DO THE RIGHT THING FOR MICHAEL and let the future take care of itself
You find your pleasure scandalizin’ every lie. Oh father, please have mercy ’cause I just can’t take it [Scream]
Over there Lynette expressed the feeling many Michael’s supporters probably have now:
- “Even if what the insider’s letter says is true the press and the haters will never allow it to be. While I have been looking up articles I have found some of the most ridiculous things being said….”
Yes, when it comes to the truth about Michael Jackson the press is still acting as if it is totally blind and deaf in the worst case or is extremely forgetful at best.
Initially I was amazed to see that no matter what truthful facts were uncovered they had no effect on the media and it kept playing the old tune. I expected a more natural and human reaction – some kind of an admission like “oh yes, at least in this and that point we were wrong, though in some others we probably weren’t”. This would have required more research and more interaction with the press and the public, and this reaction would have been only natural – but even this was missing.
Oh my god, can’t believe what I saw as I turned on the tv this evening. I was disgusted by all the injustice [Scream]
But now something else is also adding to that anger and frustration. It is a quiet understanding that no matter what their suffocating lies are we cannot be different either and under no condition can give up the truth – and this means that we will have to live and function in a world parallel to theirs. They live in their world of lies, while we live in our world of truth and all of it is a kind of a Matrix movie turning into a reality.
If they prefer not to notice us we can choose not to pay attention to them either and go on quietly doing what is necessary to be done – restoring the truth about Michael Jackson and finding out who was really who in this shameful matter of lifelong harassment of an innocent man.
You tell me I’m wrong, then you better prove you’re right. You’re sellin’ out souls but I care about mine. I’ve got to get stronger. And I won’t give up the fight [Scream]
I’ve always believed that truth is absolute in its quality and it is a big honor to be someone who uncovers it and restores the events the way they really were. And speaking up for Michael and telling the truth about him is a big, an incredibly big honor on its own.
You decide for yourself why it is important for the truth to be told. The only thing I know is that the truth about Jackson is simply a must, and that the world needs it in no less degree than Michael himself.
Vindicating Michael 
Helena my dear, I just found this amazing and loving web of yours! Thanks a lot for being such a loving, caring and beautiful person as you are. Thanks for doing all of this for Michael. I know you don’t do this to be acclaimed, I know you do this ’cause you’re a fair and good person who also sees what a great and strong human being Michael was. Anyways I wanna say thank you for all your work, for all of this you make for him. I truly love this man and I’ll always do the right to show everyone he was just treated in a very unfair way. I’ll share your web with everyone who needs it and with all the amazing MJFam, thanks again. Send you a lot of blessings and a big hug! Love you already, thanks my dear!
P.D.: Do you have a twitter or fb account or somewhere we can follow you besides this amazing blog? ….LOVE U. Michael is smiling to you! I’m sure of that…
LikeLike
Re my comment far below;I meant ofcourse some media and not all.Quite the reverse ,it has to some degree changed for the better,that is more favorable to MJ.
And it is good to see new commentators from countries all over. The nights when I stay up late I usually have the channel , without picture, that alternates brief news with music on. Almost every night there is one by Michael.
LikeLike
“I live in Poland, where Michael has loving and devoted fans. I am impressed with this blog. For 2 years I’ve had a blog dedicated to Michael Jackson: Michael Jackson’s Neverland http://mojeblogowanie-michaelina.blogspot.com/, where as here I am fighting for justice for him.”
Michaelina, hello, I’ve encountered your blog when looking for some information and was also impressed by the vast collection of great pictures and materials you gathered there. I wish you all the success, luck and perseverance you need for doing this work. And that head image for your blog is absolutely splendid. It shows Neverland in bloom.
From Van Valin’s book “Conversations in Neverland with Michael Jackson” I have a story for you about Michael planting flowers all over Neverland:
LikeLike
Interesting comments. About the FBI investigation, I really wonder why they investigated him so thoroughly from the early 90’s up to 2005 (according to their website). What was their agenda really? If they wanted him down, what was their motive? According to their website “The FBI assisted Los Angeles Police Department detectives who traveled to the Philippines to interview possible witnesses and shared news reports from London about a potential victim.” And that is only the second case. Talk about going overboard!
Its also interesting that MJ sang in the song “D.S” that he thinks Tom Sneddon cooperated with the CIA. Well it wasnt the CIA, but almost. I think he was much more aware of what was going on around him than he was showing.
I wouldnt be surprised if the Arvizos+Chandler family are being monitored by them to keep their mouths shut.
LikeLike
“I think mainstream media has changed their mind. In my country Peru it has. I think in Mexico it has.
But the problem is American tabloids and UK tabloids. They hate Michael Jackson…It will take a lot to change that.”
Jojo, I am happy to hear that in your country and Mexico the media perception of Michael has changed.
As regards the US and UK media the only recipe I have is ignoring them in the same way they ignore us, and spread the word of truth in every other way we can. I myself have long stopped listening to the media (in my country in the first place) and only feel much better after that. We would love to see the media change their ways, but since they would not, what else is there left for us but stop listening to them?
LikeLike
“Gordon Smart, a UK tabloid The Sun reporter, is believed to be a friend of Jordan Chandler… If he is friends with Jordan, why rule out the posibility that other media like CBS, NBC and others befriended the rest of the Chandlers or Jordan Chandler himself.”
Jojo, no, we absolutely do not rule it out. Jordan Chandler may be kept an eye on by the media or prosecution in the same way the Arvizos are. Everyone should adhere to the official version by all means not to allow the wall of lies to crack, so from time to time some check-ups of this wall are made.
In this connection I recall Stacy Brown reprimanding one TV journalist immediately after she publicly expressed doubt in the allegations against Michael Jackson. Though she is no friend to Michael she simply couldn’t help doubting those stories after listening to Michael’s tape recorded by Murray. Over there Michael spoke about his desire to build a hospital for children and how it hurt him to see children ill and suffering, and that it was God who wanted him to heal children. The manner Michael spoke in that half-unconscious state was awful of course, but the ideas he was expressing from his most inner self were absolving him of any suspicion once and for all.
So almost immediately after that TV host said that they might have probably made a mistake in respect of Jackson, Stacy Brown publicly reprimanded her and almost accused her of betraying their cause (not a quotation, just the idea of it). Ask David Edwards for details about it, it was him who read that twitter message from Stacy Brown.
What I want to say is that all these people are chained hand and foot by their lies about Jackson, and as soon as someone tries to escape the other captives pull them back and lock the door behind them.
In my opinion Jordan Chandler is much more afraid of them than of Michael’s fans. Now he is simply a prisoner of all those lies. If he tells the truth the media and all the rest of them will be the first to dispose of him.
LikeLike
“Most people know what the media is like…they know they have an agenda. .” – Rodrigo
I think that people should also learn that the media’s agenda has two sides to it. On the one hand they keep trashing a totally innocent person for what he never did, and on the other hand they keep silencing the truth about a real criminal who turned everything upside down and brainwashed millions of people with his criminal pseudo-science.
And I am not even saying that this “scientist” was using (and encouraging) the services of real pedophiles in his work, which automatically makes his “scientific results” criminal. In the same way no scientific community would ever accept the results of a criminal Nazi doctor Mendele even if he had achieved some great breakthroughs in science through his criminal experiments on helpless prisoners. Such a man is no scientist and cannot be a hero.
So I’m afraid that the media agenda is in fact far more sinister than we could ever expect. They labeled an innocent man a criminal, and called a real criminal a hero, and in both cases they are not telling the truth.
“And when I become author on this blog, I’m going to make a post to demonstrate exactly what they do and what deals they make…as long as you stick to THEIR story, fulls of lies and bended truths”.
Rodrigo, I can make you a contributor to this blog at any time you are ready to make a post. Please let me know.
LikeLike
“Didn’t the FBI fear what influence Michael had on the world as well at one point?” – Rodrigo
But why doesn’t the FBI fear what influence Dr. Alfred Kinsey had on the world? We even have documented evidence of Kinsey practically promoting pedophilia in his various books where he claims that children are sexual beings and have “rights” which should be given to them, and we even have pictures of him showing animals engaged in sex. I still remember the look of horror on those children’s faces. Why doesn’t anyone talk about it and everyone talks about Michael Jackson instead?
Can you imagine for one second WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED TO MICHAEL IF THEY HAD FOUND A PICTURE OF HIM SHOWING ANIMAL SEX TO CHILDREN?
I wouldn’t be talking about Kinsey so often if it were not for the CONTRAST with which he and Michael Jackson are being treated.
Kinsey is almost a god whose actions are never disputed and are even put on a banner, while Michael is regarded as the worst of criminals though he didn’t do a tiny little fraction of the harm done by Kinsey.
If people standing behind the mjfacts site are so terribly concerned about the “public good” the first thing they should do is look at what Kinsey got away with, before they even start to talk about MJ!
LikeLike
“others were the strong no nonsense types who KNEW Michael was no p-le when looking at everything, but still tried to correct the problem of an grown man hanging around with children, fearing what effect it might have on society. Which is EXACTLY what they harp on about at mjfacts. Didn’t the FBI fear what influence Michael had on the world as well at one point?” – Rodrigo
“The effect on society” is a valid argument and this is why Michael’s friends asked him to keep up the appearances. It was only Michael’s stubborn nature and total innocence that made him defy common rules of behavior. Since he wasn’t guilty of anything he didn’t understand why he should deny himself all that teenager’s paradise he had missed when he was younger and wanted to compensate for now.
Children were his most natural companions in all those day and night escapades. No one else would have agreed to follow his style. Michael rarely slept and tried to involve even some grown-ups in the same routine, only few would agree. Van Valin sometimes did and he has a wonderful story about the way they watched movies and ate sushi at 3 am as Michael “was almost never tired and was always prepared to eat on nights when he could not sleep”. Michael also drove Van Valin around Neverland on such an occasion – very slowly, constantly braking and accelerating, weaving and correcting, even on a straightway (it was fun to read about Michael driving).
What I mean to say is that Michael always needed a companion on all those sleepless night adventures and wild teenagers like Macaulay Culkin were the best variant for him.
Recently I read an account of a person who worked on the Invincible with Michael Jackson, and this man called Michael “a child trapped in an adult’s body”. I think that this is the best description we’ve ever heard of Michael:
BUT despite Michael’s “hanging out with boys” it does not mean that he was a p-le. That is why, no matter how unhappy people were with Michael’s style it still does not give them the right to slander him and stick to him a label which is worse than a murderer.
And all that worry about poor MJ’s “victims” was pure hypocrisy too. No one really worried about Michael’s companions same as no one really worried about the fate of Corey Feldman and Corey Haim who were really molested and raped by someone in Hollywood. To Corey Haim it cost his life by the way – only no one cared. All they said remembering the poor young man was that drugs, etc. were “his fault”, though all this was forced on him in his youth.
And again, the media started harassing Michael much earlier, even during the Bad era, or even before that. It is just enough to recall that huge story in 1986 about him “sleeping in the Hyperbaric Chamber to live to be at least 150”. These days it even baffles us – how could that story be so huge at the time?
No, all these arguments are just pretexts used by Michael’s haters to justify the war they declared on Jackson and the cold-blooded way they killed him.
LikeLike
“The media know well that they, as well as “the happy family” and others caused Michael unbearable stress and contributed to his early demise.They will never admit to it. We just have to go on to keep thruth alive.”
Kaarin, I still don’t believe that the media is just a solid rock. It is made up of individual people and sooner or later some of them will find it unbearable to go on spreading lies they are told to spread. We just need to wait and see who will be the first to break the wall of that bastion.
LikeLike
“Your work is very important and inspiring, so don;t get discouraged. Blessings to you and your family.”
Elaine, thank you very much for your kind words and blessings. I think the work of all of us is very important – the more people speak up for Michael the better it is, so please use every chance to spread the truth about MJ. And I am not discouraged at all. Whether it happens on its own, due to our efforts or thanks to Michael’s direct effect on the people (which is the most likely case), but some changes do take place even despite the wall of hostility from the media.
I just wanted to ask others not to be discouraged.
Of course we expected huge changes on the part of the media as soon as the first pieces of truth were uncovered, but got none of them or very few. Well, so much the worse for the media. All we’ve lost are our illusions about them. We thought that they were simply mistaken, misguided or in the very worst case money-driven to tell lies about Michael. But now they are demonstrating it themselves that they have a hidden agenda in respect of Michael and are behaving in a totally unnatural way even for the greedy selves.
What I mean is that these days the truth about MJ can draw even bigger audiences than the old moth-eaten lies. They could uncover the 1993 or 2005 setups, for example, and make huge money on the thrill of those discoveries, but look at them – they pretend they are not interested and prefer to beat the old drums instead.
The harm they are doing this way is to themselves only because they are showing too openly that the truth about Michael is a complete taboo. I am actually surprised that they don’t understand it. As to us we simply need to know where we stand, look at it without any illusions on our part and move further without paying attention to the media hypocrisy. Okay, so the media assumed a stone-like attitude, so what? We will simply pass by them and move on.
LikeLike
A LOT of people in my town believe Michael was innocent. I don’t know what to attribute that to, mainly because they are fans I suppose. But they all believe it was extortion on an innocent man, which is the truth.
The guys on Topix simply have no comprehension that media, the likes of Sneddon and higher above had an agenda for taking down Michael. While others were the strong no nonsense types who KNEW Michael was no p-le when looking at everything, but still tried to correct the problem of an grown man hanging around with children, fearing what effect it might have on society. Which is EXACTLY what they harp on about at mjfacts.
Didn’t the FBI fear what influence Michael had on the world as well at one point?
But we have won to an extent…Most people know what the media is like…they know they have an agenda. And when I become author on this blog, I’m going to make a post to demonstrate exactly what they do and what deals they make…as long as you stick to THEIR story, fulls of lies and bended truths.
With my cousins permission, I’ll use her emails with the tabloids to show how they work. Proof for the silly little haters who think they smell of roses.
LikeLike
I agree, if we get frustrated and give up, then the haters win and MJ, the truth, and all of us lose. Your work is very important and inspiring, so don;t get discouraged. Blessings to you and your family.
LikeLike
The media know well that they, as well as “the happy family” and others caused Michael unbearable stress and contributed to his early demise.They will never admit to it. We just have to go on to keep thruth alive.
LikeLike
The media, the “happy family” and so on just keep going on. It is a concerted effort on their part.How much and how they are organised we cannot know,but for sure they are well aware of each other and help the real p-f´s a ,lot.They pay no attention, what I know of, to the real and huge p-f crimes with hundred of victims that have come to light of late.
This blog and others vindicating Michael just have to go on.Otherwise there will be no
LikeLike
Gordon Smart, a UK tabloid The Sun reporter, is believed to be a friend of Jordan Chandler. This is believed because a Coachella he managed to recognize Jordan Chandler out of a mass of people that go to a Coachella concert. He is the same age as Jordan Chandler. If he is friends with Jordan, why rule out the posibility that other media like CBS, NBC and others befriended the rest of the Chandlers or Jordan Chandler himself.
LikeLike
I think mainstream media has changed their mind.
in my country Peru it has.
I think in Mexico it has.
But the problem is American tabloids and UK tabloids.
They hate Michael Jackson. Personally I think they are very involved with the Chandlers,
Diane Diamond and Maureen Orth.
It is because they believe Michael is gay, that he might have had or did molest Jordan Chandler. Because of all the plastic surgery supossedly did have that he might have done this. This is their opinion. It will take a lot to change that.
But that is up to the Jacksons to do their part on their time, and personally I think they are along with Michael´s friends.
But I love this blogs, i am just hoping it wasnt racism also that took a part on the hating on Michael Jackson, although i´ll bet anything that it did.
LikeLike
“I also posted on Raven’s blog regarding the Sullivan book that I believe that today’s generation of media people first have to die out before a fair portrayal of MJ in the media is possible. They cannot admit their mistake.”
Susanne, unfortunately it isn’t only Sullivan.
Recently I found a CNN article dated December 17, 2007. Let us note that it is practically the beginning of 2008 or a year and a half before Michael’s death. The article is supposed to be an archived article but nevertheless carries a fresh date. And you know what the title of the article is? It is “Jackson Case: Details about first child molestation suit”.
The article is nothing new and is the same old lies about the Chandlers. But what intrigued me most was the date of the article. What made CNN all of a sudden remind its readers of “details about the first suit” on the eve of 2008 or 15 years after that fictional civil case was over?
The article specifies some of those “details”, then speaks of the agreement in the civil suit and then it says that the agreement could play a role in what they call the current criminal charges Jackson faces. Then CNN December article explains to its readers that “in April, Michael Jackson was indicted on 10 criminal counts, alleging 28 acts involving child abduction, false imprisonment and extortion”.
Reading it made me feel confused. And this is said two and a half years after the criminal trial is over and the jury passed a not-guilty verdict on all counts?
All archived articles should go under the date when they were published. And over here CNN published the 2004 story as if it was big news on the eve of 2008.
How was it possible to report this stale news as if it was still an on-going case? And what if someone of a younger generation read it? They would be terribly confused by it and take it at its face value – that Jackson was still under a criminal investigation at the end of 2007! Or was reporting it this way the big idea of CNN at all?
Things like that can be done only on purpose – in order to plant doubts about Michael’s innocence again and again, and the slander campaign against him to never stop.
And this is both the worst and the best part of it. The worst is that this is a horrendous lie told in a malicious and stealthy manner. And the best part is that this way the media discloses to us their dirty kitchen sink and show to us the lengths to which they are ready to go in order to spread lies against Jackson.
Here is the article (please correct me if I misunderstood something here): http://articles.cnn.com/2007-12-17/us/court.archive.jackson3_1_accuser-jackson-case-jackson-s-neverland?_s=PM:US
LikeLike
Hello and welcome greet with all my heart.
I live in Poland, where Michael has a loving and devoted fans.
I am impressed with this blog.
2 years run a blog dedicated to Michael Jackson: Michael Jackson’s Neverland http://mojeblogowanie-michaelina.blogspot.com/,
where as here I am fighting for justice for him.
Unfortunately, I do not know English, so I’m forced to use a translator, but nevertheless in Poland are Michael and Internet forums Base Translation His Texts MJT.
After that, there is wide access to publications on this topic.
Best wishes and thank you for your wonderful blog.
Michael forever in our hearts L.O.V.E. … :)))
LikeLike
“Hello Helen I live in Italy, could you please explain to me what happened?”
Hello, Nicoletta, nothing “unusual” happened. We’ve just registered for a hundredth time that the media and general public (following the media lead) are unwilling to notice the innocent truth about Michael Jackson. This is our usual everyday reality (alas), and I just made a note to express my attitude to it and what we have to do in this situation.
In my opinion we need to go on doing research and spreading the truth without looking back at anyone at all – just work for the sake of truth and justice alone (as Susanne rightfully said). It is hard everyday work and there is no place for doubts whether we should or should not – it is simply necessary, and that’s it.
In the same way some volunteers did the Veritas project on the eve of the 2005 trial and who knows what effect it could have on its outcome – probably it was just that small straw of truth which helped to change the overall reality. They did their part of the job, so now it is our turn to do ours, until someone new comes tomorrow and picks it over from us.
The problem is that the media is extremely hostile to the truth about MJ. They think that if they don’t promote it, it will never prevail. Well, I am not sure that this is the case.
LikeLike
Hello Helen I live in Italy, could you please explain to me what happened? you make a reference to something that happened on TV?
I thank you if you can please me, thanks for your work, Nicoletta
LikeLike
Oh YES, that’s absolutely my attitude.
I also posted on Raven’s blog regarding the Sullivan book that I believe that today’s generation of media people first have to die out before a fair portrayal of MJ in the media is possible. They cannot admit their mistake. Media today need to avoid the correction of their made-up stories because they would have to admit at the same time that they are responsible for all the stress and pain MJ suffered from and as a consequence for his death.
BUT, as you say, we cannot give up this correction, even if it doesn’t happen during our lifetime. We do it for the future, for future generations, so perhaps Michael’s kids or their kids will see it happen.
And we certainly do it for the sake of truth and justice – without thinking about the outcome. It’s simply necessary.
LikeLike