Skip to content

LYNETTE’s Page

Boy’s Lawyer Seeks Photos of Michael Jackson’s Body  Posted 8/14/10

Metropolitan Digest / LOS ANGELES COUNTY NEWS IN BRIEF

January 05, 1994

The attorney representing a 13-year-old boy who claims he was molested by Michael Jackson filed court documents Tuesday in an effort to obtain photographs of the entertainer’s body.

Last month, Jackson submitted to a body search by investigators seeking evidence to corroborate the boy’s claims.

“We think that the fact that my client can establish what Mr. Jackson looks like naked is very substantial evidence of Mr. Jackson’s guilt,” said Larry Feldman, the boy’s attorney.

Feldman said he filed a motion in court that is a “multiple choice” request: Jackson may provide copies of the police photographs, submit to a second search, or the court may bar the photographs from the civil trial as evidence.

Feldman said he has asked Jackson’s attorneys and the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office for copies, but they refused.

This is a copy I made with the link below of an article that ran January 5th 1994 in the Los Angeles Times. Larry Feldman was a very tricky lawyer wasn’t he? To ask for copies of the photos (no way Michael would say) submit to a second search (certainly he would, he enjoyed the first one soooo much why not do it again), or the court may bar the photographs from the civil trial as evidence. Clever wasn’t he? If they were barred from evidence in the civil trial all they would have had to go on was Jordan’s word that Michael matched his description and the photos could not be used as exculpatory evidence either. Or better yet they could not be used as evidence that their story was a lie and they were extortionists! Then he goes to the press and blatantly lies that they were a match!

This is the day that Larry Feldman crossed the line from Lawyer to extortionist. Why didn’t someone in that press corp. ask him why they wanted to see them? I mean if they were telling the truth and knew they were a match why look at them? And after looking at them of course they would know what he looked like for heaven’s sake! Why, why, why didn’t someone ask him that one simple question? It wasn’t that they gave 2 descriptions it was that they asked for 2 searches like in 15 days Jordan suddenly remembered he was not circumcised? These people were EVIL no other word for it!

They saw Michael on TV and retaliated in this way. They saw how upset he was, how traumatized and hurt he was and wanted to do it to him AGAIN! They were just plain sick, sick sick sick.Watch this video and see if there isn’t a little more emotion than Jordan and now they would like to do it again.

http://articles.latimes.com/1994-01-05/local/me-8514_1_michael-jackson

10 Comments leave one →
  1. Marcus permalink
    June 13, 2011 9:56 am

    Thats just great, …
    I’m here because I saw your reaction to that ‘Desiree-retard’, and they just wont answer to any evidence anyone gives,
    could you pleaaaaaaaas tell me how they can say that T. Sneddon had a perfect descriptoin of MJs private parts and that he would gladly have given that as proof for his allegations..?
    Is it that they just leave out the fact that he saw the pictures and now he was sure the description was correct (not like before)…
    They riduculize your points and attack your persona, it’s sad…
    These guys, Desiree and all her pseudonyms, could actually proof there was no shoah! ! !

    Like

  2. October 23, 2010 1:14 am

    Hi Lynette, I had read your observation regarding LMP/O interview you had posted on another article. Its not showing now, would you mind sharing your thoughts again of what you had posted earlier? Thanks

    Like

  3. August 21, 2010 6:34 pm

    Lynette, I am very worried about your page – for some reason I cannot see it. Have you decided to delete it or what? Please check up your mail.

    Like

  4. lynande51 permalink
    August 15, 2010 4:41 am

    You’re exactly right. You know when you do someting everyday for a while you actually forget the process or th ereaon behind it and it is just repition. When I work in psych and we have an admission we have to write down all identifiable markings. Yes we make the person undress and change into hopital wear but we do it with great dignity.But we also have to look ther skin over to make sure it is intact and search them for articles they could use to hurt themselves.If that person is not circumcised we would have them push the foreskin back to inspect the glans for injury. Yes when they ask you for a description they ask about tattoos, scars and birthmarks. If he could have seen the discoloration he could have seen forskin thats for sure.

    Like

  5. Dialdancer permalink
    August 15, 2010 2:07 am

    @ Lynette,

    This is great. Your delivery of information is just right. This would make a great news article. Pose that question for the Media.

    During any type of assault case questioning of distinguishing marks is of the utmost importance. It removes commonalities . A spot where there may be many is one thing, but uncircumcised genitalia would have stood out in his mind…….had he seen it. Having seen it once it would not require a second inspection.

    Like

  6. lcpledwards permalink
    August 14, 2010 7:38 pm

    @ Ja

    If you look at my comment from the Ray Chandler post linked below, you’ll see a portion of Lynette’s email about Jordie’s 1998 lawsuit against MJ.

    https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2010/08/06/ray-chandler-subpoena-ready-to-tell-even-some-truth-in-order-not-to-testify/#comment-1561

    @ Lynette
    I think you should put the date that you posted this update (which is 8-14-10, right?). It only has the date of the article.

    Like

  7. August 14, 2010 7:07 pm

    Lynette,
    Wow! What a great find. Especially, about Jordan’s second lawsuit against MJ. I don’t think anybody knew that Jordan sued MJ along with his Father after the 1994 settlement.
    Do you have a link to Jordan’s 1998 lawsuit?

    Like

  8. lynande51 permalink
    August 14, 2010 3:36 pm

    After I found this a part of me thought that Evan put a bullet in his head just to chase Michael into the afterlife.That family has no excuses good enough for settling after that.

    Like

  9. Suzy permalink
    August 14, 2010 3:23 pm

    @ Lynette

    Thank you for this!

    1) “Jackson may provide copies of the police photographs”

    I don’t know if he was even in the position to provide copies. Did he have copies?

    2) “submit to a second search”

    Of course, they knew he would never do that. One humiliation of that kind was enough for a lifetime. Thank you.

    3) “or the court may bar the photographs from the civil trial as evidence”

    From the above two “alternatives” to me it seems this is what they really wanted to achieve with this ultimatum. Which is very telling once again.

    Why would they want the pics to be barred from the court – regardless whether they are allowed to see them or not – if they were so sure about them matching?

    This piece of info is absolutely precious, Lynette!

    Like

  10. August 14, 2010 9:59 am

    LYNETTE, thanks for creating your page. As to the story – wow, just wow, as Suzy would say!

    All the documents you’ve found are a gold mine but this small article about Larry Feldman asking for the pictures of Michael naked is a precious gem on top of it all!

    WHY ask for the pictures if you know what he looks like naked anyway?

    Let us make the timing of Larry Feldman’s motion clear to everyone – so they suddenly ask for the pictures of Michael’s private parts on approx. January 4, 1994, which is two weeks after the strip search (Dec.22, 1993) and one week after they made a certain ‘declaration’ in the name of Jordan (Dec.28, 1993).

    The way Larry Feldman words his request for the photographs is fantastically shrewd and misleading:

    “We think that the fact that my client can establish what Mr. Jackson looks like naked is very substantial evidence of Mr. Jackson’s guilt,” said Larry Feldman, the boy’s attorney.

    Feldman said he filed a motion in court that is a “multiple choice” request: Jackson may provide copies of the police photographs, submit to a second search, or the court may bar the photographs from the civil trial as evidence”.

    The insolence of it is staggering – they want to have the pictures of Michael naked for Jordan to study them and amend his story accordingly, then subject Michael to another humiliating procedure (for making sure they didn’t miss anything – otherwise I see no reason for it) and after that they’ll come up with another ‘declaration’ describing his private parts, making it even more graphic than the previous one and absolutely accurate this time!

    And in addition to that they say that if their request for the photographs is not met they SHOULD NOT be used in the civil suit as evidence! The photographs were apparently SO much different from Jordan’s description that Larry Feldman wanted them excluded from the civil trial!

    Wow, just wow…..

    Everyone, please spread the word about it!

    Source: http://articles.latimes.com/1994-01-05/local/me-8514_1_michael-jackson

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: