Skip to content

A Lesson To Be Learned: … In The End Lies Don’t Pay Off

January 28, 2019

Dear readers, the following post was already written in October 2017, but was not published at that time due to more important events. Now that the German scammer Michael Jacobshagen changed his plans to earn money from stories in favor of Michael into plans to benefit from anti-Jackson stories, it is necessary to make this post public for our readers.

I don’t want to provide another link to the Mirror article which tells Jacobshagen’s new lies, but the text was already posted by Helena in her comment of January 27.

Please consider that the following post was written in 2017 and relates to the events in 2017 when Jacobshagen told several lies about meetings with Michael and was unmasked in a German TV program as somebody who falsified MJ memorabilia to sell them to fans by presenting himself as one of Michael’s best friends. After he was exposed we hoped he would disappear into oblivion.

But now the situation is different, and I will explain it again in an update at the end of the post.

~~~~~

This post is meant as a completion of my post of June 7, 2017, on the lies Michael Jacobshagen and Daphne Barak spread earlier this year and Jacobshagen’s following threat to sue us unless we remove this post.

Most of our readers are probably aware by now that Jacobshagen has been exposed as a fraudster in a German TV report on September 12, 2017. He not only told tall tales about alleged meetings with Michael Jackson in the 2000s, but he also sold faked MJ memorabilia to fans for thousands of dollars.

This gives us the opportunity to complete and finally close this chapter of lies – one of many scammers who used Michael Jackson’s name to make money.

We decided to do this in a separate post because first of all we would like to take this opportunity to add more facts – as an example – disproving Jacobshagen’s lies regarding his alleged meeting with Michael in April 2009, and secondly because despite the successful unmasking of this person there is also a downside to the whole story and its end.

The April 2009 trap

In our answer to Jacobshagen we offered him to present his side of the story by answering a few questions, so the readers can decide themselves if he delivers credible answers. So we asked him to answer the following questions:

How can you prove your stay in Las Vegas in 2009? Is there a copy of a flight ticket, a hotel reservation, a photo of you and Michael Jackson or something of the kind?
Can you tell the exact dates when you were with Michael in 2009?
Where exactly did you meet him? Were his children with you, and if not who was with them?
How did Michael get to Las Vegas, when he already lived in Los Angeles in 2009?
Is there any proof of your contact with the LAPD in 2013? Did you send them a mail or did you call them?

He never answered again! We expected this, by the way, because we knew the questions would be too tough for him to answer truthfully. But now that he is exposed, we can provide the information which is necessary to give an honest answer.jac-FBpost

In order to show how unbelievably brazen his claim of meeting Michael in April 2009 is, I return to some of our own records. Our long-time readers remember very well how closely Helena followed the trials against Conrad Murray and AEG Live in 2011 and 2013 and how detailed and extensively she wrote down what we learned from the presented evidence, collecting all the facts and information from these trials. Those who are interested can go to the blog’s Categories section and check the numerous posts on these topics.

I already told in the June 7 post that Michael’s last months in his life were dissected in those two trials, this means the trial evidence provided us with almost a complete timeline of his last months in 2009. Among the evidence were also medical records, and from these medical records we know exactly for example when Michael visited Dr. Klein’s office in Los Angeles during that time. And his visits to Klein’s office were particularly frequent in April 2009.

In addition we know from the trial testimony that April 2009 was the month when the rehearsals and the dancers’ auditions started. Michael also had appointments with Dr. Metzger and Cherilyn Lee in April 2009, and Conrad Murray and Kai Chase began their work at Michael’s house in Los Angeles in April 2009.

From the available information, the timeline for Michael in April 2009 in Los Angeles was as follows:

April2009 timeline-Dokument1 - Microsoft Word

So, wow, can anyone guess when Michael should have been in Las Vegas in April to meet alone with Jacobshagen in a secret place at a secret time for 3 days?

In April, when the preparations for the London concerts were in full swing, with beginning rehearsals, dancers’ auditions and meetings not even included in this timeline? With Conrad Murray being in his house daily from April 2009 and also Kai Chase starting her daily work at Michael’s house in April? With Paris’ birthday on April 3? With his bodyguards constantly around him? None of them ever told that Michael was gone for 3 days.

Well, it’s obvious Jacobshagen never knew about these facts, never followed the trials or read the trial reports and so missed the trap into which he fell with his claim, together with the media who became his accomplices in reporting these lies.

And now he fell into another trap.

The interview trap

On the initiative of a group of MJ fans, German journalists of a cable TV program did some investigation on Michael Jacobshagen and aired a report on September 12, 2017, on the German SAT1 channel. The report was about 15 minutes long and was primarily about MJ memorabilia, letters and signatures which Jacobshagen sold to MJ fans and which now turned out to be falsified.

Our reader jacksonaktak already provided a short summary of the report in the comments section of the July post, but I’m going to repeat the most important content once more:

screenshotAkteMJThe report presents three examples of deceived fans and an interview with Jacobshagen in which he says at the beginning that he is thankful for the treasure Michael left him personally. Notes allegedly written by MJ are shown, and Jacobshagen claimed it is in Michael’s interest to make all of them public. He claimed again he remained Michael’s close friend until his death and met him regularly in later years, “for example in 2006 in England”.
At the end he is confronted in the interview with the evidence of his fraud.

The first example of a fan was the case of Thomas Käppeli, a Swiss fan, who also met Michael personally in Switzerland. He bought notes and other memorabilia from Jacobshagen for 30,000 €, allegedly with original MJ signatures.

screenshot shoesA short time after he had told Jacobshagen that he would prefer notes of MJ referring to Switzerland and written with a marker instead of a pencil, Jacobshagen surprisingly offered him 5 “original” MJ notes written with a marker and referring to Switzerland (“I love Switzerland” etc.). This made him extremely suspicious.

The next example was presented by another fan who saw a BAD LP on Ebay offered for 2 €, with a positive ranking of Jacobshagen. A month later the exactly same LP, which could be recognized because of a certain price tag in a certain corner, was suddenly “originally signed” by Michael Jackson and offered for 250 € on Jacobshagen’s account.

The third example was a fan who had bought MJ autographs from Jacobshagen and was wondering about the photo paper the autographs were written on. The photo paper of Hewlett Packard had a numerical code on the back and his research revealed that the paper was manufactured years after Jackson’s death.

Dieter Wiesner, who was Jackson’s manager for a period of time, told in the report he had asked Michael’s mother and brother Jermaine about Jacobshagen and they denied knowing him. As Wiesner is in possession of original notes and signatures of Michael, he provided them for a comparison with the notes Jacobshagen sold. The journalists contacted a handwriting expert of the forensic institute of the state criminal police (LKA) of Brandenburg and asked for an expert opinion. This woman compared the handwriting and concluded that the notes in question are “most probably not authentic”. She said: “In the comparison we can see that it was tried over a longer period of time to exercise the handwriting, but he was not successful in completely capturing the form of the authentic handwriting.”

At the end, the report tells that Jacobshagen offered the journalists hand-written MJ notes for 1000 € without being asked and that they pretended to show interest.

Then they had the following conversation:

Reporter: You were with him, when he wrote that?

Jacobshagen: Yes, of course, he stood directly in front of me and then he gave it to me.

Then the showdown begins:
The reporter says to Jacobshagen that the papers at hand had been presented to the LKA Brandenburg for examination and they came to the conclusion that they are counterfeits written by the same hand, but not by MJ. They hand the letter with this result over to Jacobshagen.

J: That’s not true, it’s all from MJ himself.

R: Do you believe that the LKA is mistaken?

J: I don’t know which people sit anywhere, I am very surprised. I was there, I know what happened.

R: How much money have you got for these notes which allegedly are from MJ personally?

J: I can’t say that, there were also a lot of gifts.

R: I’m going to ask the man they belong to. Mr. Käppeli, would you come in?

Mr. Käppeli enters the room. Jacobshagen’s face freezes at that moment.

R: Mr. Käppeli, how much did you pay for the material you bought from Mr. Jacobshagen?

Mr. Käppeli: Altogether 30,000 €.

R: He paid 30.000 € and the LKA says they are counterfeits.

J: I can’t comment on that.

He looks utterly perplexed and doesn’t find words.

A short statement of Jermaine Jackson follows. He says he doesn’t know Michael Jacobshagen or whatever his name is, he never met him. He is angry and disappointed that Jacobshagen abuses the name of his family to deceive fans.

The report ends with the information that several cheated fans are preparing criminal complaints and claims.

Two sides of the story

 Undoubtedly the fans and the journalists did a good job in putting a stop to this unscrupulous profiteer’s game. The time has come to expose him, and it was necessary. He had to be taken down from his cloud where he apparently lived in another world, believing his own lies.

But the more I thought about this surprisingly successful cooperation between journalists and fans, the more I felt a sort of irritation. There is a downside to this story, or perhaps two.

I was asking myself: Why didn’t these or journalists in general examine the accusers and their allegations against Michael in the same way? They could have done it, as we can see in this case! They have the means to do it, and they can if they want!

I know the allegations and the accusers are a complex issue which cannot be handled and explained in a 15 minutes report. But what we have missed so far is even the slightest interest of journalists (with the exception of Mary Fischer in 1994) to go deeply into this matter and examine the accusers, their agenda and their claims. Exactly this could be a very interesting investigation for journalists, though.

I personally feel anger at the fact that today not one professional journalist bothers to investigate the liars speaking against Michael in the same way, whether they are the accusers from the past (Chandler, Arvizo) or the latest ones (Robson, Safechuck) who used the former ones as their template.

Or let me ask the other way round: If fans had put the same energy into debunking the allegations against Michael, could they – with the same effort – have been able to convince journalists of investigating the allegations in detail and restore Michael’s reputation? If fans were not only interested in MJ memorabilia, but equally (or more) in the truth and in exposing those liars accusing Michael, what could they have achieved within the media?

I was wondering about the journalists’ motives for agreeing to investigate the Jacobshagen case. Could it be they were mainly interested in the weirdness of MJ fans?

Of course in this case it became very clear that the fans distance themselves strictly from this fraudster, which is very important.

But Jacobshagen was supposed to be a fan, and if fans have such a liar in their ranks, this may shed a bad light on all of them. When a Michael Jackson fan says that Michael was innocent and then he turns out to be a horrible fraudster, it makes people doubt everything he said about MJ.

Do people really see the difference between this “fan” and the others?

To me it was shocking that some fans are spending 30,000 € for MJ memorabilia. Are they also interested in MJ’s reputation?

And do people really look at Michael Jackson fans as reasonable people in light of such amounts?

The story leaves a sour taste. It’s good Jacobshagen is stopped and that fans played a part in it by cooperating with journalists, but it is of minor effect for Michael Jackson’s legacy. The real success would be the next step: if journalists could be convinced to investigate the accusations against Michael Jackson himself and so put a stop to his character assassination.

Would fans put the same energy into this kind of efforts, when it’s not about large sums of lost money?

And would journalists show the same interest in a Michael Jackson story, when it’s not about crazy fans or fraudsters, but about justice for MJ?

I am just wondering. In any case, the chapter “Jacobshagen” is closed for us now.

However, the lesson from this case for liars in general should be that lies don’t pay off in the end, as also can be seen in the case of Paul Horner, the fake news writer during the US election campaign of 2016, who now died almost a year after he had admitted publicly to writing fake news on Facebook and declaring he “was the reason Mr. Trump had been elected”, as I told in this post.

~~~~~

UPDATE  January 28, 2019

Unfortunately this chapter is not closed now! The rat came back out of its hole in a way Helena and I had already expected earlier. We always feared that he could make a U-turn in view of his public downfall and start to accuse Michael. After he miscalculated his plans to benefit from faked MJ memorabilia and pro-Jackson lies, he now tries to benefit from anti-Jackson lies. It had to be expected because a liar remains a liar, whether it’s in favour or against Michael, and now with Robson and Safechuck telling their lies in a 4-hour-film, Jacobshagen found the opportunity for him to change sides because he thinks this is more favourable for him. Because of his own massive contradictions his example shows best how some people change their stories for their own benefit. In the case of Jacobshagen this is very well documented and was even foreseeable.

See his original reply to the Robson allegations in 2013:

jacobshagen reply to wr

I left the headline of this post as it was written in 2017 because I still believe that the lies of all the accusers, whether it’s Robson, Safechuck or Jacobshagen, won’t pay off in the end!

Perhaps the whole issue requires a new post with updated information. We will see if this is necessary and possible. But to do this, we first had to make the above information available for our readers.

Update 29/01/19

Here is the video by the German cable TV with English subtitles. By the way at about 1:00 it says that Jacobshagen met Michael Jackson in 1998 (only):

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9EpoE5b1euuw/?fbclid=IwAR34yZj_9VNR_U7vgFPkH2U6WLapCyAyQFS-lkkyNeSB7uV_1Dso0_27skA

13 Comments leave one →
  1. Helen-Marie permalink
    February 4, 2019 7:18 am

    Thank you both for your time and diligence in what continues to be a web of lies and deceit from these 3. We need to keep on pushing the truth in the faces of those who report in the media. This website has become a valuable source of the truth and has a huge amount of information for those who actually want to educate themselves.

    I actually believe the tide will change in favour of the truth, as there is a whole new generation out there who just simply won’t take what the media says as fact. In the meantime we must stand strong in the face of evil.

    Like

  2. susannerb permalink*
    February 2, 2019 4:49 am

    I just want to add this short video to this post from a young man who also has something to tell about Jacobshagen:

    He made his own experience with Jacobshagen’s lies when he was contacted by J. who wanted to manage him and promised him stage appearances with Ola Ray. To him Jacobshagen said in 2017 that Michael Jackson never harmed children. Listen to him!

    Like

  3. January 29, 2019 5:02 pm

    “Why everybody who seen Leaving Neverlabd at Sundabce are ***** agree then they need must to reflect with hindsight….” – Jason

    Because this is a fantasy drama film made in the best Hollywood tradition – to bring out emotion in the audience through a sympathetic portrayal of two characters whose mothers and sisters at first believed their initial variant and then believed their revised variant, and are now heartbroken in a truly Shakespearean way.

    Jeraldine Hughes who was present at the premiere says that at some point there were even violins playing in the theatre (for creating the necessary atmosphere).

    However the only problem is that all of it goes unchallenged – they just said it, after decades of saying the opposite. However if the sum of $1,5 billion is really involved anyone would turn it into a Shakespearean tragedy, at least because of a prospect to lose so much money.

    The lawyer for Robson and Safechuck says that now he is sure they will win the appeal (especially with so much backing from the public).

    Liked by 1 person

  4. January 29, 2019 4:08 pm

    “And what about secret room at Neverland for Jackson “abuse” all chidren” – Jason

    Dear, you always come here to ask ‘innocent’ questions about things that don’t deserve even a fraction of our attention. If you did at least some minimal research you would know that the ‘secret’ room was made by the previous owner of the ranch for keeping jewelry and other valuables there. And Michael used it for the same purpose. It was so tiny that the journalists who saw it had to bend to come in.

    “Have you an idea..?”

    Yes, I have.

    Like

  5. Jason permalink
    January 29, 2019 1:40 pm

    And what about secret room at Neverland for Jackson “abuse” all chidren…
    It becomes anything…
    I hope there is a hope but it’s lost advance for the moment…

    Like

  6. Jason permalink
    January 29, 2019 1:34 pm

    Why everybody who seen Leaving Neverlabd at Sundabce are ***** agree then they need must to reflect with hindsight….
    What happened in the future ? What the Jackson going to do..?
    I know Taj Jackson want the justice, but in asking make him a donation, the haters going to serve of that to say the Estate and Jackson family try to manipulate everyone…
    It’s going to very hard to the justice…
    Have you an idea..?

    Like

  7. January 29, 2019 9:27 am

    I’ve added to Susannerb’s post the video she talked about. It is in German but has English subtitles. https://www.bitchute.com/video/9EpoE5b1euuw/?fbclid=IwAR34yZj_9VNR_U7vgFPkH2U6WLapCyAyQFS-lkkyNeSB7uV_1Dso0_27skA

    It turns out that Jacobshagen is extremely good at forging Michael’s handwriting. He trained a lot and it was only the local Office of Criminal Investigations at Brandenburg that was able to establish that the autographs he produced were not real.

    This video raises more than ever the problem of forged Michael’s signatures, notes or even damaging to Michael but totally falsified “letters” and similar materials.

    Since the Estate is looking for ways to fight these liars it will probably be not a bad idea to check the materials they have (if they have any) for their authencity.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. sanemjfan permalink
    January 28, 2019 11:53 pm

    here’s a video rebuttal to Wade’s lies! https://youtu.be/9yTTEwBLfUQ

    Like

  9. January 28, 2019 7:58 pm

    Let me draw everyone’s attention to this fine piece from Jacobshagen’s present story (though the whole of it is so splendid that it’s difficult to choose):

    Michael also told how Jackson gave him a copy of The Boy: A Photographic Essay, containing naked snaps of young lads.
    He said: “I found it strange. He said ‘This is one of my favourite books’ and he wrote personal notes inside. In one he called me ‘his special friend’ and his ‘rubba rubba friend’ because of what used to happen in the bed.”
    Years later, another copy of the book was found in Jackson’s bedroom at his Neverland ranch in California after he was arrested on suspicion of abuse.

    The book “The Boy: A Photographic Essay” was indeed in Michael Jackson’s possession, but he didn’t buy it – it was sent to him in the early 90s by someone who left the following inscription: “From your fan, xxxooo, Rhonda. 1983 Chicago”. 

    And why this piece is so magnificent is because this book was found not “years later” as the Daily Mirror reports, but in 1993, in a file cabinet in Michael’s closet which was locked when the police raided Neverland following Chandler’s accusations.

    For some reason the police knew who had the key to it– it was Blanca Francia, Michael’s former maid who had left her employment two years prior to that, in 1991. Blanca Francia was friends with Victor Gutierrez, the notorious NAMBLA attendee (there is even a picture of the two of them in Gutierrez’s book) who was making rounds of the families who knew Michael at the time and telling them that he was a p***file.

    So it was this noble woman who was specially summoned by the police to open the file cabinet and since then the book has been kept in the police vaults.

    No such book was ever found among Michael’s collection of books later or at any other time.

    So when Jacobshagen claims that Michael showed it to him in 1998, he is speaking of the book that had been seized from Michael’s cabinet five years earlier.

    The fact that it is a gross lie is no news to us – everything in Jacobshagen’s story is in exactly the same style.

    But what interests me most is who told Jacobshagen about that book and who coached him on what to say?

    Liked by 1 person

  10. January 28, 2019 7:12 pm

    Will the duplicity against Michael (or his fans) never cease! Thank you for this post.

    Like

  11. January 28, 2019 7:05 pm

    For you to have a closer look at this new breed of double-dealing accusers let me repeat here a short portfolio on Jacobshagen from the previous thread (just to keep it in one place).

    Some highlights from his present story:

    “Michael invited us to other concerts, including the HIStory Tour, when I was 14. I travelled with him to other countries.”

    “Michael, meanwhile, told the Mirror about the time Jackson stripped off in front of him in a hotel hot tub. It was 1998 – three years after they met.”

    And here is a video where he and his mother say that they met Michael Jackson in 1998. (in German).

    However the year 1998 was after the History tour ended (start date – September 7, 1996, end date – October 15, 1997). So there was no way Jacobshagen could accompany Michael on that tour. Or any other tour as History tour was Michael’s last.

    But that is not all.

    The fans who know Jacobshagen personally say that he met Michael Jackson just once. There are still horrified comments on the MJJCommunity forum about Jacobshagen and his book about MJ (then favorable to Michael) where they warn others not to believe a word of what Jacobshagen says. http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/threads/130450-Michael-Jacobshagen-All-Discussion-Here-MERGED/page2

    I befriended M. Jacobshagen for nearly 3 years. i spoke to him on phone regularly and had met him on several fan events. YES it´s true he met Michael Jackson in 1998 FIRST AND ONLY TIME and had the big chance to spend one day with him including visiting Circus Krone and having dinner together with MJ and another family from Hamburg..
    …further on M.Jacobshagen claimed in his book he would had spent nearly both legs of the History Tour with Jackson and his staff……Business Partners and close associates of M.Avram can confirm today that Jacobshagen never had been seen during any other event relating to the History Tour: NEVER! anytime, any place……..to end my post here once again i only want to warn the public out there. Don´t believe just a half in his book!

    Hello, I was there in Munich in 1998. Michael Jacobshagen is not telling the truth. He met Michael Jackson few days before he was with him at Circus Krone on 28.03.1998. I was there with the Fanclub “Angel”.
    After his experience with MJ at the Circus Krone they went to the Hotel “Bayrischer Hof” and spent time together with Anton und Franziska Schleiter and another English or American boy. In the evening he left the Hotel with some autographs of MJ and I protected him for some crazy fans they would steal the autographs from Jacobshagen. Its fact that he Not spent the night in the suite of Michael. The next day I talked with him in the Hotel lobby. This was slso seen by Wayne Nagin that Jacobshagen was talking to fans about his experience. Jacobshagen asked Wayne Nagin several times if he can go to Michael Jackson. Wayne Nagins answer was: No! That was the end of his longtime friendship with Michael Jackson.
    The Fotos on his Internet Site of him in Disneylad Paris 1995 ( a Boy with a cappy of Bayern München) shows Not him. Take Look on this Video and you can see the Face of the Boy, its NOT Jacobshagen:http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9xztTkn…%3D9xztTknHN_o

    I got to know the author of this book in 1998, when he met Michael for the FIRST time in Munich. He was 13 then and has been a regular fan…he DID NOT meet Michael before march 1998 nor did he ever meet or talk to him afterwards!
    I know that for a fact!
    I have not read his book, but whatever he writes there about being on tour with MJ…it is 100% FALSE!

    And this is what Jacobshagen says now and the Daily Mirror gleefully repeats.
    IT IS FAKE NEWS IN ITS GROSSEST FORM. But how similar it is to Robson/Safechuck’s story!

    ‘Michael Jackson called me Rubba Rubba boy in bed and I now realise he abused me’ 
    EXCLUSIVE Michael Jacobs-hagen was just 14 when he joined the singer on a string of tours but now he’s a dad himsef he realises he was abused

    He shared a bed with Michael Jackson and was nicknamed “Rubba Rubba” boy by the superstar.

    When he was a baby-faced 14-year-old Michael Jacobs-hagen joined Jackson on a string of tours – smiling for the world’s media as he posed happily with the singer.

    But today he reveals for the first time the full, horrific details of his bizarre relationship with the star who took him into his bed.

    And he admits that only now, as the father of a three-year-old himself, does he realise the twisted and serious nature of the abuse he suffered at the Jackson’s hands.

    Speaking exclusively to the Sunday Mirror, Michael, 35, said: “He overstepped the mark with me and with other children.

    I’m almost the same age now Michael was when he met me.
    “If I was to share a bed with a child, this would not be right. It is not normal and it’s not right.
    He was always asking me to sleep in his bed. I would say, ‘No Michael, I can sleep in my own suite’, but he was saying ‘Please, please… for Michael Jackson’.

    “Since I had a son, it made me look at everything in a different way and I realise now how wrong it was. Becoming a father changed my feelings.”

    Touched him inappropriately after cuddling up to him in bed And it was always worse if the star had taken medication.
    Stripped naked as they shared a Jacuzzi.
    Gave him a book “full of photos of naked boys”.
    Bought his silence with gifts – and even gave his mum a Cartier watch.

    Michael is now a public relations manager and lives in Munich, Germany, where he was famously snapped at a hotel window with Jackson and pictured in newspapers round the world as the boy in the back-to-front baseball cap.

    The King of Pop – in his trademark face mask – was 38 and touring Europe promoting the HIStory greatest hits album.

    Michael spent three weeks with the singer in the hotel suite.

    He said: “When I got back to school, pictures had been in all the media. Other kids would say, ‘You make sex with Michael Jackson’ and ‘You’re gay’.

    “It affected me psychologically, but I never told Michael. It made me feel shame. Teachers warned my mother about allegations about Michael, but she said it was my decision if I wanted to keep seeing him.”

    Michael had been thrilled to meet Jackson during an earlier visit to Disneyland Paris – after his mum asked an aide if her lad could be introduced to the star.

    He recalled: “Suddenly I was being picked up and taken to another hotel. When I went into his suite and Michael Jackson was there waiting for me, I just thought ‘Wow’. I was a huge fan.

    “He gave me a hug and said in German ‘I love you’. We spent the day playing games like hide and seek and on his PlayStation.

    “After that he kept phoning every day asking ‘Do you want to come again?’ and we spent the whole holiday together.

    Michael invited us to other concerts, including the HIStory Tour, when I was 14. I travelled with him to other countries.

    “When I slept in his bed, we wore just boxer shorts and he would put his arm around me and push his body to my body, like you would with a girlfriend.

    “He would put our bodies on each other and kiss me on the head and cheek. I woke many times and his hands were on me… one hand on the top of my legs and one hand around me.

    “When he was high on his medication he would get closer in the same way as when a man gets drunk. It disinhibited him.

    “He’d pull me closer and be grabbing me more and kissing me more on the head and on the cheek, He would also stroke my hair.

    “I didn’t feel comfortable with it, but I thought ‘I can’t say No’. When you’re 14 and you’re there with the biggest megastar in the world, you say ‘okay’.

    “He never carried out an explicit sexual act on me, but there were sexual intentions.

    “He must have been getting something out of it sexually. I feel now like he was testing me, seeing how far he could go.”

    The star was infatuated with Michael and sent notes saying he “truly missed him” – as well as instructions on hotel meets.

    Michael also told how Jackson gave him a copy of The Boy: A Photographic Essay, containing naked snaps of young lads.

    He said: “I found it strange. He said ‘This is one of my favourite books’ and he wrote personal notes inside. In one he called me ‘his special friend’ and his ‘rubba rubba friend’ because of what used to happen in the bed.”

    Years later, another copy of the book was found in Jackson’s bedroom at his Neverland ranch in California after he was arrested on suspicion of abuse.

    Jackson’s 14-week trial was held in Santa Maria, California, in 2005. He was cleared of 10 charges – even though alleged victim Gavin Arvizo told the trial he had slept in the same bed as the star as a 13-year-old.

    Michael, meanwhile, told the Mirror about the time Jackson stripped off in front of him in a hotel hot tub. It was 1998 – three years after they met.

    He said: “We were in the Jacuzzi inside Michael’s bathroom. He took his swim shorts off and said ‘If you want, you can take yours off as well’.

    “I told him ‘No, I don’t do that. I don’t feel comfortable being naked. I was 14, but I always looked younger.”

    The teenager told no one – not even his mum, who had split from his dad – about *****’s behaviour. But then the star had groomed him to remain silent and even bribed his mum.

    Michael went on: “He would buy expensive things.

    “He bought my mother a Cartier watch. We would go to toy shops or the Disney store and buy whatever I wanted.

    “And he would drink wine and offer it to me. But I always said no. He called white wine ‘Jesus juice’ and red wine ‘Jesus blood’.”

    Michael only came clean with his mum after Jackson died from a prescription overdose in 2009.

    He said: “She said that she gave him too much trust. She was very upset. All the time I was with him he needed psychological help. He was not okay.”

    Michael now has a son aged three but is estranged from the tot’s mum.

    He last saw Jackson in Las Vegas two months before his death at the age of 50.

    He added: “When I became a man he did not have so much interest in me. When I went to visit the last time he didn’t ask me to sleep with him. I had to sleep on the couch.

    “His fans won’t like me saying these things. They treat him like a God. But the truth is the truth.”
    ‘Michael Jackson called me Rubba Rubba in bed and I now realise he abused me’
    https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/michael-jackson-called-rubba-rubba-13912812?fbclid=IwAR1iYbw2Rb-mX4V2UASf_S1boOKX2WXdx6hyuj96PkkQckZwx35zsNuX3zk

    Like

  12. January 28, 2019 6:49 pm

    Jacobshagen is just the right person to highlight the main feature of all the three of them.

    Robson, Safechuck and Jacobshagen are like the founding fathers of a new movement – of those who first vehemently defend their friend (sometimes for decades), but when it doesn’t pay off grow disappointed and go over to the other, more promising side of his worst haters.

    It is hardly possible to find similar characters among genuine victims of child abuse.

    For example, it is impossible to imagine the grown-up Corey Feldman to vehemently defend his molester Jon Grissom at a sex-abuse trial and then make a U-turn and shed crocodile tears saying “Now I see that I was abused”. In spite of the fact that Corey did consider Jon Grissom his friend, by the age of 14-15 he was fully aware that what Grissom did to him was inappropriate to say the least and there was no power on earth to make him testify for Grissom.

    Or take Corey Haim, for example. Is it possible to imagine that tormented young man speaking for the one who raped him with a happy smile and raising his fingers in a V-sign in support of his rapist – instead of taking the chance to get justice for himself and blast his molester?
    Robson defends Michael Jackson at the 2005 trial

    No, it is impossible to imagine.

    And over here we have three such cases, all taking place at one and the same time. Just as I tell you – this is a new breed of accusers that has yet been unknown to science.

    P.S.
    Please note the free use of fake papers and memorabilia allegedly signed by Michael Jackson which Jacobshagen turned into a trade. With so big a talent at forging Michael’s handwriting these accusers can provide us with a ton of so-called Michael Jackson ‘love letters’ and whatnot (just a warning)

    Like

  13. January 28, 2019 5:32 pm

    Thank you, Susanne. It would be extremely interesting to see the media reaction to Jacobshagen’s present lies. Given that they were quite thorough in debunking Jacobshagen’s lies when they were pro-Jackson, will they do the same now that his lies are anti-Jackson?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: