter from Jordan’s attorney about his emancipation, they are urging him to keep the trust set up by Judge Rothman as it is. Judge Rothman was the judge that set up the trust settlement and he was also the judge that ordered the civil trial to go before the criminal trial. Now we already know that this was settled in arbitration by a three judge panel. We found that out from the Frozen in Time seminar from Carl Douglas so that would have been done through an entity called JAMS. It seems that arbitration is where things go against a defendant, and it can be mandated by the court (the judge), in a civil trial. Once it went to arbitration it seems like the defendant (in this case, Michael) they can settle without his consent and he has no legal standing to object or file suit against them. The term arbitration should make one pause and think for a minute because something in it is going to be arbitrary, the root word of the word Arbitration. No wonder Tony Pellicano quit!

I think too that some of the people that were involved and seem to give that pat answer of “but I wasn’t there” should be cut some slack. That answer coming from multiple mouths saying almost the identical thing sounds like it might have been part of that confidentiality agreement.

I also want to point out a couple of little pictures to everyone. One is the page from Evan and Natalie’s divorce saying how she gets half the money, but the line above says that only Evan gets to commercially exploit said literary works. Once again, what a wonderful guy, a real gem!  There are also a couple of bank statements of Jordan’s trust and his new bank account. There is a photo of the letter from Mathis Abrams on dated July 16th,1993. That would not have been delivered until the day after Evan supposedly pulled out Jordan’s tooth, but this is what they presented to Michael and Anthony Pellicano at the Westwood Marquis Hotel on August 4th,1993 as some kind of proof that Michael allegedly broke the law. The emancipation proves that when his dad and Natalie divorced, he stayed with her. There is also a photo of a Consent to Administer Anesthesia form, along with some photos of Jordan without his shirt, which look like he just woke up or something, and he is in a bathroom somewhere. Who took these pictures and how did they allow Victor to put them in his book or why would they want them in a book? Now does anyone wonder why we think Victor is in fact a pe*******? Maybe Jordan didn’t think his dad was such a great guy after all?

Now let’s look at the pages of Evan’s chronology. I won’t add too much commentary on that but you will see there are a couple of things that speak for themselves, like little reminders to check dates, and a question mark on page five behind the statement “Jordan masturbated Michael” (page 26). I don’t know about you but whenever I see a question mark in a place like that I have a tendency to question the rest of the story too, how about you? Be sure to pay attention to the writing on the last page that is not Jordan’s signature but the part where they call Michael’s fans crazy. Now is that a match to the writing on that drawing posted above or isn’t it?

 

There is a picture of Michael sitting in a chair in Jordan’s room at June’s house. According to this book, Evan gave this to the cops as proof that Michael was getting ready to sleep in the same bed as Jordan. There are other photos of his room so I will just say this about that: I think if he was getting ready to sleep in the bed with Jordan, I would be more convinced if a pillow wasn’t in the chair like he had slept in the chair all night!

Then of course there are the gratuitous photos of Jordan with his little brother Nicky in the tub together (added for Victor’s target audience of his friends from NAMBLA) which will not be added to this post. We also won’t add the page with a photo of 4 pairs of underwear. But we will add the page with a page from Orietta Murdoch to Michael and the Page from a NAMBLAPublication so you know where he get the idea that this guy had the same agenda! You know that P*** know that they are criminals don’t you?We have Blanca Francia with Victor’s arm around her back, and Orietta Murdoch, not to be confused with Orietta bleach? There is also a photo of Victor shaking hands with a man he claims to be Judge Hugo Alvarez from the Dominican Republic, who married Michael and Lisa. His claim is that this man told him right away that the marriage was a sham and because Michael and Lisa eventually got a divorce, Diane Dimond trusted Victor as a source when she told the story about the non- existent tape on the radio and TV.

Now let’s look at the photos of Evan’s plan of attack, his arsenal of weapons, and his surveillance equipment that was necessary due to the multitude of death threats from us crazy Michael Jackson fans. They have knives and guns and mace and a bullet proof vest all in readiness for our attack! Speaking of attack, they even have a photo of a white board with Evan’s plan of attack against Michael and Pellicano. It looks from what I can make out that Evan was going to “call Lee on Wed. about dinner”. Who was Lee and how was he/she going to attack Michael when he/she was out to dinner with Evan? That perplexes me.  I think Victor says things just to say them, just like Ralph Chacon.

It was a good thing that Ray Chandler didn’t chase down Denise Pfeiffer with that short barrel shotgun hanging there, instead of a .38 caliber pistol stuck in the back of the waistband of his jogging pants!  That police surveillance equipment only worked if Evan or Natalie turned it on, so unfortunately they didn’t catch that multitude of obscene and crazy phone calls from MJ fans. It’s a pity because if they had I would have been more believing of that story, though I do have to admit that someone called in a bomb threat to Larry Feldman’s building, whether or not it had to do with this case or not I don’t know, so he got Federal Protection for a while. The book doesn’t specify how long. Maybe it was until the Federal Marshall’s got him down the elevator and in his car because that was about how long Mark Geragos got their protection when a bomb was found in the port a potty out in front of his house in 2003.

Here is a photo of Miko Brando and Norma Staikos. Norma, according to this, fled the country in order to not testify in front of the Grand Jury. She did come back and did testify though, after settling her father’s affairs, since the reason she went to Greece in the first place was because he died, without advanced notice to Victor Gutierrez or Evan Chandler. Miko was one of Michael’s best friends, but according to court documents about the 1108 evidence he made a statement that said he would never leave his kids alone with Michael Jackson. Miko would have been a man really planning for the future because he wasn’t married and did not have children in 1993! He married his wife Karen at Neverland on August 27^th, 1994, the same day that Delores “Dee Dee” Jackson, Tito‘s former wife, was found dead, murdered by her boyfriend Donald Bohana. Miko also seemed to rethink that “statement”considering that his daughter was called by the defense in the 2003 trial!

In a little side note, it took Dee Dee’s boys, Taj, Tarryl, and TJ,( the youngest one was 16 at the time) two and a half years to convince the DA in Los Angeles county that they should investigate  Bohana for the murder of their beloved Mother. So if people wonder why the Jackson family has a slight mistrust of the justice system maybe it was because they had always had to fight for equality in it!

Anyway that was why Michael had to leave the reception early after being best man, to go to his family when they needed him. And he seemed to have let his kids alone with Michael too once they were born so I have to question the prosecution’s sources about that one. But of course a better question is who did Miko make this supposed statement to? It certainly wasn’t the Grand Jury, so I wonder of it might just be the over active imagination of Victor Gutierrez at play here? What do you guys think?

Well let’s end this lovely stroll down memory lane with Victor’s MJWML photo album on a happy and uplifting note shall we? There are photos in the book of a young and younger Michael with and without friends.

Here are the photos of a young Jordan and his first serious girlfriend Sonnet. There is even a love note from Sonnet to Jordan written in January after his 14^th birthday. Photos of the young and happy teens on an amusement park ride after the settlement, and it must be post “extensive therapy” because Jordan appears to be all smiles.

So what do you guys think? Is this the story of a crime? It is, but the crime is the extortion of Michael Jackson by an over the top greedy father and a man that I would classify, not as any kind of journalist, but as the most effective and dangerous celebrity stalkers of all time!

The saddest part of all is the remark by one person on the inside that said that all the Grand Jury ever saw was evidence of Michael Jackson’s poor judgment!

Legal

Posted: Mon., Apr. 11, 1994, 11:00pm PT

                        Print

Share

D.A. Garcetti denies Jackson probe ended

By ADAM SANDLER

Los Angeles County District Attorney Gil Garcetti denied reports Monday that the investigation into child molestation charges against singer Michael Jackson is concluded, and that a decision not to file criminal charges has been reached.

“The matter is still under investigation,” Garcetti said. “I’m reasonably confident that the investigation will be completed by the end of the month.”

Addressing a claim made by the syndicated tabloid TV show “Hard Copy” that the case will be labeled a “D.A. reject”– a term used to describe the decision not to file charges in a criminal investigation — Garcetti said, “No decision has been made.”

Sources note it is unlikely a determination as to whether charges will be filed could be made while the molestation probe is still ongoing.

The grand jury session in Santa Barbara was extended Monday for an additional 90-day term to allow S.B. District Attorney Thomas Sneddon to gather additional evidence.

Sneddon also dismissed reports that the probe was concluded, and said that it is premature to decide whether charges against Jackson will be filed.

“When we reach a time where we are prepared to make a statement about our conclusions, we will do that in fairness to everybody at one time,” Sneddon said, referring to the joint S.B. and Los Angeles County probes.

The two grand juries continue to hear testimony into allegations the pop star molested a 13-year-old boy. Sneddon said the boy is scheduled to meet with prosecutors this week.

Although prosecution sources admit to being frustrated in their grand jury probe, failing to get direct evidence linking the singer to the molestation charges, privately they concede that their case would be stronger if the boy would agree to testify.

Jackson has been under investigation since last August, when the boy claimed he was sexually molested by the entertainer. The grand juries began hearing testimony last month.

Several Jackson camp insiders have appeared before either the L.A. or Santa Barbara County grand jury, including former security consultant Anthony Pellicano, Jackson’s mother Katherine and several housekeepers. Miko Brando, a driver for the singer, and Norma Staikos, Jackson’s executive assistant, have also testified.

The charges were initially labeled by Jackson handlers as an extortion attempt by the boy’s father, who allegedly sought financing for a film deal.

When negotiations broke down between the father, a Beverly Hills dentist with ties to the film industry, and Pellicano, a lawsuit against Jackson was filed by the boy.

The lawsuit was settled in January, with Jackson agreeing to pay the boy an undisclosed sum. Sources put the settlement figure at $ 15 million.

The boy’s father was cleared of extortion charges by LAPD investigators a week before the settlement was announced. (It was actually part of the settlement agreement, read it again; it says Michael Jackson publicly withdraws the claim of extortion)

While grand jury testimony is sealed, sources said that none of the witnesses so far have offered anything that would directly implicate the singer. “The only thing Jackson could be convicted of at this point is bad judgment,” said an investigation source.

Contact the Variety newsroom at news@variety.com.

What was his act of poor judgment? He was there, that’s all it takes, if you don’t believe me look up the legal definition of negligence, which is what settled a global claim of negligence and allowed an extortionist to go free. Some people are just willing to do anything for MONEY!