Skip to content


There are five rules at the moment.


Everyone is very much requested to NEVER (or minimally) use words like ‘pedophile’ and ‘molester’ in combination with the name of MJ.   Please avoid these words as best as you can – at least in their full version.

Reason behind it:

Human perception is structured in such a way that even if you deny the above allegations by using “not” in your statements (‘he was not like that’), this “not” particle will somehow evaporate from human minds leaving a solid association link between the name of the person and the hateful word.

So with time the phrase ‘he was not like that’ will turn into ‘he was like that’ as the word will automatically pop up in one’s mind each time Michael’s name is used. So the more we use the word the stronger the association is. Unfortunately this association link has already been formed, so now we need to break it. The only way to do it is to form a NEW, positive association – like MICHAEL WAS INNOCENT, for example.

Since the rule is difficult to follow (I face the same difficulty myself) I suggest abbreviations like mol…r  or  p..le when there IS an objective need to put these words besides Michael’s name.

And since the rule naturally does not apply to the ‘sources’ we draw from we cannot change anything in what ‘they’ are writing about Michael. So if this cannot be helped let us refrain from using these word combinations at least ourselves, okay?


Propaganda of pedophilia here is FORBIDDEN in the name of Michael Jackson. This is HIS territory which is FREE from all that dirt.

Reason behind it:

Michael lost all his health and partially money fighting for his good name for so many years. He never allowed anyone to link him to the despicable class mentioned here – he sued, fought in court and in his songs against his detractors and implored us not to believe those allegations against him. Now it is the duty of Michael’s supporters to never allow pedophilia advocates to draw him into their ranks (though they actually think they are doing him a great service by inviting him there).

There is one more reason for the rule:

Michael Jackson was genuinely concerned about the fate and future of children. ‘Those’ guys are simply unable to understand it as their interest is purely sexual – children’s well being is the last thing they are concerned about. So protecting children from any kind of abuse is EXACTLY what Michael Jackson would WANT and EXPECT us to do.

This automatically makes Michael’s supporters NATURAL DEFENDERS of children’s innocence and well-being – no matter how strange it may look to his opponents.


All information from this site is free for anyone to use and quote – with a reference to the original source, please.

Reason behind this rule:

Being a victim of unheard of ruthless harassment and utmost human greediness Michael now deserves the most DECENT, ETHICAL and SELFLESS behavior on our part. Michael was a great HUMAN BEING, and following his example his supporters should try and be the BEST too.


Everyone is requested to discuss factual issues only and refrain from personal attacks against the authors.

Reason behind the rule:

We are trying to keep the discussion within maximally civilized limits – with no threats, bullying or gutter level behavior. This rule applies both to the open discussion in the blog and the so-called private discussion via emails.

In case this rule is broken by our adversaries their bullying tactics and their respective private messages can be brought out into the open and disclosed to the general public without further notice.

Our motto is “Once a gentleman – always a gentleman”, so each of us should be always ready to repeat aloud what he or she says in private.


In order to protect our readers from name-calling, continuous reference to our low IQ and typical but unsubstantiated accusations of Michael’s fans of being “rabid” all such and similar comments will be erased as boring, monotonous and completely meaningless.

Comments from haters will remain in the blog only in case they contain some factual material which requires examination on our part and may become ground for our common research.

Haters should know that they are not invited to this blog but if they do come and behave themselves they will be tolerated – if they wish to take part in a constructive discussion and are ready to accept their mistakes.

WARNING: If they start misbehaving themselves the administrator and co-eds of this blog reserve the right for themselves to do what they think fit with such intruders. It will be nothing much – just some innocent fun like pushing them into pools with cold water, playing funny games or throwing water baloons at them from our balconies and the like.


Negative information about Michael Jackson is allowed to be posted in this blog, but only on condition the person providing the text (or a link to it) refutes the negative information himself.

Reason behind this rule:

The purpose of this site is to vindicate Michael Jackson and clear him of the dirt thrown at him from various corners. Though we often use information from haters’ sites to see what new tricks they are up to, posting their texts in their “raw form” without refuting their lies is equivalent to spreading them further and giving them unnecessary promotion.

This is why every negative text should be accompanied by a proper analysis to nullify its negative effect. Otherwise we see no reason why it should be posted at all.

39 Comments leave one →
  1. elizabeth pamela walker permalink
    April 16, 2020 1:21 am

    amen and amen x


  2. Kalyan permalink
    April 15, 2020 12:07 pm

    Hello, I want to thank you for an amazing resource site for shedding light to Michael’s innocence:) I have been researching all aspects of Michael for over a year now and just recently watched a doc related to #pizzagate and it stated Michael had a close relationship with a billionaire financier named Ron Burkle…do you happen to have any insight on their relationship? This doc was the first to mention his name…the doc can be viewed on YouTube, PEDOGATE 2020 by Mouthy Buddha. He doesnt specifically say that Michael is guilty but insinuates it…I’ve read the articles on google and it does not go into detail about their relationship except that he has helped bail Michael.out on some financial woes…
    Thank you for your hard work fighting for MJ.


  3. April 1, 2019 5:36 am

    “Maybe you should give me your email adress, I sometimes fail to upload my drawings…” – crsitabilciu

    Crista, the drawings are marvellous, thank you. I’ve shifted them to the respective post.
    Initially you couldn’t upload them for a different reason – yesterday tinypic site didn’t work properly and some of those links led to nowhere. I also had a hard time yesterday before uploading some pictures here.

    My email address is in “contact me”. Thank you very much again!


  4. March 31, 2019 6:58 pm

    Maybe you should give me your email adress, I sometimes fail to upload my drawings…


  5. March 31, 2019 6:57 pm


  6. March 31, 2019 6:55 pm


  7. March 29, 2019 3:47 am

    Let me see if it works in a jpg format. It does!

    You are right – this egg is completely rotten.


  8. Crista Bilciu permalink
    March 28, 2019 3:33 pm

    Crista, sorry for the delay, I’ve been exceptionally busy with other things for the past week. Let me see if it works with me.

    Crista's picture


  9. Crista Bilciu permalink
    March 28, 2019 3:32 pm

    I am trying to send you new drawings, but it’s not working again 😦

    @Crista, the problem was with the format of the picture. You need to post a link to the picture with a jpg format. Thank you very much.


  10. March 20, 2019 1:53 pm

    Crista, it works very well. A marvellous picture. Send us more. 🙂

    The text is hilarious: “And when I saw that Chandler kid getting 20 million $ for lying, while I told the truth and got nothing, I JUST FELT SO MOLESTED…

    I’ve added it to the latest post. Thank you!

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Crista permalink
    March 20, 2019 1:13 pm

    Let’s see if this works…

    Liked by 1 person

  12. March 20, 2019 1:02 pm

    “Can I link them from my Facebook or my twitter?” – Crista

    Dear Crista, I don’t know.
    But you could try this: and then post the URL they provide you with together with your comment.


  13. Crista permalink
    March 20, 2019 12:52 pm

    Would love to, but there is no such option. A link to what? Can I link them from my Facebook or my twitter?


  14. March 20, 2019 12:47 pm

    “Is there a way to send you photos?” – Crista

    Thank you. Why don’t you post them here, in the comments – as tinypic links, for example?


  15. Crista permalink
    March 20, 2019 12:27 pm

    Hello, I love your work. I wanted to send you my drawings about ”Leaving Neverland”, maybe you would like to use them on your website. Is there a way to send you photos?


  16. December 9, 2012 12:54 am

    Do you guys have an affiliates program for fellow MJ sites?


  17. nannorris permalink
    June 4, 2012 6:53 pm

    lynande51…you are not allowed to write articles on this blog ???..that is a tragedy as far as I am concerned ..You are like an encyclopedia of knowledge regarding those false allegations..I am just so disappointed to hear this ..


  18. DVT permalink
    June 4, 2012 7:12 am

    It’s okay you don’t have to, I’ve already emailed the owner of the blog and I will only speak to her. So thank you for your help.


  19. lynande51 permalink
    June 4, 2012 7:09 am

    What isn’t?Be specific so I can get this over and done with and the blog can continue without me.


  20. DVT permalink
    June 4, 2012 6:37 am

    Actually no it isn’t.


  21. lynande51 permalink
    June 4, 2012 6:35 am

    Well you see Daphne it seems like you came here spoiling for a fight. I think that whole fight is over. You’re too late for that show an no one is asking or an encore. Helena has done what she set out to accomplish in posting David’s Twitter rant. She I’m afraid is of the mind that if she isn’t going to blog for Michael nobody is and nobody is good enough on here to do it anymore. Those were her determinations, no one elses. And I would be glad to point out a couple of Deborah Kunesh’s factual inaccuracies about how long she has put up with this but then you aren’t even interested in those are you? Like I said I am not allowed to write for the blog anymore and Helena has asked me to leave. David wants to continue here so he can write about the testimonies. I will not be writing about Michael Jackson anymore because I do not have the time to start and maintain my own blog. That is how far this went and no one started it but Helena. So I know what I know about the allegations and the trial but that information will remain my own and the rest does not matter does it. All of this who posted what about who has gone on now for the better part of a month. It is time for you and Deborah to move on. There is very little left of this blog and you are not helping it. Helena is the one that destroyed it by acting like a jealous girlfriend so to speak about how others were supposed to think and feel about Michael and we should all be exactly like her when we write. To bad she never reviewed her own Rules.


  22. sanemjfan permalink
    June 4, 2012 5:56 am

    What do you expect her to do? Do you expect her to somehow “punish” me for posting my own personal emails on my own personal twitter? What is talking to the owner of the blog going to accomplish? This has nothing to do with her!


  23. DVT permalink
    June 4, 2012 5:34 am

    I will talk to the owner of this blog not you.


  24. sanemjfan permalink
    June 4, 2012 5:21 am

    My personal photos of my emails have nothing whatsoever to do with this blog, so it is fruitless for you to come here and complain about it. Did I post those photos anywhere on this blog? No, I didn’t. They are on my personal twitter. Talk to me there or on FB if you want to disccuss them, but don’t come to this blog with it again.


  25. DVT permalink
    June 4, 2012 4:41 am

    @lynande51 Thank You.


  26. lynande51 permalink
    June 4, 2012 2:23 am

    I think a better place to get an answer to that at the moment would be Helena’s Facebook page. She is the adminstrator of the blog and she is the one that wrote the rules. She would have a better perspective of it since she has done it an a few occassions herself so she would know best when she considers it right and when she considers it wrong.


  27. DVT permalink
    June 4, 2012 1:45 am

    I’d like to know what the rule is when someone uses private emails that they were not given permission to use? This is a serious matter to me the person to whom those emails were taken from in the ruse of a question. Had I been asked from the beginning the answer would have been no. This person thinks I’m asking this to hide something and that is not the case, it’s due to the fact I told them to leave me alone and they persisted and without my permission posted my emails on twitter. I find this very offensive and abusive behavior on their part of especially since this not the behavior MJ would have stood for. I look forward to a reply from you. Sincerely DVT


  28. November 1, 2011 1:17 am

    Justice wins if murray loses.


  29. October 27, 2011 4:43 am

    Just found “The Rules”.Thank you for posting them.I believe instinctually I have followed them.
    Michael deserves to win.He comitted his life to helping children and has saved more lives,though indirectly, through his generosity,still without it many would not have survived.
    And he has brought joy to a number of children that I cannot even fathom.There was nothing wrong,and certainly not what some evil tongues claim in his relationshkip with children.I have my own theory about Michael and children,but no one to discuss this with confidentially.And I will not write about it on this public blog,even though I hold this blog in high regard.Where I now live I have nobody to talk to re this,I even lost a friend because I revealed my positive believes about Michael.
    Murray needs to lose his medical licence for good.Nobody who has done what he did should be invested with the powers that go with an M.D. after his/her name..


  30. lynande51 permalink
    October 27, 2011 1:22 am

    Michael wins because Murray killed him. Who wins if Murray is aquitted?If Murray is aquitted the world gets to go back to the tabloid world of Michael Jackson journalism.


  31. blog counsel permalink
    October 27, 2011 12:56 am

    Who wins if (when) Conrad loses? In a civil suit for damages against the Doctor’s alleged employer, AEG Entertainment, wouldn’t it help them defend against his mother and his children by saying that, while they might have been liable for his negligence, his criminal negligence went so far beyond the pall that it was unforseeable?

    Just askin’. Who wins if the Doctor loses?


  32. Heather Johnson permalink
    October 6, 2011 6:37 pm

    Thank you very much. The rules are definitely what I would dexpect from a site dedicated to educating people as to the truth about Michael Jackson. It’s all about love, L.O.V.E.


  33. May 18, 2011 9:16 am

    Love the “Rules” and this sight. Thank you for doing such a great job of “Vindicating Michael”. God bless you. You have my full support and I hope you will support “Cadeflaw”. Much LOVE to you for this.


  34. nan permalink
    April 5, 2011 4:24 am

    Michael was an advocate for children who were suffering all over the world. Thanks to sites like this more and more people are finding out the the truth about those ridiculous assertions and the true character of this generous and gentle man..
    I am so glad that there are people on this site who have taken the time and incredible effort to show the general public how unjustly Michael was treated ..Thank You for all you do..


  35. AnnieDomino permalink
    February 14, 2011 11:50 am

    Hi. I have been using those words. Sorry. I only just read the rules.


  36. January 26, 2011 6:16 am

    You don’t know how much I agree… Several times I had to talk about the disgusting subject in my blog and I couldn’t use the word “p-lia” even as a tag. Although this would help in google searching and would bring people to the correct article (expressing that MJ wasn’t a p-le), I just couldn’t because I think too that even at this level the association of his name with this word is destructive. I don’t want it to exist in top searching words in google, as there are, for example, “Michael Jackson songs” or “Michael Jackson Grammys”.


  37. December 11, 2010 7:28 pm



  38. Hayat permalink
    July 19, 2010 7:09 pm

    I’ve posted here just earlier,without reading the rules, my heart knows néver to put Michaels name next to that horrific word.
    I typed: ‘disguisting animal’.. come to think of it, even animals don’t stoop to that low level of being.
    I don’t think anyone who knows he was innocent and loving, would ever do so…



  39. Lynette permalink
    June 17, 2010 5:44 pm

    Thank you so much for the rules.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: