Skip to content

Radar Online’s FAKE to mark the seventh anniversary of Michael Jackson’s death

June 25, 2016

Seven years after Michael Jackson’s death the people who kept hacking him throughout his life are doing it again.

This time Radar Online and other Michael Jackson’s best friends like the Mirror, the Sun and the rest of the like-minded media decided to mark the anniversary of his death by spreading lies about poor Jackson under the headlines: “Never-Before-Seen Cop Reports Expose Michael Jackson’s Sick Secrets”,  “Michael Jackson ‘stockpiled child sex abuse pics in bid to seduce young boys at his Neverland ranch”,  “A vast collection of sick and twisted material was discovered at the King of Pop’s Neverland ranch in 2003, a new report alleges. Why is it only being reported now?”, and so on and so forth.

Well, a short answer to the above question is – it is being reported only now because it is only now that they thought of a new big lie and a new huge provocation against Michael Jackson. 


First of all let us make it clear that there is nothing ‘new’ about the police report they are referring to. Everything seized by the police was included in the sheriff department’s report of June 8, 2004 submitted to the court, after which most of the items listed there found their way into the courtroom and were scrutinized there by both the prosecution and defense in the presence of the jury – whose unanimous verdict was full Michael Jackson’s acquittal, as you know.

So all the items the media is hysterical about now were seen, discussed and discarded as completely legitimate stuff that can be bought by everyone in the nearby bookstore or newsstand, and there is absolutely no ‘secret’ about it.

The police report was released to the public on the official site of the Santa Barbara Supreme court and everyone including the media could easily see and analyze it (we here did it six years ago in this series of posts).

So the first big lie is this ‘never-before-seen’ trick used by the media.

However an even bigger lie is that the paper presented by Radar Online is not authentic. The tabloid or their so-called sources altered the original report by erasing some of its pages and adding to it the photos and pictures that were originally not there.

What’s even more horrible is that now it is beginning to transpire that the pictures added to the sheriff’s report are not authentic either. They were also tampered with and were made to look much more sexual than they originally were. This way the document Radar online is presenting as a ‘never-before-seen’ paper really acquired a new look and became a complete fake really never seen before.

The fact that no one knows where those pictures come from was confirmed by the official statement of the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department who said the following to Vanity Fair when they approached them for comment:

“Some of the documents appear to be copies of reports that were authored by Sheriff’s Office personnel as well as evidentiary photographs taken by Sheriff’s Office personnel interspersed with content that appears to be obtained off the Internet or through unknown sources. The Sheriff’s Office did not release any of the documents and/or photographs to the media. The Sheriff’s Office released all of its reports and the photographs as part of the required discovery process to the prosecution and the defense.”

By now Michael Jackson’s supporters have already provided the first proof that the pictures presented by Radar Online are indeed the nastiest kind of a fake.

The picture on the left is the original photo from some book, while the picture on the right is from Radar Online’s so-called police report.

Please note that the photo on the left was not in the sheriff’s report either and we don’t even know whether it has anything to do with it at all. Radar Online could simply take some picture from the internet, tamper with it to make it look more salacious and present it like it was in MJ’s possession.

The first obvious thing to do in case of so huge a provocation is to compare the real police report with the ‘new’ one and see what alterations were made there.

However here we have a problem.


The problem is that the sheriff’s report released during the discovery process in 2004 and until only recently available to all, suddenly disappeared from the internet together with all other documents from the 2005 trial. To be more exact the official site shows an error mark when you try to enter it, so either the Santa Barbara court internet address suddenly changed or some hackers meddled with their site making it unavailable to users.

Whatever it is, the disappearance phenomenon is interesting in and of itself as it is too much of a coincidence to take place right at the time when a huge fake about Jackson is raging all over the media.

In the absence of the authentic paper anything can be presented in its place, and the impossibility to see the whole register of documents at the court site does not allow to check up whether the current paper is indeed something ‘new’ or whether it is an old document already scrutinized at the 2005 trial – only in its falsified and much more scandalous variant.

Fortunately the real sheriff’s report was downloaded by us six years ago when we were busy making our posts and here it is once again:

Judging by the full register of the Santa Barbara court documents (downloaded by us too) the sheriff’s report was filed with the court on June 8, 2004. On June 16, 2005 it was unsealed by the court order and released to the public – so anyone interested in it had plenty of time to have a look.

Therefore questions ‘why is it being reported only now?’ are full of pretense and false indignation intended only for the uninitiated. The media perfectly knew about it as the report was submitted by the prosecution and was a completely anti-Jackson document where each scrap of paper and even magazines with people on the beach were presented as “grooming” materials.

It was in this capacity that they were scrutinized at the trial, so now it is no use pretending they never saw it – the media had a field day with it eleven years ago.


The comparison of the opening pages of both reports is holding another surprise for us. The first thing you see in the altered Radar Online variant is a handwritten note on its top which says that ‘Pages 1-3 are missing’.


The altered Radar Online version start with page 4

This note was not made by the police and could belong only to those who meddled with the original paper – because the original police report does have page 3 and this means that in the fake variant this page was deliberately erased.

Here is page 3 from the real police report:

Page 3 of the real sheriff's report -page 3

The omission naturally aroused my curiosity as to its possible reason. Page 3 must be containing something which the authors of the ‘new’ text preferred to hide and its careful study makes me suspect what it can be.

The missing page starts as follows:

“The next item of evidence I reviewed was Item Number 505. This item was described as being three books with photographs of nude and partially clothed children. This item was found in the downstairs cellar area of the video/arcade area.

Upon opening the evidence packaging, I found the items to be packaged within a second sealed paper bag. I broke the seals on the second paper bag. Within this package, I found three hard cover books. The first book was titled, Underworld, author Kelly Klein. The second book was titled, Room To Play, author Simen Johan. The third book was titled, Drew and Jimmy, author John Patrick Salisbury.”

Please note that page 3 gives the number of the item covering these three books, which in its turn allows to trace them during the trial – in the courtroom the prosecution and defense referred to the number of the exhibit more often than to the book titles, so without page 3 it would be more difficult to determine the correspondence between them.

The detective gives his description of each book and the last paragraph on the page says what he would later repeat for each and every item found in Michael’s possession – that not a single of them can be considered ‘child porn’ (though each time he adds that they could be used for ‘grooming’):

“None of the above noted books contained materials, which depicted illegal activities (including sexual acts with children). None of the books would meet legal requirement to be considered child pornography.  Based on my training, this type of material can be used as part of a “grooming” process.’

If you compare the above sheriff’s conclusion with what the current media is telling you, you will realize that the things they say now is a flat lie – none of those items had anything to do with the so-called ‘child sex abuse pics’ the tabloids are screaming about, and all their hysteria is actually about nothing.

The erotic materials like Hustler, Playboy, etc. were indeed found in Michael’s house, and shown to the jury page by page for whole days, making Michael’s mother blush with embarrassment, but they had nothing to do with child porn as the media presently suggests it. There wasn’t a single fraction of it in Michael’s house – either in magazines, books or videos – and the sheriff’s report makes this point crystal clear to everyone.

The only fault the police found with these books is that they ‘could’ be used for the grooming process. Well, ‘could’ is no proof, especially since everyone at the trial said they had never seen anything inappropriate in Michael’s possession (only the Arvizos claimed to have seen a couple of magazines) and besides, it is still a big question whether Michael ever held those books in his hands at all.

And this takes us to one more point which the media liars didn’t want the public to know from page 3 –  the three books mentioned there were in a sealed paper bag and were found in the cellar of the arcade room and not in Michael’s master house.

This ‘sealing’ point sounds somewhat intriguing. The police packed all Neverland items worthy of attention into a special packaging which the detective later opened when making his inventory. But over here the three books were already pre-packed and looked like a sealed parcel.

Actually a sealed parcel could be a way the books arrived at Neverland at all (with an accompanying letter naming the books, for example). After that it could be kept in a cellar and never seen by Jackson until the time the police raided Neverland and seized everything they saw fit to seize.

This is the only explanation I can find for the double packaging which even the detective thought important to make a note of – evidently it was something unusual for their standard police practice.

Of course, this is another of those ‘could-be’ situations, but if the detective made his suppositions about grooming, why can’t we do the same about the sealed paper bag?

The location of that package is noteworthy too. The main house allowed access only to the family and a close circle of Michael Jackson’s friends, while the arcade building was open to all and anyone could drop there anything they had brought in their bags. Considering that Neverland was visited by thousands of people, planting there whatever they wanted was no problem at all.

Here is a video showing the video arcade (located in a separate building on the ranch) and a crowd  of people – adult and children alike – enjoying themselves there:

The timeline of mass visits to Neverland shows that on October 12, 2003 it was attended by 200 members of the US Air Force and their families who spent the whole day there. And a year later, on September 13, 2004 Michael opened the gates of his ranch for a special charity event attended by many celebrities and most probably the general public too.

Please remember these dates as they may be important.

Besides the physical presence of hundreds of guests on Michael’s territory there was also a steady stream of gifts from his fans (and non-fans) and this huge pile had to be stored somewhere until he finally made himself familiar with them, and this place could very well be the arcade cellar or some attic where the various gifts could be kept for years without ever being seen or opened by Jackson.

The point I am trying to make is that the arcade cellar location specified on page 3 may speak to a fact that Michael Jackson didn’t see those books at all and that they could be planted there by someone else.

The book titled “Room to Play” was among the three books in the arcade cellar and is one of the items the media is screaming about most. This of their headlines surely refers to that book: “Sickening pictures of naked teen boys, child torture and animal sacrifice found at Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch are revealed in never-before-seen police report”.

Well, let’s see what these three books were all about.


The first book mentioned on page 3 is titled “Underworld”. The detective described it as follows:

“I reviewed each page of the book titled Underworld and did not find any inserted pictures and/or writings, which did not appear to be an original part of the book. The book contained numerous photographs of partially and/or fully unclothed men, women and children. The majority of the pictures within this book are of people who were wearing only their underwear.”

The author of the book is Kelly Klein, who turns out to be a fashionable photographer and wife of Calvin Klein. Her website says that she has been involved in the fashion industry for over 25 years and her ‘Underworld’ is a sort of a history of underwear beginning with the 1880s up to the 1990s. The introduction by Anne Rice says:

“Here are photos–154 in black-and-white and color–of men and women clothed or unclothed, taken from the 1880s through the 1990s by Jacques-Henri Lartigue, Imogene Cunningham, Steven Meisel, Bettina Rheims, Helmut Newton, Kurt Markus, Ellen von Unwerth, Andre Kertesz, Louis Dahl-Wolfe, Brassai, and 75 others.”  (Published November 21st 1995 by Knopf)

Kelly Klein, author of Underworld in the Vogue magazineThe photo of Kelly Klein in the Vogue magazine shows us a woman, who in the opinion of tabloid media is guilty of creating a book with ‘sickening’ photos that ‘paint a dark and frightening picture of Jackson’.

The overwhelming majority of the photos in ‘Underworld’ are those of men and women, old and young. Very few are of children and it is this type of a thing:

A page from 'Underworld' by Kelly Klein

The introduction to the book by Anne Rice says:

“Klein has superb taste in shutterbugs: Brassai, Man Ray, David Salle, Sally Mann, David Hockney, Cindy Sherman, and anonymous snappers of eye-grabbing scenes. The juxtapositions are good: Christy Turlington perfectly complements a 1930 Lartigue model; a Bruce Weber tableau matches a 1945 Playtex ad. You see a side of the doomed model Gia here in curlers that even the tell-all bio Thing of Beauty can’t tell you about.”

The comment from a reader says that the photos in the book reminded him of the then Calvin Klein’s billboard ads (apparently placed in the streets and intended to be seen by everyone, including children):

“Perhaps inspired by her then husband Calvin’s underwear billboard ads Underworld brings together a sumptuous collection of largely black and white photographs of people in various stages of undress. Some are by famous photographers such as Robert Mapplethorpe others are ‘unknown’.”

Tim Appelo who writes about the arts for Seattle Weekly, the New York Times, and People also left a comment saying that “This is a good book done for a good cause”, evidently referring to the fact that Kelly Klein is donating all proceeds to the CFDA Foundation Fund for AIDS.

Well, and Radar Online and the other tabloids say that this is ‘sick and twisted material’, so to solve the controversy I suggest these papers never publish Calvin Klein’s ads, and all photos of men in underwear and women in bikini should be radically cleaned away from their pages as these papers seem to adhere to the highest standards of morality and should not allow their readers to look at this outrage.


As you already know ‘Room To Play’ is one of the books which today’s media hype is all about and this is why it requires a much closer look.

The police detective described it as follows:

“I reviewed each page of the book titled Room to Play and did not find any inserted pictures and/or writings, which did not appear to be an original part of the book. This book contained numerous photographs of children, some of which appeared to be altered such as “morphing” was used to “sexualize” the photos by enhancing the child’s anatomical features. Many of the pictures expressed the private areas of the children.”

Now the internet has much more information about this book than at the time we made its first analysis six years ago. The Amazon book description is also more informative now and the publisher’s note to it sounds frightening indeed. It says:

“Simen Johan creates surreal and narrative tableaux of corrupted youth. His images of children and adolescents are constructed by digitally manipulating and combining parts of faces and bodies belonging to people of various ethnicities, ages, and genders. His fictional identities are depicted in equally fabricated scenarios that are replete with references to both the art historical tradition and Freudian sexuality. The poster-perfect finish of his prints belies the disturbing nature of their content; a pubescent girl hula hoops against an idyllic seaside backdrop, as the hoop leaves bruises on her waist; an androgynous teenager cradles the head of a dead sheep on which flies are beginning to land.”

From Simen Johan: “My photographs are composites of multiple-image fragments that I digitally manipulate and combine, including both images that I have photographed myself and found images. By combining different elements, my objective is to create artificial scenarios that appear vaguely familiar and produce numerous associations. I want to evoke a sense of familiarity that will seduce the viewer into allowing his or her own experience, imagination, and understanding of existing popular imagery to become tools for interpreting my work.”

If you ask me, the photos and collages in ‘Room To Play’ are actually unpleasant to look at as they show obviously unhappy and neglected children – the type of scenes Michael was always sad and woeful about.

Room to play - unhappy children

The children in this book look unkept and dirty, left to their own devices and involving themselves in whatever strange activities they find for themselves in their drab surroundings.

Room to play - collages

In one of the collages the photographer combines the body of a toddler in sodden panties with a face of an older boy (in a tzar’s crown for some reason). The picture has a drab feel to it and illustrates the detective’s idea of “morphing” as well as his note on “children’s private areas”.

And when you see these poor children smile you have a disturbing feeling that these smiles border more on the tragedy than happiness and joy.

In short the book leaves you with an uneasy feeling of something very evil and wrong going on the world of neglected children. However it certainly doesn’t have any scenes of child’s torture, and the various dead animals in the photos cannot be called ‘scenes of animal sacrifice’.

It is not also clear how these photos can be used for any ‘grooming’ process, but what is absolutely clear is that firstly, scenes like that would make Michael indignant and sad as this is exactly what he was calling adults to spare the children from.

And secondly, these pictures are definitely not the type he wanted to surround himself with – he liked happy children’s faces and the sentimental sweetness and angelic looks on the paintings of his choice even annoyed some people. They laughed at Michael and called it ‘kitsch’.

Well, the photos in ‘Room To Play’ are certainly not ‘kitsch’ and are therefore absolutely not Michael’s style. And in combination with the fact that this book was kept in some cellar, and possibly in a sealed package too, it makes me suspect that Michael didn’t see, use or open it.

But what attracted my attention most is the year when the book ‘Room To Play’ was published.

The book had only two editions – on August 1st, 2002 and February 1st, 2003. Both dates are very close to each other and the time of Bashir’s documentary about MJ, the media frenzy following it, the police investigation of Arvizos’ allegations and the eventual Neverland police raid.

For this book to be in Neverland by the time of the police raid, we have to suppose that soon after its release MJ rushed to the bookstore to buy it. But considering how busy he was in 2002 (Blanket’s birthday, rift with Sony, a 8-month long interview session with Bashir) and all the more so in 2003, and considering how little time Michael spent at Neverland at all this variant sounds a little unlikely.

Unfortunately we don’t know which edition was found in Neverland as otherwise it could have provided to us with a wealth of information.

For example, if it was the February 2003 edition, we could be more than sure that the book was planted in Neverland by some MJ ‘well-wisher’. Early February of 2003 was the time when Bashir’s documentary aired on TV. On February 18th the Los Angeles Police started an investigation of the Arvizo case (later it was closed for lack of evidence). The Department of Family and Children Services also joined in and interviewed the Arvizos (on February 20th), and ever since that documentary until the trial the attention of the whole world was focused on Neverland.

The threat of any minute police raid was hanging over the ranch and it was certainly not the best time to buy any books that could arouse the police suspicions.

Besides that both in 2002 and 2003 there were no child visitors in Neverland except for the Cascio family and Michael’s relatives, so there was actually no one to show those books to for their alleged ‘grooming’. In fact the only outsiders attending Neverland at the time were the Arvizo scoundrels (September 2002 and February-March 2003), but they never said a word about any books at all.

Michael’s haters will naturally say that if there were no children to show the book to, he must have bought it for himself – however this version is no good either. When people buy something for themselves they don’t keep it in some far-away place, but have it close at hand. Imagine having to go to the cellar of the video arcade to leaf through the book that shows a girl playing in the dust, and you will realize how absurd the whole thing is.

However the possibility of planting the book (or all three of them) was very much there. Remember the October 12, 2002 when two hundred families visited Neveland and the September 13, 2003 charity event? And please don’t forget the Arvizos’ stay there on two occasions and Martin Bashir as the only outsider visiting the ranch on a regular basis during his 8-month long interview session with Michael.

And why did we forget that soon after his first documentary Bashir and Victor Gutierrez (a long-time Michael Jackson’s hater and notorious liar) started working together on another of their fictional films about MJ?

Isn’t all of it worth thinking about when you have a moment of quiet and are able to bring yourself back to reality from the nightmare of the current media frenzy?


Photo from 'Drew and Jimmy'

Photo from ‘Drew and Jimmy’

The third book seized by the police in the video arcade cellar is titled ‘Drew and Jimmy’ and has absolutely nothing to say about it except that the author is writing about his two cousins and is illustrating it with their photos (in their clothes at that).

The Amazon describes the book as follows:

“John Patrick Salisbury’s first book (Drew & Jimmy) is the result of five years of reflection on his family’s past. Hailing originally from an isolated farming village in Northern California, Salisbury was preceded by seven generations. Family relations still live there, and Salisbury relives his past vicariously in this book through the lives of his cousins, Drew and Jimmy. What results is a poignant and moving portrait of boyhood in rural America.” – Jack Woody.

The sheriff’s report said about this great finding:

“I reviewed each page of the book titled Drew and Jimmy and did not find any inserted pictures and/or writings, which did not appear to be an original part of the book. The book contained numerous photographs of two Caucasian male juveniles that appeared to be in their early to mid-teens. The boys in these photographs are primarily clothed with occasional photographs of them wearing swim-trunk type clothing”.

Well, so what? Is this what the media calls “sick and twisted material’?

Of course we have not moved beyond page 3 yet, but even these three examples show how exaggerated and false the media statements are. Six years ago we saw the rest of the books and magazines too and none of them are ‘child porn’ or ‘child abuse sex pics’ as the sheriff’s document clearly stated it – so what we see today is actually a serious libel case, complete with fake photos and a doctored police report.

The estate of Michael Jackson has already discarded it as a falsification, and my only wish is that Radar Online and the others were made to pay for the nasty slander campaign they have restarted against Michael Jackson.

The Estate’s statement of June 21 said as follows (the bold type is mine):

Seven years ago this coming Saturday, the world lost an amazing artist and humanitarian devoted to helping children in need in all corners of the world. Michael Jackson’s fans, including the Executors of his estate, prefer to remember the wonderful gifts Michael left behind instead of having to once again see his good name dragged through the mud by tabloid trash.

Everything in these reports, including what the County of Santa Barbara calls “content that appears to be obtained off the Internet or through unknown sources” is false, no doubt timed to the anniversary of Michael’s passing. Those who continue to shamelessly exploit Michael via sleazy internet “click bait” ignore that he was acquitted by a jury in 2005 on every one of the 14 salacious charges brought against him in a failed witch hunt.

Michael remains just as innocent of these smears in death as he was in life even though he isn’t here to defend himself. Enough is enough.

The Estate of Michael Jackson

Indeed, enough is enough. All sensible people should ask themselves a question why the media keeps trashing Michael even after his death and why they have to resort to fakes to support their ‘case’ against Jackson.

The question why they are still doing is difficult to answer – the habitual trashing Michael Jackson could be a proven method of earning their money and raising profits, but it could also be an orchestrated campaign organized by someone who always wanted to strip Michael of his fame, money and good reputation. Now they are doing the same to Michael’s Estate and hope to bleed it of its money by discouraging people from listening to and buying Michael’s music and by encouraging new fictional ‘victims’ to come forward and file their suits against the deceased Michael Jackson.

As to why they have to resort to fakes in their vicious campaign against Jackson, the answer to it is very easy – they simply have nothing genuine to throw against Jackson.

Another question people should ask themselves is why the media ignores the true facts about Michael and never show him the person he was really like.

For example, speaking about the books Michael really read, you will be surprised to learn that he was an admirer of Sufi poetry which he used to read after his concerts, astonishing his friends and acquaintances by this habit (a post about the books Michael liked is here).

And speaking about the pictures Michael kept close to himself, the media never told you about the painting Michael had in his bedroom right over his bed, and in 1993 too – just at the time when according to them he was allegedly involved in some fictional ‘molestation’ of Jordan Chandler.

I bet none of you know what that picture is. The media never reported it though the picture is sensational as it shows Michael’s real mindset and the matters of most importance for him.

You think it was a photo of some child? A photo of a young woman or man? Or probably the picture of his mother? Or the picture of Michael himself, portrayed in some grandiose style the media likes to so much talk about? Or some perverse thing like an “animal tortured” as the current media is telling you?

No, none of these guesses are correct.

The painting hanging over Michael’s bed was a picture of Jesus Christ.


Since neither the media, nor the prosecution or even defense ever talked about that painting I learned about it quite by chance – from the video of a follow-up to Oprah’s interview with Michael Jackson in 1993.

This funny video showed Oprah, Liz Taylor, Michael Jackson and other people watching the freshly made footage of the interview. The recording was being shown on a huge TV set placed at the foot of Michael’s bed, which made me make a mental note that the bed was actually the only place from which anyone could watch TV there.

The bed was indeed a big one and this time it was occupied by several people watching the footage including Debby Rowe, Arnold Klein and some others.

At some point the camera started wandering about the room and fixed on a painting over Michael’s bed, and to my sheer astonishment it turned out to be the image of Jesus Christ! So Michael had the image of Christ over his bed and no one ever told us about it?

But how come it was never mentioned? The media, the prosecution and all those numerous ‘witnesses’ spoke of every little detail in his bedroom, every book and piece of cloth in every cellar, closet and attic in the house and on the ranch, but no one ever mentioned the elephant in the room – the picture of Christ in his bedroom and right over his head?

Is it because the claims that he was allegedly committing ‘crimes against children’ right under that painting would render a touch of unreality to them and mentioning this fact to the jury was out of the question as it would open their eyes to the God-abiding person Michael really was?

The fact that Michael chose that painting for the central place in his house indeed means that Jesus Christ was his daily and nightly companion, the subject of his regular prayers and an overseer of everything that was going on in Michael’s room when he was having his guests there.

Don’t know about you, but this discovery left me completely shattered. Not only was it something novel about Michael, but the fact that this was never mentioned by the press was simply the last straw.

Here is the painting I am talking about – it is a screenshot from the video and is evidently reflecting the room lights which look like candles placed below the image:

christ-over-mjs-bed-from-oprahs-documentary-1993 (2)

And at approximately the 2:05 mark of the video you can see it with your own eyes. Please remember to download the video on your computer to be able to upload it again when Michael Jackson’s well-wishers erase it from Youtube the way they did it with the genuine police report.

Speaking of that report I forgot to tell you that the original was much shorter than the Radar Online 88-page version of it. I hear that by now it has been reduced to 60+ pages, with the most obvious fakes taken away from it, however it is still a far cry from the genuine paper which had only 48 pages.

And while they are still ‘working’ on it, here is the video for you to enjoy and see what Michael was really like!


Thanks to our reader Annemarie we now have a photo of Michael’s bed in Neverland with the picture of Christ over it and learn that this very special image of Christ is called The Sacred Heart of Jesus.

It  comes from the Catholic tradition and has a special meaning of its own, and this is evidently why Michael chose it. The Sacred Heart of Jesus represents His divine love for humanity.

This image of Christ started in 1673 when a French nun had a vision of Him with his heart aflame with love – the idea that was in great contrast to the rigorous tendency of the century.

Its message is to give our love and ourselves to the needs of everyone whom God puts into our lives.

This site says about it:

That is what devotion to the Sacred Heart is all about. It is the practice of selfless love toward selfish people. It is giving ourselves to persons that do not give themselves to us.

Isn’t it the exact description of how Michael Jackson was living his life and his faith?

Update 7.12.2016

Sanemjfan has just sent us a link to a video from the opening of an art exhibit museum in New York. Among other pictures it displays the photos from “The Room to play” book seized in Neverland during the raid.

Looking at all these people walking about the exhibition halls one can’t help thinking that if we were to follow the media and prosecution logic all these people should be investigated by the police. Remember how the detective who reported this book described it?

“I reviewed each page of the book titled Room to Play < > This book contained numerous photographs of children, some of which appeared to be altered such as “morphing” was used to “sexualize” the photos by enhancing the child’s anatomical features. Many of the pictures expressed the private areas of the children.”

I suggest the opinion of this investigator should be printed out and put on the wall beside the photos. It would be interesting to see the reaction of the visitors.


55 Comments leave one →
  1. Alecxis Thunnery permalink
    November 9, 2020 2:54 pm

    Why is the video not available? 😭😭😭


  2. Asma permalink
    October 12, 2017 6:59 pm


    Thank you for the transcript. That is truly amazing and even vindicating on a small personal level for me because I *never* believed in the allegations against him. Not in ’93 and certainly not in 2003. I *always* believed he was exactly as he said he was and his care for children completely real. It’s a matter of psychology, the accusations the media and its vultures kept throwing at him just didn’t fit somehow. It was like going to the gag mirror section of carnivals or theme parks where there is a room full of mirrors that accentuated and exaggerated one’s true physical nature into something really freakish.

    On the coverage of his sleepy words, totally not surprising that the media and its vultures once again distorted the coverage. It’s par for the course for them at this point. I completely agree, there has to be some foul play regarding his name. But what *is* it exactly, that is motivating them? *Who* is it? is it just one person or far, far more? What are they getting from this? I can’t help but be nagged by these questions. Could it be that they go after him so hard to cover up their own deeds? How does painting him in this extreme light work to cover them?

    I asked already on the other thread if you are following the Harvey Weinstein case. Today James Van der Beek *also* spoke out about being sexually harassed in his youth by a powerful, older male executive. Helena, I *instantly* thought about your extensive and comprehensive post “Hollywood Predators vs. Michael Jackson” and all the photographs at Singer’s pool parties. Could this be a case of chickens *finally* coming home to roost? Obviously, a lot more needs to occur and happen but I can’t help but take notice during cases like these and wonder in a big way what this could mean for the whole Michael Jackson coverage. Obviously the media is not reliable, but maybe, just *maybe* there can be a reporter such as Ronan Farrow that will somehow *finally* help shift its gears when it comes to him. Wishful thinking, I know.


  3. October 12, 2017 5:38 pm

    “just read the words you stated MJ was telling Murray regarding his thoughts on the world’s children and building a hospital for them. Just wow. I didn’t even know this. He was quite innocent, indeed.” – Asma

    He was innocent. The recording made by Murray in MJ’s last days is Michael’s final unwitting testimony about his innocence. The tape was recorded at a moment when he couldn’t restrain himself and was revealing his thoughts and feelings that were deeply ingrained in his subconscious mind.

    Many people would be embarrassed to know what they say when they have no control themselves. But not Michael Jackson. He said exactly the same things he had always said to the public, only everyone thought that he was pretending and looked for some dirty meaning to his words.

    But he was not pretending. This tape showed that he had always been candid and sincere – he really thought of children as angels and he really hurt when he saw them sick. He really wanted to heal them and spend his hard-earned money on a children’s hospital. He really saw their depression as the root of all evil and this is why he wanted playrooms and a theatre even in his hospital, same as he wanted all of it in Neverland. And he also said it was God who wanted him to help children.

    How many of us will speak of God when we are half-asleep and reveal our innermost selves? I don’t know anyone else, except Michael Jackson.

    But it is no surprise that you and many others don’t know this. The full transcript of that tape was provided by a couple of media only, and two more (Alan Duke in CNN and ABC news) just retold Michael Jackson’s words. All the rest focused on MJ’s “eerie voice” and “slurred speech” never mentioning the glaring fact that the recording testified to Michael Jackson’s complete innocence.

    And it is no surprise either that the headlines about “slurred speech” are still very much there, while the transcript is gone and I’ve been able to find it only in the Associated Press archive.

    This selective approach to what stays and what goes as regards information about Michael Jackson is the best proof that there is some foul play around his name and it is still going on.

    Here is the full transcript:


  4. Asma permalink
    October 11, 2017 4:59 pm

    Btw Hdman,

    There are posts on this blog actually *addressing* the people with that very same mentality you just blithered on about in your post. They happen to be “academic scientists” as they like to call themselves, perpetuating this very sick and *unscientific* notion that “children have sexuality.” It’s gross, bizarre and predatory. MJ’s whole mindset and actions come from the the place that children’s innocence and purity must be *preserved.* Big difference.


  5. Asma permalink
    October 11, 2017 4:55 pm


    *What* are you babbling on about and to whom? Who here has even said, “Turn the other way?” Or, “It’s really okay, and people experiment, blah blah blah?” Who here said or is *saying* that? Just jumping into the middle of a post picking up a conversation occurring in your head doesn’t carry the torch for truth, let alone coherent logic.

    I can assure you, *no one* here said that and I am sure you know, MJ was not one who thought like that. Far from it. Once again, just because a conversation happens in your head, doesn’t make it true.

    Helena, just read the words you stated MJ was telling Murray regarding his thoughts on the world’s children and building a hospital for them. Just wow. I didn’t even know this. He was quite innocent, indeed.


  6. October 11, 2017 1:10 pm

    “It’s not really that bad,” and “It’s really OK, and people experiment,” blah, blah, blah.” Hdman

    Hdman, I wonder who you are quoting here. What is “not that bad”? “People experiment”???
    Michael Jackson never said anything of this kind. It seems that you are gravely misinformed.

    I think he fell into the same horrid trapping other have in the wicked entrainment industry.

    The entertainment industry is wicked all right, but Michael was a victim of this wickedness and not its participant. He was a sort of a sacrificial lamb thrown by the industry to the public for continuous torture – while real criminals kept committing crimes against children never to be disturbed by the police, media and public attention. This was the whole idea of it all.


  7. Hdman permalink
    October 11, 2017 5:59 am

    LOL of course someone has tried to throw in “right-wing-conspiracy” here. Sexual molestation is real and overly abundant, sadly, throughout the world–throughout the entertainment industry in both California, Florida, and other areas. It’s a huge, sick addiction, and to all our horror, a lot of money is made from it as well. I think MJ was talented; but I think he fell into the same horrid trapping other have in the wicked entrainment industry. All this denial. All this turn the other way. And even worse…. all this, “It’s not really that bad,” and “It’s really OK, and people experiment,” blah, blah, blah. No. It actually is that bad and worse. Sexual objectification is a horribly ubiquitous problem in the West as well as the rest of the world. It’s bad enough when we do it to adults; but the major agenda is, and has been for decades now, is to go full force with sexually objectifying children. It would be better that a millstone were hung around the necks of those that engage and support this.


  8. June 25, 2017 1:58 pm

    “am I really making logical fallacies?” – Kae-Leah

    I don’t think that you are making logical fallacies and think that generally your train of thought is correct. The changes Michael underwent are typical of any human being – from a shy innocent youngster to a mature man who knows his worth and is confident with women. And yes, he grew to enjoy it – partially, as he himself explained it, as a way to escape the world (“To escape the world I’ve got to enjoy that simple dance, And it seemed that everything was on my side”, from Blood on the dance floor).

    But in no way did it change his religious views. Until his last day Michael remained the believer in God he always was and it is only his understanding of the Almighty that changed. It seems that he outgrew the rigorous rules set by the church and developed a much more open view of things. In fact in one of his poems he even called God “she”.

    And in whatever shape and form this power existed for him it was always the dominant element of his life, until his last day in the literal meaning of the word. Remember Michael being recorded by Murray when he was half asleep? How many of us will speak about God wanting us to help sick children when we have no control over our words?

    Jackson: … I’m taking that money, a million children, children’s hospital, the biggest in the world, Michael Jackson’s Children’s Hospital. Gonna have a movie theater, game room. Children are depressed. The –in those hospitals, no game room, no movie theater. They’re sick because they’re depressed. Their mind is depressing them. I want to give them that. I care about them, them angels. God wants me to do it. God wants me to do it. I’m gonna do it, Conrad.
    Murray: I know you would.
    Jackson: Don’t have enough hope, no more hope. That’s the next generation that’s gonna save out planet, starting with-we’ll talk about it. United States, Europe, Prague, my babies…

    What I mean is that no matter who he was – an innocent young man, who couldn’t imagine sex outside marriage or “his father’s son” he turned into later, at least according to one of his close friends – essentially Michael remained the same person whose innocent aspirations and humane values never changed.


  9. Kae-Leah permalink
    June 24, 2017 8:05 pm

    Hey Helena, I’ll admit that I don’t always agree with some of the conclusions you draw, but since you seem to have studied Michael’s life in such detail, can I run by you a theory that I shared on another website that I was told was based on “logical fallacies”? My theory is that I find it interesting that the earliest soft-porn magazine found in the 2003 Neverland raids was dated 1991, nothing earlier, and the dates of the mags point to him increasingly consuming such material in the late ’90s/early ’00s. It’s also kind of interesting that they found only a small handful of actual porn DVDs, despite him having a huge Blockbuster-sized video library and they were all pretty recent in copyright date at the time of the raid, so it’s not like he had a huge collection of porno movies spanning years and years. My interpretation, and I realize that yes this is just speculation and we can’t truly know 100% sure, is that as the ’90s went on, his personal standards for things like porn, alcohol, swearing, etc., though of course he still had some standards and wouldn’t touch anything illegal with a ten foot pole, grew more “lax” than they were in the ’80s and possibly very early ’90s, when he was under the influence of a very conservative religious sect. Am I on the right track, fellow Jacksonologists, of analyzing his life choices, or am I really making logical fallacies?


  10. sanemjfan permalink
    September 13, 2016 7:49 pm

    Helena, a few nights ago the Reelz channel (a channel dedicated solely to tabloid entertainment and celebrity gossip shows and documentaries) debuted a new series called “Rich And Acquitted”, which highlights celebrity trials. MJ was the subject of the first episode, and it was just as bad as I expected it to be! My review and rebuttal is included in this Twitter thread, as well as the video of the episode (I recorded it and uploaded it)


  11. August 28, 2016 4:05 pm

    “Looks like the site can be accessed again by All the documents can be seen except for the ones I couldn’t access.” – Samuel Finley

    Samuel, sorry for unscreening your comment only now. It had too many links and was put into spam.
    But the news is very good. I hope all the documents are still there and nothing is missing.


  12. Jan permalink
    July 17, 2016 6:33 am

    more crap from the UK:

    get Jordan chandler into a court with tom mesereau asap and sort this out once and for all.


  13. Samuel Finley permalink
    July 14, 2016 9:35 pm

    It looks like is back and can be viewed via


  14. Samuel Finley permalink
    July 14, 2016 6:54 pm

    Looks like the site can be accessed again by All the documents can be seen except for the ones I couldn’t access.

    05/25/2004 Addendum to Decorum Order Regarding Departments 8 & 9, Dated April 1, 2004

    Click to access 052504decorumaddendum.pdf

    09/08/2004 Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Request for Order Facilitating Inspection of Certain Photographs in the Custody of the Los Angeles Police Department

    Click to access 082704exparteinspect.pdf

    09/02/2004 Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Order Sealing Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Request for Order Facilitating Inspection of Certain Photographs, Etc. Until Further Order of Court

    Click to access 082704pltnotice.pdf

    09/01/2004 Order Denying Bail Reduction

    Click to access 083104orderbailred.pdf

    09/02/2004 Protective Order

    Click to access 090104protectorder.pdf

    09/08/2004 Order to File Sealing Motion – Reply to Motion to Quash Certain Subpoenas

    Click to access 090304orderseal.pdf

    09/17/2004 Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Request for Order Directing the California Department of Justice Produce Certain Documents and Evidence to the District Attorney Concerning the Arrest and Booking of Defendant

    Click to access 091604expartecadoj.pdf

    10/20/2004 Findings and Order Re Sealing Plaintiff’s Memo Re: An Appropriate Limit to Cross-Examination of Witness Called by Defense on a Limited Issue etc.

    Click to access 101904ordersealexam.pdf

    10/21/2004 Order Directing that Stipulation Re: Certain Items of Evidence be Maintained Under Conditional Seal Pending Further Order of Court

    Click to access 102004orderrevidseal.pdf

    11/02/2004 Order That Reply to the District Attorney’s Opposition to Motion for Recusal of Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office Pursuant to Penal Code § 1424 be Filed Under Seal

    Click to access 110204orderreplyseal.pdf

    11/10/2004 Ex Parte Application to File Privilege Log for Computer Records Under Seal, to not Serve the Prosecution (Request for In Camera); Proposed Order

    Click to access 110904exparteprivlog.pdf

    11/10/2004 Protective Order

    Click to access 110904protectiveorder.pdf

    11/10/2004 Protective Order Re: Privilege Log for Computer Records

    Click to access 110904protectorder.pdf

    11/10/2004 Order Directing that Plaintiff’s Summary of Certain Items Seized Pursuant to SW-5135 Remain Under Conditional Seal Pending Further Order of Court

    Click to access 110904orderpltsumm.pdf

    11/10/2004 Order for Release of Documents [Inventory Returns]

    Click to access 110904orderrelinventory.pdf

    03/18/2005 Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Court’s Review of Plaintiff’s In Limine Motion to Forbid Disparagement of Opposing Counsel Re: Supposed Motive, to Determine Whether Sealing is Appropriate

    Click to access 022505pltmotdisparag.pdf


  15. sanemjfan permalink
    July 3, 2016 8:57 pm

    I don’t know if you’ve had a chance to read my comment from June 28th, but the name of the book that Radar obtained that photo with 3 young men (that they photoshopped to give people the impression that they were nude) is “Bidgood”, and it was indeed found at NL. (I didn’t know when I made that comment, but I went back and read Sneddon’s pleading and saw the title listed there.) I think you should add that info to the post so readers will know the origin of that photo. 🙂 Thanks!


  16. June 30, 2016 8:57 pm

    The children depicted in “Room to play” seem lost,unhappy, unnatural like objects for,or of abused children, there is something sick about them.Even though the last 2 on the page smiles it does not look real and happy.A sadist might enjoy these pics. These are absolutely not Michael’s style and the book most likely given and possibly hidden, certainly not enjoyed by Michael.In his other books of children they were happy ones on a beach, for example.
    Michael liked things and children pretty.It would not surprise me if it was planted or at least an unwanted gift left in package.-They do not look like child photos sometimes shown of poor starving children appealing for help eithrer.On his night table he liked pics of smiling babies. It has been scientifically proven that looking at such happy faces induces happy feelings.. Not sexual fantasies.if you necssarily have to so believe.
    Just listen to Paris, she is his daughter and knows besr Michaels attitude towards children.
    Michael also was good at drawing and painting. Why does somebody not try to find out his
    favorite themes.. .


  17. June 30, 2016 7:54 pm

    All those people who cannot keep their eyes off sc salacious (and false) stories about Michael are in fact perverted. Those who write them may also do it for money as well..There are so many children who really suffer, poverty,abuse and sexual abuse.Why not spend your efforts on these.? Too sad and not so profitable??


  18. June 30, 2016 7:20 pm

    I also started noticing ” news”,negative ones of Michael again.Wonder why this renewed interest in these allover … My best guess is that as usual this trash serves to divert peoples interest from more current issues. It obviously titillated them. And shame on them.There are many serious problems in the world, but also many who does not want people to pay much attention to what happens in the world at this time.Rupert Murdoch is a likely culprit.I just wonder if the same phenomena is going on in UK.


  19. sanemjfan permalink
    June 29, 2016 10:58 pm

    Helena, I don’t know if I’ve given you this link already, but here’s a newspaper article about “The Boy: A Photographic Essay” from 1965. The description of the book from the article is a testament to the innocent nature of the book, and this can definitely be used to rebut any haters who say it was made for sexual gratification.,1755348&hl=en


  20. nemoran permalink
    June 29, 2016 5:53 pm

    Oh if the detectives are convinced then we all should be convinced too , period. We shouldn’t even bother to listen to the nephews who have never said a bad word about MJ!
    No instead we should listen to Stacy Brown’s detectives.


  21. sanemjfan permalink
    June 28, 2016 12:17 am

    Helena, the name of the book that contains the photo that Radar Online photoshopped is Bidgood, a homo-erotic art book. (Scroll down to the “Take a look” section to see the original photo.) The 25th edition was released in 2009, and it’s POSSIBLE that MJ owned the original edition, but there are two questions we must answer:

    1. Did MJ own the book in the first place? It’s possible, but we’ll have to look at Sneddon’s list of books that were seized at Neverland. It’s very plausible that MJ didn’t own this book, and Radar just inserted that photo in there because of it’s inflammatory value!

    2. If MJ did own the book, did the original version that he owned have that photo in it? It’s possible that the photo wasn’t included in the original edition, but could have been added to the 25th anniversary edition. Unless we can get our hands on a copy of the original, we’ll probaby never know.

    But even IF MJ owned that book, and even IF that photo was in the original version of the book (and thus included in the seized books at Neverland), Radar nevertheless photoshopped the photo to make it appear that the men were nude, when they clearly were not!

    Here are some more links about the books: (Amazon’s 25th annivesary edition was released in Nov. 2014 in hardcover, but their paperback edition is from Dec. 1999. I couldn’t find the original publication date, but I assume it was published first in 1984.)×2782

    Bidgood recently started an online campaign for donations for a new camera and materials. In this video, he includes several art curators, museum directors, and a museum president. They all confirm that the book is ART, not porn.

    Hope this helps!


  22. June 27, 2016 11:25 pm

    Thanks Helena.This was great as usual. Thought of sharing this YT link of a video uploaded by Deborah Kunesh where she has interviewed Gavin’s former classmate. The girl who was only 13 at the time had been told by Gavin that Michael did not harm him and that it was all fabricated. But she was too young back then and overwhelmed by the media circus to speak up. Thanks to Deborah for this video.


  23. jadz permalink
    June 27, 2016 2:39 pm

    Thank you for all your hard work! I just finished reading those documents which I found deeply touching! I also asked my self WHY NOW! I did a twitterlonger With the first point that if the paper is going broke what better way to make $$$$ is use Micheal’s name twist some lies and Bingo we have a winner! But what else got me in that report is they way they reported the items of clothing they found which appear stained to be Michael’s!??Hey have we forgot the millions of people children that stayed or passed through that could have left these items behind!

    Come on These have never been proved to be Michael’s!


  24. MoonBerry permalink
    June 27, 2016 10:50 am

    Thank you for your relentless efforts to reveal the truth! I’m afraid this trash tabloid attack is only part of a bigger campaign, and I’m constantly wondering who are behind it. I hope they will be destroyed in every sense of the word. As can be predicted by bits and pieces, Robson, Safechuck and Guitierrez will be part of it, and also Murray, who threatened the family some years ago with the shit “I’m not prepared to answer that question” (whether he was a pedo or not). It seems Murray was paid to help the slanderers, just like further “victim”. I wish fans, friends, relatives, journalists and legal people loyal to MJ constructed a site, a book or a film deprooving the lies and spread it everywhere effectively. I pray and ask for MJ’s and other high spirits’ assistance on that.


  25. lynande51 permalink
    June 27, 2016 8:22 am

    Reblogged this on Michael Jackson Vindication 2.0.


  26. Saturn permalink
    June 27, 2016 8:21 am

    why the hell nobody sue the crap out of those sinful wortless monsters,poor Michael,they have no respect for his family and his children ,they do anything for money,i’m glad that in my country,there is no such “media”


  27. sanemjfan permalink
    June 27, 2016 12:47 am

    Here are MJ’s friend Firpo Carr’s 2 rebuttals to Radar: Pt. 1 and Pt. 2 I think you should include the links to all of these different posts and videos in your upcoming posts in order to help expose them as much as possible. Thanks!


  28. sanemjfan permalink
    June 27, 2016 12:41 am

    You should definitely, DEFINITELY include this in your next post! I was amazed by the level of passion he displayed while annihilating all of the allegations! Very impressive! He called for the media outlets who reported it to issue a RETRACTION! (Which we all know won’t happen, unfortunately.)

    And I’m happy to see that all of our hard work isn’t in vain. He cited MANY MJ websites and blogs in his video, including Mesereau’s Sept. 2010 speech at the Frozen In Time seminar, which I purchased, transcribed, and gave the video to others so it could be uploaded to Youtube. There were a few VERY MINOR errors that only MJ experts like us would know (e.g. facts that he could have included but didn’t, a very slight inaccuracy here and there, etc.), but overall it was a stupendous video! At the end of such a long and horrible week, things are FINALLY looking up!


  29. sanemjfan permalink
    June 26, 2016 7:43 pm

    Here’s a tweet from Brett Barnes:

    And of course, here are tweets from Paris Jackson!


  30. sanemjfan permalink
    June 26, 2016 7:29 pm

    Helena, here are some tweets from Corey Feldman defending MJ against the lies of Radar. You should include them in a future post! 🙂

    And here’s R&B singer Peabo Bryson defending MJ:


  31. Raven permalink
    June 26, 2016 7:19 pm

    To clarify, my comment is in reference to the third image you posted from Room To Play.


  32. Raven permalink
    June 26, 2016 7:18 pm

    As per the photos in Room To Play, I instantly recognized the inspiration behind that photo. It came from Led Zeppelin’s 1973 album cover Houses of The Holy. That, in turn, had been a series of paintings by Aubrey Powell inspired by a novel called Childhood’s End. Here is the original 1973 cover:

    And here is what is written about the album cover on its Wiki page:

    The cover art for Houses of the Holy was inspired by the ending of Arthur C. Clarke’s novel Childhood’s End. The cover is a collage of several photographs which were taken at the Giant’s Causeway, Northern Ireland, by Aubrey Powell of Hipgnosis. This location was chosen ahead of an alternative one in Peru which was being considered.[4]

    The two children who modelled for the cover were siblings Stefan and Samantha Gates.[5] The photo shoot was a frustrating affair over the course of ten days. Shooting was done first thing in the morning and at sunset in order to capture the light at dawn and dusk, but the desired effect was never achieved due to constant rain and clouds. The photos of the two children were taken in black and white and were multi-printed to create the effect of 11 individuals that can be seen on the album cover. The results of the shoot were less than satisfactory, but some accidental tinting effects in post-production created an unexpectedly striking album cover.[4] The inner sleeve photograph was taken at Dunluce Castle nearby the Causeway.

    In February 2010, Stefan Gates presented a half-hour BBC Radio 4 documentary entitled Stefan Gates’s Cover Story, about his part in the making of the album cover. Gates claimed in the documentary to have felt there was something sinister about the image, although his sister disagreed. He also admitted never having heard the album. The programme ended with Gates returning to Giant’s Causeway and listening to the album on a portable player, after which he claimed that a great weight had been lifted from him.

    Like Led Zeppelin’s fourth album, neither the band’s name nor the album title was printed on the sleeve. However, manager Peter Grant did allow Atlantic Records to add a wrap-around paper title band to US and UK copies of the sleeve that had to be broken or slid off to access the record.[4] This hid the children’s buttocks from general display, but still the album was either banned or unavailable in some parts of the Southern United States for several years.[6]

    The first CD release of the album in the 1980s did have the title logos printed on the cover itself.[4]

    In 1974, the album was nominated for a Grammy Award in the category of best album package. The cover was rated #6 on VH1’s 50 Greatest Album Covers in 2003.[7]

    Page has stated that the album cover was the second version submitted by Hipgnosis. The first, by artist Storm Thorgerson, featured an electric green tennis court with a tennis racket on it. Furious that Thorgerson was implying their music sounded like a “racket”, the band fired him and hired Powell in his place.[8] Thorgerson did, however, go on to produce the album artwork for Led Zeppelin’s subsequent albums Presence and In Through the Out Door.


  33. sanemjfan permalink
    June 26, 2016 6:50 pm

    Helena, the truth is starting to get out there! Our hard work is NOT in vain!


  34. June 26, 2016 6:33 pm

    “the original picture of the Divine Mercy has been slightly adapted to emphasize the Sacred Heart of Jesus. This is, again, a Catholic devotion with a special meaning. So the adapted version is the picture framed on Michael’s bedroom wall.” – Annemarie Latour

    Annemarie, the fact that this picture is called the Sacred Heart of Jesus is very, very interesting. By now I have read a little about it and see that it indeed has a special meaning. These days the heart is a symbol of feelings, while the Bible spoke of it as the inner essence of human beings, their intentions and life decisions. Human heart is a place for holding the unwritten God’s law.

    I have found a modern adaptation of the picture which is close to the one that Michael Jackson had. It’s here:

    Compare it with the picture over Michael’s bed:

    Out of the many images of Christ Michael chose this one definitely for its very special meaning.

    What a marvel Michael Jackson was.


  35. June 26, 2016 5:09 pm

    @Vindicatemj (Helena)

    Yeah, I noticed that. It’s just unbelievable how they have the guts to lie this way, as if it was impossible to find out. I wouldn’t have the courage to do that. Sometimes I wonder, is it just a job to them and they get no satisfaction in particular on smearing people, or they’re just evil? Do they ever think, if not about the pain they’re causing, about all the cursing they must be receiving from millions of people? Aren’t they scared? Don’t they have a God or some kind of ideal?


  36. June 26, 2016 2:45 pm

    “Why is it these systematically organized sources aim at Michael and all close to him, such as even his Kids with tabloid lies as well?”- archanglemichael777

    Barbara Kaufmann is giving a very good answer to that in her recent article:

    Criminals often return to the scene of their crime. Sadists revisit the act itself – over and over and over.

    It is a very true observation. They are like vampires – they are so used to feeding on Michael’s blood that they can’t stop. And there is definitely a nostalgic feeling about the ‘good old times’ when they could make up any lie about Jackson and perfectly get away with it. The sames goes for criminals – if they are not punished for their crimes they think they have a free hand to do anything and turn insatiable. All these blood-thirsty media liars about MJ are acting in the same way.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. June 26, 2016 2:16 pm

    “Of course they couldn’t use page 3 when it says the exact opposite than their headlines. It’s obvious they omitted it deliberately.” – Susannerb

    Susannerb, by now I’ve found page 3 in the Radar Online variant – they placed it somewhere among the pictures. An interesting mess – will analyze it further.


  38. June 26, 2016 1:21 pm

    “here are some important items I want to share with you, for you to either add to this post or use in a future post… Radar’s report was originally 88 pages, but they re-uploaded it to their site, and it’s now only 61 pages! So they removed 27 pages of LIES, and it’s right when they were called out by Jonathan Hobin! ” – sanemjfan

    Sanemjfan, thank you very much for your tireless work in debunking these lies and also for all the links (will study them). I also have copied the 88-page Radar Online variant (knowing who we have to deal with, it has become a habit with me to copy their “documents”). I think the analysis of what they deleted and the other things will require a new post.


  39. June 26, 2016 1:01 pm

    “Also, one day ago I found a post on this subject shared via twitter. It’s the reaction of Jonathan Hobin, one of the artists who worked on some pictures found in Michael’s house. Probably it’s worth reading” – Esmeralda Rokay

    Esmeralda, Jonathan Hobin says a very important thing – the picture of a murdered girl lookalike used by Radar Online to merge with the police report (making it look like it was found in Neverland) was made five years after the raid, in 2008! So it is another obvious fake.


    In truth I knew right away that actually it debunked the story of the day I guess about Michael Jackson because I knew for a fact that that child potentially was not even born … before the police raid,” said Hobin, and that the photo itself was taken in 2008, five years after the raid.

    “(The sheriff’s department) could have put out word immediately saying that this is someone’s attempt to … corrupt a previously existing police investigation,” he said.

    “I’d like them to speak to it sooner rather than later … everyone from Vanity Fair to Daily Mail to wherever, they’re talking about this thing that supposedly exists and to some extent I question if there is some sort of intention of them to allow that discussion to continue when they can put a stop to it right now.”


  40. susannerb permalink
    June 26, 2016 9:15 am

    Wow, Helena, you made a major discovery with the „missing“ page 3. Of course they couldn’t use page 3 when it says the exact opposite than their headlines. It’s obvious they omitted it deliberately. I am so glad you wrote this post.

    Thanks, Esmeralda Rokaj, for posting the link of the Jonathan Hobin response. It’s good CBCnews calls the whole thing an “online gossip rag”.

    Word must spread that these are orchestrated lies! Thank God for MJ’s advocates who already did a great job refuting them.


  41. Hamza permalink
    June 26, 2016 7:16 am

    Jolie, Page Six is a tabloid section of the Right-Wing biased newspaper the NY Post. Nothing they say is credible.


  42. June 26, 2016 5:04 am

    I had never noticed the Jesus Christ picture even though I had seen the video with Oprah. Reading the lines “he was allegedly committing ‘crimes against children’ right under that painting”, it truly gave me a very unsettling feeling. And in fact, wouldn’t anyone feel like that even if they had sinister intentions? Especially Michael who was a very religious man. Whatever detail you take in count, the story of a guilty Michael Jackson makes no sense.

    Also, one day ago I found a post on this subject shared via twitter. It’s the reaction of Jonathan Hobin, one of the artists who worked on some pictures found in Michael’s house. I don’t know if you were aware of it but probably it’s worth reading:


  43. June 26, 2016 3:58 am

    The internet is FILLED with information wars as well, so the truth cannot be spread that way either. Why is it these systematically organized sources aim at Michael and all close to him, such as even his Kids with tabloid lies as well?


  44. June 26, 2016 3:33 am

    Reblogged this on teammichaeljackson and commented:
    Plz read and SHARE,


  45. sanemjfan permalink
    June 25, 2016 10:50 pm

    Helena, I just wrote a very long comment with a lot of links, and it’s awaiting your approval before posting. You can delete this comment once you post the other comment.


  46. sanemjfan permalink
    June 25, 2016 10:49 pm

    Helena, it’s been a long week! Arguably the worst week since the death of MJ! There are some important items I want to share with you, for you to either add to this post or use in a future post:

    I have been tweeting nonstop all this week regarding the various lies of Radar Online. All of the tweets are “threaded”, meaning that when you open one tweet in the thread, you can scroll up and down to see the entire thread of tweets together, instead of scrolling through my timeline.

    The thread begins with me dubunking one of Radar’s other lies this week, stating that MJ had a “secret sex closet”, which even Diane Dimond confirmed was a fur closet used by the PREVIOUS owner of Sycamore Valley Ranch! I included the video of her saying this in my thread. Start here:

    Also, I tweeted this article from artist Jonathan Hobin, who created the JonBonet Ramsey lookalike photo in 2008, and published in 2010! Radar Online copied it into their PDF of the Police Report in order to insinuate that it was found at Neverland! How could MJ own it IF IT DIDN’T EVEN EXIST IN 2003??!! Hobin is very upset that his art is being misrepresented, and I hope he sues! Here’s an article about it:

    And here’s what he tweeted:

    And here’s what he posted on Instagram:

    (You can embed Tweets and Instagram posts into your post, BTW. Press the button with 3 dots, select “Embed”, and copy the link.)

    And as Jolie already posted, Stacy Brown released his trash today, and I thoroughly rebutted it in my thread. If there is anything I tweeted that you want to include in this or future posts, feel free to do so. You can embed my tweets, too, if you like. (But not the whole thread, which is well over 1,000 tweets long by now!) Obviously, most of the rebuttals I tweeted is information that you already know, but I learned the hard way this week just how unknowledgeable many fans are regarding the allegations, so I was very busy this week educating them.

    Barbara Kaufmen wrote this post about the true meaning of the “Boys Will Be Boys” book found at Neverland:

    And here’s Raven’s first post of many regarding Radar’s lies:

    One last thing: I don’t know if you know this already, but Radar’s report was originally 88 pages, but they re-uploaded it to their site, and it’s now only 61 pages! So they removed 27 pages of LIES, and it’s right when they were called out by Jonathan Hobin! Fortunately, I have a copy of the original 88 page report if you need it. We should contrast the 2 versions of the reports to see which 27 pages were removed, and what they contained. You can download the current 61 page document on Radar now, and let me know if you need me to email you the original 88 page document. Thanks!


  47. Annemarie Latour permalink
    June 25, 2016 4:50 pm

    Dear Helena,

    Thank you for your great research regarding the materials ‘found’ by Radar Online. The more we know about these works, the better, so people can get educated about such manipulations.

    You are also right about the picture of Christ over Michael’s bed. It’s a picture from the Catholic tradition, a devotion called the ‘Divine Mercy’:

    There’s another very clear picture of this portrait in Michael’s bedroom. I’ve added it to this email if you wish to use it, although I don’t own the copyrights (don’t know who does). Also, I’ve included two other pictures of the Divine Mercy – one of the complete picture (Christ head to toe) and one of the detail (face of Christ). As you can see in the ‘face’ picture, the original picture of the Divine Mercy has been slightly adapted to emphasize the Sacred Heart of Jesus: This is, again, a Catholic devotion with a special meaning. So the adapted version is the picture framed on Michael’s bedroom wall.

    Another detail is that within the Sacred Heart picture on Michael’s wall, you will see a smaller picture of a woman and child. This painting is called ‘The Madonna of the Streets’ by Italian painter Roberto Ferruzzi. More info on the painter: And the painting:

    The combination of the two paintings is quite interesting, as it shows that Michael wished to have both Christ and the Madonna (Jesus and Mary) ‘present’ in his personal living quarters.

    Please feel free to use this info if it can add something to your post!

    Kind regards,

    Annemarie Latour


  48. June 25, 2016 2:47 pm

    “It grieves me to have to report this. But I thought it was important.” – Jolie

    Jolie, it is indeed important but it seems to me (for some reason) that there is nothing to grieve about here. Stacy Brown really overdid it this time, so dear Stacy – proof, please?

    For the readers to see what it is, but to avoid promoting the site that published it, here is the full text of Stacy Brown’s new masterpiece:

    Detectives convinced Michael Jackson molested his nephews
    By Stacy Brown June 25, 2016 | 12:47pm
    Modal Trigger Detectives convinced Michael Jackson molested his nephews

    Investigators were convinced Michael Jackson preyed on his own nephews, several sources involved in the criminal probe told The Post.

    Santa Barbara County detectives interviewed two of Jackson’s nephews and another family member while investigating the King of Pop for child molestation in 2004-2005, but believe Jacko silenced his family with gifts and threats.

    “We received a credible tip about the nephews and, as with many things that happened during the investigation, Jackson’s people got wind of it and Jackson spirited the one boy off to an island,” said a former county detective. “Well, when that boy returned, Jackson had also purchased him a brand new car which we understood, along with the trip, was to shut the nephew up.”

    But the then-18-year-old nephew still hinted something was amiss.

    “He was home alone and invited two detectives in, offered refreshments and he also offered that he would be unwilling to talk bad about his uncle,” a prosecution source said.

    “It was odd that he wasn’t upset with the visit, he wasn’t upset that the detectives told them what they had suspected happened between he and Michael and he never gave a real denial,” the source said.

    Another nephew denied being assaulted by the “Dangerous” singer.

    One family member “said he feared there were several nephews who had already been victimized and that he also feared that Jackson’s own son [Blanket] was being groomed by Jackson for unsavory behavior,” the detective told the Post.

    Investigators never charged Jacko because the relatives wouldn’t cooperate, investigators said.

    The police interviews took place before Jacko’s molestation trial was beginning in Santa Maria, Calif. Jackson was accused of sexually assaulting a 13-year-old cancer patient, but was acquitted. Four years later, the singer died of a drug overdose.

    Last week, Radar Online reported that Jacko hid a twisted sex addiction as well as deviant artifacts like a Jon Benet Ramsey doll with a noose around her neck and torture magazines at his Neverland Ranch.

    The website said police also found scantily clad photos of young boys including that of Jackson’s nephews, Taj, Terrell and T.J. — the sons of Jacko’s brother Tito — who formed the 1990s pop group 3T.

    One private investigator with direct knowledge of the police raids told the website: “The detectives report cites Michael even used sexy photos of his own nephews … in their underwear to excite young boys.”

    Jackson attorney Brian Oxman said the Radar Report mischaracterized art as porn: “Terrell is standing naked with a shirt in front of him. It is reminiscent of Kim Kardashian on the cover of GQ magazine. He had the photo done for an album cover. There were 50 people there at that photo shoot.”

    Jacko recorded and produced music with his nephews and, as revealed in a family member’s tweet last year, eerily wrote a letter to the boys’ late mother – his sister in law – warning her to “please read this article about child molestation and please read it to Taj … it brings out how even your own relatives can be molesters of children, even uncles or aunts molesting nephews or nieces. Please read. Love MJ.”

    Jacko estate lawyer Howard Weitzman told The Post Jacko “never molested anyone. And, whomever would say that he would harm his own children is ridiculous.”

    Before the acquittal and in their attempts to uncover more family secrets, authorities flew to Las Vegas and met with an “immediate” family member of Jacko’s.

    “What he told us was eye-opening. He told us that Jackson had for years tried to hide his predilection for prepubescent boys.” However the family member said Jackson had also been addicted to all kinds of drugs and often was too screwed up to even realize that others were witnessing his touching little boys.

    This family member said he feared that there were several nephews, including his own son and Jacko’s own son, who may have been victims.

    Jacko had a total of 23 nephews and nieces. Oldest brother Jackie, 65, has two children, including one son; Tito, 62, has three sons; Jermaine, 61, has nine children, including seven sons; Marlon, 59, has three children, including one son; Randy, 54, has three children, including one son; sister Rebbie, 66, has three children, including one son.

    Jacko had three children, Prince, 19; Paris, 18, and Blanket, 14.

    “The family member … told us that [family matriarch] Katherine Jackson more than anyone else knew about her son’s activities with boys but was too embarrassed to do anything about it. He told us that Katherine implied that Hollywood turned Jackson gay, which had nothing to do with his being a pedophile,” the prosecution source said.

    The family member declined to testify at trial, telling investigators and friends that such testimony would lead to an unwanted divorce from his wife and he’d be ostracized from the family or even killed if he did so.”


  49. Jolie permalink
    June 25, 2016 2:26 pm


    Stacy Brown wrote an article today. Link below:

    It grieves me to have to report this. But I thought it was important.



  1. Inner Michael » Radar Online’s Secret Shame Part 2
  2. Radar Onlines Fälschung, um den siebten Jahrestag von Michael Jacksons Tod zu begehen | all4michael
  3. Radar Onlines verborgene Schande aufdecken: Die Wahrheit darüber, was Michael Jackson in seinem Schlafzimmer hatte (und nicht hatte) – Teil 2 | all4michael
  4. Exposing Radar Online’s Secret Shame: The Truth About What Michael Jackson Had (And Didn’t Have) In His Bedroom | Allforloveblog
  5. Exposing Radar Online’s Secret Shame: The Truth About What Michael Jackson Had (And Didn’t Have) In His Bedroom-Pt 2 | Allforloveblog
  6. Michael Jackson: On Purpose Insult of the Deceased by his Enemies – WHO IS BEHIND THESE TABLOIDS? RUPERT MURDOCH?- | Michael Jackson's Human Rights

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: