Skip to content

“PORN” found in Michael Jackson’s home 3

July 16, 2010

SPREAD THIS NEWS

Guys, we are still looking into the list of treasures taken from Neverland during that notable surprise visit of 70 policemen to Michael’s home. While Michael was in Las Vegas preparing his new album the police seized a whole truckload of priceless ‘evidence’ which included the books we are discussing here.

The police list seems to be never-ending and with two posts behind us we are only half through (now I wish I had never started it):

Item 316. The police officer describes is as RINEKE DIJKSTRA BEACH PORTRAITS, by Carol Ehlere and James Rondeau which is “a compilation of photographs, which depicted children with a beach background. The children were clothed in swimwear and/or undergarments. Nothing within this book appeared to be pornographic or illegal in nature. Based on my training, this type of material can be used as part of a “grooming” process by which people (those seeking to molest children) are able to lower the inhibitions of their intended victims and facilitate the molestation of said victims.”

The customer on the other hand calls the same book a wonderful insight into a truly gifted photographer.

  • “Rineke Dijkstra has a gift for capturing the underlying humanity in her portrait subjects with a simplicity and innocence that is rare even among top photographers. Beach Portraits shows a sample of this skill in a series of photographs that, at first glance, are composed in a very straightforward manner; the nuance of her composition lies in the elevation of the camera to capture the portrait: mostly at belly button height. This lends a sense of power to the subject without making the subject overpowering; the subtlety of the effect brings balance to the overall image between innocence and being somewhat self-possessed.
  • Highly recommended for the serious student of photography”.

 

The police officer making this review must be having a very vivid imagination – how can a photograph like the above be used for “grooming” our dear boy Gavin Arivizo? I can imagine what effort it should take to make him look at that photograph at all – let alone molest him with its help…

The next book reviewed by the police was Item 359 titled “POO-chi” by Mayumi Lake. The police officer says about it, “This book was a compilation of photographs in which armpits were photographed in such a manner as to make the picture seem like it depicts the female vaginal area. None of the material within this book appeared to be pornographic in nature. Based on my training this type of material can be used…” (the same crap as before).

Poo-Chi cover of the book

This POO-Chi gave me a really hard time. What can a book with a cover like that say to anyone? A follow-up investigation brought me to the website of the author, a young and naughty female Japanese photographer who devised a new kind of art. The reader says about her:

  • “Poo-Chi” is a word coined by the artist for a particular part of the adult body that she transforms into something provocative. Only through closer and careful inspection, does the viewer reach a realization that all he or she sees is an illusion.”

So this is what a Poo-chi picture is! See the photo on the right please:

The girl is really naughty but the photographs are inventive and quite amusing – and I can understand why Michael didn’t throw the book away even if someone presented it to him…

The next item reviewed by the police officer is a manila folder containing releases from MJJ Productions with images of children to be used in Michael’s videos. A long list of names ensues (please allow me to omit them as they are too long to type – anyway each of the children was surely interrogated by the police).

Maymi Lake

Next comes “The Before the Hand of Man” book by Roy Dean again (see part 2 for its description), followed by the book titled “BOB and ROD” by author Tom Bianchi.

The police say about it:” This book was a compliation of photographs of two adult males, who for the most part, were pictured in full and/or partial nudity. The males were not depicted in sexually explicit poses. The cover of the book indicated the book was a photo-documentation of the romance between the two pictured subjects”.

In short the book is about two gays and is evidently the one to which the hater holidaying in our site referred to in her initial message.

Yes, the book is about two gays, so what? It does not mean that anyone possessing it has anything to do with what is written there, neither does it mean that it has any bearing on molestation charges. Have you by the way seen the Oscar-winning film called Brokeback Mountain (2005) which is a story of two young men who also developed an affection for each other? WHAT? You not only saw it but even have it in your video library? Then what are we talking about here?

The next two items Room to Play and Naked as a Jay Byrd have already been discussed in the first part of our “porn” thread (why are these titles repeated again and again – doesn’t the police officer remember he has reviewed them already?)

You have probably noticed that I am talking only about those pieces of ‘evidence’ which are NOT known to the reader and which may look absolutely appalling to him if he listens to the police lamentations of their “grooming possibilities”. No one will be patient enough to look into what stands behind those titles as the list is really long –  so please let me omit things like Hustler videos from the “BARELY LEGAL” series as you can probably imagine what they are like yourselves, okay?

Our next item is a big number of  NUDIST PERIODICALS, all of them dated 1935-38 – see the full list presented to court http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/041905minuteorder.pdf).

This item is described by the police as “the official publication of International Nudist Conference. There were 19 copies of “Nudist, Sunshine and Health”. The periodicals contained nude photographs of men, women and children as well as writings pertaining to nudism. The photographs and writings did not appear to be pornographic in nature”.

Everything about this collective ‘item’ made me curious. The fact that the periodicals were that old (1935-1938) and that some of them were copies for the full year told me that it was a sort of a rarity, a collection representing something more than just nude pictures.

Our Visitor (thanks!) told me that Karen Faye, Michael Jackson’s long time make-up artist, was a nudist and could have introduced Michael to her hobby. The fact that the periodicals were called “Sunshine and Health” also added to the interest, as I knew that Michael had vitiligo and lupus both of which never allow a person to stay in the sun.

Periodicals up to the 50s were censored with pieces of paper placed over the critical parts or not shown at all

So I had a closer look and was absolutely carried away…. I marvelled at the pictures and the nudist style of life and went as far as reading some of the nudists’ entries in their forum. A curious thing I learned about those old nudist periodicals was that up to the 50s the pictures they contained were censored with the crucial parts being sealed by pieces of paper or brushed out.

Those magazines were definitely NOT sexual or pornographic in any way (and that is why couldn’t be used for any ‘grooming’) – they were UN-sexual and aiming at a healthy way of living in harmony with the nature. This is what nudist veterans say about nudism and those periodicals:

“I’m old enough to remember nudist magazines back in the ’50’s. In the photos, crucial parts were all air brushed out so the people looked rather weird.”

“As I am from the UK, the magazine available here was ‘Health and Efficiency’, which also had a lot of careful brushing. The present day version of that magazine has some unfortunate adverts and some doubtful material, so I do not feel free to subscribe.”

“What bothered me most is the inconsistencies of the “rulers” of the nudist movemnet back then…They talk about being natural in a natural enviroment, yet refuse to acknowledge that sex had anything to do with it…I remember a friend told me that he was in a”colony” one time and once you reach the teen years, you were pretty much treated badly….couples…mature or teen were not allowed to hold hands…and you better never had an erection…or you were out for ever...”

sometime in the 60s

“I, too, recall early magazines and publications. I agree that the presentation left much to be desired, yet in consideration of the social tabos of the time, they were well put together. Even the ones I have from the early 80’s are archaic in comparison to publications of today.”

“Like many other seniors, I got the “nudist bug” from magazines of the 1960’s. There are plenty of photos of women and families, and lots of pubic hair, but not a single penis in the entire 59 pages. And in two photos where they obviously should have been, the photos were rather unskillfully retouched to get them out”.

 

“As a young high school boy, I wasn’t aware that there was such thing as a nudist, until a friend showed me and my friends a nudist magazine he had found. I was impressed that the people pictured were simply enjoying the freedom of being unclothed. That was over 40 years ago, and the love affair goes on”.

“Ed Lange — one of the founding advocates of the Nudist/Naturalist movement — was a revered and highly acclaimed photographer; many of the Sunshine & Health covers were taken by him, including many pictures throughout every issue. Due to the extreme rarity of this publication and its naturist content, copies of the magazines can command prices of several hundred dollars each or more to the true collector”.

“The founding ethos of nudism was health. … Sunlight, along with fresh air and exercise, were the Holy Trinity of a veritable religion of physical culture which emerged around the turn of the twentieth century, whose cathedral was the Great Outdoors. … The metaphor of sun-worship is not inappropriate, giving the high-flown religiosity associated with this ‘gospel’ of the healthy body. This also encouraged the belief that nudists were a bunch of sandal-wearing, vegetarian, tee-total cranks. Certainly a far cry from the image of Coco Chanel on her yacht”.

“Early nudism, was not only not sexy, it was insistently un-erotic in its look and tone”

Interesting, isn’t it? “Back to the nature” principle, a simple and easy way of life and a body with clear, suntanned and healthy skin which Michael never had? If it was so interesting to me I can imagine how very interesting the collection must have been to Michael, no matter which way he came to possess it – as a present from Karen Faye or as a rarity bought in some antique shop.

P.S. Guys, I would love to finish it today but I can’t – there are several more books left. What a cross this list is …

33 Comments leave one →
  1. July 11, 2013 2:45 pm

    WAT PORN??? “MJ” IS PERFECT GENUIN GENTLEMAN, RARE, UNIQUE, ORIGINAL, PERFECTIONIST..HE’S OLD ENOUGH TO READ THOSE BOOKS MAYB SOME BODY HAD GIFTED HIM..SO WAT IF HE HAVE SUCH BOOKS? THERE’S NOTHING WRONG..WAT ABOUT THOSE ARTIST WHO GET NAKED INFRONT OF CAMERA? PPL IN LARGE SCREEN WATCH TAT..

    Like

  2. Rodrigo permalink
    August 9, 2012 7:11 pm

    So ALL of those things were bought JUST to groom kids? Pull the other one.

    Most of those books were given as gifts. Michael used some of them for his artwork, as he was an artist in his spare time, and he used them as inspirations for his music videos.

    Grooming with that? He shows Gavin Arvizo porn, when the police knew he had it, but not Jordan Chandler, when nobody knew he had it? Cause according to Evan Chandler, Jordan was seduced by Michael’s money and power…yeah, that simple. Michael never wore down Jordan’s inhibition’s with those things did he? No, it was all done with power and money.

    If things were true, Michael Jackson had to have been either the most miraculous or the most inconsistent and unprofessional child m-ter in existence.

    And Brokeback Mountain was used as well? I have that movie myself and I’m not gay. Seriously, people have to get over this judgmental crap. They have this, so they must be that.

    My aunt and uncle are people with artistic and historical tastes, and they have books which
    have pictures of this and that. Some had pictures of children in poses. But there are TONS of other pictures included, many beautiful artistic images. And I’m a 21 year old straight male who understands that and appreciates the forms of art. Or should I go all hysterical and childish and claim my relatives are p-les for having those books? People need to learn to grow the **** up.

    But I’ve got to laugh at it all. Even Michael did himself😀

    Like

  3. sherry douglas permalink
    August 2, 2012 11:24 am

    I alwass thought that MJ was set up. I know a lot of people thought the worst of him. I always believed the only person he ever hurt was hinself. He was a good man. I believe that the world lost it’s best frind with Miachel Jackson’s passing. I love you Miachel🙂

    Like

  4. Suzy permalink
    January 8, 2011 9:50 am

    I found something about Michael and porn and whether he used porn to “groom young boys”.

    Mark Ronson hang out with Michael and Sean Lennon as a kid. One day the boys found a porn channel on TV. Here is Ronson’s account:

    ‘Me and Sean said: “Michael, do you want to see something cool?” We turned the dial to the porn channel and there were strippers. We were like: “Michael, Michael, how cool is this?”

    ‘We turned around and he was cringing, saying: “Ooh stop it, stop it, it’s so silly.”

    ‘I think he had really strong feminist views on porn and the use of it.’

    http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/celebrity-news/261375/mark-ronson-i-made-michael-jackson-watch-porn/1/

    So instead of grooming anybody with porn, he wanted the boys to stop watching it!

    Like

  5. August 9, 2010 6:07 pm

    @Suzy, isn’t it ridiculous? These same people like Desiree also claim these books reveal he was a groomer… except, none of the kids ever said he ever showed them any of these materials.

    But of course some people are capable of believing that someone who enjoys straight porn is actually enjoying male penises and therefore gay so… clearly there are some incredibly stupid people on this planet.

    Like

  6. July 27, 2010 5:38 pm

    @Suzy.

    Sometimes I wonder…….”will they ever leave this guy alone?” And the answer I always seem to get is a stupid story written about him yet again! So I guess the answer is no. It’s something we as fans have to pray for.

    Like

  7. Suzy permalink
    July 27, 2010 5:14 pm

    @ Denise

    I read a bit more about “Hitler’s children”. It is an American ANTI-Nazi propaganda film made in 1943. And the tabloid media managed to turn it into “MJ obsessed with Nazism”. Wow, just wow.

    Like

  8. July 27, 2010 3:04 pm

    @ Suzy,

    Again, everything that Michael does, represents, or does is always……always magnified 1000 times over than what normal, non-famous Michael.

    You think Just because I watch a A few Nazi documentaries, Read books about the infamous holocaust, Or is interested in the documentaries that talks about Kids who come from broken families, does that mean I’m a racist- pedophile with no moral values? NO! And neither was Michael. You are right.

    Michael was a person who loved to study( At least I can say that about a few people in this society). And if he didn’t like to study, he just found it interesting. He was intelligent to say the least.

    The guy who had the interview with racist newspaper ” New York Post” ( I forgot the fellow’s name) But he said he thought Michael watched the Nazi documentaries because he liked to be informed, and he thought the marching was interesting(considering Michael often used military themes through out his career).

    But one thing turned into another, TMZ picked up on the story, flipped it into something they thought it should say…….And yeah……Just mentioning TMZ is enough.

    http://www.sawfnews.com/Gossip/64730.aspx

    Like

  9. Suzy permalink
    July 26, 2010 9:04 pm

    Off topic, but the same pattern. Read this article trying to suggest that Michael was kind of sympathetic of the Nazis. They kind of suggest the movies he had were some kind of dark, sinister, Nazi films: http://thecelebritycafe.com/feature/was-michael-jackson-fan-nazi-memorabilia-07-25-2010

    “Nazi collector and seller Norman Scherer claims to have sold many items to Jackson. He told the New York Post that Jackson had “a really good collection,” and sold him titles such as Nazis: Of Pure Blood, Oasis of the Zombies and Hitler’s Children.”

    I looked them up and here is what they are:

    Oasis of the Zombies (made in 1981): “The plot involves treasure hunters who track down a lost fortune in Nazi gold in the desert, only to discover that the treasure is still guarded by the Afrika Korps soldiers transporting it, who have become zombies.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oasis_of_the_Zombies

    Hitler’s Children (made in 1943). Reader review: “A Nazi officer (Tim Holt) falls in love with a freedom-fighting American girl (Bonita Granville) in WWII Germany. Very dated (of course) but still worth seeing. The film pulls no punches is showing how horrible life in Germany was during the war. I especially like them showing German citizens as being against Hitler and unhappy also. It is naive (concentration camps are mentioned once and very casually) but, at the time this was made, that’s all we knew about Germany. A big hit in its day–it’s easy to see why.

    Holt and Granville are good in the leads–especially Holt who has a powerful speech at the end. Also the film moves quickly and is never dull. A very good look at Germany during WWII. Well worth catching. ”

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0034856/

    Nazis: Of Pure Blood. Reader review: “OF PURE BLOOD is a compelling drama detailing the horrific ramifications of the Nazis’ Lebensborn programme.

    Lee Remick plays Alicia Browning, a successful New York casting director, who learns that her son (living in Germany) has been mysteriously killed. She gets another shock when she discovers that he fathered a daughter.

    Alicia travels to Germany, and uncovers the horrible truth: her granddaughter is embroiled in a revival of the ‘Lebensborn’ programme, used by the Nazis’ during WW2 as a way of breeding perfect Aryan children (the master race). When Alicia discovers that she, too, was a product of the Lebensborn programme, she decides to smuggle her granddaugher out of Germany.

    Fine, well-written thriller/drama co-starring Patrick McGoohan, Gottfried John, Richard Munch, Katharina Bohm, Edith Schneider and Carolyn Nelson. ”

    http://www.amazon.com/Nazis-Pure-Blood-Lee-Remick/dp/6301598865

    Isn’t it the same tactic as what they used with the description of these “porn books”? Try to plant an idea in people’s minds and rely on the fact that most of them will take your words at face value and will never look the items up for themselves. Unfortunately it usually works too. People are too lazy to go after things and they will just say: “MJ had Nazi films.”

    Like

  10. July 24, 2010 11:47 pm

    Does this look familiar? It should. Media heads and haters have used a potrait found in Michael’s home which he proudly displayed to insinuate all sorts of sinister thoughts. The truth is Michael loved great art so much that he inserted himself into the picture time and time again. The Michael Jackson impression painting was done by David Nordahl, but it’s likeness was taken from a painting done in 1869 by a very famous artist named William Bouguereau. Wikepedia says this about Bouguereau, “In his own time, Bouguereau was considered to be one of the greatest painters in the world by the Academic art community, and simultaneously he was reviled by the avant-garde. He also gained wide fame in Belgium, Holland, Spain, and in the United States, and commanded high prices.” You bet someone like this would have caught the attention of Michael Jackson.

    Like

  11. Soundmind permalink
    July 23, 2010 12:00 am

    Guys there is a very important fact that no one seemed to notice, Jason’s mother was the one who had the keys to the drawer where the two infamous books from 1993 were found . she did testify under oath in 2003 that she left her work in 1991, but she was contacted by the police and went to neverland to just do that.

    4 Now, you began working for Mr. Jackson in

    5 1986; is that correct?

    6 A. Yes.

    7 Q. And do you know approximately what month

    8 that was?

    9 A. No.

    10 Q. Okay. And you stopped working for Mr.

    11 Jackson in approximately 1991, right?

    12 A. Yes.

    13 Q. And you never worked for him since you

    14 stopped working in 1991, right?

    15 A. No. I never went back.

    This is what Zonen confirmed 4-29-2005:

    MR. ZONEN: If the Court would like, yes.

    2 Just briefly, Your Honor, the books that

    3 were seized in 1993 were seized at a time that was

    4 contemporaneous with the evidence presented pursuant

    5 to 1108. There were four young boys who were

    6 involved in Michael Jackson’s life. It’s

    7 interesting and unique that the maid who was called

    8 to open up this file cabinet was, in fact, the

    9 mother of one of those victims at that time.

    Like

  12. July 22, 2010 2:31 am

    Thanks admin

    Like

  13. visitor permalink
    July 20, 2010 3:49 pm

    @vindicatemj I was about to tell you about the documents, I found them too. He was scared to death about testifying his BS in the courtroom (I wonder why) but as a good media lying whore he had no problem halucinating on tv with his fictional stories. Like every other sick liar.

    Like

  14. Louise permalink
    July 20, 2010 11:17 am

    No rush Helena! Take your time :)))

    Like

  15. Paulie permalink
    July 20, 2010 12:38 am

    The one I saw was probably dated in the late 1960’s. I don’t remember that there was anything salacious about it and a boy showed it to me so he probably was looking at it for the reasons boys look at naked pictures. I just thought it looked weird (lol)…

    Like

  16. July 19, 2010 5:30 pm

    Paulie: “Hey a nudist magazine was where I got my first gander of a male penis…”

    Paulie, an important thing about the periodicals in Michael’s home is that they were dated 1935-1938 (only two were dated 1961, but even they were archaic). The nudist magazines of that period were heavily censored (all critical parts were brushed out or sealed with strips of paper) – which means that if you had seen those magazines you would NEVER have seen a male penis.

    Like

  17. July 19, 2010 5:19 pm

    Louise: “Great you have found a new doc. Have seen this link. It looks like veritas project in another version http://surftofind.com/seminal1

    Yes, the above link is part of the Veritas Project which is as vital today as it was at the time of Michael’s trial. But the documents (there are many) I’ve found are different – please don’t urge me to post them now as I still have to finish that “porn” list and the documents need retyping for a possibility to put in some comments. I’ll try to be as quick with them as it is only possible (which means that some previous plans will have to be postponed again, sorry!)

    Like

  18. Louise permalink
    July 19, 2010 2:31 pm

    Bravo Helena. Not many books left! Then we begin spreading the links in the fan sites in many languages as possible. Does anyone here has contact with chineese and japanese fan sites?

    Great you have found a new doc. Have seen this link. It looks like veritas project in another version http://surftofind.com/seminal1

    About the structure of the blog, what are your thoughts?

    Like

  19. July 19, 2010 10:01 am

    The documents have to do with Ray Chandler being subpoenaed by Michael’s defense team to the 2005 trial and how he successfully fought the subpoena in order not to testify.

    Like

  20. Suzy permalink
    July 19, 2010 9:53 am

    Wow, I’m excited to see what you have found, Helena.

    Like

  21. July 19, 2010 9:48 am

    Louise: “As far as I know nobody had looked into this list as you did. Now it’s time to spread your finding out among the fans and the others. As Suzy has written haters refer to this list. But now you have broken another taboo”.

    Yes, these findings should be spread among fans and made known to the general public. There are some 3 books left and I’ll make a post about them today or tomorrow. A slight delay is because while looking for the books I came across very important documents I hadn’t been able to find earlier and am going to publish them here.

    This will make our research more serious than ever – it is practically turning into an on-line investigation in which the effort of every Michael’s supporter will be needed. And whatever we find here should be immediately made known to Michael’s community, so that every Michael’s fan is armored with new facts. Spreading the news is becoming a top issue with us!

    The structure of the blog will probably have to change because the home page is turning into an on-line investigation ONLY.

    Like

  22. Paulie permalink
    July 18, 2010 3:49 am

    Sorry about the duplication…kept getting an error message…I read a post on The Beast (where Diane Demon squats) by someone who purported to be in the field of dealing with pedophiles and in defense of Michael said that the one spectacular thing about them is how much they *don’t* care about children which they see as things designed for their own pleasure and not as human beings.

    Like

  23. Paulie permalink
    July 18, 2010 3:44 am

    Hey a nudist magazine was where I got my first gander of a male penis…which apparently did not prepare me for recognizing penis variety later. All I remember was how weird one looked (lol). I think I was 14 years and old and was WTH?!

    Like

  24. Paulie permalink
    July 18, 2010 3:43 am

    Hey a nudist magazine was where I got my first gander of a male penis…which apparently did not prepare me for recognizing an uncircumcised penis later. All I remember was how weird one looked (lol). I think I was 14 years and old and was WTH?!

    Like

  25. Louise permalink
    July 17, 2010 6:05 pm

    Thank you Helena for the job you have done. As far as I know nobody had looked into this list as you did. Now it’s time to spread your finding out among the fans and the others. As Suzy has written haters refer to this list. But now you have broken another taboo. Their comments about these books not only show their stupidity but also reveal their machiavelic methods. I am sure you will soon get ride of the rest of this list.

    Like

  26. July 17, 2010 10:16 am

    Wow now thats perspective! I think we often react in agreement or disagreement because of our emotions, but hearing another side, passionately presented, really makes us think!

    Like

  27. Suzy permalink
    July 17, 2010 5:19 am

    @ lynande51

    I didn’t quite understand the socks and underwear part either. What’s the point of the police taking used or unused underwear with them? Michael was very disorderly, that’s no secret. It’s also not a secret that he was a pack rat, he never threw away anything. Some of these books probably came from fans or friends or the artists (photographs) themselves – he always got a lot of gifts. And even if he wasn’t very interested in the subject he would keep them, because that’s how he was.

    Here are some videos about the raid of Neverland – just to show you how it looked like:

    Makes you wonder why did they take certain items – like a jewelry box, for example…..

    Like

  28. Suzy permalink
    July 17, 2010 4:58 am

    Helena,

    Thank you for taking the trouble with this ridiculous list of “porn”, but I think it had to be done since haters often refer to that PDF document as something very damning. Look at the “Ray Chandler” site – it has a seperate menu for it. People who are lazy enough to look deeper into these items probably will read the police description and think these items are something very disturbing. In fact, when you take a look at them you will find them to be harmless. So it’s important for us and for our visitors to take a look at them, because the police PDF is rather misleading.

    As for the ridiculous notion that it could be used for “grooming” young victims. Like you pointed out: most of these are not even erotic in nature and today’s kids are used to see lot more sexual things in TV or even in simple advertisements. Let alone what all they can find and see on the Internet.

    But the point I wanted to make is: funny how haters claim he had all that hetero porn (I mean the real porn) to “groom” victims, when the only kid who has ever claimed Michael used porn on him to groom him was Arvizo. Not Chandler, not Francia, not anybody else claimed that Michael has ever shown them porn. So according to haters he had that big collection of hetero porn dated since 1991 to 2003 to “groom” but even by the accusations he only used them once to groom (Arvizo). Makes a lot of sense. LOL.

    Like

  29. lynande51 permalink
    July 17, 2010 2:44 am

    Oh were are just doing the books right. I don’t have to go over the list of socks and underwear do I? I mean, I don’t even like thinking about my own laudry let alone sombody elses.

    Like

  30. lynande51 permalink
    July 17, 2010 2:24 am

    It looks almost exactly likeYour Are Not Alone. There is a different background and Lisa is naked in their version but sure looks like it to me. I think I will go over the list in the next couple of days and see what I can find. By the way my daughter has a Masters Degree in Fine Art. There are 2 lovely nudes ( back and front) of my body hanging in my living room from her watercolor class. Her instructor asked if I would be a model for the class and I said yes. Now I have 2 great paintings.

    Like

  31. July 17, 2010 12:57 am

    Sorry

    http://www.showbiz411.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/parrish-sophie-daybreak-bg-280×420.jpg – For link.

    [img]http://www.showbiz411.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/parrish-sophie-daybreak-bg-280×420.jpg[/img] – Hope the image shows.

    Like

  32. July 17, 2010 12:53 am

    [img] http://www.showbiz411.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/parrish-sophie-daybreak-bg-280×420.jpg%5B/img%5D

    Does this look familiar to anyone (I hope the graphic shows)? Michael studied art and modernized it in his own work.

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. Michael Jackson Is Innocent « La Cienega Just Smiles

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: